| Literature DB >> 35954146 |
Maria Carolina Otálora1, Andrea Wilches-Torres1, Jovanny A Gómez Castaño2.
Abstract
The substitution of artificial colorants for pigments extracted from fruits is a highly desirable strategy in the food industry for the manufacture of natural, functional, and safe products. In this work, a 100% natural spray-dried (SD) microencapsulated colorant of pink guava pulp, using aloe vera (AV) or Opuntia ficus-indica (OFI) mucilage as functional encapsulating material, was prepared and evaluated as an additive into a yogurt (Y) matrix. The characterization of yogurt samples supplemented with OFI (Y-SD-OFI) and AV (Y-SD-AV) mucilage-covered guava pulp microcapsules was carried out through carotenoid quantification using UV-vis and HPLC-MS techniques, dietary fiber content, antioxidant capacity, colorimetry, and textural analysis, as well as by an evaluation of color stability after 25 days of storage at 4 °C in the dark. These physicochemical characteristics and color stability on the Y-SD-OFI and Y-SD-AV samples were compared with those of a commercial yogurt (control sample, Y-C) containing sunset yellow FCF synthetic colorant (E110). Y-SD-OFI and Y-SD-AV samples exhibited a high content of lycopene, dietary fiber, and antioxidant activity, which were absent in the control sample. Microencapsulated lycopene imparted a highly stable color to yogurt, contrary to the effect provided by the E110 dye in the control sample. The texture profile analysis revealed an increase in firmness, consistency, and cohesion in the Y-SD-OFI sample, contrary to the Y-SD-AV and Y-C samples, which was attributed to the variation in fiber concentration in the microcapsules. The incorporation of OFI and AV mucilage microparticles containing pink guava pulp into yogurt demonstrated its potential application as a functional natural colorant for dairy products.Entities:
Keywords: Opuntia ficus-indica; aloe vera; microencapsulation; natural colorant; spray drying; yogurt
Year: 2022 PMID: 35954146 PMCID: PMC9367863 DOI: 10.3390/foods11152380
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Figure 1Appearance of the purified mucilage: (a) mucilage extracted from OFI cladodes; (b) mucilage extracted from Aloe Vera leaves.
Figure 2Spray-drying microencapsulation process of Guava Pulp in AV and OFI mucilages.
Total carotenoid content (TCC), antioxidant capacity (TEAC), and total dietary fiber content (TDFC), as well as β-carotene and lycopene quantification via HPLC–MS, for yogurt samples enriched with pulp-guava/mucilage microcapsules (Y-SD-OFI and Y-SD-AV) versus yogurt containing E110 dye (Y-C). Different superscript letters in the same row and column for each parameter indicate a statistical difference (p < 0.05) between samples.
| Parameter | Y-SD-OFI | Y-SD-AV | Y-C |
|---|---|---|---|
| TCC 1 | 76.45 ± 1.90 a | 68.05 ± 2.47 b | 10.60 ± 0.42 c |
| TEAC 2 | 2.65 ± 0.07 a | 2.20 ± 0.14 b | 0.40 ± 0.0 c |
| TDFC 3 | 12.8 | 8.3 | - |
| β-carotene 4 | 124 | 127 | 128 |
| Lycopene 4 | 352 | 346 | - |
1 TCC is measured as µg β-carotene/g of sample in dry base. 2 TEAC is measured as mmol Trolox equivalents/kg of sample in dry base. 3 TDFC is expressed as g/100 g. 4 Values determined using HPLC–MS and expressed as mg/kg dry sample.
Color parameters and color stability () data for yogurt samples enriched with pulp-guava/mucilage microcapsules (Y-SD-OFI and Y-SD-AV) versus yogurt containing E110 dye (Y-C). Different superscript letters in the same row and column for each parameter indicate a statistical difference (p < 0.05) between samples.
| Color Parameter | Y-SD-OFI | Y-SD-AV | Y-C |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 57.66 ± 0.10 b | 56.06 ± 0.65 b | 61.61 ± 0.32 a |
|
| 2.84 ± 0.02 b | 3.15 ± 0.36 b | 13.74 ± 0.02 a |
|
| 11.91 ± 0.07 b | 9.79 ± 0.56 b | 77.72 ± 3.04 a |
| 12.24 ± 0.08 b | 10.29 ± 0.64 b | 78.92 ± 2.99 a | |
| 76.58 ± 0.07 a | 72.22 ± 1.01 a | 79.96 ± 0.39 a | |
|
| 7.38 ± 2.32 c | 12.85 ± 3.58 b | 63.32 ± 2.64 a |
1 Color data measured after storage at 4 ± 1 °C for 25 days.
Figure 3HPLC–MS chromatograms of the Y-SD-OFI, Y-SD-AV, and Y-C yogurt samples.
Figure 4Appearance comparison among Y-SD-OFI (a), Y-C (b), and Y-SD-AV (c) before (top row) and after storage for 25 days in the dark at 4 °C (bottom row).
Texture profile data of Y-SD-OFI, Y-SD-AV, and Y-C yogurt models.
| Attribute | Y-SD-OFI | Y-SD-AV | Y-C |
|---|---|---|---|
| Firmness (g) | 3.04 | 2.22 | 2.60 |
| Consistency (g.s) | 71.5 | 48.1 | 60.7 |
| Cohesiveness (g) | −2.49 | −1.67 | −2.01 |