| Literature DB >> 35953918 |
Yimin Yang1, Yechuan Huang1, Xianfeng Zhao2, Mi Lin1, Lulu Chen1, Mingxiu Zhao1, Xueqiu Chen1, Yi Yang1, Guangxu Ma1, Chaoqun Yao3, Siyang Huang4, Aifang Du1.
Abstract
Toxoplasma gondii, a worldwide distributed apicomplexan protozoan, can infect almost all warm-blooded animals and may cause toxoplasmosis. In order to provide a point-of-care detection method for T. gondii infection, an immunochromatographic test (ICT) was established. The proposed test uses recombinant T. gondii rhoptry protein 14 (ROP14) conjugated with 20 nm gold particles, recombinant protein A as the detection line and monoclonal antibody TgROP14-5D5 as the control line. The specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and stability of this new ICT were evaluated. rTgROP14 was specifically recognized by positive serum of T. gondii but not negative serum. mAb TgROP14-5D5 showed higher specific recognition of T. gondii antigens and was therefore selected for subsequent colloidal gold strip construction. The new ICT based on TgROP14 exhibited good diagnostic performance with high specificity (86.9%) and sensitivity (90.9%) using IHA as a "reference standard". Among 436 field porcine sera, ICT and IHA detected 134 (30.7%) and 99 (22.7%) positive samples, respectively. The relative agreement was 87.8%. These data indicate that this new ICT based on TgROP14 is a suitable candidate for routine testing of T. gondii in the field.Entities:
Keywords: TgROP14; Toxoplasma gondii; immunochromatographic test; swine
Year: 2022 PMID: 35953918 PMCID: PMC9367252 DOI: 10.3390/ani12151929
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 3.231
Figure 1The component and illustration of the ICT strip.
Figure 2Analysis of the recombinant protein rTgROP14-His by SDS-PAGE (a) and Western blot (b,c). M: protein marker, rROP14: rTgROP14-His. The primary antibodies in panels b and c are anti-His antibody and polyclonal mouse antibodies to T. gondii, respectively.
Figure 3Identification of TgROP14-5D5 mAb and TgROP14-1E9 mAb. (a) Western blot analysis of two mAbs reacted with T. gondii lysate antigen (TLA). Total soluble proteins of T. gondii tachyzoites (10 μg) were loaded into each lane. The primary antibodies were mAb 1E9 and 5D5 to TgROP14. M: protein marker. (b) SDS-PAGE analysis of two mAbs before and after purification. Left: 1E9 mAb after purification and before purification; right: 5D5 mAb after purification and before purification; M: protein marker. (c) IFAT of two mAbs. Vero cells were used after infection with T. gondii tachyzoites for 24 h. The primary antibodies and Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated secondary antibodies for labeling were used in 1:1000 dilution. Confocal micrographs are shown.
Immunological characteristics of TgROP14-5D5 mAb and TgROP14-1E9 mAb.
| mAb | Isotype | Titer | Additivity Index |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5D5 | IgG2a | 1:3.3 × 107 | 22.80% |
| 1E9 | IgG3 | - |
Figure 4Sensitivity and specificity of the ICT strip. (a) Sensitivity of the developed ICT. From left to right: standard T. gondii-negative porcine serum, standard undiluted T. gondii-positive porcine serum; 1:2, 1:4, 1:8 and 1:16 dilution, respectively. (b) Specificity of the developed ICT using sera of pigs infected with different pathogens as specified. From left to right: negative control, T. gondii (Tg), I. suis (Is), C. suis (Cs) and N. caninum (Nc).
Comparing the number of positive and negative samples detected by the ICT and IHA methods.
| ICT | IHA (Reference Standard) | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| No. of Positive | No. of Negative | ||
| No. of positive | 90 | 44 | 134 |
| No. of negative | 9 | 293 | 302 |
| Total | 99 | 337 | 436 |
Comparing the percentage of positive and negative samples detected by the ICT and IHA methods.
| Test | No. (%) of Positive Samples | No. (%) of Negative Samples |
|---|---|---|
| ICT | 134 (38.7) | 302 (87.3) |
| IHA | 99 (22.7) | 337 (77.3) |
Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of T. gondii diagnostic tests using a commercially available IHA and a composite reference standard as comparators.
| Test | % (95% Confidence Interval) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity | Specificity | PPV | NPV | |
| IHA as reference | ||||
| ICT | 90.9 (83.6–95.1) | 86.9 (82.9–90.1) | 67.2 (57.4–75.6) | 97.0 (94.6–98.4) |
| Composite reference standard | ||||
| ICT | 93.7 (88.5–96.7) | 100 (98.7–100) | 100 (97.4–100) | 97.0 (94.4–98.4) |