Eoin F Cleere1,2, Matthew G Davey3, Orla Young4, Aoife J Lowery3, Michael J Kerin3. 1. The Lambe Institute for Translational Research, National University of Ireland, Galway, Republic of Ireland. eoincleere@rcsi.ie. 2. Department of Otolaryngology, Galway University Hospitals, Galway, H91YR71, Republic of Ireland. eoincleere@rcsi.ie. 3. The Lambe Institute for Translational Research, National University of Ireland, Galway, Republic of Ireland. 4. Department of Otolaryngology, Galway University Hospitals, Galway, H91YR71, Republic of Ireland.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) injury is a feared complication of thyroid surgery occurring in 1-5% of cases. The present approaches to RLN preservation include RLN visualization with no nerve monitoring (No-NM), intermittent intra-operative nerve monitoring (I-IONM) and continuous intra-operative nerve monitoring (C-IONM). There is ambiguity as to which of these strategies should be the preferred method of RLN preservation. METHODS: A systematic review of the PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Collaboration databases was undertaken with network meta-analysis (NMA) performed according to the PRISMA and Cochrane Collaboration guidelines. A Bayesian NMA was conducted using R packages netmeta with outcomes expressed as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% credible intervals (CrI). Only prospective studies were included. RESULTS: Eighteen studies met inclusion criteria, including 22,080 patients and 40,642 nerves at risk (NAR). Overall, 23,364 NARs (57.5%) underwent I-IONM, 17,176 (42.3%) No-NM and 98 (0.2%) underwent C-IONM. There were no significant differences between groups regarding the incidence of permanent RLN injury following thyroid surgery (I-IONM vs.No-NM, OR 0.84, 95% CrI 0.55-1.19; C-IONM vs. No-NM, OR 0.44, 95% CrI 0.02-5.00). Pooled analysis showed that IONM (I-IONM or C-IONM) demonstrated a protective effect versus No-NM in reducing the incidence of transient RLN injury (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.59-0.97, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: IONM strategies did not significantly reduce the incidence of permanent RLN injury following thyroid surgery. However, the small number of C-IONM NARs limits conclusions that may be drawn. Further well-designed prospective studies will be required to definitively assess the utility of C-IONM.
PURPOSE: Recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) injury is a feared complication of thyroid surgery occurring in 1-5% of cases. The present approaches to RLN preservation include RLN visualization with no nerve monitoring (No-NM), intermittent intra-operative nerve monitoring (I-IONM) and continuous intra-operative nerve monitoring (C-IONM). There is ambiguity as to which of these strategies should be the preferred method of RLN preservation. METHODS: A systematic review of the PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Collaboration databases was undertaken with network meta-analysis (NMA) performed according to the PRISMA and Cochrane Collaboration guidelines. A Bayesian NMA was conducted using R packages netmeta with outcomes expressed as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% credible intervals (CrI). Only prospective studies were included. RESULTS: Eighteen studies met inclusion criteria, including 22,080 patients and 40,642 nerves at risk (NAR). Overall, 23,364 NARs (57.5%) underwent I-IONM, 17,176 (42.3%) No-NM and 98 (0.2%) underwent C-IONM. There were no significant differences between groups regarding the incidence of permanent RLN injury following thyroid surgery (I-IONM vs.No-NM, OR 0.84, 95% CrI 0.55-1.19; C-IONM vs. No-NM, OR 0.44, 95% CrI 0.02-5.00). Pooled analysis showed that IONM (I-IONM or C-IONM) demonstrated a protective effect versus No-NM in reducing the incidence of transient RLN injury (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.59-0.97, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: IONM strategies did not significantly reduce the incidence of permanent RLN injury following thyroid surgery. However, the small number of C-IONM NARs limits conclusions that may be drawn. Further well-designed prospective studies will be required to definitively assess the utility of C-IONM.
Authors: Gregory W Randolph; Henning Dralle; Hisham Abdullah; Marcin Barczynski; Rocco Bellantone; Michael Brauckhoff; Bruno Carnaille; Sergii Cherenko; Fen-Yu Chiang; Gianlorenzo Dionigi; Camille Finck; Dana Hartl; Dipti Kamani; Kerstin Lorenz; Paolo Miccolli; Radu Mihai; Akira Miyauchi; Lisa Orloff; Nancy Perrier; Manuel Duran Poveda; Anatoly Romanchishen; Jonathan Serpell; Antonio Sitges-Serra; Tod Sloan; Sam Van Slycke; Samuel Snyder; Hiroshi Takami; Erivelto Volpi; Gayle Woodson Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Allen L Feng; Sidharth V Puram; Michael C Singer; Rahul Modi; Dipti Kamani; Gregory W Randolph Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2019-07-30 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Amit Ritter; Ian Ganly; Richard J Wong; Gregory W Randolph; Thomas Shpitzer; Gideon Bachar; Aviram Mizrachi Journal: Head Neck Date: 2020-02-06 Impact factor: 3.147