Literature DB >> 3595361

Recurrence rates after curative surgery for rectal carcinoma, with special reference to their accuracy.

U Carlsson, A Lasson, G Ekelund.   

Abstract

Is the observed recurrence rate after curative surgery for rectal cancer always a good measure of therapeutic improvements? In an attempt to answer this question, the rates of local and distant recurrences were studied in two complete series of patients operated on for cure for rectal carcinoma. One hundred one consecutive patients were followed for five years in one series and 231 were followed for at least 18 years in the other series. The recurrence rate in the first series was 39 percent and in the second, with the longer observation time, 54 percent. The local recurrence rates were 24 and 38 percent, respectively. Both local and total recurrence rates increased with the length of the follow-up period. This was especially true for patients with combined local and distant disease. Autopsy sometimes demonstrated recurrences, clinically undiscovered. It is concluded that completeness, long follow-up, and intensive search for recurrence, including a high autopsy rate, are factors that raise both total and local recurrence rates. All these factors are important to consider when comparing results of different treatment modalities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3595361     DOI: 10.1007/bf02556491

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  18 in total

Review 1.  Locally recurrent rectal cancer: surgical strategy.

Authors:  J P de Azevedo; R R Dozois; L L Gunderson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1992 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Curative potential of multimodality therapy for locally recurrent rectal cancer.

Authors:  Dieter Hahnloser; Heidi Nelson; Leonard L Gunderson; Imran Hassan; Michael G Haddock; Michael J O'Connell; Stephen Cha; Daniel J Sargent; Alan Horgan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Locally Advanced Disease and Pelvic Exenterations.

Authors:  Christos Kontovounisios; Paris Tekkis
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-12-01

Review 4.  Analysis of local recurrence rates after surgery alone for rectal cancer.

Authors:  J L McCall; M R Cox; D A Wattchow
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  A nineteen gene-based risk score classifier predicts prognosis of colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Seon-Kyu Kim; Seon-Young Kim; Jeong-Hwan Kim; Seon Ae Roh; Dong-Hyung Cho; Yong Sung Kim; Jin Cheon Kim
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 6.603

6.  Surgery for recurrent colorectal carcinoma--is it worthwhile?

Authors:  S G Pollard; R Macfarlane; W G Everett
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Radioimmuno-guided endoscopy (RIGE) in the detection of primary and recurrent rectal tumor.

Authors:  U Prati; L Roveda; R Butera; S Nazari; E Trespi; C Aprile; A Zonta
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Prevention of local recurrence by extended lymphadenectomy for rectal cancer.

Authors:  K Suzuki; T Muto; T Sawada
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.549

9.  Distal clearance margin of 1 cm or less: a safe distance in lower rectum cancer surgery.

Authors:  Ermanno Leo; Filiberto Belli; Rosalba Miceli; Luigi Mariani; GianFrancesco Gallino; Luigi Battaglia; Alberto Vannelli; Salvatore Andreola
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-10-18       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 10.  Sphincter-saving procedures for distal carcinoma of the rectum.

Authors:  T J Yeatman; K I Bland
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.