Literature DB >> 35953016

Incidence and Risk Factors of Immediate Hypersensitivity Reactions and Immunization Stress-Related Responses With COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine.

Kazuo Imai1, Fumika Tanaka2, Shuichi Kawano3, Kotoba Esaki4, Junko Arakawa4, Takashi Nishiyama2, Soichiro Seno2, Kosuke Hatanaka2, Takao Sugiura2, Yu Kodama2, Seigo Yamada2, Shinichiro Iwamoto2, Shigeto Takeshima2, Nobujiro Abe4, Chikako Kamae5, Shigeaki Aono3, Toshimitsu Ito3, Tetsuo Yamamoto6, Yasunori Mizuguchi7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: With the implementation of mass vaccination campaigns against COVID-19, the safety of vaccine needs to be evaluated.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the incidence and risk factors for immediate hypersensitivity reactions (IHSR) and immunization stress-related responses (ISRR) with the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine.
METHODS: This nested case-control study included recipients who received the Moderna vaccine at a mass vaccination center, Japan. Recipients with IHSR and ISRR were designated as cases 1 and 2, respectively. Controls 1 and 2 were selected from recipients without IHSR or ISRR and matched (1 case: 4 controls) with cases 1 and cases 2, respectively. Conditional logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors associated with IHSR and ISRR.
RESULTS: Of the 614,151 vaccine recipients who received 1,201,688 vaccine doses, 306 recipients (cases 1) and 2478 recipients (cases 2) showed 318 events of IHSR and 2558 events of ISRR, respectively. The incidence rates per million doses were estimated as IHSR: 266 cases, ISRR: 2129 cases, anaphylaxis: 2 cases, and vasovagal syncope: 72 cases. Risk factors associated with IHSR included female, asthma, atopic dermatitis, thyroid diseases, and a history of allergy; for ISRR, the risk factors were younger age, female, asthma, thyroid diseases, mental disorders, and a history of allergy and vasovagal reflex.
CONCLUSION: In the mass vaccination settings, the Moderna vaccine can be used safely owing to the low incidence rates of IHSR and anaphylaxis. However, providers should be aware of the occurrence of ISRR. Although recipients with risk factors are associated with slightly increased risks of IHSR and ISRR, this is not of sufficient magnitude to warrant special measures regarding their vaccination.
Copyright © 2022 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adverse events; COVID-19; Immediate hypersensitivity reactions; Immunization stress-related responses; Moderna; Risk factors; SARS-CoV-2; mRNA vaccine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35953016      PMCID: PMC9359595          DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2022.07.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract


Although studies have estimated a low incidence rate of anaphylaxis to mRNA vaccines and identified several potential risk factors, there exists a knowledge gap regarding the incidence and risk factors for nonserious immediate hypersensitivity reactions (IHSR) and immunization stress-related responses (ISRR). Adverse events were more commonly classified as ISRR, instead of IHSR, and the incidence rates of IHSR were very low. We found that the several risk factors were associated with the increased risk of IHSR and ISRR. Although recipients with risk factors are associated with increased risks of IHSR and ISRR, their incidence rates were low. Hence, these risk factors are not of sufficient magnitude to warrant special measures regarding their vaccination. Mass vaccination campaigns for COVID-19 are being implemented worldwide to overcome the ongoing global pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2. A standardized 2-dose regimen of the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna mRNA vaccines provided a high level of protection against COVID-19 and are widely used. To evaluate the safety of the mRNA vaccine, the acute and long-term adverse events following immunization (AEFI) are being actively investigated by government agencies and the scientific community. AEFI is grouped into 5 categories: vaccine product–related reaction containing immediate hypersensitivity reactions (IHSR; eg, skin, cardiac, gastrointestinal, and respiratory symptoms), vaccine quality defect–related reaction, immunization error–related reaction, immunization stress–related responses (ISRR; eg, symptoms and signs due to vasovagal reflex, panic attack, and functional neurological disorders [FNDs]), and coincidental event. Investigations into AEFI that occur immediately after the injection, especially IHSR and ISRR, are particularly important to evaluate the safety of mass vaccine administration. Hitherto, the rate of anaphylaxis, which is an acute life-threatening and serious IHSR, to the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna mRNA vaccines has been reported to be extremely low (2.5-11.1 cases per million doses); , female gender and a history of allergy were reported as prominent risk factors. , In terms of ISRR, a high incidence rate of vasovagal syncope after receiving the COVID-19 vaccine (8.2 per 100,000 doses) has been reported, especially in females, adolescents, people with a mental disorder, or a history of vasovagal syncope. However, the majority of existing reports4, 5, 6, 7 analyzed a database of passive surveillance systems, such as the Vaccine Adverse Event Report System in the United States, which have well-documented limitations of passive surveillance systems, such as high inconsistencies in the report quality, and underreporting or biased reporting. Previous studies mainly focused on the incidence rate and risk factors for anaphylaxis4, 5, 6 or vasovagal syncope as indicators of vaccine safety. However, there exists a knowledge gap regarding the incidence and risk factors for nonserious IHSR and ISRR. Information regarding such reactions is crucial for clinicians who work in mass vaccination centers. Therefore, it is necessary to understand the detailed clinical characteristics of recipients with nonserious IHSR and ISRR to establish a safe mass vaccination system, and to identify the people who are at high risk for developing IHSR and ISRR. At the Self-Defence Forces Tokyo Large-scale Vaccination Centre, Japan, a total of 1,201,688 Moderna COVID-19 vaccines have been administered between May 24 and September 24, 2021, to civilian residents, and active surveillance of AEFI was conducted. We also performed a detailed analysis of the clinical profile of all recipients both with and without IHSR and ISRR who received the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine to identify the incidence and risk factors of IHSR and ISRR.

Materials and Methods

Study design and participants

We conducted a nested case-control study at the Self-Defence Forces Tokyo Large-scale Vaccination Centre in Japan. An overview of the vaccination center organization and standard operating procedures of vaccine administration is shown in this article’s Online Repository Text 1 at www.jaci-inpractice.org. The adult vaccine recipients (≥18 years old) who received the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine between May 24 and September 24, 2021, were enrolled in this study. AEFI, which occurred during the stay of the recipient at the center, was collected. Recipients who showed IHSR were designated as case 1 and those who developed ISRR were designated as case 2 (Figure 1 ). In case the recipients showed the same type of AEFI at both first and second doses, data for only the first dose were collected. If the recipient experienced 2 different types of AEFI at both first and second doses, each dose was selected. Vaccine recipients without AEFI were designated to controls.
Figure 1

Flow diagram of vaccine recipients at the mass vaccination center.∗A total of 2372 recipients received first dose of the Moderna vaccine in other medical facilities and received its second dose in our center. AEFI, Adverse events following immunization; IHSR, immediate hypersensitivity reactions; ISRR, immunization stress-related responses.

Flow diagram of vaccine recipients at the mass vaccination center.∗A total of 2372 recipients received first dose of the Moderna vaccine in other medical facilities and received its second dose in our center. AEFI, Adverse events following immunization; IHSR, immediate hypersensitivity reactions; ISRR, immunization stress-related responses. Baseline clinical characteristics (age, sex, comorbidities of hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, asthma, atopic dermatitis, thyroid diseases, malignancy and mental disorders, and history of allergic episodes for drugs and foods, and vasovagal episode) were collected using a pre-vaccination screening questionnaire for the COVID-19 vaccine distributed by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan, which was filled by the recipients before the injection and collected at each dose. Data for the date of vaccination and the number of doses received were collected using the in-house COVID-19 vaccine reservation and reception system (MRSO Inc, Tokyo, Japan). Next, all relevant clinical findings (symptoms, signs, the timing of onset of symptoms after the injection, medication received, if any, and the clinical outcome of requiring transportation to the hospitals and death) of the vaccine recipients with an AEFI were collected via medical records maintained in the first-aid rooms. During the study period, 2 trained physicians (KI and KE) and an emergency physician (FT) reviewed medical records to classify an AEFI daily. This study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Self-Defence Forces Central Hospital, Tokyo, Japan (Approval number: 03-006). Informed consent was obtained from all participants in the form of opt-out.

Definitions

As defined by the World Health Organization, “AEFI” was described as “any untoward medical occurrence which follows immunization and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the use of the vaccine. The adverse event may be any unfavourable or unintended sign, an abnormal laboratory finding, a symptom, or a disease.” Acute AEFI were classified according to the following standard criteria: (1) coincidental events, traumatic injuries, or symptoms/signs that have occurred before the recipient received the vaccine; (2) localized pain by vaccine product-related reactions, localized pain at the injection site without other symptoms/signs; (3) IHSR—1 or more of following symptoms/signs were exhibited: urticarial or any type of rash, angioedema, local or generalized pruritus, wheezing, stridor, persistent cough, hoarseness, and anaphylaxis; (4) ISRR—symptoms/signs that were not accompanied by coincidental events, localized pain by vaccine product-related reactions or IHSR; discomfort in the mouth and throat, palpitations, cold sweat, shortness of breath, chest pain, abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, vertigo, syncope, general weakness, numbness or loss of sensation, headache, malaise, hyperventilation/panic attack, photophobia, feeling of a hot flush, and vital signs abnormalities indicative of a vasovagal reflex (hypotension and/or bradycardia). Confirmatory anaphylaxis was diagnosed based on the Brighton Collaboration definition. Grade 3 hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure >180 mm Hg and/or diastolic blood pressure >110 mm Hg.

Statistical analysis

We calculated the incidence rates and 95% confidence interval (CI) for AEFI using the number of vaccine doses administered at a center as the denominator. Categorical variables are presented as frequency and percentage (%) and were compared using a χ2 test or the Fisher exact test, as appropriate. As reported by the existing literature, age, sex, multiple comorbidities, and a history of allergy or vasovagal reflex after vaccination increased the risk of IHSR to other drugs. , , 13, 14, 15 Also, age, sex, mental disorders, and history of vasovagal reflex increased the risk of ISRR to other vaccines. , Therefore, we also selected comparable characteristics—age, sex, the presence of comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, cardiovascular diseases, asthma, atopic dermatitis, thyroid diseases, malignancy, and mental disorders), and a history of allergy to drugs and foods or a vasovagal reflex as variables of interest. The period of vaccine administration and the number of vaccinations received were considered as potential confounders. Thus, controls 1 and controls 2 were matched with cases 1 and 2, respectively, based on the period of vaccine administration (May 24-June 23, June 24-July 23, July 24-August 23, and August 24-September 24) and the number of vaccinations received (first dose and second dose) (Figure 1). We selected controls randomly sampled from recipients without AEFI at both doses (1 case: 4 controls) matched with the period of vaccine administration and the number of vaccinations received. All variables that may be potentially associated with an increased risk of IHSR or ISRR as observed by univariate analysis (P < .10) were further processed through multivariable models. The final model was selected using backward stepwise conditional logistic regression to minimalize the Akaike information criterion. All models included age and sex and were adjusted by the period of the vaccine administration and the number of vaccination doses. A 2-sided P value of <.05 was considered statistically significant. Missing values were imputed with the use of multiple imputations by fully conditional specification using multivariate imputation by the chained equation (mice) package in R. The generalized variance inflation factor (GVIF)1/(2∗degree of freedom) was used for diagnosing the collinearity in the multivariate logistic regression. GVIF1/(2∗degree of freedom) < 2 determined that there was no multicollinearity. Two types of sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of the results: (1) excluding recipients with missing data (complete case analysis) with the initial case definition, (2) complete case analysis with changing the definitions of IHSR and ISRR within the case. The case definition was gradually narrowed down to eliminate possible misclassifications between IHSR and ISRR (case definition of IHSR-2 and -3 or ISRR-2 and -3). Matched controls for each case of the IHSR and ISRR groups were extracted from controls 1 or controls 2, respectively (Figures E1 and E2, available in this article’s Online Repository at www.jaci-inpractice.org). Case definitions in each sensitivity analysis are shown in Tables E1 and E2 (available in this article’s Online Repository at www.jaci-inpractice.org). Final models selected in the initial analysis were evaluated by new cases and their controls. Sample size consideration is shown in this article’s Online Repository Text 2 at www.jaci-inpractice.org. All statistical analyses were performed using R software (v 4.0.2; R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria; http://www.R-project.org/).
Figure E1

Flow diagram of immediate hypersensitivity reaction (IHSR) groups in sensitivity analysis. We excluded recipients with missing data in sensitivity analyses (complete case analysis). IHSR-2, Initial case definition without respiratory symptoms; IHSR-3, initial case definition included only clinical signs.

Figure E2

Flow diagram of immunization stress-related response (ISRR) groups in sensitivity analysis. We excluded recipients with missing data in sensitivity analyses (complete case analysis). ISRR-2, Initial case definition of ISRR without gastrointestinal symptoms; ISRR-3, initial case definition of ISRR without gastrointestinal and respiratory symptoms.

Table E1

Case definition of immediate hypersensitivity reaction (IHSR) in sensitivity analyses

Symptoms/signsInitialIHSR-2IHSR-3
Any type of rashIncludedIncludedIncluded
AngioedemaIncludedIncludedIncluded
PruritusIncludedIncluded
WheezingIncludedIncludedIncluded
StridorIncludedIncludedIncluded
Persistent coughIncluded
HoarsenessIncluded
AnaphylaxisIncludedIncludedIncluded

IHSR-2, Initial case definition without respiratory symptoms; IHSR-3, initial case definition included only clinical signs.

Table E2

Case definition of immunization stress-related response (ISRR) in sensitivity analyses

Symptoms/signsInitialISRR-2ISRR-3
Mouth and throat discomfortIncludedIncluded
PalpitationsIncludedIncludedIncluded
Cold sweatIncludedIncludedIncluded
Shortness of breathingIncludedIncluded
Chest painIncludedIncluded
Abdominal painIncluded
NauseaIncluded
VomitingIncluded
DiarrheaIncluded
VertigoIncludedIncludedIncluded
SyncopeIncludedIncludedIncluded
General weaknessIncludedIncludedIncluded
Numbness or loss of sensationIncludedIncludedIncluded
HeadacheIncludedIncludedIncluded
MalaiseIncludedIncludedIncluded
Hyperventilation/panic attackIncludedIncludedIncluded
PhotophobiaIncludedIncludedIncluded
Feeling of hot flushIncludedIncludedIncluded
Vasovagal reflexIncludedIncludedIncluded

Vasovagal reflex included hypotension and/or bradycardia.

ISRR-2, Initial case definition of ISRR without gastrointestinal symptoms;

ISRR-3, initial case definition of ISRR without gastrointestinal and respiratory symptoms.

Results

Baseline characteristics of participants

Between May 24 and September 24, 2021, 614,151 people received the Moderna vaccine at the study center (587,537 received both first and second doses, 24,242 received only the first dose and 2372 received the second dose). A total of 1,201,688 vaccine doses (611,779 and 589,909 for the first dose and second dose, respectively) were administered at the study center. During the study period, 3014 instances of AEFI were observed in 2913 recipients—a total of 101 recipients showed AEFI twice, both at the first and second doses. Based on the clinical symptoms and signs, 318 events of IHSR were observed in 306 recipients (11%, cases 1) and 2558 events of ISRR in 2478 recipients (85%, cases 2) (Figure 1). Among the 611,237 recipients without AEFI, 1208 recipients were selected as matched controls 1 for cases 1 and 9940 recipients as control 2 for cases 2 (Figure 1). Each control was matched (1 case: 4 controls) with each case based on the period of vaccine administration and the number of vaccinations received. The summary of available data among 611,238 recipients without AEFI and selected controls is shown in Table E3 (available in this article’s Online Repository at www.jaci-inpractice.org). The baseline characteristics of cases and selected controls are shown in Table I .
Table E3

Characteristics of all recipients without adverse events following immunization (AEFI) and matched controls

Demographic characteristicRecipients without AEFI (N = 611,238)Controls 1 (N = 1224)Controls 2 (N = 9912)
Age (y)
 >65196,168 (32)467 (38)2344 (26)
 51-65130,158 (21)258 (21)1913 (18)
 36-50140,193 (23)264 (22)2815 (29)
 ≤35144,718 (24)235 (19)2840 (27)
Period at first dose
 May 24-June 23235,749 (39)591 (48)3047 (31)
 June 24-July 2391,500 (15)167 (14)551 (6)
 July 24-August 23229,085 (37)415 (34)5334 (54)
 August 24-September 2455,106 (9)48 (4)957 (10)
Period at second dose
 May 24-June 23782 (0)0 (0)2 (0)
 June 24-July 23254,220 (42)532 (44)2603 (27)
 July 24-August 2373,884 (12)128 (11)891 (9)
 August 24-September 24260,948 (43)533 (45)6282 (64)

Data are presented as n (%).

Table I

Baseline characteristics

Demographic characteristicImmediate hypersensitivity reactions
Immunization stress-related responses
Cases 1 (N = 306)Controls 1 (N = 1224)P valueCases 2 (N = 2478)Controls 2 (N = 9912)P value
Age (y)
 >65108 (35)467 (38).817430 (20)2344 (26)<.001
 51-6569 (23)258 (21)361 (13)1913 (18)
 36-5068 (22)264 (22)620 (26)2815 (29)
 ≤3561 (20)235 (19)1067 (41)2840 (27)
Sex
 Male63 (21)692 (57)<.001827 (33)5475 (55)<.001
 Female243 (79)532 (44)1651 (67)4437 (45)
Comorbidities
 Hypertension40 (13)156 (13).848163 (7)899 (9)<.001
 Dyslipidemia17 (6)58 (5).55289 (4)406 (4).303
 Diabetes12 (4)59 (5).64755 (2)351 (4).002
 Cardiovascular diseases5 (2)40 (3).18257 (2)197 (2).284
 Asthma24 (8)17 (1)<.00196 (4)123 (1)<.001
 Atopic dermatitis5 (2)3 (0).01021 (1)36 (0).002
 Thyroid diseases15 (5)13 (1)<.00150 (2)89 (1)<.001
 Malignancy6 (2)21 (2).80726 (1)90 (1).476
 Mental disorders7 (2)20 (2).463113 (5)127 (1)<.001
 Missing data of comorbidities4 (1)033 (1)0
History
 Allergic episodes for drugs86 (28)41 (3)<.001320 (13)303 (3)<.001
 Allergic episodes for foods80 (26)33 (3)<.001308 (12)327 (3)<.001
 Vasovagal episode9 (3)10 (1).006246 (10)136 (1)<.001
 Missing data of histories6 (2)045 (2)10 (0)
No. of vaccine received
 First207 (68)828 (68)1.0001844 (74)7376 (74)1.000
 Second99 (32)396 (32)634 (26)2536 (26)
Period
 May 24-June 2398 (32)392 (32)1.000486 (20)1944 (20)1.000
 June 24-July 2358 (19)232 (19)323 (13)1292 (13)
 July 24-August 2389 (29)356 (29)1071 (43)4284 (43)
 August 24-September 2461 (19)244 (20)598 (24)2392 (24)

Data are presented as n (%).

P value showed a comparison between cases 1 and control 1.

P value showed a comparison between cases 2 and control 2.

Baseline characteristics Data are presented as n (%). P value showed a comparison between cases 1 and control 1. P value showed a comparison between cases 2 and control 2.

Risk factor analysis

In the univariable analysis, we observed that recipients with ISRR were significantly younger (P < .001) than their controls (cases 2 vs controls 2), but no significant difference was found in the IHSR group (cases 1 vs controls 1). The proportion of females were significantly higher (P < .001) in recipients with both IHSR and ISRR than in their respective controls. The variables potentially associated with the IHSR group included asthma, atopic dermatitis, thyroid diseases, history of allergy to drugs and foods, and history of vasovagal reflex; those potentially associated with the ISRR group included hypertension, diabetes, asthma, atopic dermatitis, thyroid diseases, mental disorders, history of allergy to drugs and foods, and history of vasovagal reflex (P < .100) (Table I). In the multivariable conditional logistic regression analysis, the variables significantly associated with an increased risk of IHSR included female gender, asthma, atopic dermatitis, thyroid diseases, and history of allergy to drugs and foods (Figure 2 , A), of which a history of allergy to drugs (odds ratio [OR]: 13.32 [95% CI: 7.57-23.44]) and foods (OR: 11.80 [95% CI: 7.04-19.80]) had the strongest association for an increased risk of IHSR (Figure 2, A). Similarly, in recipients who developed ISRR, younger age (≤65 years), female gender, asthma, mental disorders, history of allergy to drugs and foods, and history of vasovagal reflex were significantly associated with an increased risk (Figure 2, B). Younger the recipient’s age, the greater the risk of developing ISRR. Multicollinearity was not detected among the variables.
Figure 2

Risk factors associated with immediate hypersensitivity reactions and immunization stress-related responses to the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine. (A) Forest plot showing the odds ratio for an increased risk of immediate hypersensitivity reactions and (B) immunization stress-related responses using multivariable analysis of conditional logistic regression analysis. Plots and horizontal lines indicate estimated odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals (CI), respectively.

Risk factors associated with immediate hypersensitivity reactions and immunization stress-related responses to the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine. (A) Forest plot showing the odds ratio for an increased risk of immediate hypersensitivity reactions and (B) immunization stress-related responses using multivariable analysis of conditional logistic regression analysis. Plots and horizontal lines indicate estimated odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals (CI), respectively.

Sensitivity analysis

The complete case analysis with the initial case definition did not change the study findings. According to the new case definition, 284 cases (IHSR-2) and 188 cases (IHSR-3) were selected from the case 1 group and were compared with 1136 and 752 matched controls, respectively. Likewise, 2304 cases (ISRR-2) and 2129 cases (ISRR-3) were selected from cases 2 to compare with 9208 and 8516 matched controls selected from controls 2, respectively (Tables E4 and E5, and Figures E3 and E4, available in this article’s Online Repository at www.jaci-inpractice.org). We observed that changing the case definitions of IHSR and ISRR did not change the study findings, although the association of atopic dermatitis for an increased risk of IHSR did not reach statistical significance as per the new case definition. Multicollinearity was not detected among the variables in sensitivity analysis.
Table E4

Participant of immediate hypersensitivity reaction (IHSR) groups in sensitivity analysis

Demographic characteristicIHSR-2
IHSR-3
Cases (N = 284)Controls (N = 1136)P valueCases (N = 188)Controls (N = 752)P value
Age (y)
 >65103 (36.3)441 (38.8).85374 (39.4)324 (43.1).610
 51-6563 (22.2)237 (20.9)42 (22.3)147 (19.5)
 36-5062 (21.8)249 (21.9)36 (19.1)156 (20.7)
 ≤3556 (19.7)209 (18.4)36 (19.1)125 (16.6)
Sex
 Male61 (21.5)651 (57.3)<.00144 (23.4)446 (59.3)<.001
 Female223 (78.5)485 (42.7)144 (76.6)306 (40.7)
Comorbidities
 Hypertension40 (14.1)148 (13.0).62633 (17.6)120 (16).582
 Diabetes12 (4.2)58 (5.1).6468 (11.7)42 (5.9).587
 Dyslipidemia16 (5.6)54 (4.8).54115 (4.3)44 (5.6).312
 Cardiovascular diseases4 (1.4)39 (3.4).0823 (1.6)30 (4.0).125
 Asthma20 (7.0)16 (1.4)<.00114 (7.4)13 (1.7)<.001
 Atopic dermatitis4 (1.4)3 (0.3).0334 (2.1)3 (0.4).033
 Thyroid diseases14 (4.9)11 (1.0)<.00111 (5.9)9 (1.2)<.001
 Malignancy5 (1.8)19 (1.7)1.0003 (1.6)16 (2.1).780
 Mental disorders6 (2.1)19 (1.7).6154 (2.1)18 (2.4)1.000
History
 Allergic episodes for drugs81 (28.5)36 (3.2)<.00154 (28.7)28 (3.7)<.001
 Allergic episodes for foods76 (26.8)29 (2.6)<.00149 (26.1)20 (2.7)<.001
 Vasovagal episode8 (2.8)10 (0.9).0163 (1.6)5 (0.7).202
No. of vaccine doses received
 First189 (66.5)756 (66.5)1.000128 (68.1)512 (68.1)1.000
 Second95 (33.5)380 (33.5)60 (31.9)240 (31.9)
Period
 May 24-June 2390 (31.7)360 (31.7)1.00072 (38.3)288 (38.3)1.000
 June 24-July 2357 (20.1)228 (20.1)30 (16.0)120 (16.0)
 July 24-August 2380 (28.2)320 (28.2)50 (26.6)200 (26.6)
 August 24-September 2457 (20.1)228 (20.1)36 (19.1)144 (19.1)

Data are presented as n (%).

IHSR-2, Initial case definition without respiratory symptoms; IHSR-3, initial case definition included only clinical signs.

Table E5

Participant of immunization stress-related response (ISRR) groups in sensitivity analysis

Demographic characteristicISRR-2
ISRR-3
Cases (N = 2302)Controls (N = 9208)P valueCases (N = 2129)Controls (N = 8516)P value
Age (y)
 >65400 (17.4)2200 (23.9)<.001364 (17.1)1987 (23.3)<.001
 51-65342 (14.9)1784 (19.4)312 (14.7)1657 (19.5)
 36-50576 (25.0)2596 (28.2)516 (24.2)2424 (28.5)
 ≤35984 (42.7)2628 (28.5)937 (44.0)2448 (28.7)
Sex
 Male767 (33.3)5081 (55.2)<.001727 (34.1)4699 (55.2)<.001
 Female1535 (66.7)4127 (44.8)1402 (65.9)3817 (44.8)
Comorbidities
 Hypertension149 (6.5)850 (9.2)<.001135 (6.3)753 (8.8)<.001
 Diabetes50 (2.2)326 (3.5).00144 (2.1)294 (3.5).001
 Dyslipidemia85 (3.7)383 (4.2).31174 (3.5)348 (4.1).560
 Cardiovascular diseases51 (2.2)184 (2.0).51045 (2.1)172 (2.0).784
 Asthma85 (3.7)112 (1.2)<.00175 (3.5)106 (1.2)<.001
 Atopic dermatitis18 (0.8)33 (0.4).00817 (0.8)30 (0.4).007
 Thyroid diseases49 (2.1)84 (0.9)<.00143 (2.0)79 (0.9)<.001
 Malignancy25 (1.1)85 (0.9).47321 (1.0)68 (0.8).395
 Mental disorders104 (4.5)119 (1.3)<.00196 (4.5)107 (1.3)<.001
History
 Allergic episodes for drugs302 (13.1)285 (3.1)<.001275 (12.9)260 (3.1)<.001
 Allergic episodes for foods286 (12.4)304 (3.3)<.001254 (11.9)283 (3.3)<.001
 Vasovagal episode242 (10.5)129 (1.4)<.001232 (10.9)121 (1.4)<.001
No. of vaccine doses received
 First1708 (74.2)6832 (74.2)1.0001591 (74.7)6364 (74.7)1.000
 Second594 (25.8)2376 (25.8)538 (25.3)2152 (25.3)
Period
 May 24-June 23449 (19.5)1796 (19.5)1.000405 (19.0)1620 (19.0)1.000
 June 24-July 23305 (13.2)1220 (13.2)275 (12.9)1100 (12.9)
 July 24-August 23998 (43.4)3992 (43.4)941 (44.2)3764 (44.2)
 August 24-September 24550 (23.9)2200 (23.9)508 (23.9)2032 (23.9)

Data are presented as n (%).

ISRR-2, Initial case definition of ISRR without gastrointestinal symptoms; ISRR-3, initial case definition of ISRR without gastrointestinal and respiratory symptoms.

Incidence rates of IHSR and ISRR

Of the 318 IHSR events, 2 events were classified as anaphylaxis according to the Brighton Criteria (one event at the first dose—level 2-2, and another at the second dose—level 3). Of the 2558 IHSR events, 86 events of vasovagal syncope were observed. Overall, the incidence rate per million doses of AEFI in the 1,201,688 vaccine doses administered was estimated as follows: IHSR: 266 cases (95% CI: 236-295 cases), ISRR: 2129 cases (95% CI: 2047-2212 cases), anaphylaxis: 2 cases (95% CI: 0.2-6 cases), and vasovagal syncope: 72 cases (95% CI: 57-88 cases) (Figure 3 , A; Table E6, available in this article’s Online Repository at www.jaci-inpractice.org). The incidence rate of AEFI at the first dose, except for anaphylaxis, was significantly higher than at the second dose (P < .001) (Table E6).
Figure 3

Incidence rates of adverse events following immunization to the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine. (A) Bar plot showing the incidence rates of immediate hypersensitivity reactions (IHSR) and immunization stress-related responses (ISRR) and of (B) clinical symptoms and signs. The incidence rates were estimated using vaccine doses administered as the denominator. The error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals.

Table E6

Estimated incidence rates of adverse events following immunization

EventsTotal dose (N = 1,201,688)
First doses (N = 611,779)
Second doses (N = 589,909)
P value
Total no. of eventsIncidence rate (95% CI)Total no. of eventsIncidence rate (95% CI)Total no. of eventsIncidence rate (95% CI)
IHSR318265.6 (236.3-295.3)213348.2 (303.0-398.2)105178.0 (145.6-215.5)<.001
ISRR25582128.7 (2047.1-2212.7)18423010.9 (2875.1-3151.4)7141210.4 (1123.2-1302.4)<.001
Anaphylaxis21.7 (0.2-6.0)11.6 (0-9.1)11.7 (0-9.4)1.000
Vasovagal syncope8671.6 (57.2-88.4)76123 (97.9-155.5)1017.0 (8.1-31.1)<.001

Incidence rates of acute adverse events were calculated by using vaccine administration of doses in a center as the denominator. Incidence rates were shown as per million doses.

CI, Confidence interval; IHSR, immediate hypersensitivity reactions; ISRR, immunization stress-related responses.

Incidence rates of adverse events following immunization to the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine. (A) Bar plot showing the incidence rates of immediate hypersensitivity reactions (IHSR) and immunization stress-related responses (ISRR) and of (B) clinical symptoms and signs. The incidence rates were estimated using vaccine doses administered as the denominator. The error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals.

Symptoms and signs of vaccine recipients with IHSR and ISRR

In the ISRR events, vertigo, malaise, and numbness or loss of sensation in part of the body were the most common clinical symptoms (Figure 3, B; Table E7, available in this article’s Online Repository at www.jaci-inpractice.org). In the IHSR events, any types of rash and pruritus were the most common symptoms. Syncope (included in the standard criteria for ISRR) was observed in the ISRR events only, and all of these cases were diagnosed with vasovagal syncope. Hypotension and bradycardia due to vasovagal reflex were the most common vital sign abnormalities in the ISRR events, whereas grade 3 hypertension (not included in the standard criteria for either IHSR or ISRR) was the most common vital sign abnormality in the IHSR events.
Table E7

Number of events of clinical symptoms and signs

Symptoms/signsTotal events, N (rates per million doses [95% CI])Immediate hypersensitivity reactions, N (rates per million doses [95% CI])Immunization stress-related responses, N (rates per million doses [95% CI])
Skin, facial, and oral symptoms/signs
 Any type of rash193 (160.6 [138.8-184.9])193 (160.6 [138.8-184.9])0 (0)
 Angioedema7 (5.8 [2.3-12.0])7 (5.8 [2.3-12.0])0 (0)
 Pruritus147 (122.3 [103.4-143.8])147 (122.3 [103.4-143.8])0 (0)
 Mouth and throat discomfort179 (149.0 [127.9-172.4])33 (27.5 [18.9-38.6])146 (121.5 [102.6-142.9])
Cardiovascular symptoms/signs
 Palpitations298 (248.0 [220.6-277.8])8 (6.7 [2.9-13.1])290 (241.3 [214.4-270.8])
 Cold sweat125 (104.0 [86.6-123.9])1 (0.8 [0-4.6])124 (103.2 [85.8-123.0])
Respiratory symptoms/signs
 Wheezes or stridor4 (3.3 [0.9-8.5])4 (3.3 [0.9-8.5])0 (0)
 Hoarseness1 (0.8 [0-4.6])1 (0.8 [0-4.6])0 (0)
 Persistent cough25 (20.8 [13.5-30.7])25 (20.8 [13.5-30.7])0 (0)
 Shortness of breathing138 (114.8 [96.5-135.7])13 (10.8 [5.8-18.5])125 (104.0 [86.6-123.9])
 Chest pain37 (30.8 [21.7-42.4])0 (0)37 (30.8 [21.7-42.4])
Gastrointestinal symptoms/signs
 Abdominal pain21 (17.5 [10.8-26.7])3 (2.5 [0.5-7.3])18 (15.0 [8.9-23.7])
 Nausea281 (233.8 [207.3-262.8])12 (10.0 [5.2-17.4])269 (223.9 [197.9-252.3])
 Vomiting14 (11.7 [6.4-19.5])0 (0)14 (11.7 [6.4-19.5])
 Diarrhea2 (1.7 [0.2-6.0])0 (0)2 (1.7 [0.2-6])
Neurological symptoms/signs
 Vertigo891 (741.5 [693.6-791.8])8 (6.7 [2.9-13.1])883 (734.8 [687.2-784.9])
 Syncope86 (71.6 [57.2-88.4])0 (0)86 (71.6 [57.2-88.4])
 General weakness47 (39.1 [28.7-52.0])2 (1.7 [0.2-6])45 (37.4 [27.3-50.1])
 Numbness or loss of sensation411 (342.0 [309.8-376.7])8 (6.7 [2.9-13.1])403 (335.4 [303.4-369.8])
Other symptoms/signs
 Headache112 (93.2 [76.7-112.1])3 (2.5 [0.5-7.3])109 (90.7 [74.5-109.4])
 Malaise497 (413.6 [378-451.6])11 (9.2 [4.6-16.4])486 (404.4 [369.3-442])
 Hyperventilation/panic attack30 (25.0 [16.8-35.6])1 (0.8 [0-4.6])29 (24.1 [16.2-34.7])
 Photophobia28 (23.3 [15.5-33.7])3 (2.5 [0.5-7.3])25 (20.8 [13.5-30.7])
 Feeling of hot flush22 (18.3 [11.5-27.7])0 (0)22 (18.3 [11.5-27.7])
Abnormalities of vital signs
 Hypotension458 (381.1 [347-417.7])6 (5.0 [1.8-10.9])452 (376.1 [342.3-412.5])
 Hypertension171 (142.3 [121.8-165.3])32 (26.6 [18.2-37.6])139 (115.7 [97.2-136.6])
 Bradycardia385 (320.4 [289.2-354.0])10 (8.3 [4.0-15.3])375 (312.1 [281.3-345.3])
 Tachycardia33 (27.5 [18.9-38.6])6 (5.0 [1.8-10.9])27 (22.5 [14.8-32.7])
 Tachypnoea40 (33.3 [23.8-45.3])3 (2.5 [0.5-7.3])37 (30.8 [21.7-42.4])

Data are presented as n (incidence rates per million doses [95% CI]).

CI, Confidence interval.

Specific events for immediate hypersensitivity reactions. Hypotension: systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg and/or diastolic blood pressure <60 mm Hg, hypertension: systolic blood pressure >180 mm Hg and/or diastolic blood pressure >110 mm Hg, bradycardia: heart rate <60 beats per minute, tachycardia: heart rate >120 beats per minute and tachypnoea: respiratory rate >24 per min.

Symptom onset within 15 minutes of the vaccination was recorded in 179 of 318 (56%) events of IHSR and 1928 of 2558 (75%) events of ISRR, whereas in 294 of the 318 (93%) events of IHSR and 2450 of the 2558 (96%) events of ISRR, the symptoms appeared within 30 minutes of vaccination (Table II ). Epinephrine was used for 7 events with a clinical diagnosis of severe IHSR at the first-aid rooms. Erroneous administration of epinephrine for hypotension due to vasovagal reflex was reported for 2 events in the ISRR events. A total of 75 events (3%) required additional treatment in neighboring hospitals. Twenty-seven events (9%) required additional treatment at neighboring hospitals in the IHSR event, whereas 48 events (2%) required additional examination at neighboring hospitals in the ISRR events including 14 events of persistent grade 3 hypertension and 17 events of neurological disorders (1 or more symptoms of general weakness, numbness, loss of sensation, and movement disorders). In the IHSR events, 287 events (90%) were self-limiting requiring no medication or treatment.
Table II

Descriptive characteristics of vaccine recipients with acute adverse events following immunization

Clinical characteristic and outcomeNo. of total events (N = 2876)No. of events of immediate hypersensitivity reactions (N = 318)No. of events of immunization stress-related responses (N = 2558)
Onset of initial symptoms/signs
 ≤15 min2107 (73)179 (56)1928 (75)
 ≤30 min2744 (95)294 (93)2450 (96)
 >30 min71 (3)17 (5)54 (2)
 Missing61754
Medications at a center
 Epinephrine9 (0)7 (2)2 (0)
 Antihistamine3 (0)3 (1)0
 Corticosteroid1 (0)1 (0)0
Outcome
 Transported to the hospitals75 (3)27 (9)48 (2)
 Recovered at a center2801 (97)291 (92)2510 (98)
  Recovered with medication6 (0)4 (1)2 (0)
  Recovered without medication2795 (97)287 (90)2508 (98)
 Death000

Data are presented as n (%).

Descriptive characteristics of vaccine recipients with acute adverse events following immunization Data are presented as n (%).

Recurrence rates of IHSR and ISRR

Of 207 recipients who showed IHSR at the first dose, 174 (84%) recipients received the second dose in the center. No premedication before the second dose was prescribed. Of 174 recipients, 12 (7%) recipients showed recurrent IHSR at the second dose, and no recipient was diagnosed with anaphylaxis. Of 1844 recipients who showed ISRR at the first dose, 1561 (85%) recipients received the second dose in the center. Of 1561 recipients, 80 (5%) recipients showed the recurrent ISRR at the second dose. Therefore, the recurrent rates of IHSR and ISRR were calculated as 6.9% (95% CI: 3.6%-11.7%) and 5.1% (95% CI: 4.1%-6.4%), respectively. At the second dose, 3 recipients (1 was IHSR and 2 were ISRR) needed additional examination and treatment at a center or neighborhood hospitals. The remaining recipients were self-limited without medication (Table III ).
Table III

Immediate reactions at second dose among recipients showed IHSR and ISRR at first dose

Immediate reactions at second doseIHSR at first dose (N = 174)ISRR at first dose (N = 1561)
None159 (91)1480 (95)
IHSR12 (7)1 (0)
ISRR3 (2)80 (5)
Anaphylaxis00
Vasovagal syncope01 (0)
Outcome
Medications at a center00
Transported to the hospitals1 (1)2 (0)
Death00

Data are presented as n (%).

IHSR, Immediate hypersensitivity reactions; ISRR, immunization stress-related responses.

Immediate reactions at second dose among recipients showed IHSR and ISRR at first dose Data are presented as n (%). IHSR, Immediate hypersensitivity reactions; ISRR, immunization stress-related responses.

Discussion

This single-center nested case-control study provides an outline of the incidence rates and risk factors for developing IHSR and ISRR among recipients of the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine in Japan. We conducted active surveillance at our center to document the clinical findings of all recipients who developed an AEFI regardless of the severity. Notably, more than 80% of all instances AEFI were classified as ISRR, instead of IHSR, and the incidence rates of both IHSR and ISRR were significantly higher after the first dose compared with the second one; however, the overall incidence of AEFI was very low at both first and second doses. By comparing clinical characteristics between recipients with and without AEFI, we identified several risk factors associated with the development of IHSR and ISRR. We observed that the incidence rate of IHSR was very low, approximately 266 cases per million doses (0.03%) of all recipients, at both first and second doses, which is significantly different from the estimated incidence reported previously. Blumenthal et al conducted a questionnaire-based study and described that the incidence rate of IHSR within 3 days after the injection was 2.1% of 64,900 health care employees who received their first dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. Contrarily, Myles et al conducted real-time surveillance by an allergist at a mass vaccination center and reported an incidence rate of 0.12% of IHSR among the 14,655 vaccine recipients. Our results are in line with those reported by Myles et al. Likewise, the anaphylaxis rate was also extremely low in our study (2 cases per million doses), which is consistent with the existing data reports for the United States. , The mechanisms of IHSR after the Moderna vaccine administration are not completely clarified; however, polyethylene glycol (PEG)-2000 is the identified candidate allergen. Currently, only the female gender and history of allergy are known factors associated with an increased risk of anaphylaxis to mRNA vaccines. Shimabukuro et al reported that anaphylaxis was more frequently observed in females than males. Similarly, Desai et al documented that people with a history of allergy and anaphylaxis had a 2 to 7 times higher incidence of anaphylaxis after vaccination compared with people without any history of allergy. Our findings were comparable to these studies regarding the risk factors for IHSR. In addition, we identified comorbidities (asthma, atopic dermatitis, and thyroid diseases) that were associated with a greater risk of IHSR. Thyroid diseases were also identified as a risk factor for IHSR to contrast media but not to other common drugs. Asthma and atopic dermatitis are established risk factors for IHSR to several drugs. Thus, it seems that populations with atopic dermatitis and asthma are predisposed to develop IHSR to drugs, including mRNA vaccines, but the response may not be specific to mRNA vaccine components, such as PEG-2000. Taking the low incidence rate of IHSR into account, recipients with risk factors are at an increased risk of IHSR, but this is not of sufficient magnitude to warrant a contraindication to vaccinations or special measures regarding their vaccination (premedication or a change in the postvaccination observation period). The 2 previous studies evaluated the recurrence rate of IHSR after the second dose in recipients with a previous history of IHSR at the first dose. The first study by Krantz et al, which was based on a group of 159 recipients with a history of IHSR including 19 cases of anaphylaxis, investigated the second dose tolerance in the United States. The study found that the incidence rate of IHSR to the second dose was 20% among recipients who had a history of IHSR to the first dose, and their symptoms were self-limited, mild, and/or resolved with antihistamines alone. Recently, Macy et al reported a population-based cohort study that enrolled 391,123 recipients in the United States. The study found that the 6.7% of incidence rate of IHSR at the second dose among recipients with a vhistory of IHSR included none of the anaphylaxis cases. In the present study, the recurrence rate of IHSR was low (7%), and dominantly recurrent IHSR were self-limited. No anaphylaxis cases were observed at the second dose in Japanese population, similar to those reported by previous studies. , Our findings reconfirmed that the Moderna vaccine may have good tolerance to the second dose among recipients with a history of IHSR to the first dose and that the IHSR events at the first dose may not be usually a contraindication to further vaccinations. IHSR can be attributed to IgE-mediated and non–IgE-mediated mechanisms, including complement activation-related pseudoallergy (CARPA). Warren et al investigated patients with IHSR to mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and suggested that the IHSR are likely due to IgG anti–PEG-induced CARPA based on the results of the skin test and basophil activation test. The evidence that patients have gone on to receive second doses uneventfully may support that their initial reactions were not IgE-mediated mechanisms. It is known that ISRR is caused by anxiety and fear about injection, needles, vaccine components, adverse events, or pre-existing conditions. The incidence rate of ISRR in our study was low but not enough to be ignored (2129 cases per million doses: 0.21%). A notable finding was the significantly high incidence rate of vasovagal syncope (72 cases per million doses), although people who had a history of vasovagal reflex were screened and were administered the vaccine in a lying position. Hause et al also reported a high incidence of vasovagal syncope after the J&J/Janssen COVID-19 vaccine, a viral vector vaccine, estimated at 8.2 per 100,000 doses in mass vaccination centers in the United States. Strikingly, the incidence rate of vasovagal syncope after COVID-19 vaccines was significantly higher than the influenza vaccine (0.05 per 100,000 doses), and similar to that of the quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine (7.8 cases per 100,000 doses). In addition, we found that several clinical symptoms and signs resulted from ISRR, especially, a type of neurological symptoms, known as the FNDs, that were difficult to assess as caused by psychological or organic factors in the setting of mass vaccination. Indeed, 2% of recipients with ISRR were transported to hospitals, and one-third of these patients showed neurological symptoms most likely due to FNDs, although more careful evaluations are needed for the diagnosis. Further studies with active surveillance are needed for a better understanding of the incidence of FNDs and to take appropriate mitigating measures at mass vaccination centers. For effective implementation of precautionary measures, it is important to first identify individuals with a high risk of ISRR. In general, adolescence, female gender, mental disorders, and history of vasovagal reflex were considered as the risk factors for ISRR. , Our findings reaffirm that these risk factors increase the chances of developing an ISRR after mRNA vaccines. In addition, specific comorbidities (asthma and thyroid diseases) and a history of allergy were identified as additional risk factors of ISRR. There are several possibilities regarding these associations. The presence of comorbidities and a history of allergy may provoke strong anxiety and fear about the allergic adverse events and the effects of vaccination on comorbidities, especially during the first dose. The present scenario that this mRNA vaccine is a novel type of vaccine for infectious diseases may increase the associated fear and anxiety. Also, asthma and thyroid diseases increase the risk of mental disorders by 1.5 times and 2.3-3.5 times, respectively, and undiagnosed or under-reported mental disorders may increase the risk of ISRR. Therefore, at mass vaccination centers, providers should be aware that a greater proportion of recipients are predisposed to ISRR after vaccination compared with the known high-risk cases. Several symptoms, especially respiratory and gastrointestinal, are overlapped between IHSR and ISRR. To check for potential misclassification between IHSR and ISRR, we performed sensitivity analyses by narrowing the case definitions to reduce the effect of misclassification. The risk factors for IHSR and ISRR were consistent in our sensitivity analysis even while using narrowed case definitions, except for atopic dermatitis for IHSR with low prevalence, suggesting that there is little effect of misclassification. There are several limitations to this study. First, a selection bias may limit the generalizability of our findings. This study was conducted at a single center and a single country. ISRR can be affected by environmental factors of the vaccination center and can occur in clusters or group settings. Therefore, the incidence rate of ISRR cannot be specified in a mass vaccination center. Second, the possibility of underestimation of the incidence rate of IHSR and ISRR cannot be denied. The observation period after the administration of the vaccine was limited (mean observation time was 20 minutes: see this article’s Online Repository Text 1 at www.jaci-inpractice.org) due to the study design. Third, the sample size of the case with IHSR was smaller than planned due to the low incidence rate of IHSR in our study (see this article’s Online Repository Text 2 at www.jaci-inpractice.org). Therefore, our sample size of IHSR may not have statistical power to detect the factors that slightly increased the risk of IHSR with a low prevalence rate, such as atopic dermatitis, in the sensitivity analysis. Fourth, the simple randomization method without bootstrapping algorithms was used for matching and may cause biases in the estimation of the effect on increased risk of IHSR and ISRR. Fifth, the data on comorbidities were collected based on the recipient’s self-reported information. We did not evaluate the treatment states or etiology of comorbidities, such as thyroid diseases. We suggest that multicenter and multinational studies may complement the limitations of our study.

Conclusion

The incidence rate of IHSR and anaphylaxis in our single-center study was very low, suggesting that the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine can be used safely for mass vaccinations. However, health care providers need to take appropriate measures to prevent and respond adequately to the development of ISRR. Although recipients with risk factors are at an increased risk of IHSR and ISRR, this is not of sufficient magnitude to warrant a contraindication to vaccinations or special measures regarding their vaccination.
Table E8

Sample size calculation

Prevalence rate (%)Minimum odds ratio of detectionPowerTwo-sided type I error rate (α)CasesControls (1:4)
0.55.00.80.052621048
0.54.00.80.054131652
0.53.00.80.058023208
0.52.00.80.05264310,572
14.00.80.05211844
13.00.80.054081632
12.00.80.0511365344
24.00.80.05110440
23.00.80.05211844
22.00.80.056832732
54.00.80.0550200
53.00.80.0593372
52.00.80.052921168
  24 in total

Review 1.  Understanding vaccine safety information from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System.

Authors:  Frederick Varricchio; John Iskander; Frank Destefano; Robert Ball; Robert Pless; M Miles Braun; Robert T Chen
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.129

Review 2.  Adverse reactions to drugs.

Authors:  D Vervloet; S Durham
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-05-16

3.  Acute Allergic Reactions to mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines.

Authors:  Kimberly G Blumenthal; Lacey B Robinson; Carlos A Camargo; Erica S Shenoy; Aleena Banerji; Adam B Landman; Paige Wickner
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Syncope and seizures following human papillomavirus vaccination: a retrospective case series.

Authors:  Nigel W Crawford; Hazel J Clothier; Sonja Elia; Teresa Lazzaro; Jenny Royle; Jim P Buttery
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2011-01-03       Impact factor: 7.738

5.  Safety Evaluation of the Second Dose of Messenger RNA COVID-19 Vaccines in Patients With Immediate Reactions to the First Dose.

Authors:  Matthew S Krantz; Jason H Kwah; Cosby A Stone; Elizabeth J Phillips; Gilbert Ortega; Aleena Banerji; Kimberly G Blumenthal
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 44.409

Review 6.  mRNA Vaccines to Prevent COVID-19 Disease and Reported Allergic Reactions: Current Evidence and Suggested Approach.

Authors:  Aleena Banerji; Paige G Wickner; Rebecca Saff; Cosby A Stone; Lacey B Robinson; Aidan A Long; Anna R Wolfson; Paul Williams; David A Khan; Elizabeth Phillips; Kimberly G Blumenthal
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract       Date:  2020-12-31

7.  Population-Based Incidence, Severity, and Risk Factors Associated with Treated Acute-Onset COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination-Associated Hypersensitivity Reactions.

Authors:  Eric Macy; Shalin Pandya; Javed Sheikh; Amber Burnette; Jiaxiao M Shi; Joanie Chung; Nancy Gin; William Crawford; Jing Zhang
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract       Date:  2021-12-29

8.  Assessment of Allergic and Anaphylactic Reactions to mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines With Confirmatory Testing in a US Regional Health System.

Authors:  Christopher Michael Warren; Theo Thomas Snow; Alexandra S Lee; Mihir Mukesh Shah; Anja Heider; Andra Blomkalns; Brooke Betts; Anthony S Buzzanco; Joseph Gonzalez; R Sharon Chinthrajah; Evan Do; Iris Chang; Diane Dunham; Grace Lee; Ruth O'Hara; Helen Park; Mohamed H Shamji; Lisa Schilling; Sayantani B Sindher; Deepak Sisodiya; Eric Smith; Mindy Tsai; Stephen J Galli; Cezmi Akdis; Kari C Nadeau
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-09-01

Review 9.  Current Concepts in Diagnosis and Treatment of Functional Neurological Disorders.

Authors:  Alberto J Espay; Selma Aybek; Alan Carson; Mark J Edwards; Laura H Goldstein; Mark Hallett; Kathrin LaFaver; W Curt LaFrance; Anthony E Lang; Tim Nicholson; Glenn Nielsen; Markus Reuber; Valerie Voon; Jon Stone; Francesca Morgante
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 18.302

10.  Relationship between pre-existing allergies and anaphylactic reactions post mRNA COVID-19 vaccine administration.

Authors:  Aditya P Desai; Aryan P Desai; Gregory J Loomis
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 4.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.