Literature DB >> 35951121

Redefining the role of routine postoperative bloodwork following uncomplicated bariatric surgery.

Rajajee Selvam1, Amer Jarrar2, Cynthia Meghaizel2, Joseph Mamazza2, Amy Neville2, Caolan Walsh2, Nicole Kolozsvari2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A quality improvement opportunity was identified to de-adopt the low-value care practice of routinely performing bloodwork for all patients undergoing elective bariatric surgery. While these patients are typically discharged on postoperative day 1 (POD1) after bloodwork is performed, it is uncommon for the discharge plan to change due to unexpected laboratory abnormalities alone.
METHODS: Patients undergoing bariatric surgery between September 2020 and April 2021 only had POD1 bloodwork if there were perioperative clinical concerns, they had insulin-dependent diabetes, or they were therapeutically anticoagulated. Thirty-day Emergency Department (ED) visits and readmissions were monitored as balancing measures. Outcomes were compared to a control group that underwent bariatric surgery prior to September 2020 when POD1 laboratory testing was routinely performed. Financial and environmental costs were estimated based our institutional standards.
RESULTS: The intervention group consisted of 303 patients: 248 (82%) Roux-en-Y gastric bypasses and 55 (18%) sleeve gastrectomies. Most patients (n = 256, 84.5%) did not have POD1 bloodwork. Twelve (3.9%) had bloodwork performed in violation of our protocol, of which none had a change in management based on the results. Of the 35 (12%) who had appropriately ordered bloodwork, 6 (2%) required a transfusion and 2 (0.7%) required a second surgery on the same admission for hemorrhage. Forty-four (14.5%) had 30-day ED visits of which 17 (5.6%) were within 7 days. Sixteen (5.3%) were readmitted. There were no significant differences between intervention and control groups in the rate of transfusion, second surgery, or 30-day ED visits. The avoidance of POD1 bloodwork saved approximately $6602.24 in lab processing fees alone and 512 test tubes.
CONCLUSION: POD1 bloodwork can be safely avoided in the absence of clinical concerns. In addition to not significantly increasing postoperative complications, there were benefits from a financial cost, environmental impact, and patient discomfort perspective.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bariatric surgery; Carbon footprint; Choosing wisely; Climate change; Quality improvement

Year:  2022        PMID: 35951121     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09518-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   3.453


  7 in total

1.  Engaging physicians and patients in conversations about unnecessary tests and procedures: Choosing Wisely Canada.

Authors:  Wendy Levinson; Tai Huynh
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Clinical Impact of Routine Complete Blood Counts Following Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Elizabeth P Howell; Beau J Kildow; Vasili Karas; Cynthia L Green; Daniel J Cunningham; Sean P Ryan; Michael P Bolognesi; Thorsten M Seyler
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Daily Postoperative Complete Blood Counts After Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty May Not Always Be Necessary.

Authors:  Andrew J Mostello; William Tenpenny; Max Lingamfelter; Eddie S Wu
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 1.390

4.  Routine Postoperative Laboratory Tests Are Not Necessary After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mohamad J Halawi; Julia M Plourde; Mark P Cote
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  The utility of obtaining routine hematological laboratory values following an anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Blaine T Manning; Sriram Sankaranarayanan; Hamid Hassanzadeh; Sreeharsha V Nandyala; Alejandro Marquez-Lara; Abbas Naqvi; Islam M Elboghdady; Mohamed Noureldin; Kern Singh
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Low-value care: an intractable global problem with no quick fix.

Authors:  John N Mafi; Michael Parchman
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2018-01-13       Impact factor: 7.035

Review 7.  Towards understanding the de-adoption of low-value clinical practices: a scoping review.

Authors:  Daniel J Niven; Kelly J Mrklas; Jessalyn K Holodinsky; Sharon E Straus; Brenda R Hemmelgarn; Lianne P Jeffs; Henry Thomas Stelfox
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 8.775

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.