Literature DB >> 35951103

Identification of high-risk intracranial plaques with 3D high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging-based radiomics and machine learning.

Hongxia Li1, Jia Liu1, Zheng Dong2, Xingzhi Chen3, Changsheng Zhou4, Chencui Huang3, Yingle Li1, Quanhui Liu4, Xiaoqin Su4, Xiaoqing Cheng5, Guangming Lu6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Identifying high-risk intracranial plaques is significant for the treatment and prevention of stroke.
OBJECTIVE: To develop a high-risk plaque model using three-dimensional (3D) high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (HRMRI) based radiomics features and machine learning.
METHODS: 136 patients with documented symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis and available HRMRI data were included. Among these patients, 136 and 92 plaques were identified as symptomatic and asymptomatic plaques, respectively. A conventional model was developed by recording and quantifying the radiological plaque characteristics. Radiomics features from T1-weighted images (T1WI) and contrast-enhanced T1WI (CE-T1WI) were used to construct a high-risk plaque model with linear support vector classification (linear SVC). The radiological and radiomics features were combined to build a combined model. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate these models.
RESULTS: Plaque length, burden, and enhancement were independently associated with clinical symptoms and were included in the conventional model, which had an AUC of 0.853 vs. 0.837 in the training and test sets. While the radiomics and the combined model showed an improved AUC: 0.923 vs. 0.925 for the training sets and 0.906 vs. 0.903 in the test sets. Both the radiomics model (p = 0.024, p = 0.018) and combined model (p = 0.042, p = 0.049) outperformed the conventional model in the two sets, whereas the performance of the combined model was not significantly different from that of the radiomics model in the two sets (p = 0.583 and p = 0.606).
CONCLUSION: The radiomics model based on 3D HRMRI can accurately differentiate symptomatic from asymptomatic intracranial arterial plaques and significantly outperforms the conventional model.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany.

Entities:  

Keywords:  High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging; Intracranial atherosclerotic disease; Machine learning; Radiomics; Stroke

Year:  2022        PMID: 35951103     DOI: 10.1007/s00415-022-11315-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol        ISSN: 0340-5354            Impact factor:   6.682


  37 in total

1.  Prevalence and prognosis of coexistent asymptomatic intracranial stenosis.

Authors:  Fadi Nahab; George Cotsonis; Michael Lynn; Edward Feldmann; Seemant Chaturvedi; J Claude Hemphill; Richard Zweifler; Karen Johnston; David Bonovich; Scott Kasner; Marc Chimowitz
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 2.  Intracranial Atherosclerosis Treatment: Past, Present, and Future.

Authors:  Brent Flusty; Adam de Havenon; Shyam Prabhakaran; David S Liebeskind; Shadi Yaghi
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Intracranial Atherosclerotic Plaque as a Potential Cause of Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source.

Authors:  Lin Tao; Xiao-Qiu Li; Xiao-Wen Hou; Ben-Qiang Yang; Cheng Xia; George Ntaios; Hui-Sheng Chen
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Intracranial atherosclerosis: correlation between in-vivo 3T high resolution MRI and pathology.

Authors:  Tanya N Turan; Zoran Rumboldt; Ann-Charlotte Granholm; Laura Columbo; Cynthia T Welsh; Maria F Lopes-Virella; M Vittoria Spampinato; Truman R Brown
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 5.162

5.  Ex-vivo imaging and plaque type classification of intracranial atherosclerotic plaque using high resolution MRI.

Authors:  Yuanliang Jiang; Chengcheng Zhu; Wenjia Peng; Andrew J Degnan; Luguang Chen; Xinrui Wang; Qi Liu; Yang Wang; Zhenzhen Xiang; Zhongzhao Teng; David Saloner; Jianping Lu
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 5.162

6.  Autopsy prevalence of intracranial atherosclerosis in patients with fatal stroke.

Authors:  Mikael Mazighi; Julien Labreuche; Fernando Gongora-Rivera; Charles Duyckaerts; Jean-Jacques Hauw; Pierre Amarenco
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  Vessel Wall Magnetic Resonance Imaging Biomarkers of Symptomatic Intracranial Atherosclerosis: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jae W Song; Athanasios Pavlou; Jiayu Xiao; Scott E Kasner; Zhaoyang Fan; Steven R Messé
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Prognosis of Asymptomatic Intracranial Stenosis in Patients With Transient Ischemic Attack and Minor Stroke.

Authors:  Robert Hurford; Frank J Wolters; Linxin Li; Kui Kai Lau; Wilhelm Küker; Peter M Rothwell
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 18.302

9.  Differential Features of Culprit Intracranial Atherosclerotic Lesions: A Whole-Brain Vessel Wall Imaging Study in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Fang Wu; Qingfeng Ma; Haiqing Song; Xiuhai Guo; Marcio A Diniz; Shlee S Song; Nestor R Gonzalez; Xiaoming Bi; Xunming Ji; Debiao Li; Qi Yang; Zhaoyang Fan
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-07-22       Impact factor: 5.501

10.  Prevalence, predictors, and prognosis of symptomatic intracranial stenosis in patients with transient ischaemic attack or minor stroke: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Robert Hurford; Frank J Wolters; Linxin Li; Kui Kai Lau; Wilhelm Küker; Peter M Rothwell
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 44.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.