Literature DB >> 35951077

Successful same-day discharge in 88% of patients after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Tarik Bayoumi1, Jelle P van der List2,3, Lindsey V Ruderman4, Hendrik A Zuiderbaan5, Gino M M J Kerkhoffs2,3, Andrew D Pearle4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of day-case unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) by assessment of successful same-day discharge (SDD), readmission, complication and reoperation rates in the recent literature.
METHODS: For this systematic review and meta-analysis, PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library were comprehensively searched to identify all eligible studies reporting outcomes of day-case UKA. Studies with intended same-day home discharge after UKA were included. A meta-analysis of proportions, using a random-effects model, was performed to estimate overall rates of successful SDD and adverse events. Subgroup analyses were performed for studies including selected patients (i.e., patients had to meet certain patient-specific criteria to be eligible for day-case UKA) and unselected patients (i.e., no additional criteria for day-case UKA), as well as for clinical and registry-based studies. Additional outcomes included reasons for the failure of SDD and patient satisfaction.
RESULTS: A total of 29 studies and 9694 patients were included with a mean age of 66 ± 9 years and mean follow-up of 59 days (mean range 30-270 days). Based on 24 studies (2733 patients), the overall successful SDD rate was 88% (95% confidence interval [CI] 80-92). These rates were 91% (95% CI 84-95) across studies with selected patients and 76% (95% CI 55-89) across studies with unselected patients. Overall readmission, complication and reoperation rates were 3% (95% CI 1.9-4.4), 4% (95% CI 2.8-5.2) and 1% (95% CI 0.8-1.3), respectively. Inability to mobilize, nausea and uncontrolled pain were frequently reported reasons for failed SDD. The overall patient satisfaction rate was 94%.
CONCLUSION: This systematic review with meta-analysis found an overall successful SDD rate of 88% after UKA in a heterogeneous cohort of selected and unselected patients. Readmission, complication and reoperation rates suggest UKA can be performed safely and effectively as a same-day discharge procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of level III and IV studies.
© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical pathway; Day-case arthroplasty; Knee; Outpatient; Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Year:  2022        PMID: 35951077      PMCID: PMC9366132          DOI: 10.1007/s00167-022-07094-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.114


  44 in total

1.  Meta-analysis in clinical trials.

Authors:  R DerSimonian; N Laird
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1986-09

2.  Inpatient Versus Outpatient Arthroplasty: A Single-Surgeon, Matched Cohort Analysis of 90-Day Complications.

Authors:  Brian Darrith; Nicholas B Frisch; Matthew W Tetreault; Michael P Fice; Chris N Culvern; Craig J Della Valle
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Outpatient surgery for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is effective and safe.

Authors:  Nanne P Kort; Yoeri F L Bemelmans; Martijn G M Schotanus
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Comparison of day-case versus inpatient uni-compartmental knee replacement.

Authors:  Neng-Ping Gao; Oday Al-Dadah
Journal:  Musculoskeletal Care       Date:  2022-06-02

5.  The patient perspective, experience and satisfaction of day case unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A short-term mixed-methods study.

Authors:  K T Patel; T L Lewis; P Gill; M Chatterton
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  The feasibility and perioperative complications of outpatient knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Richard A Berger; Sharat K Kusuma; Sheila A Sanders; Elizabeth S Thill; Scott M Sporer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Is Outpatient Arthroplasty Safe? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Monketh Jaibaji; Andrea Volpin; Fares S Haddad; Sujith Konan
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Ambulatory unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Short outcome of 50 first cases.

Authors:  N Ruiz; X Buisson; G Filippi; M Roulet; H Robert
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 2.256

9.  Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range.

Authors:  Xiang Wan; Wenqian Wang; Jiming Liu; Tiejun Tong
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Outpatient unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: who is afraid of outpatient surgery?

Authors:  Alexander Hoorntje; Koen L M Koenraadt; Margreet G Boevé; Rutger C I van Geenen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 4.342

View more
  1 in total

1.  Exploring the relationship between bearing extrusion and postoperative persistent pain in Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A trajectory measurement study.

Authors:  Pengfei Wen; Qidong Zhang; Xiaowei Sun; Binfei Zhang; Tao Ma; Yumin Zhang
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-09-29
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.