Isabel Methfessel1, Michael Belz2, Fabienne Bühler2, David Zilles-Wegner2. 1. Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Von-Siebold-Str. 5, 37075, Göttingen, Deutschland. isabel.methfessel@med.uni-goettingen.de. 2. Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Von-Siebold-Str. 5, 37075, Göttingen, Deutschland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The application of ECT in Germany varies widely depending on regional availability. This shortfall in ECT supply is partly compensated via referrals to hospitals with ECT services, yet restricted by limited resources in these clinics. OBJECTIVE: External referrals for ECT were investigated at the University Medical Center Göttingen. We analyzed the referring institutions, patient characteristics, pharmacotherapy according to current guidelines before indications for ECT, and clinical outcome in cases of treatment with ECT. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All external referrals were systematically recorded and retrospectively evaluated for the time span of 1 year. Besides descriptive presentation of the data, pharmacological pretreatment was compared with the current guideline recommendations. We used overall clinical impression (CGI-I) to determine the treatment response post-ECT. RESULTS: External referrals were made for N = 52 patients, 82.7% of whom were from the inpatient setting and from a distance of up to 300 km. The most common diagnoses were unipolar depression (57.7%), followed by schizophrenia spectrum (36.5%). Prior to referral, at least one guideline-based pretreatment was given in the majority of cases. ECT was performed in 18 patients in our hospital, of whom 72.7% showed a good to very good response. CONCLUSION: Both numbers and radius of external referrals indicate a high unmet need for ECT and thus limited access to this evidence-based and guideline-recommended therapy. As treatment close to home should be the goal, more hospitals are needed to establish (or expand) ECT services; however, even with considerable delays which are often associated with external referrals, the response rate is good across all diagnoses.
BACKGROUND: The application of ECT in Germany varies widely depending on regional availability. This shortfall in ECT supply is partly compensated via referrals to hospitals with ECT services, yet restricted by limited resources in these clinics. OBJECTIVE: External referrals for ECT were investigated at the University Medical Center Göttingen. We analyzed the referring institutions, patient characteristics, pharmacotherapy according to current guidelines before indications for ECT, and clinical outcome in cases of treatment with ECT. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All external referrals were systematically recorded and retrospectively evaluated for the time span of 1 year. Besides descriptive presentation of the data, pharmacological pretreatment was compared with the current guideline recommendations. We used overall clinical impression (CGI-I) to determine the treatment response post-ECT. RESULTS: External referrals were made for N = 52 patients, 82.7% of whom were from the inpatient setting and from a distance of up to 300 km. The most common diagnoses were unipolar depression (57.7%), followed by schizophrenia spectrum (36.5%). Prior to referral, at least one guideline-based pretreatment was given in the majority of cases. ECT was performed in 18 patients in our hospital, of whom 72.7% showed a good to very good response. CONCLUSION: Both numbers and radius of external referrals indicate a high unmet need for ECT and thus limited access to this evidence-based and guideline-recommended therapy. As treatment close to home should be the goal, more hospitals are needed to establish (or expand) ECT services; however, even with considerable delays which are often associated with external referrals, the response rate is good across all diagnoses.
Authors: Clémence Cabelguen; Pascal Caillet; Emmanuel Poulet; David Szekely; Thomas Desmidt; Anne Pichot; Jean-Marie Vanelle; Anne Sauvaget; Samuel Bulteau Journal: J ECT Date: 2020-12 Impact factor: 3.635
Authors: Pia Nordanskog; Martin Hultén; Mikael Landén; Johan Lundberg; Lars von Knorring; Axel Nordenskjöld Journal: J ECT Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 3.635