| Literature DB >> 3595055 |
Abstract
The fetus destined to be born rather than aborted has become increasingly an object of medical and moral concern. With considerable justification, women view this concern--which they share to a great degree--with suspicion that it will serve as a pretext for denying them social and economic equality with men. This article attempts to show that practical moral judgments about our obligations to not-yet-born children can be made without falling into the abyss of controversy surrounding abortion. By stressing the similarities in fathers' duties to their born children, we can also counter a measure of our historical propensity to view women's moral duties to their not-yet-born children as the overwhelmingly important feature of their moral lives, and resist the temptation to impose coercive public policies.Entities:
Keywords: Genetics and Reproduction; Behavior; Clinic Activities; Counseling; Decision Making; Ethics; Examinations And Diagnoses; Fetal Viability--religious aspects; Fetus--religious aspects; Genetic Technics--religious aspects; Laboratory Examinations And Diagnoses; Organization And Administration; Pregnancy; Program Activities; Programs; Reproduction
Mesh:
Year: 1987 PMID: 3595055
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Perinatol ISSN: 0095-5108 Impact factor: 3.430