X W Xie1,2, F Li1, G H Ling1, X Xie1, S Q Xu1,2, Y Y Chen1,2. 1. Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha 410011, China. 2. Department of Clinical Nursing, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha 410011, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To develop and test the health education knowledge assessment questionnaire for gout and to investigate the understanding degree of health education knowledge in patients with gout. METHODS: From June 2019 to June 2019, 150 cases of gout patients were enrolled.According to the literature review and the healthy education requirements of gout patients, the framework of education knowledge system was preliminarily formed.The pre-test questionnaire was obtained through two rounds of he Delphi technique.A survey of 150 patients with gout was carried out.The analysis and selection of the questionnaire were based on the coefficient of variation, the analysis of determination value, the correlation coefficient of the items and the total scores, and the exploratory factor analysis.In this study, we evaluated the reliability of internal consistency, semi-reliability.Validity test mainly included content validity and construct validity.In addition, a total of 150 patients with gout in our hospital and outpatient gout were selected to investigate the understanding degree of health education knowledge from June 2019 to December 2019. RESULTS: The significance of the first level index of the questionnaire was 3.83-5.00, the secondary index was 3.00-4.83, and the variation coefficient of each item was 0.31-1.23, and the critical ratio(CR) value of each item in this questionnaire was 3.168-8.333.The Pearson correlation coefficient of each item and the total score of this study was 0.319-0.544.After exploratory factor analysis, some topics were deleted in four dimensions, and there were 16 entries in the final questionnaire.Cronbach' s α coefficient of this questionnaire was 0.715, split-half reliability Spearman-Brown coefficient was 0.785, and retest reliability coefficient was 0.729. The correlation coefficient between each factor of this questionnaire and the total questionnaire was 0.300-0.701, and the correlation coefficient between each item of the questionnaire and each factor was 0.402-0.732, all P < 0.05. The results were statistically significant. By questionnaire investigation, the total score of questionnaire was (6.85±3.22), the score of disease-related knowledge was (2.03±1.24), the score of dietary guidance was (1.53± 1.06), the score of exercise guidance was (2.19±1.24), the score of medication guide was (1.24±1.22). CONCLUSION: The Health Education Knowledge Assessment Questionnaire For Gout has a good reliability and validity for measuring related content, the compilation process is scientific and the content is comprehensive, which can be further applied in clinic.The understanding degree of health education knowledge is low in Chinese patients with gout, and knowledge of gout medicine is lacking especially.
OBJECTIVE: To develop and test the health education knowledge assessment questionnaire for gout and to investigate the understanding degree of health education knowledge in patients with gout. METHODS: From June 2019 to June 2019, 150 cases of gout patients were enrolled.According to the literature review and the healthy education requirements of gout patients, the framework of education knowledge system was preliminarily formed.The pre-test questionnaire was obtained through two rounds of he Delphi technique.A survey of 150 patients with gout was carried out.The analysis and selection of the questionnaire were based on the coefficient of variation, the analysis of determination value, the correlation coefficient of the items and the total scores, and the exploratory factor analysis.In this study, we evaluated the reliability of internal consistency, semi-reliability.Validity test mainly included content validity and construct validity.In addition, a total of 150 patients with gout in our hospital and outpatient gout were selected to investigate the understanding degree of health education knowledge from June 2019 to December 2019. RESULTS: The significance of the first level index of the questionnaire was 3.83-5.00, the secondary index was 3.00-4.83, and the variation coefficient of each item was 0.31-1.23, and the critical ratio(CR) value of each item in this questionnaire was 3.168-8.333.The Pearson correlation coefficient of each item and the total score of this study was 0.319-0.544.After exploratory factor analysis, some topics were deleted in four dimensions, and there were 16 entries in the final questionnaire.Cronbach' s α coefficient of this questionnaire was 0.715, split-half reliability Spearman-Brown coefficient was 0.785, and retest reliability coefficient was 0.729. The correlation coefficient between each factor of this questionnaire and the total questionnaire was 0.300-0.701, and the correlation coefficient between each item of the questionnaire and each factor was 0.402-0.732, all P < 0.05. The results were statistically significant. By questionnaire investigation, the total score of questionnaire was (6.85±3.22), the score of disease-related knowledge was (2.03±1.24), the score of dietary guidance was (1.53± 1.06), the score of exercise guidance was (2.19±1.24), the score of medication guide was (1.24±1.22). CONCLUSION: The Health Education Knowledge Assessment Questionnaire For Gout has a good reliability and validity for measuring related content, the compilation process is scientific and the content is comprehensive, which can be further applied in clinic.The understanding degree of health education knowledge is low in Chinese patients with gout, and knowledge of gout medicine is lacking especially.
Entities:
Keywords:
Gout; Health education; Questionnaire; Reliability; Validity
Authors: Li Yun Zhang; H Ralph Schumacher; Hou Heng Su; Dai Lie; Janet Dinnella; Joshua F Baker; Joan M Von Feldt Journal: J Clin Rheumatol Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 3.517
Authors: Jan D Hirsch; Susan J Lee; Robert Terkeltaub; Dinesh Khanna; Jasvinder Singh; Andrew Sarkin; Jodi Harvey; Arthur Kavanaugh Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 2008-10-15 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: Tuhina Neogi; Tim L Th A Jansen; Nicola Dalbeth; Jaap Fransen; H Ralph Schumacher; Dianne Berendsen; Melanie Brown; Hyon Choi; N Lawrence Edwards; Hein J E M Janssens; Frédéric Lioté; Raymond P Naden; George Nuki; Alexis Ogdie; Fernando Perez-Ruiz; Kenneth Saag; Jasvinder A Singh; John S Sundy; Anne-Kathrin Tausche; Janitzia Vaquez-Mellado; Steven A Yarows; William J Taylor Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Bart Spaetgens; Tobias Pustjens; Lieke E J M Scheepers; Hein J E M Janssens; Sjef van der Linden; Annelies Boonen Journal: Clin Rheumatol Date: 2016-02-22 Impact factor: 2.980
Authors: Richard O Day; Lauren J Frensham; Amy D Nguyen; Melissa T Baysari; Eindra Aung; Annie Y S Lau; Nicholas Zwar; Jennifer Reath; Tracey Laba; Ling Li; Andrew McLachlan; William B Runciman; Rachelle Buchbinder; Robyn Clay-Williams; Enrico Coiera; Jeffrey Braithwaite; H Patrick McNeil; David J Hunter; Kevin D Pile; Ian Portek; Kenneth Mapson WIlliams; Johanna I Westbrook Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2017-10-16 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: John D FitzGerald; Nicola Dalbeth; Ted Mikuls; Romina Brignardello-Petersen; Gordon Guyatt; Aryeh M Abeles; Allan C Gelber; Leslie R Harrold; Dinesh Khanna; Charles King; Gerald Levy; Caryn Libbey; David Mount; Michael H Pillinger; Ann Rosenthal; Jasvinder A Singh; James Edward Sims; Benjamin J Smith; Neil S Wenger; Sangmee Sharon Bae; Abhijeet Danve; Puja P Khanna; Seoyoung C Kim; Aleksander Lenert; Samuel Poon; Anila Qasim; Shiv T Sehra; Tarun Sudhir Kumar Sharma; Michael Toprover; Marat Turgunbaev; Linan Zeng; Mary Ann Zhang; Amy S Turner; Tuhina Neogi Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2020-05-11 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Mengying Sun; Ana I Vazquez; Richard J Reynolds; Jasvinder A Singh; Mathew Reeves; Tony R Merriman; Angelo L Gaffo; Gustavo de Los Campos Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2018-05-03 Impact factor: 5.156