| Literature DB >> 35949248 |
John S Kinsey1, Robert Giannelli2, Robert Howard3, Brandon Hoffman4, Richard Frazee5, Michael Aldridge2, Cullen Leggett2, Katherine Stevens6, David Kittelson7, William Silvis8, Jeffrey Stevens2, Prem Lobo9, Steven Achterberg10, Jacob Swanson7, Kevin Thomson11, Timothy McArthur12, Donald Hagen10, Max Trueblood10, Lindsay Wolff13, David Liscinsky14, Russell Arey15, Kate Cerully16, Richard Miake-Lye17, Timothy Onasch17, Andrew Freedman17, William Bachalo18, Gregory Payne18, Mikal Durlicki12.
Abstract
The SAE International has published Aerospace Information Report (AIR) 6241 which outlined the design and operation of a standardized measurement system for measuring non-volatile particulate matter (nvPM) mass and number emissions from commercial aircraft engines. Prior to this research, evaluation of this system by various investigators revealed differences in nvPM mass emissions measurement on the order of 15-30% both within a single sampling system and between two systems operating in parallel and measuring nvPM mass emissions from the same source. To investigate this issue, the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency in collaboration with the U. S. Air Force's Arnold Engineering Development Complex initiated the VAriable Response In Aircraft nvPM Testing (VARIAnT) research program to compare nvPM measurements within and between AIR-compliant sampling systems used for measuring combustion aerosols generated both by a 5201 Mini-CAST soot generator and a J85-GE-5 turbojet engine burning multiple fuels. The VARIAnT research program has conducted four test campaigns to date. The first campaign (VARIAnT 1) compared two essentially identical commercial versions of the sampling system while the second campaign (VARIAnT 2) compared a commercial system to the custom-designed Missouri University of Science and Technology's North American Reference System (NARS) built to the same specifications. Comparisons of nvPM particle mass (i.e., black carbon), number, and size were conducted in both campaigns. Additionally, the sensitivity to variation in system operational parameters was evaluated in VARIAnT 1. Results from both campaigns revealed agreement of about 12% between the two sampling systems, irrespective of manufacturer, in all aspects except for black carbon determination. The major source of measurement differences (20-70%) was due to low BC mass measurements made by the Artium Technologies LII-300 as compared to the AVL 483 Micro-Soot Sensor, the Aerodyne Cavity Attenuated Phase Shift (CAPS PMSSA) monitor, and the thermal-optical reference method for elemental carbon (EC) determination, which was used as the BC reference.Entities:
Keywords: Aerosol sampling systems; Aircraft turbine engines; Black carbon; Combustion aerosols; Elemental carbon; Laboratory generated soot
Year: 2021 PMID: 35949248 PMCID: PMC9358972 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2020.105734
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Aerosol Sci ISSN: 0021-8502 Impact factor: 4.586