| Literature DB >> 35948648 |
Brian Diskin1, Salma Adam1, Gustavo Sanchez Soto1, Miguel Liria1, Berk Aykut1, Belen Sundberg1, Eric Li1, Joshua Leinwand1, Ruonan Chen1, Mirhee Kim1, Ruben D Salas1, Marcelo F Cassini1, Chandan Buttar1, Wei Wang1, Mohammad Saad Farooq1, Sorin A A Shadaloey1, Gregor Werba1, Amreek Fnu1, Fan Yang1, Carolina Hirsch1, John Glinski1, Angilee Panjwani1, Yael Weitzner1, Deirdre Cohen2, George Miller3,4,5.
Abstract
Response to cancer immunotherapy in primary versus metastatic disease has not been well-studied. We found primary pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) is responsive to diverse immunotherapies whereas liver metastases are resistant. We discovered divergent immune landscapes in each compartment. Compared to primary tumor, liver metastases in both mice and humans are infiltrated by highly anergic T cells and MHCIIloIL10+ macrophages that are unable to present tumor-antigen. Moreover, a distinctive population of CD24+CD44-CD40- B cells dominate liver metastases. These B cells are recruited to the metastatic milieu by Muc1hiIL18hi tumor cells, which are enriched >10-fold in liver metastases. Recruited B cells drive macrophage-mediated adaptive immune-tolerance via CD200 and BTLA. Depleting B cells or targeting CD200/BTLA enhanced macrophage and T-cell immunogenicity and enabled immunotherapeutic efficacy of liver metastases. Our data detail the mechanistic underpinnings for compartment-specific immunotherapy-responsiveness and suggest that primary PDA models are poor surrogates for evaluating immunity in advanced disease.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35948648 DOI: 10.1038/s41388-022-02425-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncogene ISSN: 0950-9232 Impact factor: 8.756