Literature DB >> 35946767

The Baecke Habitual Physical Activity Questionnaire (BHPAQ): a valid internal structure of the instrument to assess healthy Brazilian adults.

Daniel Santos Rocha1, Almir Vieira Dibai-Filho2, Jocassia Silva Pinheiro2, Lisiane Fernanda Simeão de Azevedo3, Angela Falcai3, Rudys Rodolfo de Jesus Tavarez4, Adriana Sousa Rego5, Gabriela Nascimento de Santana6, Cid André Fidelis de Paula Gomes6, Daniela Bassi-Dibai3,4,5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to validate the internal structure of the Brazilian version of the Baecke Habitual Physical Activity Questionnaire.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted with individuals over 18 years old of both sexes, with Brazilian Portuguese as their native language. The structure of the Baecke Habitual Physical Activity Questionnaire was tested by confirmatory factor analysis. The model fit was evaluated by the following indices: root mean square error of approximation, comparative fit index, Tucker-Lewis index, standardized root mean square residual, and χ²/degrees of freedom. We used the Akaike information criterion and Bayesian information criterion to compare different structures of the Baecke Habitual Physical Activity Questionnaire.
RESULTS: A total of 241 individuals participated in this study. The original structure of the Baecke Habitual Physical Activity Questionnaire with 16 items and 3 domains was compared to a structure with 14 items and 3 domains. The internal structure of the Baecke Habitual Physical Activity Questionnaire with 14 items showed better fit indices and lower Akaike information criterion and Bayesian information criterion values.
CONCLUSION: The best internal structure of the Brazilian version of the Baecke Habitual Physical Activity Questionnaire in adults presents 3 domains and 14 items.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35946767      PMCID: PMC9574949          DOI: 10.1590/1806-9282.20211374

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992)        ISSN: 0104-4230            Impact factor:   1.712


  6 in total

1.  [Methodology to evaluation the habitual physical activity in men aged 50 years or more].

Authors:  Alex Antonio Florindo; Maria do Rosario Dias de Oliveira Latorre; Patrícia Constante Jaime; Tomoe Tanaka; Cristiano Augusto de Freitas Zerbini
Journal:  Rev Saude Publica       Date:  2004-04-26       Impact factor: 2.106

2.  Reliability and validity of three physical activity questionnaires in Flemish males.

Authors:  R M Philippaerts; J Lefevre
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1998-05-15       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures.

Authors:  C A C Prinsen; L B Mokkink; L M Bouter; J Alonso; D L Patrick; H C W de Vet; C B Terwee
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  A short questionnaire for the measurement of habitual physical activity in epidemiological studies.

Authors:  J A Baecke; J Burema; J E Frijters
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 7.045

5.  Fear of Movement Is Not Associated With Objective and Subjective Physical Activity Levels in Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Flávia A Carvalho; Chris G Maher; Marcia R Franco; Priscila K Morelhão; Crystian B Oliveira; Fernanda G Silva; Rafael Z Pinto
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 3.966

6.  Validity and Reliability of the Persian Version of Baecke Habitual Physical Activity Questionnaire in Healthy Subjects.

Authors:  Meissam Sadeghisani; Farideh Dehghan Manshadi; Hadi Azimi; Ali Montazeri
Journal:  Asian J Sports Med       Date:  2016-05-31
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.