| Literature DB >> 35945757 |
Sixia Xie1, Xibiao Jia1,2, Tingting Li1, Yuanyuan Xu1, Weiwei Wu3, Yichao Qiu1, Shuang Yuan1, Xue Peng4, Hongjing Wang1,2.
Abstract
There are debates on the management of immature ovarian teratoma and its recurrence. This study aimed to report the incidence of pelvic masses after surgery for immature ovarian teratoma and to identify prognostic factors of disease-free survival after surgery, discussing aspects of primary treatment and postoperative management. Data on the diagnosis and treatment of patients with immature teratomas were collected. Follow-up data were acquired from clinic visits and telephone interviews. Disease-free survival was defined as the time interval between the initial surgery for immature ovarian teratoma and the diagnosis of a new pelvic mass. Survival curves were drawn using the Kaplan-Meire method, and multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazard regression model using PASW statistics software. The estimated 5-year disease-free survival and overall survival were 74.3% (95%CI 63.9%-84.7%) and 96.5% (95%CI 91.6%-100.0%), respectively. The incidence of growing teratoma syndrome and immature teratoma relapse at a median follow-up of 46 months were 20.0% and 7.7%, respectively. Two patients died of repeated relapses or repeated growing teratoma syndrome. Rupture of initial lesions (RR 4.010, 95%CI 1.035-5.531), lymph node dissection (RR 0.212, 95%CI 0.051-0.887) and adjuvant chemotherapy (RR 0.143, 95%CI 0.024-0.845) were independent prognostic factors for disease-free survival. The development of growing teratoma syndrome is more prevalent than relapse after treatment of immature ovarian teratomas. Lymph node dissection and chemotherapy are recommended to reduce recurrence. Close surveillance and active surgical intervention are important for the diagnosis and appropriate management of new pelvic masses.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35945757 PMCID: PMC9351857 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029727
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) ISSN: 0025-7974 Impact factor: 1.817
Figure 1.Survival curves calculated by relapse and GTS and a merged curve for total events. DFS = disease-free survival, GTS = growing teratoma syndrome.
Univariate analysis of clinical and pathologic parameters upon initial treatment.
| Parameters | Groups | N | 2-year DFS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WHO Grade | Grade I | 12 | 91.70% | 0.236 |
| Grade II | 33 | 81.80% | ||
| Grade III | 29 | 67.90% | ||
| FIGO stage | Stage I | 52 | 80.80% | 0.783 |
| Stage II/III | 22 | 76.80% | ||
| Ascites | <500 mL | 57 | 71.60% | 0.265 |
| ≥500 mL | 11 | 80.70% | ||
| Largest diameter | <16 cm | 31 | 74.20% | 0.356 |
| ≥16 cm | 34 | 85.20% | ||
| Rupture of ovarian cysts | Yes | 22 | 68.20% | 0.317 |
| Intact orN.A. | 52 | 82.20% | ||
| Lymph node involvement | Positive | 8 | 87.50% | 0.806 |
| Negative | 31 | 90.30% | ||
| Gliomatosis peritonei | Yes | 17 | 88.20% | 0.343 |
| No | 44 | 77.30% | ||
| Residual disease | Yes | 12 | 51.90% | 0.115 |
| No | 62 | 82.30% | ||
| Lymph node dissection | Yes | 38 | 89.70% | 0.003 |
| No | 36 | 56.70% | ||
| Chemotherapy | Yes | 60 | 82.90% | 0.273 |
| No | 14 | 66.70% |
Figure 2.Survival curves grouped by different parameters.
Multivariate analysis based on Cox proportional-hazard regression model.
| Parameters | Relative risk | 95.0% CI for relative risk | |
|---|---|---|---|
| WHO grade | 2.333 | 0.841–6.474 | 0.104 |
| Ascites | 0.883 | 0.171–4.550 | 0.881 |
| Rupture of ovarian cysts | 4.010 | 1.035–15.531 |
|
| Peritoneal dissemination | 2.857 | 0.471–17.341 | 0.254 |
| Residual disease | 2.569 | 0.461–14.304 | 0.282 |
| Lymph node dissection | 0.212 | 0.051–0.887 |
|
| Adjuvant chemotherapy | 0.143 | 0.024–0.845 |
|
Figure 3.Survival curves of LND and chemotherapy (stratified by grade). Notes: Survival curve for grade I is not available because all cases are censored in one of the arms.
Clinical characteristics of 18 patients with recurrences.
| Original IOTs | Episodes of recurrences | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patient no. | Age | Stage | Grade | Imaging | AFP | Event | Imaging | AFP | Event | Imaging | AFP | Outcome |
| 01 | 28 | III | II | ◐ | / | GTS | ◐ | normal | GTS | ◐ | normal | |
| 02 | 27 | I | III | / | elevated | GTS | ○ | normal | GTS | ● | normal | 41 |
| 03 | 15 | I | II | / | / | GTS | ○ | / | 36 | |||
| 04 | 17 | III | III | ◐ | elevated | GTS | ○ | normal | 38 | |||
| 05 | 26 | II | III | ● | elevated | GTS | ◐ | normal | 54 | |||
| 06 | 14 | III | III | / | elevated | Relapse | ◐ | normal | Relapse | ● | normal | |
| 07 | 17 | I | II | ◐ | / | Relapse | ◐ | elevated | GTS | ○ | normal | 106 |
| 08 | 18 | III | III | ◐ | elevated | GTS | ◐ | normal | 82 | |||
| 09 | 26 | I | III | ○ | / | GTS | ◐ | normal | 22 | |||
| 10 | 22 | I | III | ◐ | elevated | Relapse | ◐ | normal | 33 | |||
| 11 | 26 | I | II | / | normal | GTS | ○ | normal | 8 | |||
| 12 | 22 | I | III | ◐ | elevated | GTS | / | normal | 21 | |||
| 13 | 16 | I | I | ◐ | / | GTS | ○ | normal | 70 | |||
| 14 | 15 | I | III | / | elevated | Relapse | / | elevated | 33 | |||
| 15 | 21 | I | II | / | / | GTS | ◐ | normal | 52 | |||
| 16 | 45 | I | III | / | normal | Relapse | ◐ | elevated | 60 | |||
| 17 | 15 | I | II | / | / | GTS | / | / | GTS | ◐ | normal | 102 |
| 18 | 27 | II | II | / | / | GTS | ◐ | normal | GTS | ◐ | normal | 59 |