Literature DB >> 35945398

Deois flexuosa (Hemiptera: Cercopidae) in Perennial Forage Species (Poaceae): Quali-quantitative Impacts and Tolerance Expression.

Leandro do Prado Ribeiro1, Dylan Thomas Telles Amandio2, Adriana Lídia Santana Klock3, Cristiano Nunes Nesi3, Ângela Fonseca Rech4, Edson Luiz Lopes Baldin5.   

Abstract

This study aimed to characterize the quantitative and qualitative damage caused by Deois flexuosa (Walker) (Hemiptera: Cercopidae) adults in Axonopus catharinensis cv. SCS 315 Catarina and Cynodon dactylon (Tifton 85 and Jiggs cultivars) under different infestation densities and, consequently, the expression of tolerance-type resistance. For this purpose, potted plants were infested with different insect densities (0, 5, 10, 20, and 40 adults m-2). The impact of the infestation levels was assessed in the first growth cycle (10-day coexistence period) and in the regrowth (40 days after the first cut, without infestation) based on crop yield and chemical-bromatological composition as well as on photosynthetic pigments and hydrogen peroxide content. The principal component analysis relating infestation density and chemical-bromatological parameters showed a positive correlation between infestation density of D. flexuosa and the contents of neutral detergent fiber, acid detergent fiber, and the dry matter (DM). On the other hand, infestation density inversely correlated with the tillering rate, photosynthetic pigments (chlorophyll a and b, carotenoids), and iron content. In general, the impacts on DM production and chemical-bromatological composition were lower in A. catharinensis cv. SCS 315 Catarina when compared to the Cynodon species, possibly because A. catharinensis has higher tillering capacity and does not show a reduction in the photosynthetic pigments, which may act as compensating factors to D. flexuosa damage. Our results demonstrate that the A. catharinensis cultivar expresses tolerance-type resistance to D. flexuosa and constitutes an interesting option for pasturelands formation and diversification where this spittlebug species is an emerging pest.
© 2022. Sociedade Entomológica do Brasil.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Spittlebugs, Host plant resistance, Bermudagrass, Giant missionary grass, Chemical-bromatological composition

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35945398     DOI: 10.1007/s13744-022-00984-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neotrop Entomol        ISSN: 1519-566X            Impact factor:   1.650


  14 in total

1.  Chinch bug-resistant buffalograss: an investigation of tolerance, antixenosis, and antibiosis.

Authors:  Tiffany M Heng-Moss; Frederick P Baxendale; Terrance P Riordan; Linda Young; Kit Lee
Journal:  J Econ Entomol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  Levels of tolerance, antibiosis, and antixenosis among resistant buffalograsses and zoysiagrasses.

Authors:  Thomas E Eickhoff; Tiffany M Heng-Moss; Frederick P Baxendale; John E Foster
Journal:  J Econ Entomol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  Warm-Season (C4) Turfgrass Genotypes Resistant to Spittlebugs (Hemiptera: Cercopidae).

Authors:  M R Gusmão; J R Valério; F P Matta; F H D Souza; B B Z Vigna; A P Fávero; W Barioni; G R Inácio
Journal:  J Econ Entomol       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 2.381

4.  Physiological responses of resistant and susceptible buffalograsses to Blissus occiduus (Hemiptera: Blissidae) feeding.

Authors:  Tiffany Heng-Moss; Tulio Macedo; Lisa Franzen; Frederick Baxendale; Leon Higley; Gautam Sarath
Journal:  J Econ Entomol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Induction of insect plant resistance to the spittlebug Mahanarva fimbriolata Stål (Hemiptera: Cercopidae) in sugarcane by silicon application.

Authors:  A P Korndörfer; E Grisoto; J D Vendramim
Journal:  Neotrop Entomol       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.434

6.  Screening for resistance to adult spittlebugs (Hemiptera: Cercopidae) in Brachiaria spp.: methods and categories of resistance.

Authors:  Francisco López; Cesar Cardona; John W Miles; Guillermo Sotelo; James Montoya
Journal:  J Econ Entomol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.381

7.  Physiological and biochemical responses of resistant and susceptible wheat to injury by Russian wheat aphid.

Authors:  Lisa D Franzen; Andrea R Gutsche; Tiffany M Heng-Moss; Leon G Higley; Gautam Sarath; John D Burd
Journal:  J Econ Entomol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.381

8.  Gene expression profiling of tolerant barley in response to Diuraphis noxia (Hemiptera: Aphididae) feeding.

Authors:  A Gutsche; T Heng-Moss; G Sarath; P Twigg; Y Xia; G Lu; D Mornhinweg
Journal:  Bull Entomol Res       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 1.750

9.  Adaptability and Comparative Biology of Fall Armyworm on Maize and Perennial Forage Species and Relation with Chemical-Bromatological Composition.

Authors:  L P Ribeiro; A L S Klock; C N Nesi; F R G Luczkievicz; M R L Travi; A F Rech
Journal:  Neotrop Entomol       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 1.434

Review 10.  Plant Tolerance: A Unique Approach to Control Hemipteran Pests.

Authors:  Kyle G Koch; Kaitlin Chapman; Joe Louis; Tiffany Heng-Moss; Gautam Sarath
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 5.753

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.