Christina Lenschow1, Andreas Wennmann1, Anne Hendricks1, Christoph-Thomas Germer1, Martin Fassnacht2, Andreas Buck3, Rudolf A Werner3, Lars Plassmeier1, Nicolas Schlegel4. 1. Department of General, Visceral, Transplant, Vascular and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberduerrbacherstrasse 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany. 2. Department of Internal Medicine I, Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberduerrbacherstrasse 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany. 3. Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberduerrbacherstrasse 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany. 4. Department of General, Visceral, Transplant, Vascular and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberduerrbacherstrasse 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany. Schlegel_N@ukw.de.
Abstract
PURPOSE: A successful focused surgical approach in primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT) relies on accurate preoperative localization of the parathyroid adenoma (PA). Most often, ultrasound is followed by [99mTc]-sestamibi scintigraphy, but the value of this approach is disputed. Here, we evaluated the diagnostic approach in patients with surgically treated pHPT in our center with the aim to further refine preoperative diagnostic procedures. METHODS: A single-center retrospective analysis of patients with pHPT from 01/2005 to 08/2021 was carried out followed by evaluation of the preoperative imaging modalities to localize PA. The localization of the PA had to be confirmed intraoperatively by the fresh frozen section and significant dropping of the intraoperative parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels. RESULTS: From 658 patients diagnosed with pHPT, 30 patients were excluded from the analysis because of surgery for recurrent or persistent disease. Median age of patients was 58.0 (13-93) years and 71% were female. Neck ultrasound was carried out in 91.7% and localized a PA in 76.6%. In 23.4% (135/576) of the patients, preoperative neck ultrasound did not detect a PA. In this group, [99mTc]-sestamibi correctly identified PA in only 25.4% of patients. In contrast, in the same cohort, the use of [11C]-methionine or [11C]-choline PET resulted in the correct identification of PA in 79.4% of patients (OR 13.23; 95% CI 5.24-33.56). CONCLUSION: [11C]-Methionine or [11C]-choline PET/CT are superior second-line imaging methods to select patients for a focused surgical approach when previous ultrasound failed to identify PA.
PURPOSE: A successful focused surgical approach in primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT) relies on accurate preoperative localization of the parathyroid adenoma (PA). Most often, ultrasound is followed by [99mTc]-sestamibi scintigraphy, but the value of this approach is disputed. Here, we evaluated the diagnostic approach in patients with surgically treated pHPT in our center with the aim to further refine preoperative diagnostic procedures. METHODS: A single-center retrospective analysis of patients with pHPT from 01/2005 to 08/2021 was carried out followed by evaluation of the preoperative imaging modalities to localize PA. The localization of the PA had to be confirmed intraoperatively by the fresh frozen section and significant dropping of the intraoperative parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels. RESULTS: From 658 patients diagnosed with pHPT, 30 patients were excluded from the analysis because of surgery for recurrent or persistent disease. Median age of patients was 58.0 (13-93) years and 71% were female. Neck ultrasound was carried out in 91.7% and localized a PA in 76.6%. In 23.4% (135/576) of the patients, preoperative neck ultrasound did not detect a PA. In this group, [99mTc]-sestamibi correctly identified PA in only 25.4% of patients. In contrast, in the same cohort, the use of [11C]-methionine or [11C]-choline PET resulted in the correct identification of PA in 79.4% of patients (OR 13.23; 95% CI 5.24-33.56). CONCLUSION: [11C]-Methionine or [11C]-choline PET/CT are superior second-line imaging methods to select patients for a focused surgical approach when previous ultrasound failed to identify PA.
Authors: Constantin Smaxwil; Philip Aschoff; Gerald Reischl; Mirjam Busch; Joachim Wagner; Julia Altmeier; Oswald Ploner; Andreas Zielke Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2021-04-13 Impact factor: 4.241