Literature DB >> 35945270

Utility of tissue-specific gene expression scores for gene prioritization in Mendelian diseases.

Daiki Kato1,2, Satomi Mitsuhashi1, Fuyuki Miya3,4, Shinji Saitoh5, Nobuhiko Okamoto6, Tatsuhiko Tsunoda4,7, Yuta Kochi8.   

Abstract

In genetic testing of Mendelian diseases, it is a bioinformatics challenge to effectively prioritize disease-causing candidate genes listed from massively parallel sequencing. Tissue specificity of the gene expression levels may give a clue because it may reflect tissue-specific disease manifestation. However, considering poor correlations between mRNA and protein expression in some genes, it is not clear whether transcriptomics- or proteomics-based tissue specificity should be used to prioritize candidate genes. Therefore, we compared the efficiency of tissue-specific scores (TS scores) obtained from transcriptome and proteome data in prioritizing candidate genes for whole exome sequencing (WES) analysis of Mendelian disease patients. We show that both Protein and RNA TS scores are useful in prioritizing candidate genes in WES analysis, although diseases like coagulopathies get more benefit from Protein TS score. This study may provide useful evidence in developing new methods to effectively identify novel disease-causing genes.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Japan Society of Human Genetics.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35945270     DOI: 10.1038/s10038-022-01071-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1434-5161            Impact factor:   3.755


  7 in total

Review 1.  What can exome sequencing do for you?

Authors:  Jacek Majewski; Jeremy Schwartzentruber; Emilie Lalonde; Alexandre Montpetit; Nada Jabado
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 6.318

2.  A Quantitative Proteome Map of the Human Body.

Authors:  Lihua Jiang; Meng Wang; Shin Lin; Ruiqi Jian; Xiao Li; Joanne Chan; Guanlan Dong; Huaying Fang; Aaron E Robinson; Michael P Snyder
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 3.  The emerging landscape of single-molecule protein sequencing technologies.

Authors:  Javier Antonio Alfaro; Peggy Bohländer; Mingjie Dai; Mike Filius; Cecil J Howard; Xander F van Kooten; Shilo Ohayon; Adam Pomorski; Sonja Schmid; Amit Meller; Chirlmin Joo; Aleksei Aksimentiev; Eric V Anslyn; Georges Bedran; Chan Cao; Mauro Chinappi; Etienne Coyaud; Cees Dekker; Gunnar Dittmar; Nicholas Drachman; Rienk Eelkema; David Goodlett; Sébastien Hentz; Umesh Kalathiya; Neil L Kelleher; Ryan T Kelly; Zvi Kelman; Sung Hyun Kim; Bernhard Kuster; David Rodriguez-Larrea; Stuart Lindsay; Giovanni Maglia; Edward M Marcotte; John P Marino; Christophe Masselon; Michael Mayer; Patroklos Samaras; Kumar Sarthak; Lusia Sepiashvili; Derek Stein; Meni Wanunu; Mathias Wilhelm; Peng Yin
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 47.990

4.  Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.

Authors:  Sue Richards; Nazneen Aziz; Sherri Bale; David Bick; Soma Das; Julie Gastier-Foster; Wayne W Grody; Madhuri Hegde; Elaine Lyon; Elaine Spector; Karl Voelkerding; Heidi L Rehm
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 5.  Overview of the coagulation system.

Authors:  Sanjeev Palta; Richa Saroa; Anshu Palta
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2014-09

6.  A phenotype centric benchmark of variant prioritisation tools.

Authors:  Denise Anderson; Timo Lassmann
Journal:  NPJ Genom Med       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 8.617

7.  Personalised analytics for rare disease diagnostics.

Authors:  Denise Anderson; Gareth Baynam; Jenefer M Blackwell; Timo Lassmann
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 14.919

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.