Hyewon Chung1,2, Ji Yong Park3,4,5,6, Kyuwan Kim4,5, Ran Ji Yoo4,5, Minseok Suh7, Gyo Jeong Gu1, Jin Sil Kim4, Tae Hyeon Choi4,7, Jung Woo Byun4, Young Wook Ju8, Wonshik Han8, Han Suk Ryu9, Gehoon Chung6,10, Do Won Hwang4,11, Yujin Kim3, Hye-Ryun Kang3, Yi Rang Na12, Hongyoon Choi4, Hyung-Jun Im7,13, Yun-Sang Lee3,4,5, Seung Hyeok Seok1,3. 1. Macrophage Lab, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, and Institute of Endemic Disease, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea. 2. Bio-MAX Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea. 3. Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea. 4. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea. 5. Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea. 6. Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea. 7. Department of Molecular Medicine and Biopharmaceutical Sciences, Graduate School of Convergence Science and Technology, Seoul National University, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea. 8. Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea. 9. Department of Pathology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea. 10. Department of Oral Physiology, Seoul National University, School of Dentistry, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea. 11. Research and Development Center, THERABEST, Co. Ltd., Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea. 12. Transdisciplinary Department of Medicine and Advanced Technology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea. 13. Research Institute for Convergence Science, Seoul National University, Seoul 08823, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
The development of molecular imaging probes to identify key cellular changes within lung metastases may lead to noninvasive detection of metastatic lesions in the lung. In this study, we constructed a macrophage-targeted clickable albumin nanoplatform (CAN) decorated with mannose as the targeting ligand using a click reaction to maintain the intrinsic properties of albumin in vivo. We also modified the number of mannose molecules on the CAN and found that mannosylated serum albumin (MSA) harboring six molecules of mannose displayed favorable pharmacokinetics that allowed high-contrast imaging of the lung, rendering it suitable for in vivo visualization of lung metastases. Due to the optimized control of functionalization and surface modification, MSA enhanced blood circulation time and active/passive targeting abilities and was specifically incorporated by mannose receptor (CD206)-expressing macrophages in the metastatic lung. Moreover, extensive in vivo imaging studies using single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT and positron emission tomography (PET) revealed that blood circulation of time-optimized MSA can be used to discern metastatic lesions, with a strong correlation between its signal and metastatic burden in the lung.
The development of molecular imaging probes to identify key cellular changes within lung metastases may lead to noninvasive detection of metastatic lesions in the lung. In this study, we constructed a macrophage-targeted clickable albumin nanoplatform (CAN) decorated with mannose as the targeting ligand using a click reaction to maintain the intrinsic properties of albumin in vivo. We also modified the number of mannose molecules on the CAN and found that mannosylated serum albumin (MSA) harboring six molecules of mannose displayed favorable pharmacokinetics that allowed high-contrast imaging of the lung, rendering it suitable for in vivo visualization of lung metastases. Due to the optimized control of functionalization and surface modification, MSA enhanced blood circulation time and active/passive targeting abilities and was specifically incorporated by mannose receptor (CD206)-expressing macrophages in the metastatic lung. Moreover, extensive in vivo imaging studies using single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT and positron emission tomography (PET) revealed that blood circulation of time-optimized MSA can be used to discern metastatic lesions, with a strong correlation between its signal and metastatic burden in the lung.
Entities:
Keywords:
albumin nanoplatform; blood circulation; lung metastasis; macrophage; noninvasive imaging
The lung is a frequent site of metastases
from various cancers,
including breast, skin, and colon cancer, and lung metastases in patients
correlate with unfavorable prognosis.[1] Thus,
early detection of lung metastasis can be beneficial for patients,
as it will enable administration of appropriate and timely therapeutic
interventions.To detect metastatic lesions, positron emission
tomography (PET),
computed tomography (CT), and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
are currently being used as standard noninvasive strategies.[2−4] However, their sensitivity in detecting small metastases is limited.[5,6] Several types of nanoplatforms have been developed to overcome this
limitation; however, the pharmacokinetic limitations of the existing
nanoplatforms in reaching the metastatic lung constitute a major hurdle
in in vivo imaging of lung metastases.[7−10] For example, suboptimal blood circulation time and rapid clearance
by the reticuloendothelial system (RES), including the liver, compromise
the retention and transportation of nanoplatforms to the lungs. Furthermore,
the functionalization of nanoplatforms to enhance specific targeting
may alter their intrinsic properties and in vivo biodistribution,
rendering them unsuitable for detecting the metastatic lung, particularly
poorly vascularized and small metastatic lesions. Thus, a strategy
that utilizes both passive and active targeting and enhances retention
time and specific cellular internalization within metastatic lesions
is required.The use of macrophages is potentially beneficial
for in
vivo imaging of lung metastases. Macrophages are preferentially
recruited to metastatic microenvironments,[11,12] in which they avidly incorporate nanoparticles via phagocytosis
or endocytosis, favoring the accumulation of injected nanoparticles
at metastatic sites without functionalization. Moreover, macrophages
exhibit high tissue-penetrating ability into the poorly vascularized
hypoxic regions within the tumor.[13−16] Thus, taking advantage of the
aforementioned characteristics of macrophages, nanoparticles functionalized
with ligands specific for metastasis-associated macrophages would
further improve the targeting efficiency of the nanoformulations and
enable sensitive detection of lung metastasis. We have previously
used mannose as a target ligand for active targeting of macrophages
that highly express the mannose receptor.[17,18] So far, several nanomaterials, including iron oxide, polymers, and
liposomes, have been introduced as potential candidates for CD206-targeted in vivo imaging.[19−24] However, imaging using these nanomaterials in the clinic may be
challenging because of their large size, immunogenicity, and regulatory
hurdles associated with modification. Furthermore, current imaging
strategies that target CD206-expressing macrophages are primarily
aimed at imaging primary tumors or draining lymph nodes,[25,26] whereas distant metastases including those to the lung, other than
the lymph node, have not been considered completely in previous studies.Human serum albumin (HSA) has emerged as a promising biomolecule,
as it is biologically compatible and can be easily modified using
surface chemistry for drug delivery carriers.[27,28] In addition, the long circulation half-life of HSA enhances the
efficacy of drug delivery to the target site via enhanced permeability
and retention (EPR) effects.[29] Thus, compared
to other nanomaterials, the small size, low immunogenicity, and excellent
biocompatibility of HSA render it advantageous for in vivo diagnostic imaging and targeted delivery. Interestingly, a recent
study using an albumin-based platform for in vivo imaging of CD206-expressing macrophages showed promising results
in tumor imaging; however, metastatic lesions were not diagnosed satisfactorily.[26] One possible reason for this failure is that
albumin formed clusters with an average size of 130–140 nm,
which is ∼16-fold larger than the conventional size of albumin
(6–8 nm).[26,30] As the properties of albumin
may be altered during functionalization depending on the conditions
and compounds used in the reaction, harsh conditions such as low or
high pH or using reducing agents presumably led to albumin aggregation,
thereby shortening the in vivo circulation half-life
and limiting its accumulation at metastatic sites, including the lungs,
as confirmed by similar levels of uptake of CD206-targeted and nontargeted
HSA.To circumvent these problems, we recently reported a click
chemistry-based
nanoplatform in which a clickable albumin nanoplatform (CAN) was easily
functionalized for in vivo imaging with sufficient
circulation half-life.[31] Moreover, as the
physical and radiochemical properties of albumin were maintained to
some extent during functionalization, the potency of HSA in
vivo may be further amplified by the EPR effect, as well
as the secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC) produced
in the local metastatic microenvironment,[32] thereby facilitating cellular internalization of HSA within the
metastatic sites.Here, we report the design, synthesis, and
optimization of mannosylated
serum albumin (MSA) as an imaging probe for detecting metastatic lung
lesions. The optimized MSA was preferentially internalized by metastasis-associated
macrophages, and thus, lung metastatic lesions were quantitatively
visualized in tumor models. Hence, we believe that noninvasive imaging
of MSA may be a promising strategy for the identification of lung
metastatic lesions, which may increase the therapeutic output in a
substantial number of patients.
Results and Discussion
Construction and Characterization of MSA
Based on previously
reported half-life data,[31] we selected
the degree of functionalization (DOF) of CAN and functionalized it
using Man-N3 as a targeting molecule to synthesize MSA
(Figures A and S1A), while the range of modification level was
selected using slightly different reaction ratios. In addition, as
the mannose level is known to affect targeting ability, click reaction
conditions in which the number of mannose molecules on the albumin
surface differed by two conjugation levels each were used.[33] Reactions 1 (R1) to 4 (R4) had molar ratios
of albumin to azadibenzocyclooctyne-N-hydroxysuccinimide
(ADIBO-NHS) of 3.5, 7, 14, and 28, respectively. Matrix-assisted laser
desorption ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) spectroscopy showed
that the mass increased according to the reaction ratio (Figure B). The increase
in molecular weight according to reaction ratios and the number of
attached ADIBOs and DOFs can be calculated, as confirmed using MALDI-TOF
bases DOF (Figure C). The UV–visible spectrum also showed increase in peak intensities
at specific wavelengths for both albumin (peak intensity at 280 nm,
black square box) and ADIBO (peak intensity at 309 nm, blue square
box) according to the reaction ratio (Figure D). The methods for calculating DOF were
confirmed previously using a simple equation that shows the correlation
between the MALDI-TOF results and intraclass correlation (ICC) of
0.991 (Figure S1B).[31] The peak intensities of albumin and ADIBO showed correlation
coefficient (R2) of 0.9992, indicating
that the increase in peak intensity at the wavelength of albumin was
due to the change in peak intensity of ADIBO. The UV-based number
of attached ADIBOs and DOFs can be calculated and shown in UV-based
DOF bases (Figure C and E). We prepared CANs with different DOFs and finally chose
R2 and R3 as candidates for further experiments. The CAN with six
DOFs was denoted as AD-Alb(6), which was synthesized using the R2
reaction conditions. Eleven DOFs were denoted as AD-Alb(11) and were
synthesized under R3 reaction conditions. For in vitro fluorescence imaging, both AD-Alb(6) and AD-Alb(11) were conjugated
to an azide functional dye (FL-N3). To optimize the number
of mannose molecules on Albs, we added azide functional mannose (Man-N3) to AD-Alb(6) and AD-Alb(11) at different reaction ratios
(4-, 6-, 8-, and 12-fold excesses). Finally, we prepared mannose-functionalized
HSAs with four different mannose levels, with two, four, six, and
eight DOFs, denoted as Man(2)-Alb-FL, Man(4)-Alb-FL, Man(6)-Alb-FL
and Man(8)-Alb-FL, respectively. In addition, Man(6)-Alb-FL, described
later, has the same number of FLs as Alb(11)-FL. Subsequently, even
if FL is not mentioned, same quantities of it are always conjugated
to all CANs. The UV and MALDI-based data and calculated results are
shown using the same methods of CAN formulation (Figures C,F and S2A).
Figure 1
Construction and characterization of MSA. (A) Schematic
representation
of MSAs using click reaction in AD-Alb with other functional molecules.
(B) MALDI-TOF data of AD-Alb according to the reaction ratio. (C)
Comparison of DOF on each albumin sample using UV-based analysis and
MALDI-TOF-based calculation. (D) UV spectrum of the same albumin sample
used in MALDI-TOF measurement of AD-Albs. (E) UV-based calculated
data of each type of AD-Albs. (F) UV-spectrum of Man-Alb and AD-Alb
according to reaction ratio. (G) Size data of all AD-Alb and Man-Alb
using DLS after averaging five measurements. (H) TEM image analysis
using selected samples to be used for in vitro and in vivo experiments. Scale bar = 500 nm; 250 nm for the
magnified images.
Construction and characterization of MSA. (A) Schematic
representation
of MSAs using click reaction in AD-Alb with other functional molecules.
(B) MALDI-TOF data of AD-Alb according to the reaction ratio. (C)
Comparison of DOF on each albumin sample using UV-based analysis and
MALDI-TOF-based calculation. (D) UV spectrum of the same albumin sample
used in MALDI-TOF measurement of AD-Albs. (E) UV-based calculated
data of each type of AD-Albs. (F) UV-spectrum of Man-Alb and AD-Alb
according to reaction ratio. (G) Size data of all AD-Alb and Man-Alb
using DLS after averaging five measurements. (H) TEM image analysis
using selected samples to be used for in vitro and in vivo experiments. Scale bar = 500 nm; 250 nm for the
magnified images.Further analysis was performed to measure the molecular
sizes and
zeta potentials (Figure G and Table ) of
AD-Alb and Man-Alb using dynamic light scattering (DLS). The hydrodynamic
diameters of all products were similar irrespective of the DOF and
mannose levels. The sizes and size distributions of all Man-Alb, including
AD-Alb, used as imaging agents for the animal model, were also measured
using the DLS method and were found to be almost similar (8–9
nm) to that of natural albumin (Figure S2B), and the polydispersity index (PDI) values were around 0.2, except
those of AD-Alb(20), which were slightly high, but had no considerable
effect on in vivo imaging for targeting macrophages.
However, the zeta potentials tended to decrease as the DOFs increased,
which represents the masking of the amine group on albumin (Table ). The MSAs also showed
slightly different zeta values; however, the results were within the
margin of error. The morphologies of AD-Alb(11) and Man(6)-Alb were
examined using transmission electron microscopy (TEM). As shown in
the TEM images, AD-Alb(11) and Man(6)-Alb exhibited a uniform morphology,
with an average size of ∼10 nm (Figure H). The structures of other AD-Alb and MSAs
were also confirmed by TEM (Figure S3).
It is noteworthy that, unlike conventional albumin nanoclusters, MSAs
maintained their original size and morphology even after various modifications,
including conjugation with ADIBO-NHS, click reactions with mannose,
and fluorescence dyes.
Table 1
Size and Zeta Potential of Samples
sample
size (nm)
PDI
zeta potential (mV)
albumin
9.844 ± 1.8
0.217
–14.1 ± 4.44
AD-Alb(2)
9.568 ± 1.3
0.233
–16.7 ± 9.36
AD-Alb(6)
8.604 ± 1.6
0.211
–18.1 ± 10.5
AD-Alb(11)
8.503 ± 1.2
0.276
–20.6 ± 4.24
AD-Alb(20)
8.246 ± 1.5
0.405
–34.7 ± 7.27
Man(2)-Alb
8.539 ± 0.7
0.241
–20.7 ± 8.81
Man(4)-Alb
8.882 ± 0.4
0.210
–21.8 ± 13.4
Man(6)-Alb
8.544 ± 0.6
0.211
–22.1 ± 7.30
Man(8)-Alb
8.578 ± 0.4
0.226
–23.4 ± 5.51
Pharmacokinetics and Biodistribution of MSA
DOF alters
the pharmacokinetics and in vivo distribution of
albumin. As DOF increased, circulation time and blood pool activity
tended to decrease, whereas liver uptake significantly increased.
In this context, low DOF may be more advantageous than high DOF; however,
the number of functional groups of low DOF that can be added is limited.
In addition, imaging probes with blood retention can show stronger
signals in the lungs, which renders differentiation of small metastatic
lesions in the lungs challenging. To address this issue, we performed
biodistribution studies of MSA derivatives with different conjugation
levels of mannose using PET imaging analysis to determine the optimal
pharmacokinetic properties of MSAs as in vivo lung
imaging agents in healthy mice (Figure A). We introduced two or four mannose molecules into
AD-Alb(6) and six or eight mannose molecules into AD-Alb(11) and compared
their biodistribution based on the images (Figure B). As expected, AD-Alb(6) and AD-Alb(11)
showed a similar distribution pattern and circulation half-life of
6.75 ± 0.85 and 6.98 ± 1.80 h, respectively (Figure C and Table ). Interestingly, despite the same DOF, the
blood circulation half-life differed significantly with the mannose
level (Tables and 3). As the amount of mannose increased, higher liver
uptake was observed 2 h after injection (Table ). In the case of two or four mannose residues,
liver uptake increased with time compared to that observed for AD-Alb(6),
although the difference in imaging was not sufficient for it to qualify
as an imaging probe. However, for Man(6)-Alb, which has six mannose
residues, the blood circulation half-life was as high as that of Man(4)-Alb,
while it showed high liver uptake, similar to that observed for Man(8)-Alb.
In particular, Man(6)-Alb and Man(8)-Alb showed a low image signal
of the lungs after 24 h; therefore, it was possible to select an imaging
time point to monitor metastatic lesions in the lung. In addition,
the elimination time (β half-life, T1/2β) indicated the removal time from the blood, which tended to decrease
with increase in mannose level (Table ). In particular, Man(6)-Alb had similar T1/2β values as those of AD-Albs, and liver uptake
was as high as that of Man(8)-Alb; hence, it is considered to be the
most optimized MSA for in vivo lung imaging. At this
time, as the β half-life of Man(6)-Alb is almost 19 h, we concluded
that obtaining images after that time point can minimize the effect
of signals from the blood pool. Importantly, at 24 h, Man(6)-Alb imaging
showed similar levels of liver uptake as AD-Alb(11). In this case,
other distribution images of the body at 24 h were similar, whereas
only the metastatic lung might represent different uptake patterns,
which depended on mannose targeting to macrophages.
Figure 2
Pharmacokinetics and
biodistribution of MSA. (A) Image-based evaluation
strategy according to the number of ADIBO groups and mannose for optimized
image agent. (B) Alteration of biodistribution according to DOF. The
biodistribution of AD-Alb(6) and AD-Alb(11) was compared using serial in vivo PET imaging as a control for selecting the optimal
number of Man-Albs. (C) Time–activity curve of AD-Albs and
Man-Albs in the blood, liver, and lung. The graph shows the in vivo pharmacokinetics of the imaging agent. n = 5 mice/group. (D) Representative confocal immunofluorescent images
of Man(6)-Alb-FL (red) and DAPI (nucleus, blue) in GM-BMM, M-BMM,
and 4T1 cells. Scale bar = 50 μm. (E) Quantification of in vitro uptake of AD-Alb(11)-FL or Man(6)-Alb-FL as measured
using flow cytometry after incubation for 1 h. n =
4–6/group. Data are normalized to each cell (GM-BMM, M-BMM,
and 4T1) treated with AD-Alb(11)-FL. Data show means ± SEM. ****P < 0.0001 using Student’s t test.
N.S.: nonsignificant.
Table 2
Pharmacokinetics of MSAs with Different
DOFs
T1/2α (h)
T1/2β (h)
avg
SD
avg
SD
AD-Alb(6)
6.75
0.85
19.08
0.92
AD-Alb(11)
6.98
1.80
21.05
5.21
Man(2)-Alb
5.19
0.95
24.84
6.73
Man(4)-Alb
3.44
0.14
20.24
1.11
Man(6)-Alb
3.49
0.17
19.21
4.05
Man(8)-Alb
2.99
0.12
16.48
1.65
Table 3
Quantification of MSAs Uptake in the
Blood, Liver, and Lung with Different DOF of ADIBO and Mannose Group
Measured Using PET Imaging
blood pool (% ID/g)
liver (% ID/g)
lung (% ID/g)
AD-Alb(6)
0 h
52.39 ± 2.46
15.77 ± 4.90
10.25 ± 2.99
2 h
45.03 ± 1.39
19.40 ± 3.32
7.33 ± 0.97
4 h
36.64 ± 0.98
22.45 ± 1.50
5.21 ± 0.53
24 h
15.17 ± 1.56
16.00 ± 3.70
1.98 ± 0.08
Man(2)-Alb
0 h
50.48 ± 2.30
15.48 ± 0.72
11.01 ± 2.1
2 h
42.97 ± 2.67
19.18 ± 2.33
6.88 ± 0.69
4 h
30.47 ± 2.25
25.84 ± 0.67
5.11 ± 0.51
24 h
13.47 ± 4.03
25.30 ± 2.62
1.57 ± 0.05
Man(4)-Alb
0 h
50.22 ± 1.15
17.20 ± 0.56
10.8 ± 1.15
2 h
35.43 ± 2.81
22.87 ± 2.47
5.22 ± 0.35
4 h
20.93 ± 0.91
27.50 ± 1.57
4.87 ± 0.81
24 h
11.27 ± 2.87
22.83 ± 2.73
1.1 ± 0.08
AD-Alb(11)
0 h
48.13 ± 2.19
19.23 ± 3.18
10.53 ± 3.33
2 h
42.79 ± 2.24
23.23 ± 2.08
6.97 ± 0.78
4 h
33.67 ± 1.82
28.07 ± 1.46
5.01 ± 0.74
24 h
15.17 ± 1.56
25.67 ± 3.48
1.54 ± 0.1
Man(6)-Alb
0 h
48.64 ± 4.27
22.50 ± 1.30
9.84 ± 2.54
2 h
33.33 ± 2.25
41.87 ± 2.51
5.37 ± 0.85
4 h
20.63 ± 1.53
47.49 ± 2.36
4.22 ± 0.33
24 h
8.17 ± 2.20
28.27 ± 2.91
0.49 ± 0.04
Man(8)-Alb
0 h
36.59 ± 1.39
29.63 ± 0.80
5.89 ± 1.22
2 h
17.00 ± 1.35
47.67 ± 2.30
2.8 ± 0.35
4 h
12.13 ± 1.40
49.43 ± 2.05
2.3 ± 0.4
24 h
3.63 ± 0.60
46.13 ± 1.83
0.43 ± 0.02
Pharmacokinetics and
biodistribution of MSA. (A) Image-based evaluation
strategy according to the number of ADIBO groups and mannose for optimized
image agent. (B) Alteration of biodistribution according to DOF. The
biodistribution of AD-Alb(6) and AD-Alb(11) was compared using serial in vivo PET imaging as a control for selecting the optimal
number of Man-Albs. (C) Time–activity curve of AD-Albs and
Man-Albs in the blood, liver, and lung. The graph shows the in vivo pharmacokinetics of the imaging agent. n = 5 mice/group. (D) Representative confocal immunofluorescent images
of Man(6)-Alb-FL (red) and DAPI (nucleus, blue) in GM-BMM, M-BMM,
and 4T1 cells. Scale bar = 50 μm. (E) Quantification of in vitro uptake of AD-Alb(11)-FL or Man(6)-Alb-FL as measured
using flow cytometry after incubation for 1 h. n =
4–6/group. Data are normalized to each cell (GM-BMM, M-BMM,
and 4T1) treated with AD-Alb(11)-FL. Data show means ± SEM. ****P < 0.0001 using Student’s t test.
N.S.: nonsignificant.The labeling conditions and efficiency of isotope-labeled
AD-Albs
and Man-Albs were also determined to assess the feasibility of using
them as probes for nuclear medicine imaging (Figure S4). In particular, as it is postlabeling via a click reaction,
the effects on physiochemical and morphology could be minimized, and
the stability of the label was confirmed to ensure its stability as
an imaging probe (Figure S5). These results
suggested that the optimal number of mannose molecules for obtaining
clear and quantitative images of the lung metastasis region using
imaging probes is six on AD-Alb(11). Thus, we used Man(6)-Alb as an in vivo circulation-controlled imaging probe in subsequent
analyses.We next examined the cellular uptake of Man(6)-Alb. In
vitro uptake of Man(6)-Alb was confirmed by the fact that
Man(6)-Alb uptake was more evident in M-CSF-grown bone marrow-derived
macrophages (M-BMMs), which expresses higher levels of CD206, than
in GM-CSF-grown bone marrow-derived macrophages (GM-BMMs) and 4T1
(Figures D,E and S6A). Additionally, we tested the cytotoxicity
and specificity of Man(6)-Alb uptake in M-BMMs. The incubation of
M-BMMs with Man(6)-Alb for 24 h showed little cytotoxicity (Figure S6B), and pretreatment of a saturating
amount of mannan (a natural ligand for CD206) effectively blocked
the binding to CD206, thereby leading to a significant inhibition
of Man(6)-Alb uptake by M-BMMs (Figure S6C). To further evaluate the specificity of Man(6)-Alb, an in vivo blocking study was performed in control mice (tumor-free,
TF), and we found that blocking of CD206 using mannan resulted in
a marked reduction in liver uptake of Man(6)-Alb to the level comparable
to that of untargeted AD-Alb(11) (Figure S7). These findings demonstrated that the internalization of Man(6)-Alb
is a CD206-dependent process.
Increase in Man(6)-Alb-FL Signal Directly Correlates with the
Metastatic Burden in the Lungs
First, we investigated the
correlation between [111In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL uptake and
the metastatic burden in vivo. Toward this, we constructed
an experimental metastasis model, in which 4T1 cancer cells were directly
injected into the tail. The degree of metastasis varied with the number
of cancer cells injected, i.e., high (1 × 105) or
low (5 × 104). Tumor-bearing mice were injected with
[111In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL and imaged after 24 h using SPECT/CT
(Figure A). The difference
in gross metastases in the lungs in these experimental metastasis
models was confirmed using histology (Figure B and C). As shown in Figure D and E, the [111In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL
signal appeared in the metastatic lung after injection and the intensity
of the SPECT signal was significantly high in the lungs of mice injected
with higher number of cancer cells (high met) than in those injected
with lower number (low met). The CD206-targeting specificity was further
confirmed by a decreased signal in metastatic lung after injection
of [111In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL with a blocking dose of mannan
(Figure S8). Interestingly, [111In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL showed excellent linear correlation (r = 0.9413) between the signal intensity and metastatic
burden, as is evident from the number of metastatic nodules in the
lung after intravenous injection of cancer cells (Figure F). The capability of [111In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL for the noninvasive detection of metastatic
lesions was further tested in a metastatic B16F10 melanoma model (Figure S9). Collectively, our data suggested
that MSA is a clinically applicable tracer with superior sensitivity
and specificity that is sufficient to noninvasively discern metastatic
lesions with strong correlation with the metastatic burden.
Figure 3
Increase in
[111In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL signal directly
correlates with the metastatic burden in the lung. (A) Schematic showing
SPECT/CT imaging of lung metastases in mice after intravenous injection
of different numbers of 4T1 cancer cells (low met vs high met). (B,C)
Different metastatic burdens induced by intravenous injection of low
(5 × 104) or high (1 × 105) number
of 4T1 cells were confirmed using H&E staining (B) and determining
the lesion area of lung metastatic foci and number of lung metastases
(C) 14 days after tumor injection. Scale bar = 100 μm. (D) Representative
SPECT/CT images (coronal, sagittal, and transverse views) of mice
with lower metastases and higher metastases 24 h after [In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL injection. [In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL was able to detect lung metastases (LM)
with significantly higher signal in lungs from the high met group
than in those from the low met group. (E) Ex vivo biodistribution of [In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL
in various organs of mice with lung metastases, expressed as % ID/g.
(F) Correlation between [In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL
signal and metastatic burden, as determined by the number of metastatic
foci in lungs from 4T1-bearing mice after intravenous tumor injection. n = 3–4 mice/group. Data represent the mean ±
SEM. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01
using Student’s t test.
Increase in
[111In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL signal directly
correlates with the metastatic burden in the lung. (A) Schematic showing
SPECT/CT imaging of lung metastases in mice after intravenous injection
of different numbers of 4T1 cancer cells (low met vs high met). (B,C)
Different metastatic burdens induced by intravenous injection of low
(5 × 104) or high (1 × 105) number
of 4T1 cells were confirmed using H&E staining (B) and determining
the lesion area of lung metastatic foci and number of lung metastases
(C) 14 days after tumor injection. Scale bar = 100 μm. (D) Representative
SPECT/CT images (coronal, sagittal, and transverse views) of mice
with lower metastases and higher metastases 24 h after [In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL injection. [In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL was able to detect lung metastases (LM)
with significantly higher signal in lungs from the high met group
than in those from the low met group. (E) Ex vivo biodistribution of [In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL
in various organs of mice with lung metastases, expressed as % ID/g.
(F) Correlation between [In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL
signal and metastatic burden, as determined by the number of metastatic
foci in lungs from 4T1-bearing mice after intravenous tumor injection. n = 3–4 mice/group. Data represent the mean ±
SEM. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01
using Student’s t test.
In Vivo Imaging of Lung Metastases in Orthotopic
Mouse Breast Tumors
The targeting ability and specificity
of Man(6)-Alb-FL for the detection of spontaneous lung metastases in vivo were evaluated in 4T1 tumor-bearing mice. Twenty-8
days after inoculating the orthotopic luciferase-expressing 4T1 (4T1-luc),
control mice (TF) and tumor-bearing mice (TB) with lung metastases
were intravenously injected with [111In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL,
and SPECT/CT images were acquired 24 h postinjection (Figure A). In addition to the substantial
uptake by the tumors, we demonstrated clearly high uptake in the lungs
of 4T1-bearing mice (TB), whereas no signal was observed in the lungs
of control mice (TF) (Figure B). Major organs, including the heart, lung, liver, stomach,
spleen, kidney, and intestine, and the tumor, were excised immediately
after imaging and subjected to ex vivo imaging of
colabeled FNR648 fluorescence. In agreement with the results of whole
body imaging, ex vivo fluorescence imaging confirmed
that [111In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL was incorporated by the lungs
of tumor-bearing mice, in which metastasis was confirmed using bioluminescence
imaging of injected 4T1-luc cells (Figures C and D). The uptake of [111In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL
by the liver was also observed in both tumor-free and tumor-bearing
mice, mainly because of the presence of CD206-expressing Kupffer cells
in this organ. [111In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL was also found to
be excreted via hepatobiliary routes, as indicated by the deposition
of fluorescence in the gastrointestinal tract (Figure D).
Figure 4
In vivo imaging of lung metastases
in orthotopic
mouse breast tumors. (A) Illustration of orthotopic injection of 4T1-luciferase
cells, followed by the intravenous injection of [111In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL
and SPECT/CT imaging. (B) Tumor-free mice (TF, control) and 4T1-bearing
mice (TB, day 28) were injected with [111In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL,
and SPECT/CT images were acquired 24 h postinjection. Representative
SPECT/CT images (coronal and sagittal views) imaged with [111In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL revealed strong signals in the lung metastases
(day 28). (C,D) Representative luminescence (C) and fluorescence (D)
images of multiple dissected organs (heart, lung, liver, stomach,
spleen, kidney intestine, and tumor) from tumor-free (TF) and 4T1-bearing
mice (TB) after SPECT/CT imaging on day 28. (E) SPECT/CT images of
4T1-bearing mice (TB) injected with [111In]In-Alb(11)-FL
or [111In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL on day 28. While [111In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL signals were detected in the lungs (LM), [111In]In-Alb(11)-FL signals were only detected in the heart
(He), but not in the lungs. (F) Ex vivo biodistribution
of [111In]In-Alb(11)-FL and [111In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL
in various organs of mice with lung metastases, expressed as % ID/g.
(G) Correlation between [111In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL signal
and metastatic burden, as determined from the number of metastatic
foci in lungs from 4T1-bearing mice after orthotopic tumor injection. n = 4 mice/group. Data represent the mean ± SD **P < 0.01 using Student’s t test.
In vivo imaging of lung metastases
in orthotopic
mouse breast tumors. (A) Illustration of orthotopic injection of 4T1-luciferase
cells, followed by the intravenous injection of [111In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL
and SPECT/CT imaging. (B) Tumor-free mice (TF, control) and 4T1-bearing
mice (TB, day 28) were injected with [111In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL,
and SPECT/CT images were acquired 24 h postinjection. Representative
SPECT/CT images (coronal and sagittal views) imaged with [111In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL revealed strong signals in the lung metastases
(day 28). (C,D) Representative luminescence (C) and fluorescence (D)
images of multiple dissected organs (heart, lung, liver, stomach,
spleen, kidney intestine, and tumor) from tumor-free (TF) and 4T1-bearing
mice (TB) after SPECT/CT imaging on day 28. (E) SPECT/CT images of
4T1-bearing mice (TB) injected with [111In]In-Alb(11)-FL
or [111In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL on day 28. While [111In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL signals were detected in the lungs (LM), [111In]In-Alb(11)-FL signals were only detected in the heart
(He), but not in the lungs. (F) Ex vivo biodistribution
of [111In]In-Alb(11)-FL and [111In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL
in various organs of mice with lung metastases, expressed as % ID/g.
(G) Correlation between [111In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL signal
and metastatic burden, as determined from the number of metastatic
foci in lungs from 4T1-bearing mice after orthotopic tumor injection. n = 4 mice/group. Data represent the mean ± SD **P < 0.01 using Student’s t test.To further demonstrate the specificity of MSA for in vivo applications, we directly compared [111In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL
with nontargeted albumin [111In]In-Alb(11)-FL. First, in
tumor-free mice, the biodistribution was checked 24 h postinjection
of [111In]In-Alb(11)-FL and [111In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL.
The lung uptake was similarly measured (Figure S10). Interestingly, in tumor-bearing mice, [111In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL uptake in the metastatic lung was significantly
higher than that of [111In]In-Alb(11)-FL, which was also
confirmed using the biodistribution analysis of [111In]In-Alb(11)-FL
and [111In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL (Figures E,F and Table ). A linear correlation was also observed between the
[111In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL signals in the lung (% ID/g) and
metastatic burden, as determined from the number of metastatic nodules
in the lung (r = 0.9535, Figure G). Taken together, these data showed that
the high accumulation of [111In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL in the
metastatic lung was attributed to the CD206-specific binding affinity
of Man(6)-Alb-FL during functionalization and its long circulation
time in vivo.
Table 4
Quantification of Uptake of [111In]In-Alb(11)-FL or [111In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL in
the Blood, Liver, and Lung from 4T1 Tumor-Bearing Mice Measured Using
PET Imaging
blood pool (% ID/g)
liver (% ID/g)
lung (% ID/g)
[111In]In-Alb(11)-FL
3.62 ± 0.28
15.13 ± 1.91
2.41 ± 0.15
[111In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL
1.28 ± 1.1
17.73 ± 2.56
5.11 ± 0.82
Confirmation of Man(6)-Alb-FL as a Macrophage-Targeted Probe
To monitor the selective targeting of [111In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL
among cells within the metastatic organ, the lungs were collected
immediately after imaging, followed by sectioning and staining with
CD206. CD206-expressing macrophages were predominantly localized adjacent
to metastatic lesions in the lungs, and the niches where macrophages
accumulated showed [111In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL fluorescence
(Figure A). Confocal
imaging at higher magnification allowed direct visualization of [111In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL uptake by macrophages at the cellular
level (Figure B).
For further evaluation, we quantitatively analyzed uptake using flow
cytometry. [111In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL uptake by CD206+ macrophages was approximately 4 times higher than that by
CD206– macrophages (Figure C).
Figure 5
Confirmation of Man(6)-Alb-FL as a macrophage-targeted
probe. (A)
Representative H&E stained images of lungs from 4T1-bearing mice
injected with Man(6)-Alb-FL 28 days after tumor injection (left).
Representative confocal immunofluorescent images showing in
vivo colocalization of injected Man(6)-Alb-FL (red) with
the CD206+ macrophages (green) within the lungs from 4T1-bearing
mice, as confirmed in the overlay image (yellow). The white dotted
lines indicate metastatic nodules in the lung. Scale bar = 75 μm.
Higher magnification view (B) further demonstrates CD206+ macrophage-specific uptake (yellow arrowheads) in vivo. DAPI, blue. Scale bar = 10 μm. (C,D) Quantification of CD206+ macrophage-specific uptake in vivo using
flow cytometry. (C) Man(6)-Alb-FL uptake by each gated CD206– macrophage (CD45+CD11b+F4/80+CD206–) and CD206+ macrophage (CD45+CD11b+F4/80+CD206+) subset was determined
from the fold change in the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of colabeled
fluorescent dye (FNR-648). (D) Fold change in MFI of colabeled FNR-648
on CD206+ macrophages from 4T1-bearing mice following injection
with Alb(11)-FL or Man(6)-Alb-FL. n = 4–7
mice/group. Data represent the mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05, ****P < 0.0001 using Student’s t test.
Confirmation of Man(6)-Alb-FL as a macrophage-targeted
probe. (A)
Representative H&E stained images of lungs from 4T1-bearing mice
injected with Man(6)-Alb-FL 28 days after tumor injection (left).
Representative confocal immunofluorescent images showing in
vivo colocalization of injected Man(6)-Alb-FL (red) with
the CD206+ macrophages (green) within the lungs from 4T1-bearing
mice, as confirmed in the overlay image (yellow). The white dotted
lines indicate metastatic nodules in the lung. Scale bar = 75 μm.
Higher magnification view (B) further demonstrates CD206+ macrophage-specific uptake (yellow arrowheads) in vivo. DAPI, blue. Scale bar = 10 μm. (C,D) Quantification of CD206+ macrophage-specific uptake in vivo using
flow cytometry. (C) Man(6)-Alb-FL uptake by each gated CD206– macrophage (CD45+CD11b+F4/80+CD206–) and CD206+ macrophage (CD45+CD11b+F4/80+CD206+) subset was determined
from the fold change in the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of colabeled
fluorescent dye (FNR-648). (D) Fold change in MFI of colabeled FNR-648
on CD206+ macrophages from 4T1-bearing mice following injection
with Alb(11)-FL or Man(6)-Alb-FL. n = 4–7
mice/group. Data represent the mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05, ****P < 0.0001 using Student’s t test.Interestingly, comparison of the signal intensity
of [111In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL and [111In]In-Alb(11)-FL
in CD206+ macrophages from 4T1-bearing mice revealed a
significantly
higher signal of [111In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL than that of [111In]In-Alb(11)-FL (Figure D), providing additional evidence that active targeting
with [111In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL leads to preferential accumulation
in metastasis-associated macrophages, which was beyond the mere passive
uptake of albumin via the EPR effect. Similarly, SPECT imaging revealed
sufficient accumulation of [111In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL in the
tumor 3–72 h after injection (Figure S11A) and confirmed its CD206-specific uptake (Figure S11B–D).
Multimodal Imaging of Man(6)-Alb-FL in Lung Metastasis Models
Based on the ability of Man(6)-Alb-FL to visualize lung metastasis
with low metastatic burden as well as the strong correlation between
its signal and metastatic burden in experimental metastasis models
(Figure ), we further
applied MSA to monitor small metastatic lesions in the spontaneous
metastasis model. In the established models, the 4T1 cancer cells
allowed colonization to result in the formation of discrete metastatic
lesions on day 21, as confirmed using histological analyses, which
grew to overt metastases in the lung on day 28 after the orthotopic
injection of the cancer cells. To monitor the signal in the lungs
of the 4T1-bearing mice on days 21 and 28 with different degrees of
metastatic burden, we injected [111In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL
and found that the signal intensity gradually increased in the lungs
until day 28 when substantial metastatic nodules were observed (Figure A). [111In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL also showed lymph node metastases on day 28.
Most notably, [111In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL imaging showed distinct
signals in the lungs on day 21, as evidenced by image-based visual
analysis and a 5.6-fold increase in the [111In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL
signal (% ID/g) compared to that in the tumor-free mice (Figure B). Furthermore, ex vivo biodistribution was similar in most of organs, except
for that in the lung with low metastases, which showed a higher uptake
of [111In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL (Figure C).
Figure 6
Multimodal imaging of Man(6)-Alb-FL in lung
metastasis models.
(A) Representative SPECT/CT images (MIP) with [In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL in tumor-free (TF) and 4T1-bearing mice
(TB) on days 21 and 28. The images revealed that [In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL was able to detect lung metastases (LM,
yellow arrowheads) at an earlier time (day 21) when metastatic burden
was relatively low. A strong signal was also observed in the lymph
node (white arrowhead). (B) Quantification of [In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL signal in the resected lung, expressed
as % ID/g. (C) Ex vivo biodistribution of [In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL in various organs of 4T1-bearing
mice 21 days after tumor injection. (D–H) Simultaneous PET/MRI
imaging of [64Cu]Cu-Man(6)-Alb-FL and CT imaging were performed
in tumor-free (TF) and 4T1-bearing mice (TB) on days 21 and 28. (D)
Representative PET/MRI images of [64Cu]Cu-Man(6)-Alb-FL.
(E) Quantification of [64Cu]Cu-Man(6)-Alb-FL signal in
the resected lung, expressed as % ID/g. (F) Representative H&E
stained images and quantification of metastatic lesion area in lungs
from 4T1-bearing mice on days 21 and 28. Scale bar = 50 μm.
(G,H) MRI (G) and CT (H) images (coronal, transverse, and sagittal
views) are also shown. Representative MRI and CT images show strong
signals from lung metastases on day 28, while no significant change
was detected at an earlier stage (day 21). n = 5–10
mice/group. Data represent mean ± SEM. **P <
0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P <
0.0001 using Student’s t test.
Multimodal imaging of Man(6)-Alb-FL in lung
metastasis models.
(A) Representative SPECT/CT images (MIP) with [In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL in tumor-free (TF) and 4T1-bearing mice
(TB) on days 21 and 28. The images revealed that [In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL was able to detect lung metastases (LM,
yellow arrowheads) at an earlier time (day 21) when metastatic burden
was relatively low. A strong signal was also observed in the lymph
node (white arrowhead). (B) Quantification of [In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL signal in the resected lung, expressed
as % ID/g. (C) Ex vivo biodistribution of [In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL in various organs of 4T1-bearing
mice 21 days after tumor injection. (D–H) Simultaneous PET/MRI
imaging of [64Cu]Cu-Man(6)-Alb-FL and CT imaging were performed
in tumor-free (TF) and 4T1-bearing mice (TB) on days 21 and 28. (D)
Representative PET/MRI images of [64Cu]Cu-Man(6)-Alb-FL.
(E) Quantification of [64Cu]Cu-Man(6)-Alb-FL signal in
the resected lung, expressed as % ID/g. (F) Representative H&E
stained images and quantification of metastatic lesion area in lungs
from 4T1-bearing mice on days 21 and 28. Scale bar = 50 μm.
(G,H) MRI (G) and CT (H) images (coronal, transverse, and sagittal
views) are also shown. Representative MRI and CT images show strong
signals from lung metastases on day 28, while no significant change
was detected at an earlier stage (day 21). n = 5–10
mice/group. Data represent mean ± SEM. **P <
0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P <
0.0001 using Student’s t test.We next investigated whether MSA could be a feasible
PET imaging
probe, which is the preferred choice in relevant clinical fields.
We performed [64Cu]Cu-Man(6)-Alb-FL PET/MRI imaging using
the same approach as that used for [111In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL
to detect lung metastases in two different syngeneic models of metastasis
(4T1- and Lewis lung carcinoma [LLC]-bearing mice). [64Cu]Cu-Man(6)-Alb-FL was successfully applied to monitor metastatic
progression in the lungs of 4T1 and LLC tumor-bearing mice (Figures D and S12A,B). In addition, PET imaging of 4T1-bearing
mice after injection of [64Cu]Cu-Man(6)-Alb-FL with and
without a blocking dose of mannan showed high and specific accumulation
of [64Cu]Cu-Man(6)-Alb-FL in the lung when only a few microsized
metastatic lesions were visible on day 21 (Figures E and S13), as
confirmed using hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining of the excised
lung after in vivo imaging (Figure F). However, metastatic lesions were not
clearly discernible using MRI and CT imaging in the same mice (Figures G,H and S12C).Collectively, these data demonstrated
that MSA imaging, along with
clinically applicable imaging modalities (either SPECT/CT or PET/MRI),
enables the early diagnosis of lung metastasis with noninvasive evaluation
of the degree of metastatic burden.
Fluorescence Imaging of Human Breast Cancer Tissues with Man(6)-Alb-FL
To validate the clinical applicability of Man(6)-Alb-FL for diagnostic
imaging, CD206 expression was evaluated in estrogen receptor (ER)+/progesterone receptor (PR)+ and malignant triple-negative
(TN) breast cancer tissues. We found that CD206 expression in TN tissues
was substantially higher than that in ER+/PR+ tissues (Figure S14A and B). In addition,
CD206 expression in TN tissues was closely associated with metastasis-related
clinicopathological indices such as tumor stage, lymph node metastasis,
ductal cell in situ (DCIS), and vimentin, an epithelial-to-mesenchymal
transition marker (Figure S14C and D).Next, we performed a pilot analysis of a small number of resected
tumor tissues from human breast cancer patients to investigate whether
MSA could be used to visualize macrophages in these tissues. Fresh
breast tumor tissues after resection surgery were incubated with Man(6)-Alb-FL
for 2 h, followed by ex vivo fluorescence imaging
to evaluate Man(6)-Alb-FL uptake in these tissues (Figure A). Consistent with observations
obtained from CD206 staining of human breast cancer tissues (Figure S14), the uptake of Man(6)-Alb-FL was
more evident in tumor tissues of patients with TN (n = 10) than in those with ER+/PR+ breast cancer
(n = 12) (Figure B and C), and costaining with CD206 revealed that a
large proportion of CD206+ cells incorporated Man(6)-Alb-FL
(Figure D). Further
quantitative measurements of the fluorescence signals of Man(6)-Alb-FL
revealed a positive correlation between the number of CD206+ cells and their uptake (Figure E), indicating that MSA might be differentially incorporated
by CD206+ cells in human tissues. In addition, as expected,
among the 22 tumor tissues obtained from each group, the Man(6)-Alb-FL
signal intensity in TN tumor tissues was more than three times higher
than that in ER+/PR+ tumor tissues (Figure F and G).
Figure 7
Fluorescence
imaging of human breast cancer tissues with Man(6)-Alb-FL.
(A) Illustration of fluorescence imaging of Man(6)-Alb-FL in resected
tumor tissues from breast cancer patients. (B,C) Representative confocal
immunofluorescent images of CD206 (green), Man(6)-Alb-FL (red), and
DAPI (nucleus, blue) in ER+/PR+ (n = 12) (B) and triple-negative (TN) (n = 10) (B)
human breast tumor sections 2 h after Man(6)-Alb-FL administration.
Yellow arrowheads indicate Man(6)-Alb-FL-loaded CD206+ cells
(B). Higher magnification images of the yellow-outlined area also
show Man(6)-Alb-FL uptake in CD206+ cells (yellow arrowheads)
in a triple-negative breast tumor section (C). Scale bar = 50 μm
for images in (B) and (C), and 10 μm for the yellow magnified
images in (C). (D) Pie chart indicating the percentage of Man(6)-Alb-FL
uptake by CD206+ cells in human breast tumor sections.
(E) Correlation analysis of CD206+ cells and Man(6)-Alb-FL-positive
cells (Man(6)+ cells) in human breast tumor sections. Black
and blue dots indicate ER+/PR+ (n = 12) and triple-negative (TN) (n = 10) breast
tumor sections, respectively. (F) The number of Man(6)-Alb-FL-positive
(Man(6)+) CD206+ cells in ER+/PR+ (n = 12, black) and triple-negative (TN)
(n = 10, blue) human breast tumor sections. (G) The
average number of Man(6)+CD206+ cells in ER+/PR+ and TN human breast tumor sections. For quantification,
3–6 nonoverlapping images per section were counted. Data show
means ± SEM. ****P < 0.0001 using Student’s t-test.
Fluorescence
imaging of human breast cancer tissues with Man(6)-Alb-FL.
(A) Illustration of fluorescence imaging of Man(6)-Alb-FL in resected
tumor tissues from breast cancer patients. (B,C) Representative confocal
immunofluorescent images of CD206 (green), Man(6)-Alb-FL (red), and
DAPI (nucleus, blue) in ER+/PR+ (n = 12) (B) and triple-negative (TN) (n = 10) (B)
human breast tumor sections 2 h after Man(6)-Alb-FL administration.
Yellow arrowheads indicate Man(6)-Alb-FL-loaded CD206+ cells
(B). Higher magnification images of the yellow-outlined area also
show Man(6)-Alb-FL uptake in CD206+ cells (yellow arrowheads)
in a triple-negative breast tumor section (C). Scale bar = 50 μm
for images in (B) and (C), and 10 μm for the yellow magnified
images in (C). (D) Pie chart indicating the percentage of Man(6)-Alb-FL
uptake by CD206+ cells in human breast tumor sections.
(E) Correlation analysis of CD206+ cells and Man(6)-Alb-FL-positive
cells (Man(6)+ cells) in human breast tumor sections. Black
and blue dots indicate ER+/PR+ (n = 12) and triple-negative (TN) (n = 10) breast
tumor sections, respectively. (F) The number of Man(6)-Alb-FL-positive
(Man(6)+) CD206+ cells in ER+/PR+ (n = 12, black) and triple-negative (TN)
(n = 10, blue) human breast tumor sections. (G) The
average number of Man(6)+CD206+ cells in ER+/PR+ and TN human breast tumor sections. For quantification,
3–6 nonoverlapping images per section were counted. Data show
means ± SEM. ****P < 0.0001 using Student’s t-test.
Conclusions
In this study, we sought to investigate
the benefits of targeting
cellular components enriched in metastatic niches, particularly macrophages,
for noninvasive visualization of lung metastasis. Using a click reaction
to functionalize albumin, we developed the macrophage-targeted probe,
MSA, which is especially useful for in vivo lung
imaging with an optimized blood circulation time by introducing six
molecules of mannose (Man(6)-Alb). In lung metastasis models, whole-body
imaging with optimized MSA can noninvasively monitor macrophage accumulation
in the lungs of tumor-bearing mice upon tumor progression, even when
the metastatic burden is low. Furthermore, the fluorescence imaging
of patient tumor samples ex vivo has broadened its
potential clinical applicability. When translated to clinical settings,
the ease of preparation and cost-effectiveness of MSA can be considerably
advantageous for its use as a metastasis screening method for high-risk
patients. Thus, MSA could be a promising monitoring tool that can
provide additional information regarding the degree of metastatic
disease, which is instructive for the early diagnosis of metastasis
and therapeutic interventions.
Methods
General
All reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich
(St. Louis, MO, USA), unless otherwise stated. Azadibenzocyclooctyne-N-hydroxysuccinimide (ADIBO-NHS), 2,2′,2″-(2-(4-(3-(3-azidopropyl)thioureido)benzyl)-1,4,7-triazonane-1,4,7-triyl)triacetic
acid (NOTA-N3), and azido-Flamma 648 (FNR646-N3) were purchased from FutureChem (Seoul, Korea). 1-O-(2-(2-(2-Azidoethoxy)ethoxy)ethoxy)-α-d-mannopyranoside
(Man-N3) was purchased from Iris Biotech GmbH (Marktredwitz,
Germany). HSA was purchased from MP Biomedicals (Aurora, OH, USA).
Distearoylphosphatidylcholine (DSPC), cholesterol, istearoylphosphatidylethanolamine
(DSPE), and DBCO-PEG2000-DSPE were purchased from Avanti Polar Lipids
Inc. (Alabaster, AL, USA). Instant thin-layer chromatography-silica
gel (ITLC-SG) plates were purchased from Agilent Technologies, Inc.
(Santa Clara, CA, USA). The PD-10 desalting columns were obtained
from GE Healthcare (Buckinghamshire, UK). Radioactivity was measured
using a gamma scintillation counter (Packard Cobra II; GMI, NM, USA).
The molecular weights of HSA and its conjugates were determined using
MALDI-TOF/TOF mass spectrometry with the TOF/TOF 5800 system (AB Sciex,
Foster City, CA, USA). The hydrodynamic diameter and size distribution
of the nanoparticles were analyzed using a DLS system and/or nanoparticle
tracking analysis (Zetasizer Nano ZS90 and/or NanoSight, Malvern Instruments
Ltd., Worcestershire, UK). The albumin concentration was spectrophotometrically
measured using a NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies,
Wilmington, DE, USA).
Cells
Primary macrophages were differentiated from
the mouse bone marrow cells. Bone marrow cells were obtained from
7–12 week old C57BL/6J male mice and differentiated into mature
bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) for 7 days in Roswell Park
Memorial Institute (RPMI)-1640 media containing 10% fetal bovine serum
(FBS), 1% penicillin/streptomycin (PS), and 2 mM l-glutamine
(Gibco), supplemented with recombinant murine GM-CSF (25 ng/mL, Miltenyi
Biotec) for GM-BMMs or murine M-CSF (50 ng/mL, Miltenyi Biotec) for
M-BMMs. The medium was replaced on days 3 and 5 with fresh medium
containing GM-CSF or M-CSF. The breast carcinoma cell line, 4T1, melanoma
cell line, B16F10, and LLC cell line were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium
supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% PS. All cells were cultured at 37
°C in a humidified incubator containing 5% CO2.
Synthesis of MSA Derivatives
A schematic diagram showing
the synthesis of MSA derivatives is shown in Figures A and S1A. MSA
derivatives were synthesized using a previous method with slight modifications.[31] Briefly, albumin (20 mg, 294 nmol) in phosphate
buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4, 0.5 mL) was reacted with 3.5, 7, 14,
and 28 equiv of ADIBO-NHS in 2% dimethyl sulfoxide. The mixture was
stirred at room temperature for 2 h and purified using a desalting
column (PD-10) with PBS as an eluent to obtain 38 mg/mL ADIBO-albumin
(AD-Alb, 280 nmol).For fluorescence labeling, ADIBO-albumin
(280 nmol) was reacted with N3-FNR648 (28 nmol) for 30
min. After the reaction, AD-Alb-fluorescence (AD-Alb-FL) was purified
and concentrated using a centrifugal filter. It is noteworthy that
all the Alb-FL described later contain FL with the same number of
conjugations. Man-N3 was mixed with quantified Alb-FL for
conjugation of ADIBO and N3 groups using a click reaction
to produce different numbers of mannosylated Alb-FL (Man-Alb-FL).
Finally, radiolabeled NOTA-N3 ([111In]In-NOTA-N3 or [64Cu]Cu-NOTA-N3) was conjugated
with Alb-FL or Man-Alb-FL via a click reaction to generate radiolabeled-MSA
([111In]In-Man-Alb-FL, [64Cu]Cu-Man-Alb-FL,
RI-Man-Alb-FL, or RI-Alb-FL), respectively. The ADIBO incorporation
(DOF) and concentration of albumin were also determined using an UV–visible
spectrophotometer (NanoDrop, Thermo Fisher) and calculations using
MALDI-TOF data. Briefly, the molar concentration of albumin and ADIBO
from AD-Alb was calculated using A280 (UV absorbance of ADIBO-albumin
at 280 nm), A309 (UV absorbance of ADIBO-albumin at 309 nm), and the
specific epsilons of albumin and ADIBO based on the Beer–Lambert
law. This method indicates that the DOF of AD-Alb can be estimated
rapidly and easily using only UV–vis analysis without performing
MALDI-TOF. The 4 and 6 molar excesses of Man-N3 were mixed
with AD-Alb-FL that contained 6 DOF (AD-Alb(6)-FL), and the 8 and
12 molar excesses of Man-N3 were mixed with CAN that contained
11 DOF (AD-Alb(11)-FL). The number of mannosyl groups on Man-Alb-FL
was calculated using MALDI-TOF. This was also confirmed from the change
in the absorbance value of ADIBO (A309) before and after the reaction
of AD-Alb-FL with the azide-functionalized compounds.
Cell Viability Assay
M-BMMs were seeded in a 96-well
plate at a density of 2 × 105 cells/mL in 100 μL
of medium and incubated for 24 h for cell attachment. Various concentrations
of Man(6)-Alb-FL were added to each well and incubated for 1 or 24
h at 37 °C. Then, 10 μL of Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8,
Dojindo) reagent was added and the cells were incubated for another
4 h at 37 °C in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions.
Optical density of solutions was determined on a microplate reader
(PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) at 450 nm.
Cellular Uptake of Man(6)-Alb-FL
To observe cellular
uptake, GM-BMMs, M-BMMs, and 4T1 cells were incubated with 1 nmol
of Man(6)-Alb-FL for 1 h at 37 °C. Cellular uptake of Man(6)-Alb-FL
was determined by fluorescence imaging and flow cytometry. In mannan
inhibition experiments, M-BMMs were preincubated at 37 °C for
20 min with 2 mg/mL mannan (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). Subsequently, 1
nmol of Man(6)-Alb-FL was added to the cells for 1 h at 37 °C
and uptake was analyzed by flow cytometry.
Radiochemistry
The radioisotope-containing vial (370
MBq of 111In or 64Cu) was dried under N2 flow in a lead-shielded fume hood for 20 min. After the vial
was completely dried, 100 μL of 1 M sodium acetate buffer (pH
5.3) was added to the vial, followed by NOTA-N3 (10 μg,
15 nmol) in distilled water (10 μL), and incubated at 70 °C
for 10 min to obtain quantitative amounts of [111In]In-NOTA-N3 or [64Cu]Cu-NOTA-N3. Finally, 37 MBq
(10 μL) of [111In]In-NOTA-N3 or [64Cu]Cu-NOTA-N3 was mixed with Alb-FL or Man-Alb-FL
(500 μg, 73.5 nmol, 0.5 mL) in PBS and incubated at room temperature
for 30 min to obtain quantitative yield of radiolabeled [111In]In-Man-Alb-FL or [64Cu]Cu-Man-Alb-FL.The radiolabeling
efficiency was determined using radio-instant thin layer chromatography-silica
gel (radio-ITLC-SG) and a 0.1 M citric acid solution as the mobile
phase. The Rf values of the free 111In (or 64Cu), [111In]In-NOTA-N3 (or [64Cu]Cu-NOTA-N3), and radiolabeled
MSA were 0.9–1.0, 0.7–0.8, and 0.0–0.1, respectively
(Figure S4). The stabilities of RI-Alb-FL
and RI-Man-Alb-FL were assessed 24 h after labeling to confirm the
stable conjugation of the radiolabeled agent during the imaging procedure
(Figure S5).
Study Approval
Animal experiments were performed in
accordance with the Institute for Experimental Animals College of
Medicine guidelines and the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory
Animals prepared by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee
of Seoul National University (accession number SNU-150708-1-1). Informed
consent was obtained from each patient with the approval of the Institutional
Review Board (C-1805-059-945).
Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
Total
RNA was extracted using the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) according
to the manufacturer’s instructions. cDNA was synthesized from
1 μg of total RNA using reverse transcription, and the amount
of mRNA was determined using real-time PCR analysis with the SYBR
Green qPCR Pre-Mix (Enzynomics, Daejeon, South Korea) on an ABI real-time
PCR 7500 machine (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA). Gene expression was
normalized to housekeeping gene 18sRNA. Primer sequences were as follows:
CD206 (forward: 5- AATGAAGATCAAGCGCTGC-3;
reverse: 5-TGACACCCAGCGGAATTTCT-3); and 18sRNA
(forward: 5-GCAATTATTCCCCATGAACG-3; reverse:
5-GGCCTCACTAAACCATCCAA-3).
Immunofluorescence Staining
Cryostat sections (4 μm)
were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA), blocked, and permeabilized
in blocking buffer (5% goat serum, 0.3% Triton X-100 in PBS) for 60
min at room temperature. For staining, the sections were incubated
with the primary antibody against CD206 (1:200, Abcam) overnight at
4 °C and then with Alexa Fluor-conjugated secondary antibody
(1:500, Alexa Fluor 488 goat antirabbit IgG (H+L), Invitrogen) for
2 h at room temperature. For fluorescence imaging with Man(6)-Alb-FL
using fresh tumor tissues from breast cancer patients (n = 22), the freshly resected tumor tissues, without fixation, were
rinsed with PBS and incubated with Man(6)-Alb-FL (20 μg/500
μL PBS) for 2 h, followed by CD206 staining. The accumulation
of MSA within the tumor tissue was analyzed using confocal microscopy.
The sections were counterstained with 1 mg/mL DAPI solution (Sigma-Aldrich).
Images were acquired using a Leica TCS SP8 confocal fluorescence microscope.
Immunohistochemistry
Human breast tissue microarrays
(TMAs) were constructed from archival tumor blocks (formalin-fixed,
paraffin-embedded tissues) of breast cancer patients, including those
with ER+/PR+ (294) and triple-negative breast
cancer (396), after surgical intervention, at Seoul National University
Hospital, from 1997 to 2003. The study was approved by the institutional
review boards of the institutions of the collaborating pathologists
and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All
patients participating in the study provided written informed consent.
Clinicopathological information was obtained by reviewing pathology
reports and from H&E-stained sections.Immunohistochemistry
was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Paraffin-embedded sections were deparaffinized, hydrated with Tris-buffered
saline (TBS), and blocked with H2O2. For antigen
retrieval, the slides were pretreated by steaming in sodium citrate
buffer (10 mM sodium citrate, pH 6.0). After blocking in a blocking
solution (10% FBS, 1% serum albumin in TBS), the slides were incubated
overnight at 4 °C with rabbit anti-CD206 antibody (1:200, Abcam).
The sections were washed three times in TBS with Tween-20, followed
by incubation with biotinylated secondary polyclonal goat anti-rabbit
antibodies (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark). Staining was performed using
DAB chromogen solution (Dako) to allow proper development of brown
color and counterstaining with hematoxylin. The slides were imaged
using a digital camera (Leica DFC 290) at 100× magnification.
The immunostaining was evaluated after blinding the clinicopathological
information, and scoring was based on the number of CD206-positive
cells, which were classified based on the intensity of immunostaining
as negative, weak, moderate, and strong.
Flow Cytometry
The anti-mouse CD16/32 antibody (clone
number 93) was added to single-cell suspensions from primary tumors
and lungs to block nonspecific binding of immunoglobulin to macrophage
Fc receptors, followed by staining with the following antibodies:
anti-mouse CD45 (30-F11), CD11b (M1/70, BD Biosciences), and F4/80
(BM8). All antibodies were obtained from eBioscience, unless otherwise
indicated. An additional antibody used for flow cytometry analysis
included CD206 (Abcam), which was followed by staining with the appropriate
secondary antibodies. Data were acquired using LSRFortessa (BD Bioscience)
and analyzed using the FlowJo software (Tree Star).
PET Image Acquisition and Analysis of the Time–Activity
Curve
PET images were acquired using preclinical PET/X-ray
scanner (Sofie Bioscience) to confirm pharmacokinetic parameters and
biodistribution of [64Cu]Cu-Man-Alb-FL and [64Cu]Cu-Alb-FL of varying mannosylation number. Simultaneously, the
same amount of each derivative was added to mice, and all images were
acquired for 5 min at 0, 2, 4, and 24 h after injection.
SPECT/CT Image Acquisition and Analysis
Animal SPECT/CT
imaging was performed using a four-headed multipinhole NanoSPECT (Bioscan
Inc., Washington DC) at 24 h after the intravenous injection of either
[111In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL or [111In]In-Alb(11)-FL.
For quantitative analysis of the SPECT/CT image sequence, automatically
programmed software in the GE workstation produced a volume of interest
(VOI) of images, presented as mean counts.
Biodistribution Analysis
The biodistribution of [111In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL and [111In]In-Alb(11)-FL
was evaluated in 4T1-bearing mice. At 24 h after injecting [111In]In-Man(6)-Alb-FL or [111In]In-Alb(11)-FL, the animals
were sacrificed and dissected for organ collection. Radioactivity
in each organ was measured using a gamma counter. Counts per minute
were decay-corrected, and the results were expressed as % ID/g.
Animal Models
For tumor models, syngeneic BALB/c mice
for 4T1 cells and syngeneic C57BL/6 mice for B16F10 and LLC cells
were used. Orthotopic tumor injections were performed by administering
4T1 cells (2 × 105) into the inguinal right fourth
mammary fat pads of 7–8 week old female mice. At the end of
the experiment, 4T1 tumor-bearing mice were injected with luciferin
(PerkinElmer) and monitored using a Xenogen IVIS 200 imaging system
(Xenogen, Alameda, CA, USA). For metastasis of lung carcinoma, LLC
cells (3 × 105) were injected into the flank of 7–8
week old female mice. For intravenous injections, single-cell suspensions
of 5 × 104 and 1 × 105 4T1 cells or
2 × 105 B16F10 cells in 100 μL PBS were injected
into the tail vein. For blocking studies, Man(6)-Alb-FL was coinjected
into mice with 100 μL mannan (25 mg/mL in Saline)
[64Cu]Cu-Man-Alb-FL PET/MRI Image Acquisition and
Analysis
All PET/MRI data used in this experiment were acquired
using a simultaneous PET/MRI system (Aspect Imaging; Shoham, Israel).
The SimPET system consists of a 1-T permanent magnet-based MRI and
SiPM-based PET insert. The SimPET insert has a peak sensitivity of
3.4% and a center volumetric resolution of 0.53 mm3. For
imaging, 11.1 MBq was injected 1 h after injection, and simultaneous
PET/MRI scans were performed for 5 min using a T1-weighted gradient
echo (GRE) MR sequence (TR/TE, 25/3 ms; flip angle, 45°). PET/MRI
images using [64Cu]Cu-Man-Alb-FL were obtained at the same
time point as SPECT/CT imaging of [111In]In-Man-Alb-FL
24 h after intravenous injection.The PET and MRI images were
evaluated via visual inspection to detect any abnormal lesions indicative
of metastatic nodules in the lungs. After quantitative analysis, spherical
VOIs, 3 mm in diameter, were drawn over the MRI images of the lungs
of each mouse. Uptake in the lung was estimated by applying VOIs (drawn
on MRI images) over the respective simultaneously acquired PET images.
The mean standard uptake value (SUVmean) was calculated
as follows:The PET images obtained using [64Cu]Cu-Man-Alb-FL were analyzed using MIMvista (MIM Software Inc.,
USA). The three-dimensional region of interest was used for the quantitative
evaluation of uptake in the lung, liver, and tumor (for the models).
Statistical Analysis
All statistical analyses were
performed using the GraphPad Prism software (version 6.0), and results
are displayed as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM)
or standard deviation (SD). A difference was considered to be significant
at P-values less than 0.05, and differences are represented
by *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01;
***P < 0.001; and ****P <
0.0001.
Authors: Avi Schroeder; Daniel A Heller; Monte M Winslow; James E Dahlman; George W Pratt; Robert Langer; Tyler Jacks; Daniel G Anderson Journal: Nat Rev Cancer Date: 2011-12-23 Impact factor: 60.716
Authors: Kiavash Movahedi; Steve Schoonooghe; Damya Laoui; Isabelle Houbracken; Wim Waelput; Karine Breckpot; Luc Bouwens; Tony Lahoutte; Patrick De Baetselier; Geert Raes; Nick Devoogdt; Jo A Van Ginderachter Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2012-06-19 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Ji Yong Park; Myung Geun Song; Woo Hyoung Kim; Kyu Wan Kim; Nadeem Ahmed Lodhi; Jin Yeong Choi; Young Ju Kim; Jung Young Kim; Hyewon Chung; Chiwoo Oh; Yun-Sang Lee; Keon Wook Kang; Hyung-Jun Im; Seung Hyeok Seok; Dong Soo Lee; Edmund E Kim; Jae Min Jeong Journal: Theranostics Date: 2019-05-18 Impact factor: 11.556