Lingyang Hua1, Majd Alkhatib2, Dino Podlesek2, Leila Günther2, Thomas Pinzer2, Matthias Meinhardt3, Silke Zeugner3, Sylvia Herold3,4, Daniel P Cahill5, Priscilla K Brastianos6, Erik A Williams5, Victoria E Clark5, Ganesh M Shankar5, Hiroaki Wakimoto5, Leihao Ren7, Jiawei Chen7, Ye Gong7, Gabriele Schackert2, Tareq A Juratli8,9. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. lyhua15@fudan.edu.cn. 2. Department of Neurosurgery, Carl Gustav Carus University Hospital, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany. 3. Department for Pathology, Carl Gustav Carus University Hospital, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany. 4. Core Unit for Molecular Tumor Diagnostics (CMTD), National Center for Tumor Diseases Dresden (NCT/UCC), Dresden, Germany. 5. Department of Neurosurgery, Translational Neuro-Oncology Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 6. Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 7. Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. 8. Department of Neurosurgery, Carl Gustav Carus University Hospital, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany. Tareq.Juratli@ukdd.de. 9. Department of Neurosurgery, Translational Neuro-Oncology Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. Tareq.Juratli@ukdd.de.
Spinal meningiomas (SM) comprise 5–10% of primary meningiomas and up to 30% of spinal intradural tumors. SMs are usually sporadic, but rarely, they can develop in association with genetic diseases like neurofibromatosis type 2 or schwannomatosis [2, 4, 6]. While the mutational landscape of intracranial meningiomas has been extensively studied [3, 5, 11, 14], our understanding of the molecular profile of SM remains incomplete. To date, genomic studies in SMs have been underpowered to make significant conclusions about the correlations between main genomic driver alterations and clinical features of these tumors. Here, we sought to assess the mutational profile of WHO grade 1 SM and to investigate the clinical characteristics that correlate with the genomic status.Targeted next-generation sequencing was performed using assays covering frequently mutated genes in meningiomas as previously described [8] and online resource. Moreover, we correlated clinical and imaging data with the molecular tumor status.Our study cohort consisted of 50 patients with newly diagnosed SM WHO grade 1 (Table 1). Thirty-eight patients were female and 12 were male (female:male ratio of 3.2:1). The median age at diagnosis was 66 years (range 28–84 years). Cohort patients were included if they had suspected sporadic meningioma based on lack of family history of neurofibromatosis type 2, schwannomatosis, and/or lack of other meningiomas or CNS tumors. The mean follow-up time of our SM cohort was 60 months (range 6–288 months).
Table 1
Comparison between patient’s demographics and tumor features of AKT1- and NF2-mutant spinal meningiomas
All tumors (n = 50)
AKT1-mutant(n = 15)
NF2-mutant(n = 32)
P value
Median age (years)
66
71
65
0.032
Female sex
38
7/15 (46.6%)
30/32 (94%)
0.0006
Thoracic spine location
28
4/15 (26.6%)
24/32 (75%)
0.0034
Cervical spine location
21
11/15 (73.3%)
7/32 (21.8%)
0.0012
Ventral or ventro-lateral location to spinal cord
28
13/15 (87%)
14/32 (40.6%)
0.010
Dorsal or dorso-lateral location to spinal cord
22
2/15 (13.3%)
19/32 (59.3%)
0.0043
Meningothelial histology
24
14/15 (93.3%)
7/32 (21.8%)
0.0001
Tumor calcification
17
None
17/32 (53.2%)
0.0002
Bold indicates significance (P < 0.05)
Comparison between patient’s demographics and tumor features of AKT1- and NF2-mutant spinal meningiomasBold indicates significance (P < 0.05)Two predominant recurrent mutations were observed: AKT1 mutations were detected in 15 (30%, 7 females and 8 males) and NF2 mutations in 32 (64%, 30 females and 2 males) patients. Both mutations were mutually exclusive. In three cases (6%, one female and two males), no known driver mutation was found. All detected AKT1 mutations were confirmed using Sanger sequencing, as described above. Meningiomas with an AKT1 mutation harbored additionally ATRX (n = 2), ARID1A (n = 2), TRAF7 (n = 1) and POLR2A (n = 1). Co-mutations in NF2-mutant meningiomas included SMARCB1 (n = 3) and PTEN (n = 1) mutations (Supplementary Tables 1 and 2, online resource).Upon examination of the clinical features of patient harboring these two mutations, distinct cohorts emerged. The median age of patients with AKT1 mutations (71 years old) was significantly higher when compared with patients with NF2-mutant meningiomas (65.5 years-old, p = 0.032). Notably, NF2-mutant meningiomas had a near-complete female predominance (n = 30/32, 94%) when compared to the balanced female–male incidence of AKT1-mutant tumors (n = 7/15, p = 0.0006, Table 1). A tumor location in the thoracic spine was significantly more common in NF2-mutant meningiomas (75%) than in their AKT1-mutant counterparts (26.6%) (p = 0.0034). In contrast, meningiomas harboring an AKT1 mutation were predominantly located in the cervical spine (73.3%) and 87% of AKT1-mutant meningiomas (n = 13) (compared to 43.75% of NF2-mutant meningiomas, n = 14) arose ventrally or ventro-laterally to the spinal cord (p = 0.010). In contrast to AKT1-mutant meningiomas, a substantial proportion of NF2-mutant meningiomas developed in the dorsal or dorso-lateral location to the spinal cord (59.3%, p = 0.0043, Fig. 1 and Supplementary Fig. 1, online resource). Consistent with intracranial meningiomas, the histologic subtype of NF2-mutant meningiomas was variable (7 meningothelial, 16 psammomatous, 4 transitional, 5 fibrous), while all but 1 AKT1-mutant meningioma showed a meningothelial histology (93.3%, p = 0.0001). None of the AKT1-mutant meningiomas showed calcifications in the preoperative MRI or CT scan, whereas all calcified meningiomas (n = 17) harbored a NF2 mutation (p = 0.0002). Several prior reports have discussed tumor calcification as a potential risk for permanent neurological deterioration due to difficult surgical removal [9, 12]. In our series, four patients (8%) experienced local tumor recurrence with three of these cases harboring a NF2 mutation and with tumor calcifications.
Fig. 1
Anatomic distribution of AKT1- and NF2-mutant meningiomas along the spinal column and in relation to the spinal cord
Anatomic distribution of AKT1- and NF2-mutant meningiomas along the spinal column and in relation to the spinal cordOur data demonstrate the primary role of NF2 and AKT1 alterations as driver events in WHO grade 1 SM, as 94% of the cases harbored mutations in these genes. AKT1 and NF2 mutations presented in a mutually exclusive pattern, identifying unique clinical cohorts. In concordance with our findings, Arslantas et al. investigated 16 SM samples and described NF2 mutations in 8 cases[1]. Remarkably, all NF2-mutant cases in the aforementioned study were located in the thoracic spine and six of them were female patients. Subsequently, Sahm et al. screened 1437 tumors for AKT1 mutations and found 65 mutant cases, including 6 AKT1-mutant cases in 57 SMs [10], and described a strong association between AKT1 mutations and spinal tumor localization.In contrast to AKT1-mutant intracranial meningiomas, where TRAF7 mutations are found to co-occur very frequently [5], we observed only a single AKT1-mutant SM case with a TRAF7 co-mutation. Combining our data with these prior reports, focusing on WHO grade 1 meningiomas only, Clark et al. found TRAF7 co-mutations in 50/68 AKT1-mutant intracranial meningiomas (15 were AKT1 “isolated”, and 3 were co-mutant for AKT1/NF2), while we observed only 1 of 15 co-mutant tumors. Therefore, there appears to be a strong locational difference (p < 0.0001), suggesting that AKT1-mutant meningiomas arising from the ventral cervical spinal arachnoid are genetically distinct from their intracranial counterparts, based on the relative absence of TRAF7 co-mutation. We speculate that the absence of TRAF7 co-mutations in these tumors may potentially correlate with the more indolent clinical behavior that has been observed in AKT1-mutant SM compared to their intracranial counterparts.Furthermore, we found two SMARCB1 mutations that co-occurred in NF2-mutant meningiomas. SMARCB1 mutations have been associated with the development of SM [2, 7]. Of note, our study included WHO grade 1 SMs exclusively and thus, did not include meningiomas with clear cell histology. This selection criterion may explain the absence of SMARCE1 mutations in our study, which are known driver events in clear cell meningiomas [13]. Nevertheless, the presence of cryptic inactivation of SMARCB1, NF2 or other genes cannot be definitely excluded in the three cases in our series that did not show known hot spot mutations in driver genes.In summary, we have identified two predominant molecular subgroups in WHO grade 1 SM, characterized by AKT1 and NF2 mutations. Both mutations are mutually exclusive and are associated with distinct patient characteristics and tumor features. AKT1-mutant meningiomas originate in the cervical spine ventrally to the spinal cord, are almost exclusively associated with meningothelial histology and exhibit no calcifications on imaging. In contrast, NF2-mutant meningiomas show strong female gender predominance, arise with a wider anatomic distribution, although most frequently in the thoracic spine dorsally to the spinal cord, and can be calcified while displaying variable histologic subtypes (Supplementary Figs. 2 and 3, online resource).Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.Supplementary file1 (DOCX 907 KB)
Authors: Felix Sahm; Daniel Schrimpf; Damian Stichel; David T W Jones; Thomas Hielscher; Sebastian Schefzyk; Konstantin Okonechnikov; Christian Koelsche; David E Reuss; David Capper; Dominik Sturm; Hans-Georg Wirsching; Anna Sophie Berghoff; Peter Baumgarten; Annekathrin Kratz; Kristin Huang; Annika K Wefers; Volker Hovestadt; Martin Sill; Hayley P Ellis; Kathreena M Kurian; Ali Fuat Okuducu; Christine Jungk; Katharina Drueschler; Matthias Schick; Melanie Bewerunge-Hudler; Christian Mawrin; Marcel Seiz-Rosenhagen; Ralf Ketter; Matthias Simon; Manfred Westphal; Katrin Lamszus; Albert Becker; Arend Koch; Jens Schittenhelm; Elisabeth J Rushing; V Peter Collins; Stefanie Brehmer; Lukas Chavez; Michael Platten; Daniel Hänggi; Andreas Unterberg; Werner Paulus; Wolfgang Wick; Stefan M Pfister; Michel Mittelbronn; Matthias Preusser; Christel Herold-Mende; Michael Weller; Andreas von Deimling Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2017-03-15 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Felix Sahm; Juliane Bissel; Christian Koelsche; Leonille Schweizer; David Capper; David Reuss; Katja Böhmer; Ulrike Lass; Tanja Göck; Katrin Kalis; Jochen Meyer; Antje Habel; Stefanie Brehmer; Michel Mittelbronn; David T W Jones; Jens Schittenhelm; Steffi Urbschat; Ralf Ketter; Stephanie Heim; Christian Mawrin; Johannes A Hainfellner; Anna-Sophie Berghoff; Matthias Preusser; Albert Becker; Christel Herold-Mende; Andreas Unterberg; Christian Hartmann; Philipp Kickingereder; V Peter Collins; Stefan M Pfister; Andreas von Deimling Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2013-10-06 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: Ali Arslantas; Sevilhan Artan; Ulkü Oner; Ramazan Durmaz; Hamza Müslümanoglu; Metin Ant Atasoy; Nurettin Başaran; Eşref Tel Journal: Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 1.742
Authors: Miriam J Smith; Andrew J Wallace; Chris Bennett; Martin Hasselblatt; Ewelina Elert-Dobkowska; Linton T Evans; William F Hickey; Jack van Hoff; David Bauer; Amy Lee; Robert F Hevner; Christian Beetz; Daniel du Plessis; John-Paul Kilday; William G Newman; D Gareth Evans Journal: J Pathol Date: 2014-10-06 Impact factor: 7.996
Authors: Priscilla K Brastianos; Peleg M Horowitz; Sandro Santagata; Robert T Jones; Aaron McKenna; Gad Getz; Keith L Ligon; Emanuele Palescandolo; Paul Van Hummelen; Matthew D Ducar; Alina Raza; Ashwini Sunkavalli; Laura E Macconaill; Anat O Stemmer-Rachamimov; David N Louis; William C Hahn; Ian F Dunn; Rameen Beroukhim Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2013-01-20 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Franz L Ricklefs; Krystian D Fita; Ulrich Schüller; Sven O Eicker; Malte Mohme; Christian Mawrin; Ramin Rahmanzade; Felix Sahm; Lasse Dührsen; Carolin Göbel; Katrin Lamszus; Manfred Westphal Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2022-09-27 Impact factor: 15.887