Literature DB >> 35943386

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Have Clinical Activity in Patients With Recurrent Chordoma.

Andrew J Bishop1, Behrang Amini2, Heather Lin3, Shaan M Raza4, Shreyaskumar Patel5, David R Grosshans1, Amol Ghia1, Ahsan Farooqi1, B Ashleigh Guadagnolo1,6, Devarati Mitra1, Kadir C Akdemir4,7, Alexander J Lazar8,7, Wei-Lien Wang8, Christopher Alvarez-Breckenridge4, Justin Bird9, Laurence D Rhines4, Neeta Somaiah5, Anthony P Conley5.   

Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcomes and tolerance of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for patients with recurrent chordoma. We reviewed the records of 17 patients with recurrent chordomas who received ICIs for progressing disease as part of their treatment between 2016 and 2020. Response was assessed using response evaluation criteria in solid tumors 1.1 criteria. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Clinical benefit was defined as having stable disease (SD), a partial response, or a complete response. The median follow-up from the start of ICIs was 29 months [interquartile range (IQR): 13-35 m]. The majority received pembrolizumab (n=9, 53%), and the median number of cycles delivered was 8 (IQR: 7-12). The 1-year OS was 87%, and the 1-year PFS was 56% with a median PFS of 14 months (95% CI, 5-17 mo). After ICI initiation, most patients (n=15, 88%) had clinical benefit consisting of a complete response (n=1, 6%), partial response (n=3, 18%), and stable disease (n=11, 65%). Among all responders (n=15), the median duration of response was 12 months. Toxicities were limited: 2 (12%) patients having grade 3/4 immune-related toxicities (colitis, grade 3; myocarditis, grade 4). We observed a high rate of clinical benefit and favorable durability from ICI use for patients with recurrent chordoma. These data provide support for the integration of ICIs as a standard first-line systemic therapy option for patients with recurrent chordoma. Prospective studies are warranted to further evaluate efficacy and enhance response rates.
Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35943386      PMCID: PMC9452485          DOI: 10.1097/CJI.0000000000000431

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Immunother        ISSN: 1524-9557            Impact factor:   4.912


  22 in total

1.  Multiple cutaneous metastatic chordomas from the sacrum.

Authors:  Ryan M Svoboda; Donald Mackay; Michael Jude Welsch; Bryan E Anderson
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 11.527

2.  First report of clinical responses to immunotherapy in 3 relapsing cases of chordoma after failure of standard therapies.

Authors:  Denis Migliorini; Nicolas Mach; Diego Aguiar; Rémi Vernet; Basile Nicolas Landis; Minerva Becker; Thomas McKee; Valérie Dutoit; Pierre-Yves Dietrich
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 8.110

Review 3.  Chordomas: A review with emphasis on their pathophysiology, pathology, molecular biology, and genetics.

Authors:  Georgia Karpathiou; Jean Marc Dumollard; Maroa Dridi; Pierre Dal Col; Fabrice-Guy Barral; Jean Boutonnat; Michel Peoc'h
Journal:  Pathol Res Pract       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 3.250

4.  Mobile spine chordoma: results of 166 patients from the AOSpine Knowledge Forum Tumor database.

Authors:  Ziya L Gokaslan; Patricia L Zadnik; Daniel M Sciubba; Niccole Germscheid; C Rory Goodwin; Jean-Paul Wolinsky; Chetan Bettegowda; Mari L Groves; Alessandro Luzzati; Laurence D Rhines; Charles G Fisher; Peter Pal Varga; Mark B Dekutoski; Michelle J Clarke; Michael G Fehlings; Nasir A Quraishi; Dean Chou; Jeremy J Reynolds; Richard P Williams; Norio Kawahara; Stefano Boriani
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2015-12-18

5.  Prognostic factors in chordoma of the sacrum and mobile spine: a study of 39 patients.

Authors:  P Bergh; L G Kindblom; B Gunterberg; F Remotti; W Ryd; J M Meis-Kindblom
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Surgical margins and local control in resection of sacral chordomas.

Authors:  Pietro Ruggieri; Andrea Angelini; Giuseppe Ussia; Maurizio Montalti; Mario Mercuri
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Chordoma of the mobile spine and sacrum: a retrospective analysis of a series of patients surgically treated at two referral centers.

Authors:  Silvia Stacchiotti; Paolo Giovanni Casali; Salvatore Lo Vullo; Luigi Mariani; Elena Palassini; Mario Mercuri; Marco Alberghini; Silvana Pilotti; Licciana Zanella; Alessandro Gronchi; Piero Picci
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Clinicopathologic implications of CD8+/Foxp3+ ratio and miR-574-3p/PD-L1 axis in spinal chordoma patients.

Authors:  Ming-Xiang Zou; Ke-Miao Guo; Guo-Hua Lv; Wei Huang; Jing Li; Xiao-Bin Wang; Yi Jiang; Xiao-Ling She
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 6.968

9.  Clinical response to nivolumab in an INI1-deficient pediatric chordoma correlates with immunogenic recognition of brachyury.

Authors:  Laura M Williamson; Craig M Rive; Daniela Di Francesco; Emma Titmuss; Hye-Jung E Chun; Scott D Brown; Katy Milne; Erin Pleasance; Anna F Lee; Stephen Yip; Daniel G Rosenbaum; Martin Hasselblatt; Pascal D Johann; Marcel Kool; Melissa Harvey; David Dix; Daniel J Renouf; Robert A Holt; Brad H Nelson; Martin Hirst; Steven J M Jones; Janessa Laskin; Shahrad R Rassekh; Rebecca J Deyell; Marco A Marra
Journal:  NPJ Precis Oncol       Date:  2021-12-20

Review 10.  Chordoma-Current Understanding and Modern Treatment Paradigms.

Authors:  Sean M Barber; Saeed S Sadrameli; Jonathan J Lee; Jared S Fridley; Bin S Teh; Adetokunbo A Oyelese; Albert E Telfeian; Ziya L Gokaslan
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.