Jennifer E Lapin1, Sarah J Beal2,3, Ryan E Adams2,4, Jennifer Ehrhardt2,4, Ernest Pedapati2,5, Tanya E Froehlich2,4. 1. Division of Developmental Pediatrics, Dayton Children's Hospital, Dayton, OH. 2. Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH. 3. Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH. 4. Division of Behavioral and Developmental Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH; and. 5. Division of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether children with developmental disorders (DDs) in protective custody are more likely to experience specific placement types and stay in care longer than their typically developing peers. Furthermore, in the DD-only group, we examined whether the likelihood of each placement type differed by specific DD diagnosis. METHODS: This observational retrospective study used child welfare administrative data linked to electronic health records in a large Ohio county. Participants were aged 5 to 20 years (N = 2787). DD diagnoses were determined using problem list and encounter diagnosis codes. RESULTS: Children with versus without DD were less likely to be in kinship placement (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.66-0.94) and more likely to be in congregate care (aOR, 1.26; 95% CI: 1.04-1.53) and nonrelative foster care (aOR, 1.20; 95% CI: 1.00-1.45). A likelihood of independent living placement did not differ for those with and without DD. Those with versus without DD had longer lengths of stay in protective custody ( p ≤ 0.001), but the number of placement changes did not differ after accounting for length of stay. The pattern of results differed somewhat by individual DD diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Compared with their typically developing peers, children with DD are less likely to be in kinship care and tend to have longer lengths of stay in protective custody. If replicated, these findings suggest the need to identify and address mechanisms to support children with DD across placement settings and to better understand factors prolonging their protective custody stay.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether children with developmental disorders (DDs) in protective custody are more likely to experience specific placement types and stay in care longer than their typically developing peers. Furthermore, in the DD-only group, we examined whether the likelihood of each placement type differed by specific DD diagnosis. METHODS: This observational retrospective study used child welfare administrative data linked to electronic health records in a large Ohio county. Participants were aged 5 to 20 years (N = 2787). DD diagnoses were determined using problem list and encounter diagnosis codes. RESULTS: Children with versus without DD were less likely to be in kinship placement (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.66-0.94) and more likely to be in congregate care (aOR, 1.26; 95% CI: 1.04-1.53) and nonrelative foster care (aOR, 1.20; 95% CI: 1.00-1.45). A likelihood of independent living placement did not differ for those with and without DD. Those with versus without DD had longer lengths of stay in protective custody ( p ≤ 0.001), but the number of placement changes did not differ after accounting for length of stay. The pattern of results differed somewhat by individual DD diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Compared with their typically developing peers, children with DD are less likely to be in kinship care and tend to have longer lengths of stay in protective custody. If replicated, these findings suggest the need to identify and address mechanisms to support children with DD across placement settings and to better understand factors prolonging their protective custody stay.
Authors: Mary V Greiner; Sarah J Beal; Judith W Dexheimer; Parth Divekar; Vikash Patel; Eric S Hall Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2019-08 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Mary V Greiner; Jennifer Ross; Courtney M Brown; Sarah J Beal; Susan N Sherman Journal: Clin Pediatr (Phila) Date: 2015-01-05 Impact factor: 1.168
Authors: Shannon Dorsey; Elizabeth M Z Farmer; Richard P Barth; Kaylin Greene; John Reid; John Landsverk Journal: Child Youth Serv Rev Date: 2008-12-01
Authors: Jessica Schmidt; Miranda Cunningham; Lawrence D Dalton; Laurie E Powers; Sarah Geenen; Claudia Guadalupe Orozco Journal: J Public Child Welf Date: 2013
Authors: Sarah J Beal; Constance A Mara; Katie Nause; Robert T Ammerman; Rebecca Seltzer; Melissa Jonson-Reid; Mary V Greiner Journal: Acad Pediatr Date: 2021-05-21 Impact factor: 3.107
Authors: Matthew J Maenner; Kelly A Shaw; Jon Baio; Anita Washington; Mary Patrick; Monica DiRienzo; Deborah L Christensen; Lisa D Wiggins; Sydney Pettygrove; Jennifer G Andrews; Maya Lopez; Allison Hudson; Thaer Baroud; Yvette Schwenk; Tiffany White; Cordelia Robinson Rosenberg; Li-Ching Lee; Rebecca A Harrington; Margaret Huston; Amy Hewitt; Amy Esler; Jennifer Hall-Lande; Jenny N Poynter; Libby Hallas-Muchow; John N Constantino; Robert T Fitzgerald; Walter Zahorodny; Josephine Shenouda; Julie L Daniels; Zachary Warren; Alison Vehorn; Angelica Salinas; Maureen S Durkin; Patricia M Dietz Journal: MMWR Surveill Summ Date: 2020-03-27