| Literature DB >> 35942367 |
Changqing Sheng1, Jin Zhang2, Jiang Jue3.
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between the levels of endocrine and metabolic indicators and ovarian ultrasonography indicators in patients with ovarian syndrome (PCOS).Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35942367 PMCID: PMC9356803 DOI: 10.1155/2022/7238344
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.650
Comparison of hormone and blood glucose levels between the two groups.
| Observation group ( | Control group ( | |
|---|---|---|
| Total testosterone (ng/ml) | 0.62 ± 0.22a | 0.53 ± 0.38 |
| Free testosterone (pg/ml) | 0.72 ± 0.84a | 0.64 ± 0.69 |
| Androstenedione (ng/mL) | 3.41 ± 0.75 | 3.39 ± 0.97 |
| Dehydroepiandrosterone (UG/DL) | 202.39 ± 107.70a | 191.18 ± 104.51 |
| FSH (IU/L) | 6.09 ± 0.28 | 6.11 ± 0.29 |
| LH (IU/L) | 12.62 ± 5.40a | 9.18 ± 4.73 |
| LH/FSH | 2.93 ± 0.71a | 1.21 ± 1.03 |
| PRL (ng/ml) | 18.25 ± 8.06 | 18.01 ± 7.96 |
| Progesterone (ng/ml) | 1.14 ± 0.51 | 1.09 ± 0.72 |
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 89.74 ± 13.77a | 86.03 ± 12.90 |
| Insulin (uU/mL) | 22.35 ± 10.02a | 18.56 ± 9.71 |
Compared with the control group, a represents P < 0.05.
Comparison of lipid and IGF levels between the two groups.
| Group |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | Triglyceride (mg/dL) | LDL (mg/dl) | HDL (mg/dl) | IGF-I (ng/ml) | IGFBP-1 (ng/ml) | Free IGF -I (ng/ml) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observation group | 340 | 154.39 ± 10.36 | 86.35 ± 42.71 | 101.58 ± 23.26 | 40.60 ± 9.35 | 403.02 ± 129.73 | 0.92 ± 1.63 | 8.13 ± 3.34 |
| Control group | 340 | 153.57 ± 19.82 | 85.35 ± 44.48 | 86.80 ± 16.98 | 51.20 ± 10.29 | 395.56 ± 137.60 | 1.13 ± 2.17 | 6.51 ± 4.27 |
|
| 0.676 | 0.299 | 9.463 | 14.058 | 0.727 | 1.427 | 5.510 | |
|
| 0.499 | 0.765 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.467 | 0.154 | <0.001 |
Comparison of ultrasonic indexes between the two groups.
| Group |
| SA (cm2) | TA (cm2) | V (ml) | FN (number) | Ovarian interstitial artery PI | Ovarian interstitial artery RI | Uterine artery PI | Uterine artery RI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observation group | 340 | 1.04 ± 0.32 | 5.42 ± 0.79 | 13.13 ± 2.32 | 13.27 ± 5.66 | 0.88 ± 0.12 | 0.49 ± 0.02 | 2.02 ± 0.12 | 0.82 ± 0.07 |
| Control group | 340 | 0.99 ± 0.13 | 4.77 ± 0.60 | 12.37 ± 1.94 | 10.93 ± 2.96 | 0.91 ± 0.15 | 0.51 ± 0.04 | 1.95 ± 0.03 | 0.79 ± 0.06 |
|
| 2.669 | 12.082 | 4.634 | 6.755 | 2.88 | 8.246 | 10.435 | 6.000 | |
|
| 0.008 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.004 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Correlation analysis of serum E1 level with clinical, ultrasonic, and endocrine and metabolic indicators.
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Age (years) | −0.030 | 0.720 | 0.053 | 0.076 | −0.009 | 0.785 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 0.043 | 0.319 | −0.066 | 0.530 | 0.127 | 0.320 |
| SA (cm2) | 0.237 |
| −0.359 | 0.249 | 0.206 | 0.351 |
| TA (cm2) | 0.429 |
| −0.234 | 0.655 | 0.007 | 0.734 |
| V (ml) | 0.509 |
| 0.353 | 0.154 | 0.093 | 0.511 |
| FN (number) | 0.322 | 0.870 | 0.076 | 0.246 | 0.087 | 0.722 |
| Interstitial ovarian artery PI | 0.410 | 0.625 | 0.091 | 0.499 | 0.055 | 0.403 |
| Ovarian interstitial artery RI | 0.352 | 0.179 | 0.085 | 0.765 | 0.098 | 0.472 |
| Uterine artery PI | 0.465 | 0.058 | 0.117 | 0.344 | 0.192 | 0.239 |
| Uterine artery RI | 0.399 | 0.112 | 0.125 | 0.143 | 0.155 | 0.332 |
| AMH (ng/ml) | 0.308 | 0.275 | −0.099 | 0.784 | 0.075 | 0.616 |
| FSH (IU/L) | −0.44 | 0.344 | −0.367 | 0.896 | −0.005 | 0.180 |
| LH (IU/L) | 0.229 |
| 0.149 | 0.673 | −0.037 | 0.110 |
| LH/FSH | 0.351 |
| 0.074 | 0.157 | −0.007 | 0.050 |
| Total testosterone (ng/ml) | 0.317 |
| −0.065 | 0.534 | 0.818 | 0.935 |
| Free testosterone (pg/ml) | 0.288 |
| −0.097 | 0.314 | 0.515 |
|
| Dehydroepiandrosterone (UG/DL) | 0.381 |
| −0.116 | 0.376 | 0.076 | 0.989 |
| Progesterone (ng/ml) | 0.230 |
| 0.173 | 0.415 | −0.037 | 0.434 |
Comparison of endocrine indexes after different treatment methods.
| Group |
| Total testosterone (ng/ml) | LH (IU/L) | LH/FSH | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | ||
| Combination therapy group | 170 | 0.62 ± 0.22 | 0.53 ± 0.26a | 12.62 ± 5.40 | 10.27 ± 3.66a | 2.93 ± 0.71 | 1.31 ± 0.42a |
| Treatment group | 170 | 0.62 ± 0.22 | 0.60 ± 0.19a | 12.62 ± 5.40 | 12.03 ± 4.96a | 2.93 ± 0.71 | 2.23 ± 0.74a |
|
| — | 2.834 | — | 3.723 | — | 14.098 | |
|
| — | 0.005 | — | <0.001 | — | <0.001 | |