| Literature DB >> 35942366 |
Wanli Zhu1, Rundong Zhang1, Chenchao Ma2, Yangyang Hu1, Xuan Shi3, Xiyu Wang4, Xing Wu5, Kaixing Ai1.
Abstract
Objective: The lung is the second most common site of colorectal cancer (CRC) metastasis. This study aims to investigate the therapeutic effects and potential action mechanisms of Yifei Jianpi Tongfu formula (YJTF) in CRC lung metastasis in a comprehensive and systematic way by network analysis, molecular docking, and experimental verification.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35942366 PMCID: PMC9356795 DOI: 10.1155/2022/6229444
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.650
Figure 1Herb-compound-target network (H-C-T network) of YJTF. Yellow ellipses represent the herbs present in YJTF; red octagons represent active compounds in each herb; pink hexagons represent active compounds shared by two or more herbs; and blue diamonds correspond to related targets (the IDs of the components are described in Supplementary Table 1).
Figure 2PPI networks of YJTF for CRC lung metastasis treatment. Each node represents a protein target and each line represents the interaction between two nodes. Nodes in red are important and nodes in green are less important in the network. (a) The PPI network diagram arranged according to the degree value. Two clusters are detected in the YJTF-CRC lung metastasis PPI network. (b, c) Clusters 1 and 2. The diamonds are seed nodes of each cluster.
Figure 3GO enrichment analysis of the 81 putative targets. The top 10 significantly enriched terms in BP (biological process) (a), CC (cellular component) (b), and MF (molecular function) (c) categories.
Information on enrichment analysis based on Metascape.
| Term ID | Pathway | Counts | Log | Genes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| hsa05200 | Pathways in cancer | 17 | −14.8972 | AKT1, AR, CDK2, CDK6, DAPK1, EGFR, FLT3, GSK3B, IGF1R, MET, MMP2, MMP9, NOS2, PIK3R1, PPARD, PTGS2, PTK2 |
| hsa04913 | Ovarian steroidogenesis | 9 | −13.3126 | ALOX5, CYP1B1, CYP17A1, CYP19A1, HSD17B1, IGF1R, INSR, PTGS2, AKR1C3 |
| hsa01522 | Endocrine resistance | 10 | −12.6956 | AKT1, EGFR, ESR1, ESR2, IGF1R, MMP2, MMP9, PIK3R1, PTK2, SRC |
| hsa04151 | PI3K-Akt signaling pathway | 15 | −12.6073 | AKT1, CDK2, CDK6, EGFR, FLT3, GSK3B, IGF1R, IL2, INSR, KDR, MET, PIK3CG, PIK3R1, PTK2, SYK |
| hsa01521 | EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance | 9 | −11.8265 | AKT1, AXL, EGFR, GSK3B, IGF1R, KDR, MET, PIK3R1, SRC |
| hsa05205 | Proteoglycans in cancer | 11 | −10.4553 | AKT1, EGFR, ESR1, IGF1R, KDR, MET, MMP2, MMP9, PIK3R1, PTK2, SRC |
| hsa04510 | Focal adhesion | 10 | −9.52178 | AKT1, EGFR, GSK3B, IGF1R, KDR, MET, MYLK, PIK3R1, PTK2, SRC |
| hsa00140 | Steroid hormone biosynthesis | 7 | −9.47634 | CYP1B1, CYP17A1, CYP19A1, AKR1C1, AKR1C2, HSD17B1, AKR1C3 |
| hsa04915 | Estrogen signaling pathway | 9 | −9.42356 | AKT1, CTSD, EGFR, ESR1, ESR2, MMP2, MMP9, PIK3R1, SRC |
| hsa04520 | Adherens junction | 7 | −8.8002 | CSNK2A1, EGFR, IGF1R, INSR, MET, PTPN1, SRC |
| hsa04917 | Prolactin signaling pathway | 7 | −8.63274 | AKT1, CYP17A1, ESR1, ESR2, GSK3B, PIK3R1, SRC |
| hsa05222 | Small cell lung cancer | 7 | −8.32439 | AKT1, CDK2, CDK6, NOS2, PIK3R1, PTGS2, PTK2 |
| hsa05215 | Prostate cancer | 7 | −8.21676 | AKT1, AR, CDK2, EGFR, GSK3B, IGF1R, PIK3R1 |
| hsa04068 | Foxo signaling pathway | 8 | −8.21522 | AKT1, CCNB1, CDK2, EGFR, IGF1R, INSR, PIK3R1, PLK1 |
| hsa04914 | Progesterone-mediated oocyte maturation | 7 | −7.91617 | AKT1, CCNB1, CDK1, CDK2, IGF1R, PIK3R1, PLK1 |
| hsa04370 | VEGF signaling pathway | 6 | −7.72779 | AKT1, KDR, PIK3R1, PTGS2, PTK2, SRC |
| hsa05224 | Breast cancer | 8 | −7.64375 | AKT1, CDK6, EGFR, ESR1, ESR2, GSK3B, IGF1R, PIK3R1 |
| hsa04072 | Phospholipase D signaling pathway | 8 | −7.60218 | AKT1, EGFR, F2, CXCR1, INSR, PIK3CG, PIK3R1, SYK |
| hsa00590 | Arachidonic acid metabolism | 6 | −7.59584 | ALOX12, ALOX5, ALOX15, PTGS2, AKR1C3, PTGES |
| hsa05218 | Melanoma | 6 | −7.31274 | AKT1, CDK6, EGFR, IGF1R, MET, PIK3R1 |
| hsa04611 | Platelet activation | 7 | −7.00258 | AKT1, F2, MYLK, PIK3CG, PIK3R1, SRC, SYK |
Figure 4Results of the pathway analysis of the top 21 pathways: bubble diagram of the pathway (a) and T-P network diagram (b).
The binding energy values of core compounds of YJTF and core targets.
| Target | Compounds | Binding affinity/(kcal/mol) |
|---|---|---|
| AKT1 (6HHF) | Luteolin | −6.73 |
| Quercetin | −6.86 | |
| Kaempferol | −6.84 | |
| Isorhamnetin | −6.91 | |
| Apigenin | −9.39 | |
|
| ||
| EGFR (3GKW) | Luteolin | −6.54 |
| Quercetin | −7.13 | |
| Kaempferol | −6.39 | |
| Isorhamnetin | −7.24 | |
| Apigenin | −7.96 | |
|
| ||
| SRC (6E6E) | Luteolin | −5.59 |
| Quercetin | −5.05 | |
| Kaempferol | −5.30 | |
| Isorhamnetin | −5.18 | |
| Apigenin | −6.61 | |
|
| ||
| ESR1 (1R5K) | Luteolin | −5.73 |
| Quercetin | −5.19 | |
| Kaempferol | −5.51 | |
| Isorhamnetin | −6.97 | |
| Apigenin | −7.65 | |
|
| ||
| PTGS2 (5IKQ) | Luteolin | −6.90 |
| Quercetin | −6.79 | |
| Kaempferol | −6.45 | |
| Isorhamnetin | −7.05 | |
| Apigenin | −7.36 | |
Figure 5Molecular docking diagrams of AKT1 (a), EGFR (b), SRC (c), ESR1 (d), and PTGS2 (e) complexed with apigenin.
Figure 6H&E analysis in each group indicated that there were no obvious abnormal changes (not shown) in the HE slices.
Figure 7Changes in body weight of mice. The body weight of mice treated with YJTF was relatively stable. (P < 0.05, P < 0.01, P < 0.001).
Figure 8Number of lung metastatic nodes in BALB/c nude mice injected with HCT116 cells in each group. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM (∗P < 0.05, P < 0.001, and P < 0.0001).
Figure 9Immunofluorescence staining to evaluate the levels of E-cadherin, N-cadherin, and vimentin. All experiments were performed in triplicate.