| Literature DB >> 35942225 |
Zhiyun Shen1, Yaping Zhang2, Chun Yang3, Jie Liu3, Chenxu Huang1, Xian Zhang1, Yuxia Zhang1, Ying Lin1.
Abstract
Background: For a long time, fluid balance monitoring has been one of the most difficult problems in the management of patients with heart failure (HF). There is considerable interest in technology-facilitated fluid balance monitoring. However, little is known about patient acceptance and the use of mobile technology for fluid balance monitoring. Objective: The aim of this study was to develop a mobile app for technology-facilitated fluid balance monitoring and to determine its usability.Entities:
Keywords: fluid balance monitoring; heart failure; intake and output; mobile applications; telemedicine
Year: 2022 PMID: 35942225 PMCID: PMC9356697 DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S373393
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Patient Prefer Adherence ISSN: 1177-889X Impact factor: 2.314
Participant Characteristics
| Characteristics | Value | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years), mean (SD) | 54.40±15.11 | ||
| Age (years), n (%) | 23~40 | 9 (25.00) | |
| 41–60 | 14 (38.89) | ||
| 61–80 | 12 (33.33) | ||
| ≥81 | 1 (2.78) | ||
| Gender, male, n (%) | 23 (63.89) | ||
| Education status, n (%) | |||
| Primary school and below | 9 (25.00) | ||
| High school or vocational training | 17 (47.22) | ||
| College and above | 10 (27.78) | ||
| Marital status | Married | 30 (83.33) | |
| Others | 6 (16.67) | ||
| Living conditions | Living with family | 35 (97.22) | |
| Living alone | 1 (2.78) | ||
| Education status, n (%) | College | 7 (25.00) | |
| Undergraduate | 19 (67.86) | ||
| Postgraduate | 2 (7.14) | ||
| Years of work experience | <2 | 2 (7.14) | |
| 2–5 | 7 (25.00) | ||
| 6–10 | 7 (25.00) | ||
| 11–20 | 12 (42.86) | ||
| Years of experience working with the nursing information system | <5 | 10 (35.71) | |
| ≥5 | 18 (64.29) | ||
Abbreviation: SD, standard deviation.
Figure 1System Usability Scale scores for each statement and usability aspect in the patients (higher scores reflect higher usability).
Figure 2System Usability Scale scores for each statement and usability aspect in the nurses (higher scores reflect higher usability).
Characteristics of the Interviewees
| 1 | Male | 36 | College and above | 3 | Living with family | ||
| 2 | Female | 32 | High school or vocational training | 7 | Living with family | ||
| 3 | Male | 58 | Primary school and below | 82 | Living with family | ||
| 4 | Female | 84 | College and above | 17 | Living with family | ||
| 5 | Male | 70 | Primary school and below | 15 | Living with family | ||
| 6 | Female | 73 | College and above | 30 | Living alone | ||
| 7 | Female | 49 | Primary school and below | 5 | Living with family | ||
| 8 | Male | 23 | High school or vocational training | 29 | Living with family | ||
| 9 | Male | 65 | Primary school and below | 31 | Living with family | ||
| 1 | Postgraduate | <2 | 7 | <5 | |||
| 2 | Undergraduate | <2 | 2 | <5 | |||
| 3 | College | 2–5 | 5 | <5 | |||
| 4 | Undergraduate | 2–5 | 34 | <5 | |||
| 5 | Undergraduate | 6–10 | 46 | ≥5 | |||
| 6 | College | 6–10 | 59 | ≥5 | |||
| 7 | Postgraduate | 11–20 | 80 | ≥5 | |||
| 8 | College | 11–20 | 18 | ≥5 | |||