Literature DB >> 35942166

Physiological, biochemical and molecular evaluation of mungbean genotypes for agronomical yield under drought and salinity stresses in the presence of humic acid.

Hameed Alsamadany1.   

Abstract

Drought and salinity are potential threats in arid and semi arid regions. The current study was conducted with objective to optimize the production of different exotic genotypes of mungbean (NM-121-25, Chakwal M-6, DM-3 and PRI-Mung-2018) under drought and salinity stresses using humic acid in field experiments. One year tri-replicate field experiment was performed in RCBD using three factorial arrangement and effects of humic acid (60 kg ha-1) were evaluated at physiological, biochemical, molecular and agronomical level under individual and integrated applications of drought (no irrigation till 15 days) and salinity (EC 6.4 dSM-1). Data for physiological parameters (total chlorophyll, photosynthesis rate, stomatal conductance, transpiration rate and membrane damage), antioxidant enzymes (superoxide dismutase, catalase, peroxidase) and proline were collected on weekly basis since after the initiation of drought and salinity stresses. However data for agronomic characteristics (plant height, branches plant-1, LAI, pods plant-1, pod length and hundred seed weight) and grain carbohydrate content were collected after harvesting, while sampling for drought (VrDREB2A, VrbZIP17 and VrHsfA6a) and salinity (VrWRKY73, VrUBC1 and VrNHX1) related genes expression study was done after plants attained seedling stage. Under both individual and integrated applications of drought and salinity, all genotypes showed significant (p ≤ 0.05) increase in all traits excluding Cell membrane damage and proline during humic acid application. Likewise, genes expression revealed statistically distinct (p ≤ 0.05) up-regulation under humic acid treatment as compared to no humic acid treatment during both individual and integrated applications of drought and salinity. The genotype PRI-Mung-2018 recorded noteworthy performance during study. Moreover correlation and PCA analysis revealed that ultimate agronomical yield due to humic acid is an outcome of interconnection of physiological and biochemical parameters.
© 2022 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antioxidant; BPP, branches per plant; Biochemical; CAT, catalase; Drought; GCC, Grain carbohydrate content; Gene expression; Gs, stomatal conductance; HA0, the presence HA of humic acid; HSW, hundred seed weight; LAI, leaf area index; MD, membrane damage; PH, plant height; PL, pod length; POD, peroxidase; PPP, pods per plant; Physiological; Pn, photosynthesis rate; Proline; RCBD, randomized complete block design; ROS, Reactive oxygen species; SOD, superoxide dismutase; Salinity; Tr, transpiration rate

Year:  2022        PMID: 35942166      PMCID: PMC9356277          DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2022.103385

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci        ISSN: 2213-7106            Impact factor:   4.052


  15 in total

Review 1.  Acquiring control: The evolution of ROS-Induced oxidative stress and redox signaling pathways in plant stress responses.

Authors:  Muhammad Ansar Farooq; Adnan Khan Niazi; Javaid Akhtar; Muhammad Farooq; Zahra Souri; Naser Karimi; Zed Rengel
Journal:  Plant Physiol Biochem       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 4.270

Review 2.  Reactive oxygen species: metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction.

Authors:  Klaus Apel; Heribert Hirt
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Biol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 26.379

Review 3.  Biostimulants in Plant Science: A Global Perspective.

Authors:  Oleg I Yakhin; Aleksandr A Lubyanov; Ildus A Yakhin; Patrick H Brown
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 4.  Humic Substances: Determining Potential Molecular Regulatory Processes in Plants.

Authors:  Zahid Hussain Shah; Hafiz M Rehman; Tasneem Akhtar; Hameed Alsamadany; Bahget T Hamooh; Tahir Mujtaba; Ihsanullah Daur; Yahya Al Zahrani; Hind A S Alzahrani; Shawkat Ali; Seung H Yang; Gyuhwa Chung
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 5.753

5.  Morphophysiological and biochemical response of mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] varieties at different developmental stages under drought stress.

Authors:  Pooja Bangar; Ashok Chaudhury; Bhavana Tiwari; Sanjay Kumar; Ratna Kumari; Kangila Venkataramana Bhat
Journal:  Turk J Biol       Date:  2019-02-07

Review 6.  Biostimulants for the Regulation of Reactive Oxygen Species Metabolism in Plants under Abiotic Stress.

Authors:  Mirza Hasanuzzaman; Khursheda Parvin; Kirti Bardhan; Kamrun Nahar; Taufika Islam Anee; Abdul Awal Chowdhury Masud; Vasileios Fotopoulos
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-09-25       Impact factor: 6.600

7.  Potassium and Humic Acid Synergistically Increase Salt Tolerance and Nutrient Uptake in Contrasting Wheat Genotypes through Ionic Homeostasis and Activation of Antioxidant Enzymes.

Authors:  Ghulam Abbas; Sadia Rehman; Manzer H Siddiqui; Hayssam M Ali; Muhammad Ansar Farooq; Yinglong Chen
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-19

8.  Genomic and transcriptomic comparison of nucleotide variations for insights into bruchid resistance of mungbean (Vigna radiata [L.] R. Wilczek).

Authors:  Mao-Sen Liu; Tony Chien-Yen Kuo; Chia-Yun Ko; Dung-Chi Wu; Kuan-Yi Li; Wu-Jui Lin; Ching-Ping Lin; Yen-Wei Wang; Roland Schafleitner; Hsiao-Feng Lo; Chien-Yu Chen; Long-Fang O Chen
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 4.215

Review 9.  Salinity and High Temperature Tolerance in Mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] from a Physiological Perspective.

Authors:  Bindumadhava HanumanthaRao; Ramakrishnan M Nair; Harsh Nayyar
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 5.753

10.  Comparative genome-wide analysis of WRKY transcription factors in two Asian legume crops: Adzuki bean and Mung bean.

Authors:  Richa Srivastava; Sanjeev Kumar; Yasufumi Kobayashi; Kazutaka Kusunoki; Prateek Tripathi; Yuriko Kobayashi; Hiroyuki Koyama; Lingaraj Sahoo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.