Literature DB >> 35942159

The current status of gene expression profilings in COVID-19 patients.

Mirolyuba Ilieva1, Max Tschaikowski2, Andrea Vandin3,4, Shizuka Uchida1.   

Abstract

Background: The global pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has swept through every part of the world. Because of its impact, international efforts have been underway to identify the variants of SARS-CoV-2 by genome sequencing and to understand the gene expression changes in COVID-19 patients compared to healthy donors using RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) assay. Within the last two and half years since the emergence of SARS-CoV-2, a large number of OMICS data of COVID-19 patients have accumulated. Yet, we are still far from understanding the disease mechanism. Further, many people suffer from long-term effects of COVID-19; calling for a more systematic way to data mine the generated OMICS data, especially RNA-seq data.
Methods: By searching gene expression omnibus (GEO) using the key terms, COVID-19 and RNA-seq, 108 GEO entries were identified. Each of these studies was manually examined to categorize the studies into bulk or single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) followed by an inspection of their original articles.
Results: The currently available RNA-seq data were generated from various types of patients' samples, and COVID-19 related sample materials have been sequenced at the level of RNA, including whole blood, different components of blood [e.g., plasma, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), leukocytes, lymphocytes, monocytes, T cells], nasal swabs, and autopsy samples (e.g., lung, heart, liver, kidney). Of these, RNA-seq studies using whole blood, PBMCs, nasal swabs and autopsy/biopsy samples were reviewed to highlight the major findings from RNA-seq data analysis. Conclusions: Based on the bulk and scRNA-seq data analysis, severe COVID-19 patients display shifts in cell populations, especially those of leukocytes and monocytes, possibly leading to cytokine storms and immune silence. These RNA-seq data form the foundation for further gene expression analysis using samples from individuals suffering from long COVID.
© 2022 The Authors. Clinical and Translational Discovery published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Shanghai Institute of Clinical Bioinformatics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID‐19; RNA‐seq; biomarker; gene expression

Year:  2022        PMID: 35942159      PMCID: PMC9350144          DOI: 10.1002/ctd2.104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transl Discov        ISSN: 2768-0622


INTRODUCTION

The rise of next‐generation sequencing, especially RNA sequencing (RNA‐seq) has revolutionized the way we conduct research. Due to the decreased costs of performing RNA‐seq experiments, it is now commonly used as the first step of research to profile gene expression changes of one condition compared to another. Through the development of a more elaborate assay, gene expression profiling at the single‐cell level is possible, which is collectively called single‐cell RNA‐seq (scRNA‐seq). Instead, the term bulk RNA‐seq is used for RNA‐seq assay other than scRNA‐seq. It is now a common practice and requirement for most journals to deposit the generated RNA‐seq data before the publication of each study in a journal. These data are readily available from public domains, such as gene expression omnibus (GEO), ArrayExpress, and Sequence Read Archive (SRA). Such data sharing allows for secondary analysis of the previously published RNA‐seq data to discover gene expression changes from a different perspective than originally intended by combining two or more similar studies. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) is the causative virus for the global pandemic, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19). Because of its global impact, numerous approaches, especially those using high‐throughput OMICS techniques, have been taken to characterise the genomic mutations of this virus as well as the impact on the COVID‐19 patients, especially using RNA‐seq assay. Due to the rapid mutations of RNA viruses, SARS‐CoV‐2 has mutated by acquiring more aggressive infection rates in humans. These mutations are closely monitored by performing genomic sequencing of COVID‐19 patients around the world. Although various mutations and dominant variants of SARS‐CoV‐2 have been identified, the symptoms and severity of COVID‐19 patients vary significantly depending, in part, on underlying conditions (e.g., older ages, diabetes, obesity, gender). The symptoms of COVID‐19 are diverse, especially those suffering from long‐term symptoms. The specific term, long COVID, has been developed to describe those suffering for more than 3 months. The current findings indicate that the damage to endothelial and nerve cells might be responsible for the short‐ and long‐term COVID symptoms, which result in damage to the lungs, heart, brain, and other vital organs of those infected. , With the appearance of the less life‐threatening variant of SARS‐CoV‐2, the BA.2 variant (so‐called stealth omicron ), it is clear that the research has shifted to understanding the chronic complications of COVID‐19, including chest pain, cough, fatigue, headaches, joint pain, loss of smell or tastes, and shortness of breath. Due to the global interest to elucidate the disease mechanism, many data have been collected, including OMICS data. Yet, one is still far from understanding the whole spectrum of the negative impact of SARS‐CoV‐2 on human health as in the case of possible causative contribution to the rise of mysterious hepatitis in children in recent weeks. Thus, it is clear that more systematic approaches are urgently needed to understand the impact of long COVID. To facilitate such approaches, this Mini‐Review surveys the current status of gene expression profilings of COVID‐19 patients using the RNA‐seq technique.

PUBLICLY AVAILABLE RNA‐SEQ DATA OF COVID‐19 PATIENTS AND COVID‐RELATED RESEARCH

To screen for genes affected by SARS‐CoV‐2 and possibly responsible for the symptoms of COVID‐19 patients, both bulk RNA‐seq and scRNA‐seq techniques have been used. Because of the global impact of COVID‐19, various types of patients’ samples and COVID‐19 related sample materials have been sequenced at the level of RNA, including whole blood, different components of blood [e.g., plasma, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), leukocytes, lymphocytes, monocytes, T cells], nasal swabs, and autopsy samples (e.g., lung, heart, liver, kidney) (Table 1).
TABLE 1

List of RNA‐seq data available from GEO. PMID stands for PubMed ID

GEO Accession ID Target cells/tissues Conditions Number of samples Type of sequencing Publication
GSE147975human pluripotent stem cell‐derived colonic organoidsinfected with SARS‐CoV‐2 pseudo‐entry virus2Single‐Cell RNA‐seqPMID: 33116299
GSE149689peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs)healthy donors, flu, or COVID‐19 patients20Single‐Cell RNA‐seqPMID: 32651212
GSE149973Vero 6 or Calu 3 cellsinfected with BavPat1/2020 EPI_ISL_40686226Bulk RNA‐seq, ribosome‐profilingPMID: 32906143
GSE150316lung, jejunum, heart, liver, kidney, bowel, fat, skin, bone marrow, placentaautopsy samples from patients deceased due to SARS‐Cov2 infection88Bulk RNA‐seqPMID: 33298930
GSE150392human induced pluripotent stem cell‐derived cardiomyocytesinfected with SARS‐CoV‐26Bulk RNA‐seqPMID: 32835305, 33805011
GSE150819human bronchial organoids, primary human bronchial epithelial cells, or A549 cellinfected with SARS‐CoV‐2 in the presence of absence of camostat18Bulk RNA‐seq https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.05.25.115600v2.article‐info
GSE150861peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs)severe COVID‐19 patients treated with Tocilizumab (time‐course)7Single‐Cell RNA‐seq PMID: 32764665
GSE151161whole bloodCOVID‐19 patients treated with abatacept (time‐course)76Bulk RNA‐seq PMID: 34075090
GSE151878human embryonic stem cell‐derived cardiomyocytesinfected with SARS‐CoV‐2 Pseudo‐entry virus and co‐cultured with macrophages3Single‐Cell RNA‐seq PMID: 33236003
GSE151973olfactory epithelium, nasal respiratory epitheliumCOVID‐19 patients6Bulk RNA‐seq PMID: 33251489
GSE152522virus‐reactive memory CD4+ T cellshealthy donors or COVID‐19 patients78Single‐Cell RNA‐seq, TCR‐seq PMID: 33096020
GSE152641whole bloodhealthy donors or COVID‐19 patients86Bulk RNA‐seq PMID: 33437935
GSE153931virus‐reactive memory CD8+ T cellshealthy donors or COVID‐19 patients45Single‐cell RNA‐seq PMID: 33478949
GSE154244nasopharyngeal swabCOVID‐19 patients4Bulk RNA‐seq PMID: 33413422
GSE154311neutrophils (CD16 subtypes)severe COVID‐19 patients9Bulk RNA‐seq PMID: 33986193
GSE154567blood buffy coatCOVID‐19 patients9Single‐cell RNA‐seq PMID: 32743611, 33357411
GSE155223peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs)severe COVID‐19 patients (time‐course)18single‐cell RNA‐seq PMID: 35064122
GSE155249macrophages and T cellsbronchoalveolar lavage fluid from COVID‐19 positive, COVID‐19 negative with bacterial pneumonia secondary to infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii, COVID‐19 negative, intubated for airway protection to facilitate endoscopy for severe gastrointestinal bleeding without pneumonia19Bulk RNA‐seq PMID: 33429418
GSE155286lung organoidhuman lung‐only mice (LoM) infected with recombinant coronaviruses SARS‐CoV, MERS‐CoV, SARS‐CoV‐2, full length bat coronaviruses WIV1 or SHC01413Bulk RNA‐seq PMID: 33561864
GSE155518AT2 cellscultured in 3D and infected with SARS‐CoV26Bulk RNA‐seq No
GSE157103leukocyteshealthy donors or COVID‐19 patients126Bulk RNA‐seq PMID: 33096026
GSE157344blood or bronchoalveloar lavagehealthy donors or COVID‐19 patients54Single‐Cell RNA‐seq PMID: 33674591
GSE157403kidneyCOVID‐19 patient1Bulk RNA‐seq PMID: 33942030
GSE157490Calu‐3 cellsinfected with SARS‐CoV‐2 (time‐course)127Bulk RNA‐seq, RPF‐seq, QTI‐seq, sRNA‐seq PMID: 34433827
GSE157789leukocytes and lymphocyteshealthy donors, severe COVID‐19, or bacterial acute respiratory distress syndrome patients with or without dexamethasone treatment31Single‐Cell RNA‐seq PMID: 34782790
GSE157852choroid plexus organoidsinfected with SARS‐CoV‐2 (time‐course)9Bulk RNA‐seq PMID: 33010822
GSE158127Lunghealthy donors or patients with prolonged COVID‐1922Single‐cell RNA‐seq PMID: 33257409
GSE159556primary human pancreatic islet cellsinfected with SARS‐CoV‐25Single‐cell RNA‐seq PMID: 34081913
GSE159678monocytesCOVID‐19 patients and treated with hydroxychloroquine in vitro47RNA‐seq, ChIP‐seq PMID: 33377122
GSE160351peripheral monocyteshealthy donors or COVID‐19 patients9Bulk RNA‐seq PMID: 33208929, 34145258
GSE161225Skinhealthy controls, maculopapular drug rash with or without COVID‐19 infection15Bulk RNA‐seq PMID: 34157151
GSE162316A549stably expressing ACE2 and treated with CoV2‐miR‐7a.1 and CoV2‐miR‐7a.2, or control mimic RNA16small RNA‐seq PMID: 34914162
GSE162323Calu‐3 cellsinfected with SARS‐CoV‐2 (time‐course)42Bulk RNA‐seq, ribosome profiling PMID: 33979833
GSE162562peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs)healthy donors, asymptomatic COVID‐19 patients, highly exposed seronegative subjects, non‐Ischgl community (ski resort in Austria) COVID‐19 patients with mild symtoms, or highly exposed seronegative non‐Ischgl community subjects108Bulk RNA‐seq PMID: 33608566, 34100027
GSE162629Caco‐2 cellsinfected with SARS‐CoV‐2 GFP delN P1 or P10 virus2Bulk RNA‐seq No
GSE162911lung, trachea, heartregions of interest (ROIs) from FFPE samples of 9 COVID‐19 patients784Bulk RNA‐seq PMID: 33915569
GSE163005cerebrospinal fluid‐derived leukocytesNeuro‐COVID, non‐inflammatory or autoimmune neurological diseases, or viral encephalitis38Single‐cell RNA‐seq PMID: 33382973
GSE163151blood or nasopharyngeal swabhealthy donors, individuals with SARS‐CoV‐2 infection, other viral acute respiratory infections, non‐viral acute respiratory illness404Bulk RNA‐seq PMID: 33536218
GSE164013Lung80 regions of interest (ROIs) from autopsy FFPE lung tissues from a cohort of 5 patients with positive SARS‐CoV‐2 nasopharyngeal swab on admission80Bulk RNA‐seq PMID: 33915569
GSE164332brain (frontal cortex)healthy donors or COVID‐19 patients16Bulk RNA‐seq PMID: 34022369
GSE164948peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs)healthy donors, COVID‐19 or community‐acquired pneumonia patients4Single‐cell RNA‐seq PMID: 34424199
GSE165080peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs)healthy donors or COVID‐19 patients53Single‐cell RNA‐seq PMID: 35281000
GSE165193umbilical cord blood mononuclear cellsinfants born to mothers infected with SARS‐CoV‐2 in the third trimester12Single‐cell RNA‐seq PMID: 33758834, 34750520
GSE166530nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal swabshealthy donors or COVID‐19 patients41Bulk RNA‐seq PMID: 34586723
GSE166990human induced pluripotent cellsoverexpression of ACE2 and infected with SARS‐CoV‐26Bulk RNA‐seq PMID: 33880436
GSE166992peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs)healthy donors or COVID‐19 patients9Single‐cell RNA‐seq PMID: 33691089
GSE167075Caco‐2 cellsinfected with SARS‐CoV‐2 and treated with shRNA against control sequence or m6A writer, METTL316Bulk RNA‐seq PMID: 33961823
GSE167747induced pluripotent stem cell‐derived human kidney organoids/kidney autopsyinfected with SARS‐CoV‐2/COVID‐19 patients6Single‐cell RNA‐seq PMID: 35032430
GSE167930peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs)healthy donors or COVID‐19 patients40Bulk RNA‐seq PMID: 34586734
GSE168215bronchial brushingCOVID‐19 patients9Bulk RNA‐seq PMID: 34937051
GSE168797A549 cellsoverexpression of ACE224Bulk RNA‐seq PMID: 33758843
GSE169241hearts/human embryonic stem cell‐derived cardiomyocyteshealthy donors or COVID‐19 patients/infected with SARS‐CoV‐2 and treated with Ranolazine or Tofacitinib23Bulk RNA‐seq PMID: 33853355
GSE171110whole bloodhealthy donors or COVID‐19 patients54Bulk RNA‐seq PMID: 34127958
GSE171370human pluripotent stem cell‐derived cardiomyocytes (hPSC‐CMs)overexpression of Orf9c, a SARS‐CoV‐2 encoded gene6Bulk RNA‐seq PMID: 35180394
GSE171381decidua or placental villipregnant women with and without COVID‐199Single‐cell RNA‐seq PMID: 33969332
GSE171555peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs)healthy donors, COVID‐19 inpatients (hospitalized) and outpatients (infected), or uninfected close contacts (exposed)48Single‐cell RNA‐seq PMID: 33870241
GSE171668lung, heart, liver, kidneysevere COVID‐19 patients188Bulk RNA‐seq, single‐cell RNA‐seq, single‐nucleus RNA‐seq PMID: 33915569
GSE172114whole bloodcritical and non‐critical COVID‐19 patients at hospitalization69Bulk RNA‐seq PMID: 34698500
GSE173507Vero E6, A549‐ACE2, or BEAS‐2B cellsinfected with SARS‐CoV‐24Bulk RNA‐seq PMID: 35233578; 35313591
GSE174083whole bloodfour‐time points before and after the meditation retreat388Bulk RNA‐seq PMID: 34907015
GSE174668A549 or HepG2 cellsincubated with extracellular vesicles (EVs) isolated from healthy donors, presymptomatic S1, hyperinflammatory S2, convalescent S3, or resolution S4 phases of COVID‐19 patients30Bulk RNA‐seq PMID: 34158670
GSE174745brain (ventral midbrain)non‐COVID‐19 or COVID‐19 patients15Bulk RNA‐seq No
GSE176201peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) or BAL T cellshealthy donors or aged COVID‐19 convalescents14Single‐cell RNA‐seq, TCR‐seq PMID: 34591653
GSE176269nasal wash cellsadults with COVID‐19, influenza A, or no disease (healthy)116Single‐cell RNA‐seq No
GSE176479cardiac microvascular endothelial cellsexposed to platelet releasate originating from patients with COVID‐19 or healthy controls14Bulk RNA‐seq PMID: 34516880
GSE176498plasmahealthy controls, non‐severe or severe COVID‐19 patients47Bulk RNA‐seq PMID: 34755842
GSE178331pooled human umbilical vein endothelial cells (pHUVECs)/bloodpHUVECs were stimulated with bloods from COVID‐19 negative, mild, moderate, or severe patients25Bulk RNA‐seq PMID: 35405523
GSE178824granulocytic‐myeloid derived suppressor cellshealthy donors, severe, asymptomatic, or convalescent COVID‐19 patients16Bulk RNA‐seq PMID: 34341659
GSE179448T regulatory cellshealthy donors or COVID‐19 patients86Bulk RNA‐seq PMID: 34433692
GSE181238placentahealthy controls, COVID‐19+ mothers, or mothers with on‐COVID related inflammatory pathologies31Bulk RNA‐seq No
GSE182297oral pharynx, prefrontal cortex, nasal pharynx, olfactory bulb, salivary gland, tongue, heart, liver, lung, or kidneyone COVID‐19 patient compared to a pool of brain RNA from multiple donors as control22Bulk RNA‐seq PMID: 34506752
GSE182917liver, heart, kidney, spleen, lunghealthy control donors or SARS‐CoV‐2 infected patients24Bulk RNA‐seq PMID: 35022412
GSE183716peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs)multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS‐C) after SARS‐CoV‐2 infection8Single‐cell RNA‐seq, CITE‐seq No
GSE187420Calu‐3 cellscontrol, SARS‐CoV‐2 infection, or IMD‐0354 treatment followed by SARS‐CoV‐2 infection9Bulk RNA‐seq No
GSE188847brain (frontal cortex)severe COVID‐19 or unaffected patients24Bulk RNA‐seq No
GSE189039peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs)COVID‐19 patients infected by SARS‐CoV‐2 Beta varient (Beta) or SARS‐CoV‐2 naïve vaccinated individuals40Bulk RNA‐seq PMID: 35465056
GSE189506SerumCOVID‐19 patients (6 survivors, 6 deceased) with multifocal interstitial pneumonia and requiring oxygen therapy12small RNA‐seq PMID: 35122770
GSE190193lung epithelial cells derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSC)infected with SARS‐CoV‐29Bulk RNA‐seq No
GSE190680buffy coatCOVID‐19 patients infected by SARS‐CoV‐2 Alpha varient with or without the escape mutation100Bulk RNA‐seq PMID: 35181735
GSE190747peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs)recovered COVID‐19 patients or naïve individuals who had received the BNT162b mRNA vaccine115Bulk RNA‐seq No
GSE192391peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs)COVID‐19 patients (time‐course)30Single‐cell RNA‐seq PMID: 35169146
GSE193722hamster hearts or human embryonic stem cell–derived sinoatrial node‐like pacemaker cellsinfected with SARS‐CoV‐221Bulk RNA‐seq PMID: 35255712
GSE193770T cellshealthy controls, multiple sclerosis patients or COVID‐19 patients10Single‐cell RNA‐seq PMID: 35258337
GSE196455monocytesmale and female donors treated with mock, ORF8, or hIL‐17A12Bulk RNA‐seq PMID: 35343786
GSE197204whole bloodcritically‐ill COVID‐19 patients obtained at admission in an Intensive Care Unit56Bulk RNA‐seq No
GSE198256monocyteshealthy controls, acute or convalescent COVID‐19 patients34Bulk RNA‐seq No
GSE198449whole bloodCOVID‐19 Health Action Response for Marines (CHARM) study: samples collected from 475 subjects at different time points as part of SARS‐Cov‐2 initial outbreak and later surveillance on the Marine recruits1858Bulk RNA‐seq PMID: 35479098
GSE199272humanized mice (MISTRG6‐hACE2) infected with SARS‐CoV‐2lung3Single‐cell RNA‐seq No
GSE200561humanized mice (MISTRG6‐hACE2) infected with SARS‐CoV‐2lung16Bulk RNA‐seq No
List of RNA‐seq data available from GEO. PMID stands for PubMed ID

Whole blood

The drawing of blood is a standard medical practice to diagnose various diseases. Thus, it is no surprise that many RNA‐seq data of whole blood of COVID‐19 patients compared to that of healthy donors are available. For example, the analysis of RNA‐seq data of whole blood from 42 severe hospitalized COVID‐19 patients compared to 10 healthy donors shows that 4 079 genes are differentially expressed at the threshold of 1.5‐fold change. Not surprisingly, many genes involved in immune response (e.g., neutrophil and interferon signalling, T and B cell receptor responses) are differentially regulated, especially CD177, a marker of neutrophil activation. Another study comparing RNA‐seq data of 46 critical (in the intensive care unit under mechanical ventilation) and 23 non‐critical COVID‐19 patients shows that genes involved in inflammatory response, myeloid cell activation, and neutrophil degranulation are enriched in critical COVID‐19 patients, especially the metalloprotease ADAM9. Compared to people with underlying conditions, many people infected with SARS‐CoV‐2 are asymptomatic. Thus, RNA‐seq data of COVID‐19 Health Action Response for Marines (CHARM) study is of great interest because it collected whole blood from 475 subjects at different time points during SARS‐Cov‐2 initial outbreak and later surveillance on the United States Marine recruits. Yet, the original publication of this study did not explore the RNA‐seq data in detail. This is because the study concentrated more on proteomic analysis, which identified the elevated level of serum IL‐17C in asymptomatic participants compared to those with COVID‐19 symptoms (Figure 1). As this study generated time‐course 1 858 RNA‐seq data, re‐analysis of RNA‐seq data will be of great interest to further elucidate the gene expression changes associated with COVID‐19 symptoms.
FIGURE 1

RNA‐seq data of whole blood and nasal swabs of COVID‐19 patients compared to healthy donors. Genes involved in immune response (e.g., neutrophil and myeloid activation, T‐ and B‐cell response, interferon signalling) are enriched in critical COVID patients. CD177 and the metalloprotease ADAM9 are upregulated, while NFkB, TREM1, and lymphocyte‐related genes are down‐regulated in severe COVID‐19 patients compared to the healthy donors, suggesting an overall dysregulated immune response. In contrast, asymptomatic infected patients show elevated level of serum IL‐17C. Created with BioRender.com

RNA‐seq data of whole blood and nasal swabs of COVID‐19 patients compared to healthy donors. Genes involved in immune response (e.g., neutrophil and myeloid activation, T‐ and B‐cell response, interferon signalling) are enriched in critical COVID patients. CD177 and the metalloprotease ADAM9 are upregulated, while NFkB, TREM1, and lymphocyte‐related genes are down‐regulated in severe COVID‐19 patients compared to the healthy donors, suggesting an overall dysregulated immune response. In contrast, asymptomatic infected patients show elevated level of serum IL‐17C. Created with BioRender.com

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells

Besides whole blood, different components of blood were used to perform RNA‐seq assay. A PBMC is any blood cell having round nucleus, including lymphocytes [T cells, B cells, natural killer (NK) cells] and monocytes. , Because PMBCs include different immune cell types, scRNA‐seq assay is employed to decipher transcriptome dynamics and cell‐type differences in COVID‐19 patients compared to healthy donors. For example, the analysis of scRNA‐seq data of PBMCs collected from 11 healthy donors, 5 asymptomatic individuals, 33 individuals with moderate COVID‐19 symptoms, 10 individuals with severe COVID‐19 symptoms, and two time‐point data of two individuals with severe COVID‐19 symptoms identified 76 cell subpopulations associated with various clinical presentations of COVID‐19 patients, highlighting the complicated cell‐type landscapes of COVID‐19 symptoms. Although such identification of cell subpopulations is important, further follow‐up studies focusing on the functionalities of these subpopulations of cells are necessary. Across all age groups, males have a higher rate of respiratory intubation, a longer length of hospital stay, and a higher death rate from COVID‐19 compared to females. To address the gender differences in COVID‐19 patients, scRNA‐seq combined with flow cytometry analysis of 10 healthy donors, 9 COVID‐19 inpatients (hospitalized), 19 outpatients (infected), and 7 uninfected close contacts (exposed) show that circulating mucosal‐associated invariant T (MAIT) cells were recruited to airway tissues more robustly in female COVID‐19 patients compared to male COVID‐19 patients as circulating MAIT cells are higher in frequencies in females than males in the healthy setting. Interestingly, this study identified two subpopulations of MAIT cells, MAITα and MAITβ (Figure 2A). The authors defined MAITα cells to be immunologically active based on the enriched expressions of genes associated with cytotoxic T cells (GNLY, CD8A, and CD8B), migration/adhesion (CXCR4 and ITGB2), and cytokine signalling (IRF1, B2M, NFKBIA, JUNB, and FOS). In contrast, MAITβ cells are defined as pro‐apoptotic based on the enriched expressions of genes categorized under cellular responses to external stimuli, metabolism of RNA, viral infection, and programmed cell death but not immune processes. In the healthy setting, MAITα cells are dominant in females, while MAITβ cells are dominant in males. Based on these findings, the authors conclude that female‐specific protective MAIT subpopulation might be responsible for the reduced severity of COVID‐19 symptoms and death.
FIGURE 2

Immune profilings of COVID‐19 patients. (A) Mucosal‐associated invariant T (MAIT) cells are identified in two subpopulations: MAITα and MAITß. MAITα are immunologically active and higher in frequency in female, while MAITß are pro‐apoptotic and are dominant in male. Female‐specific MAITα cells have a protective effect, possibly related to reduced mortality rate and complications in females compared to males. (B) scRNA‐seq after Tocilizumab (Actemra) treatment of severe COVID‐19 patients. Tocilizumab targets IL6 and thus suppresses the cytokine storm caused by monocyte subpopulation of severe COVID‐19 patients. Created with BioRender.com

Immune profilings of COVID‐19 patients. (A) Mucosal‐associated invariant T (MAIT) cells are identified in two subpopulations: MAITα and MAITß. MAITα are immunologically active and higher in frequency in female, while MAITß are pro‐apoptotic and are dominant in male. Female‐specific MAITα cells have a protective effect, possibly related to reduced mortality rate and complications in females compared to males. (B) scRNA‐seq after Tocilizumab (Actemra) treatment of severe COVID‐19 patients. Tocilizumab targets IL6 and thus suppresses the cytokine storm caused by monocyte subpopulation of severe COVID‐19 patients. Created with BioRender.com Although COVID‐19 vaccines have been developed to reduce the mortality rate, the effective treatment of COVID‐19 patients is still lacking. Up until now, some therapeutic approaches have been taken. One of such is the usage of Tocilizumab (Actemra), which is an immunosuppressive drug targeting IL6. Using time‐course scRNA‐seq experiment of severe COVID‐19 patients treated with Tocilizumab, it was found that a subpopulation of monocytes contributes to the inflammatory cytokine storms of severe COVID‐19 patients. This monocyte subpopulation expresses CCL3, IL6, IL10, TNF, inflammation‐related chemokine genes (CCL4, CCL20, CXCL2, CXCL3, CCL3L1, CCL4L2, CXCL8, and CXCL9), and inflammasome activation‐associated genes (NLRP3 and IL1B). Further, humoral and cell‐mediated antiviral immune responses were sustained even upon treatment with Tocilizumab, suggesting that further treatment targeting these cell populations is needed for COVID‐19‐related cytokine storms (Figure 2B).

Nasal swabs

Nasal or nasopharyngeal swabs are a common method to test for the presence of SARS‐CoV‐2. Besides detecting fragments of viral RNA, genome‐wide transcriptomic analysis of the host (i.e., COVID‐19 patients) can be performed. For example, by comparing RNA‐seq data generated from naso/oropharyngeal swabs of 36 COVID‐19 Indian patients hospitalized during the first surge of COVID‐19 to those of 5 COVID‐19 negative control samples, 251 up‐ and 9 068 down‐regulated genes were identified at the threshold of two‐fold changes and adjusted p‐value < .05. The differentially expressed genes include up‐regulation of genes involved in innate immune response (e.g., interferon signalling, response to virus) and down‐regulation of genes involved in membrane potentials and neurotransmitter transport as well as cardiac, muscular, and neurological processes, suggesting that significant down‐regulation of host transcriptomes can be monitored via nasal swabs. By performing RNA‐seq assay of whole blood and/or nasopharyngeal swabs of COVID‐19 patients compared to healthy donors and individuals with other viral acute respiratory infections (i.e., influenza or seasonal coronavirus infection) or non‐viral acute respiratory illness (i.e., bacterial sepsis) (a total of 404 bulk RNA‐seq data), the activation of interferon‐mediated antiviral pathways and inhibition of other immune and inflammatory pathways (e.g., nuclear factor κB, TREM1, NK cell signalling pathways) were identified, suggesting an overall dysregulated immune response in COVID‐19 patients. This study is particularly interesting as COVID‐19 specific gene expression changes were inferred by comparing it to other infectious diseases.

Autopsy and biopsy samples

It is now clear that the first response to the infection of SARS‐CoV‐2 is through innate immune responses, leading to strong and dysregulated inflammatory responses and prolonged effects in various tissues. Thus, gene expression profilings of autopsy samples from COVID‐19 patients are informative in understanding the prolonged effects of SARS‐CoV‐2 on the human body. By developing a COVID‐19 autopsy biobank consisting of 11 organs and 17 donors, scRNA‐seq experiment was performed to profile 24 lungs, 16 kidneys, 16 liver and 19 heart autopsy tissues of individuals who passed away from COVID‐19. Through the detailed analysis of these data, the authors uncovered altered cellular compartments, especially in lungs, where defect in alveolar type 2 differentiation was recorded. This study provides a valuable source of autopsy samples as well as OMICS data, including bulk RNA‐seq, scRNA‐seq, and single‐nucleus RNA‐seq data. It would be of interest to compare these data to other RNA‐seq data of autopsy samples , , (Table 1) to identify common defects in tissue regeneration in COVID‐19 patients in regards to dysregulated signalling pathways. Without a doubt, the lungs are the most affected organ by SARS‐CoV‐2. Thus, intensive research focusing on gene expression profilings in lungs has been conducted. For example, scRNA‐seq data of bronchoalveolar lavage fluids (BAL) and matched peripheral blood samples from 21 severe COVID‐19 patients admitted to intensive care units (ICU) and on peripheral blood of 6 mild COVID‐19 patients and 5 healthy donors show that the severe COVID‐19 patients had a higher proportion of neutrophils and decreased proportion of lymphocytes in their blood samples compared to other two sample groups. In BAL, the gene expressions of pro‐inflammatory M1 macrophages [characterized by the expression of SPP1 (osteopontin)] were induced and associated with a better prognosis for severe COVID‐19 patients (Figure 3). Based on these data, the authors conclude that immune silence in severe COVID‐19 patients may stem from myeloid dysregulation and lymphoid impairment. Just as with any other scRNA‐seq study, further follow‐up studies with more functional and mechanistic studies of the identified subpopulations of cells are necessary to firmly establish the observations made by scRNA‐seq data analysis.
FIGURE 3

scRNA‐seq of lungs of COVID‐19 patients. Severe COVID‐19 patients have a higher level of neutrophiles and decreased level of lymphocytes. Pro‐inflammatory M1 macrophages expressing SPP1 are associated with suppression of cytokine storm and better prognosis for severe COVID‐19 patients. Created with BioRender.com

scRNA‐seq of lungs of COVID‐19 patients. Severe COVID‐19 patients have a higher level of neutrophiles and decreased level of lymphocytes. Pro‐inflammatory M1 macrophages expressing SPP1 are associated with suppression of cytokine storm and better prognosis for severe COVID‐19 patients. Created with BioRender.com

CONCLUSION

The longitudinal cohort study of COVID‐19 patients who had survived hospitalization indicates that even two years after discharge from Jin Yin‐tan Hospital (Wuhan, China), survivors with long COVID symptoms had a lower health‐related quality of life (HRQoL), worse exercise capacity, more mental health abnormality, and increased health‐care use after discharge compared to those without long COVID symptoms. This indicates that mechanistic understanding of long‐term effects of COVID‐19 is urgently needed. To this end, more RNA‐seq data should be generated from individuals with long COVID symptoms. Such newly generated data can be compared to the previously generated data as listed in Table 1 to perform a comparative analysis of transcriptomic data to understand how gene expression changes affect COVID‐19 patients. There are some studies already published that performed secondary analysis of previously generated RNA‐seq and microarray data of COVID‐19 patients compared to healthy donors and individuals with other illnesses [e.g., SARS and the Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS), lupus]. , , , Yet, to understand the disease mechanism of SARS‐CoV‐2, RNA‐seq data from long‐COVID patients should be generated not only from blood or blood‐related materials but also from tissue biopsy samples from the affected areas by SARS‐CoV‐2. Furthermore, more systematic analysis of RNA‐seq data combined with other OMICS data (e.g., genomics, proteomics, metabolomics), especially those of time‐course data, are urgently needed. These data should be analysed not only for gene expression changes but also for gene regulatory networks as well as using machine learning algorithms to train and predict the early diagnostic biomarkers of long COVID. It is also important to note that gene expression changes should be verified with protein expressions, including proteomics and fluorescence‐activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis. Such combined approaches will help to understand the disease mechanisms of SARS‐CoV‐2 causing long COVID.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported.
  29 in total

1.  Explaining the unexplained hepatitis in children.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 25.071

2.  CD177, a specific marker of neutrophil activation, is associated with coronavirus disease 2019 severity and death.

Authors:  Yves Lévy; Aurélie Wiedemann; Boris P Hejblum; Mélany Durand; Cécile Lefebvre; Mathieu Surénaud; Christine Lacabaratz; Matthieu Perreau; Emile Foucat; Marie Déchenaud; Pascaline Tisserand; Fabiola Blengio; Benjamin Hivert; Marine Gauthier; Minerva Cervantes-Gonzalez; Delphine Bachelet; Cédric Laouénan; Lila Bouadma; Jean-François Timsit; Yazdan Yazdanpanah; Giuseppe Pantaleo; Hakim Hocini; Rodolphe Thiébaut
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-06-10

Review 3.  Effects of COVID-19 on the Nervous System.

Authors:  Costantino Iadecola; Josef Anrather; Hooman Kamel
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Temporal and spatial heterogeneity of host response to SARS-CoV-2 pulmonary infection.

Authors:  Niyati Desai; Azfar Neyaz; Annamaria Szabolcs; Angela R Shih; Jonathan H Chen; Vishal Thapar; Linda T Nieman; Alexander Solovyov; Arnav Mehta; David J Lieb; Anupriya S Kulkarni; Christopher Jaicks; Katherine H Xu; Michael J Raabe; Christopher J Pinto; Dejan Juric; Ivan Chebib; Robert B Colvin; Arthur Y Kim; Robert Monroe; Sarah E Warren; Patrick Danaher; Jason W Reeves; Jingjing Gong; Erroll H Rueckert; Benjamin D Greenbaum; Nir Hacohen; Stephen M Lagana; Miguel N Rivera; Lynette M Sholl; James R Stone; David T Ting; Vikram Deshpande
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Mucosal-associated invariant T cell responses differ by sex in COVID-19.

Authors:  Chen Yu; Sejiro Littleton; Nicholas S Giroux; Rose Mathew; Shengli Ding; Joan Kalnitsky; Yuchen Yang; Elizabeth Petzold; Hong A Chung; Grecia O Rivera; Tomer Rotstein; Rui Xi; Emily R Ko; Ephraim L Tsalik; Gregory D Sempowski; Thomas N Denny; Thomas W Burke; Micah T McClain; Christopher W Woods; Xiling Shen; Daniel R Saban
Journal:  Med (N Y)       Date:  2021-04-13

6.  Postmortem high-dimensional immune profiling of severe COVID-19 patients reveals distinct patterns of immunosuppression and immunoactivation.

Authors:  Haibo Wu; Peiqi He; Yong Ren; Shiqi Xiao; Wei Wang; Zhenbang Liu; Heng Li; Zhe Wang; Dingyu Zhang; Jun Cai; Xiangdong Zhou; Dongpo Jiang; Xiaochun Fei; Lei Zhao; Heng Zhang; Zhenhua Liu; Rong Chen; Weiqing Li; Chaofu Wang; Shuyang Zhang; Jiwei Qin; Björn Nashan; Cheng Sun
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  RNA SARS-CoV-2 Persistence in the Lung of Severe COVID-19 Patients: A Case Series of Autopsies.

Authors:  Tamara Caniego-Casas; Laura Martínez-García; Marina Alonso-Riaño; David Pizarro; Irene Carretero-Barrio; Nilda Martínez-de-Castro; Ignacio Ruz-Caracuel; Raúl de Pablo; Ana Saiz; Rosa Nieto Royo; Ana Santiago; Marta Rosas; José L Rodríguez-Peralto; Belén Pérez-Mies; Juan C Galán; José Palacios
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Identification of Distinct Immune Cell Subsets Associated With Asymptomatic Infection, Disease Severity, and Viral Persistence in COVID-19 Patients.

Authors:  Xiaorui Wang; Han Bai; Junpeng Ma; Hongyu Qin; Qiqi Zeng; Fang Hu; Tingting Jiang; Weikang Mao; Yang Zhao; Xiaobei Chen; Xin Qi; Mengyang Li; Jiao Xu; Jingcan Hao; Yankui Wang; Xi Ding; Yuanrui Liu; Tianlong Huang; Chao Fang; Changli Ge; Dong Li; Ke Hu; Xianwen Ren; Baojun Zhang; Binghong Zhang; Bingyin Shi; Chengsheng Zhang
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 9.  COVID-19 Genetic Variants and Their Potential Impact in Vaccine Development.

Authors:  Giau Van Vo; Eva Bagyinszky; Seong Soo A An
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-03-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.