| Literature DB >> 35942124 |
Andrii Chernozub1, Veaceslav Manolachi2,3, Georgiy Korobeynikov4, Vladimir Potop3,5, Liudmyla Sherstiuk1, Victor Manolachi2,3, Ion Mihaila5.
Abstract
Background: To study the peculiarities of changes in functional indicators and body composition parameters of mixed martial arts (MMA) athletes of strike fighting style and a number of biochemical blood indicators during two months of using different intensity training load regimes, and to determine the most informative criteria for assessing adaptive body changes in these training conditions.Entities:
Keywords: Adaptive changes; Evaluation criteria; Load training regimes; Mixed martial arts; Special training; Strike fighting style
Year: 2022 PMID: 35942124 PMCID: PMC9356583 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.13827
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 3.061
Structure of training load regimes used by participants of research in the process of strength training in MMA.
| Training load indicators | Training load regimes | |
|---|---|---|
| Medium intensity ( | High intensity ( | |
| Amplitude of exercise, %: | Maximum (100%) | Partial (90% from maximum) |
| Conditional coefficient of movement amplitude (Q) | 0.9 | 0.8 |
| Duration of movement phases | Concentric phase–2 s; | Concentric phase–3 s; |
| Eccentric phase–3 s | Eccentric phase–6 s | |
| Duration of one repetition (t, s) | 5 | 9 |
| Duration of rest between sets, p | 60 | 40 |
| Number of repetitions in a set | 8 | 4 |
| Maximum duration of work in a set (Tmax, s) | 40 | 36 |
| Projectile working mass (m), % of maximum (1RM) | 64–69 | 72–74 |
| Training load index ( | 0.64 | 0.72 |
| Training load intensity | Medium intensity | High intensity |
| Duration of training session, min | 30–32 | 30–32 |
Parameters of maximum muscle strength (1 RM) development in both group participants during the research, n = 40.
| Control exercises, 1RM, kg | Group | Observation period, months | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial data | After 1 month of training | After 2 months of training | |||
| Bench press on the Smith simulator | A | 62.47 ± 1.72 | 73.62 ± 1.17 | 85.00 ± 2.21 | |
| B | 61.50 ± 1.74 | 74.62 ± 1.89 | 85.75 ± 1.89 | ||
| Block thrust behind the head | A | 65.25 ± 1.39 | 72.50 ± 1.02 | 78.12 ± 1.21 | |
| B | 60.00 ± 1.52 | 69.37 ± 1.51 | 77.75 ± 1.38 | ||
| Legs press in the simulator lying | A | 115.25 ± 3.68 | 143.52 ± 5.01 | 169.62 ± 6.27 | |
| B | 122.20 ± 4.58 | 167.00 ± 5.21 | 201.25 ± 4.98 | ||
Notes.
The difference in comparison with previous results is significant according to the Wilcoxon test (p < 0.05); df, the number of degrees of freedom; p, level of significance.
Parameters of the number of accurate kicks on the mannequin for 30 s in both group participants during the research, n = 40.
| Control exercises | Group | Observation period, months | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial data | After 1 month of training | After 2 months of training | |||
| Front kick | A | 14.25 ± 0.23 | 14.40 ± 0.21 | 14.45 ± 0.19 | |
| B | 14.10 ± 0.17 | 14.65 ± 0.19 | 15.75 ± 0.27 | ||
| Side kick | A | 18.60 ± 0.19 | 18.90 ± 0.19 | 18.95 ± 0.18 | |
| B | 18.45 ± 0.16 | 19.05 ± 0.18 | 19.80 ± 0.25 | ||
| Reverse side kick | A | 16.40 ± 0.18 | 16.75 ± 0.14 | 16.95 ± 0.16 | |
| B | 16.50 ± 0.13 | 17.25 ± 0.17 | 18.45 ± 0.11 | ||
| Roundhouse kick | A | 18.05 ± 0.16 | 18.40 ± 0.11 | 18.50 ± 0.11 | |
| B | 18.15 ± 0.15 | 18.60 ± 0.13 | 20.20 ± 0.15 | ||
Notes.
The difference in comparison with previous results is significant according to the Wilcoxon test (p < 0.05); df, the number of degrees of freedom; p, level of significance.
Parameters of body composition of research participants during two months, n = 40.
| Parameters | Group | Observation period, months | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial data | After 1 month of training | After 2 months of training | |||
| BF | A | 11.93 ± 0.83 | 13.25 ± 0.84 | 11.47 ± 0.80 | |
| B | 16.30 ± 1.08 | 14.27 ± 1.18 | 14.09 ± 1.06 | ||
| FFM | A | 67.50 ± 1.29 | 67.05 ± 1.28 | 68.62 ± 1.25 | |
| B | 63.86 ± 0.62 | 65.77 ± 0.94 | 65.94 ± 0.99 | ||
| BCM | A | 62.54 ± 0.71 | 65.31 ± 1.11 | 63.70 ± 0.24 | |
| B | 63.98 ± 0.16 | 62.45 ± 0.31 | 62.84 ± 0.22 | ||
| BMI | A | 23.80 ± 0.51 | 23.76 ± 0.39 | 23.92 ± 0.46 | |
| B | 24.09 ± 0.58 | 24.27 ± 0.60 | 24.39 ± 0.58 | ||
| DCW | A | 10.95 ± 0.29 | 11.35 ± 0.25 | 11.34 ± 0.22 | |
| B | 10.55 ± 0.11 | 10.50 ± 0.14 | 10.69 ± 0.13 | ||
Notes.
The difference in comparison with previous results is significant according to the Wilcoxon test (p < 0.05); df, the number of degrees of freedom; p, level of significance.
Biochemical blood indicators of group participants during the research, n = 40.
| Indicator | Group | At the beginning of the study | After 2 months of training | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before training load | After training load | Before training load | After training load | ||
| Cortisol, nmol/l | A | 320.53 ± 14.72 | 351.62 ± 27.85 | 416.50 ± 26.70 | 506.85 ± 42.06 |
| B | 332.72 ± 11.26 | 525.55 ± 36.41 | 509.88 ± 28.79 | 677.72 ± 9.50 | |
| Testosterone, nmol/l | A | 19.42 ± 1.28 | 20.52 ± 1.72 | 25.32 ± 2.27 | 27.65 ± 1.98 |
| B | 28.85 ± 1.53 | 29.15 ± 1.63 | 34.62 ± 0.62 | 35.72 ± 0.75 | |
| Creatinine, µmol/l | A | 85.50 ± 0.83 | 83.95 ± 0.86 | 86.00 ± 1.27 | 94.85 ± 1.25 |
| B | 84,60 ± 2.24 | 82.15 ± 2.88 | 99.30 ± 1.49 | 105.75 ± 1.16 | |
| Calcium, | A | 2.48 ± 0.01 | 2.61 ± 0.11 | 2.36 ± 0.01 | 2.42 ± 0.01 |
| B | 2.55 ± 0.01 | 2.57 ± 0.11 | 2.35 ± 0.01 | 2.37 ± 0.01 | |
| Phosphorus, mmol/l | A | 1.10 ± 0.01 | 1.23 ± 0.01 | 0.94 ± 0.03 | 0.97 ± 0.02 |
| B | 1.11 ± 0.03 | 1.17 ± 0.03 | 1.14 ± 0.03 | 0.99 ± 0.01 | |
| Cholesterol, mmol/l | A | 4.32 ± 0.13 | 4.72 ± 0.08 | 4.10 ± 0.12 | 4.15 ± 0.09 |
| B | 4.20 ± 0.06 | 4.07 ± 0.04 | 4.37 ± 0.06 | 4,32 ± 0,04 | |
| LDH, | A | 371.50 ± 7.42 | 502.55 ± 7.44 | 434.55 ± 16.84 | 447.75 ± 7.98 |
| B | 389.50 ± 6.52 | 442.20 ± 18.26 | 378.50 ± 15.97 | 379.25 ± 9.25 | |
Notes.
The difference in comparison with previous results is significant according to Wilcoxon’s test (p < 0.05).
The difference between basal parameters (before training load) in comparison with previous results is significant according to Wilcoxon’s test (p < 0.05).
Figure 1Correlation between biochemical parameters of blood in group A athletes during 2 months of research in the conditions of medium intensity training load regime (Ra = 0.64).
(A) The results recorded at the beginning of the study before training; (B) the results recorded at the beginning of the study after training; (C) the results recorded after 2 months of study before training; (D) the results recorded after 2 months of study after training; two asterisks (**) indicates a correlation at the level of 0.01; one asterisk (*) indicates a correlation at the level of 0.05.
Figure 2(A–D) Correlation between biochemical parameters of blood in group B athletes during 2 months of research in the conditions of high intensity training load regime (Ra = 0.72).