| Literature DB >> 35941928 |
Yanqiu He1, Cheng Hu1, Shiyu Liu1, Mingjie Xu1, Ge Liang2, Dan Du3, Tingting Liu1, Fei Cai1, Zhiyao Chen1, Qingyuan Tan1, Lihui Deng1, Qing Xia1.
Abstract
Background: Acute pancreatitis (AP) is an inflammatory disorder of the exocrine pancreas without specific treatment. Shenmai injection (SMI) was reported to eliminate the severity of experimental AP. This study aimed to explore the mechanisms underlying the synergistic protective effects of SMI on AP based on network pharmacology and experimental validation.Entities:
Keywords: IL6/STAT3 signaling pathway; Shenmai injection; acute pancreatitis; molecular docking; network pharmacology
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35941928 PMCID: PMC9356589 DOI: 10.2147/DDDT.S364352
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Drug Des Devel Ther ISSN: 1177-8881 Impact factor: 4.319
Figure 1Study flowchart.
Basic Information of Two Medicinal Materials of SMI
| Chinese Name | English Name | Latin Name | Family |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hongshen | Red Ginseng Ophiopogon japonicus | Panax ginseng C.A. MeyOphiopogon japonicus (L.f) Ker-Gawl | Araliaceae |
Chromatography and Mass Spectrum for Components and the Corresponding Authentic Standards
| Compound | Formula | RT (min) | Precursor (m/z) | Ion | Error (ppm) | MS/MS | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | SMI | Standard | SMI | |||||
| Re | C48H82O18 | 2.959 | 2.980 | 991.552 | 991.553 | [M+FA-H]- | 0.706 | 945.543 799.485 637.433 |
| Rg1 | C42H72O14 | 2.985 | 3.010 | 845.499 | 845.497 | [M+FA-H]- | −3.075 | 845.487 799.483 637.431 |
| Rb1 | C54H92O23 | 3.552 | 3.594 | 1153.622 | 1153.612 | [M+FA-H]- | −8.668 | 1153.599 1107.593 600.300 |
| D | C44H70O16 | 5.680 | 5.687 | 899.467 | 899.467 | [M+FA-H]- | 0 | 853.459 721.415 575.358 |
| D’ | C44H70O16 | 5.811 | NA | 899.467 | 899.467 | [M+FA-H]- | NA | 853.457 721.417 |
Abbreviations: RT, retention time; SMI, Shenmai injection; MS, mass spectrometry; Re, Ginsenoside Re; Rg1, Ginsenoside Rg1; Rb1, Ginsenoside Rb1; D, Ophiopogonin D; D’, Ophiopogonin D’; NA, not applicable.
Figure 2Confirmation of the components of SMI by standard compounds. (A) Representative base peak intensity chromatograms of standards (red line) and SMI (blue line). (B) Measured MS/MS spectral fragmentation profiles of SMI (top, in black) matching chemical standards (bottom, in red).
Figure 3Crosstalk between SMI and AP targets. (A) Venn diagram of compound-related target interactions overlapping with AP-related targets. (B) Protein–protein interaction network in the STRING database.
Hub Genes and Topological Property
| Gene Symbol | Protein Name | Average Shortest Path | Betweenness Centrality | Degree |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IL6 | Interleukin-6 | 1.3947 | 0.2066 | 23 |
| STAT3 | Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 | 1.7747 | 0.1601 | 21 |
| VEGFA | Vascular endothelial growth factor A | 1.4737 | 0.2799 | 21 |
| TNF | Tumor necrosis factor | 1.6053 | 0.0588 | 17 |
| MMP9 | Matrix metalloproteinase-9 | 1.6316 | 0.0825 | 16 |
| PTGS2 | Prostaglandin G/H synthase 2 | 1.7105 | 0.0651 | 13 |
| MMP2 | Matrix metalloproteinase-2 | 1.7105 | 0.0176 | 13 |
| ICAM1 | Intercellular adhesion molecule 1 | 1.7105 | 0.022 | 12 |
| MMP3 | Matrix metalloproteinase-9 | 1.8421 | 0.0371 | 10 |
| JAK2 | Tyrosine-protein kinase JAK2 | 1.9474 | 0.0599 | 9 |
| PTPRC | Receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase C | 1.9211 | 0.037 | 9 |
| MMP1 | Matrix metalloproteinase-1 | 1.8421 | 0.0058 | 9 |
| ERBB2 | Receptor tyrosine-protein kinase erbB-2 | 1.8421 | 0.0074 | 8 |
| SERPINE1 | Plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 | 1.8684 | 0.0136 | 8 |
| HMOX1 | Heme oxygenase 1 | 1.8947 | 0.0022 | 7 |
Figure 4GO enrichment analysis. (A) Histogram of hub gene degree scores. (B) Visual analysis of the hub genes in CytoHubba. (C–E) GO enrichment analysis of the hub genes from three aspects: biological process (BP), cellular component (CC) and molecular function (MF).
Figure 5Pharmacological network analysis. (A) The main compounds-targets-pathways network. (Diamonds represent the four active compounds; pink circles represent targets; red arrows represent KEGG pathways; edges indicate interactions between compounds and targets.). (B) Subnetwork of the four active compounds predicted to be targets of IL6, STAT3, TNF, and JAK2 related to the IL6/STAT3 pathway.
Binding Affinity Between Four Active Components from SMI and Potential Targets
| Components | Binding Affinity (kcal/mol) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| STAT3 | VEGFA | IL6 | TNF | |
| Ginsenoside Rg1 | −7.3 | −7.7 | −8.5 | −6.1 |
| Ginsenoside Re | −7.7 | −7.8 | −8.8 | −6.7 |
| Ginsenoside Rb1 | −8 | −8.1 | −8.4 | −7.3 |
| Ophiopogonin D | −9.9 | −9.1 | −9.6 | −8 |
Abbreviations: STAT3, signal transducer and activator of transcription 3; VEGFA, vascular endothelial growth factor a; IL6, Interleukin 6; TNF, tumor necrosis factor.
Figure 6Molecular docking models of the four active compounds binding to IL6 and STAT3 (A–D).
Figure 7Effects of SMI and compounds on cellular viability and IL6/STAT3. (A) Effects of SMI on viability of NaT-stimulated 266–6 cells. (B) Effects of the four active compounds on viability of NaT-stimulated 266–6 cells. (C) Representative Western blotting images for p-STAT3, STAT3 IL-6 and β-actin in 266–6 cells. (D) Relative expression levels of IL6 and p-STAT3 in each group. Data are expressed as the mean ± standard error from 4–5 independent experiments. **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001 vs control group, #P < 0.05; ##P < 0.01; ###P < 0.001 vs NaT group.
Figure 8Effects of SMI on the histopathological severity of NaT-induced AP in mice. (A) Representative H&E images of pancreatic sections (magnification 100×). (B) Pancreatic histopathology scores. (C) Representative Western blotting images of p-STAT3, STAT3 IL-6 and β-actin of pancreatic tissue. (D) Relative expression levels of corresponding proteins. Data are expressed as means ± standard error from two independent experiments (n = 3–4 per group). **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001 vs control group, #P < 0.05; ##P < 0.01 vs NaT group.