Divya Lakhaney1,2,3, Luz Adriana Matiz1,3. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Division of Child and Adolescent Health, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA. 2. Department of Pediatrics, Division of Critical Care and Hospital Medicine, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA. 3. NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
In the face of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, clinicians have
increased their utilization of telemedicine services due to the urgent need for
social distancing, staff shortages, lack of personal protective equipment, and
reducing overall in-person contact. Its use has shown particular promise in children
with medical complexity (CMC), who face a number of barriers to their health care.
While telemedicine has been used in CMC previously, it has mostly been implemented
on a small scale in individual complex care programs.[1,2] Although innovations in
technology have allowed for expansion of telemedicine, rapid growth of this service
has been limited as regulations, laws, and payment structures have lagged
behind.[3] Changes to reimbursement policies for telemedicine during the
pandemic by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, including payment parity
with in-person visits, reimbursement for out-of-state visits, and use of alternative
video-based platforms to conduct telemedicine visits, allowed for rapid expansion of
telemedicine.[4] As we will demonstrate, the expansion of telemedicine during
the COVID-19 pandemic offered a unique opportunity to advance the care of CMC, to
narrow potential disparities in care delivery, and also introduces the importance of
monitoring for potential new disparities with the digital divide created from
technological advancements.[5]
CMC and Barriers to Health Care
CMC is characterized by having chronic and severe health conditions, substantial
family-identified service needs, functional limitations, high resource
utilization, and the need for or use of medical technology.[6] Many CMCs
have chronic conditions that affect multiple organ systems requiring numerous
clinicians to coordinate treatment plans and facilitate active communication and
shared decision-making among families and care teams. While CMC represent <1%
of all US children, they account for approximately 30% of all pediatric health
care costs.[7]Barriers to health care exist for CMC including access to and availability of
clinicians, especially for patients insured by Medicaid. Multiple in-person
visits on the same day may not be billable or reimbursed in certain payment
models, making coordination challenging and inefficient. Pediatricians and
subspecialists needed for CMC are limited in number and practice at children’s
hospitals that do not have equitable geographic distributions impacting those
living in rural and medically underserved areas. This inequity is compounded by
the need for frequent routine and urgent medical visits. In addition,
transportation to and from appointments can be costly, difficult, and
disruptive, particularly for those who live farther from tertiary medical
centers. When patients are seen in person, waiting and examination rooms are
often not optimized to account for medical equipment and supplies may not always
be available on site to meet patient needs (ie, ability to administer feeds,
suction, oxygen tanks). Telemedicine offers a solution to many of the issues
faced given that medical visits can be conducted at home while their care can
remain uninterrupted.
Local Experience
Prior to the pandemic, our institution, like many others, had a small
telemedicine footprint and expanded services rapidly in March 2020 nearly
simultaneous to the launch of a new electronic health record with telemedicine
capacity. Specific measures were taken to ensure and prioritize CMC in this
expansion recognizing the advantages of telemedicine and the need to limit
exposure of this vulnerable group to the SARS-CoV-2 virus. We learned several
key lessons for consideration as telemedicine expanded which can serve as a road
map for others serving CMC.At NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, we provide
outpatient primary care and care coordination to CMC through 2 main settings:
(1) 4 general academic practices with nearly 19 000 patients, 5% of whom are
CMC; and (2) Our Columbia Children’s Complex Care program, a closed enrollment
program that provides intensive care coordination across healthcare settings to
57 patients. Recognizing early on as the pandemic struck and the in-person care
footprint was significantly decreased, leaders in both settings of care
prioritized portal enrollment. Proactive enrollment of their respective
populations to a newly launched portal that supports telemedicine visits began
in early Spring 2020. We collectively enrolled nearly 900 CMCs in the portal and
supported families’ access to telemedicine visits by setting up e-mail accounts
to ensure portal connection, facilitating the downloading of the portal
application, as well as ensuring connectivity to WiFi. Support was provided by
team members including medical students, community health workers (CHWs), care
managers, and medical assistants.
Specific Lessons Learned and Future Directions
Value of telemedicine in CMC
While telemedicine was initially leveraged to replace traditional in-person
visits, we quickly learned the value of virtual visits to address many of
the unique needs of CMC. CMC follow with multiple subspecialists and require
high-intensity care coordination. This is typically performed without
face-to-face communication via phone calls, limiting opportunities to
evaluate a child’s clinical status and assess the true home environment.
Locally, we have used telemedicine to enhance care coordination through team
and family meetings. We have found that these meetings are easier to
schedule as we can typically accommodate all participants’ schedules as
travel is not required. In addition, for patients who have multiple complex
chronic conditions, we have been able to use telemedicine to provide joint
specialty visits to ensure that medical care is being provided in a holistic
way. In some cases, we have scheduled multiple telemedicine visits on the
same day with different clinicians as they can be reimbursed in comparison
with same day in-person visits by multiple clinicians, which are not
reimbursed consistently.The use of telemedicine for more acute needs has also been valuable and
distinct from care coordination needs. An example is the use of telemedicine
to triage acute issues and findings. We have been able to schedule ad hoc
telemedicine visits when families call with an acute issue such as a change
in appearance of a gastrostomy site that requires assessment of the
patient’s status to determine disposition. We have used telemedicine to
reinforce education within the patient’s home setting and ensure a thorough
medication reconciliation, especially at points of transitions in care. This
has been particularly effective for CMC who have been recently hospitalized
where multiple changes to their medication have been made or new technology
have been implemented.Our use of telemedicine in CMC has proven to be beneficial in providing
convenient, accessible care while reducing potential infectious exposures.
In programs that use telemedicine as part of their practice, patient and
family satisfaction has been demonstrated to be high.[8,9] As
society shifts to treating COVID-19 as an endemic rather than a pandemic
virus, a hybrid model of both telemedicine and in-person visits is likely
going to be the standard of care. Careful consideration must be taken for
this patient population to determine which visits need to be in person and
which can be done virtually. We cannot promote a mode of care that may lead
to poor outcomes (ie, incorrect diagnosis or the overuse of antibiotics due
to the lack of in-person evaluation). In addition, we must we must
systematically review the implementation of telemedicine in this population
to better understand the financial implications of this care delivery model.
Finally, we must develop telemedicine-specific quality metrics for CMC to
ensure patient care is safe and not simply convenient.
Identification of CMC
The success of outreach to CMC in the 4 pediatric practices was largely due
to the use of our existing registry of CMC, facilitated by an adapted child
with special health care needs designation in our electronic health
record.[10] As telemedicine continues to expand, identification
of CMC at a health-system level will be of utmost importance to ensure
access to this modality of health care for this high-risk population.
Developing registries for CMC is a challenging undertaking, especially in
practices with limited resources and support for population health outreach.
Despite this challenge, it is important for health care systems to advocate
for standard processes to identify CMC to ensure access to telemedicine
services for this population. Identification of these patients at a
health-system level can be through application of existing diagnosis
classification systems that can be applied to health administrative
data.[11,12] In addition, efforts should be focused on other
health care settings that care for large number of CMC including complex
care programs, transplant services, and oncology services to proactively
ensure that their high-risk patients have access to telemedicine.
Importance of expanded team members and standardization of telemedicine
screening
Key to our success was the engagement of expanded team members to help
patients and families access telemedicine care. During the pandemic, these
responsibilities were shared between doctors, nurses, medical assistants,
nutritionists, CHWs, medical students, and care managers. All who came in
contact with CMC prioritized enrollment in the portal and education to
support telemedicine visits. As we move forward, it is important that
institutions establish defined roles in their workforce to support outreach
to CMC engaging in care for the first time. We can enhance enrollment in
telemedicine by incorporating it into points of registration similar to
demographic and insurance information to ensure it occurs consistently and
systematically. In addition, we recognize that use of this technology can
exacerbate health inequities for CMC and their families, particularly for
those without adequate technology, Internet access, or digital literacy. As
we look to the future, standardized formal digital literacy and digital
access screening must be developed as part of routine screening for
patients, as well as referring families to local resources to access needed
technology.
Conclusions
In our experience, telemedicine has provided a successful solution to many of the
barriers that CMC patients face in accessing health care and has provided new
opportunities for improved care. As the temporary measures taken to increase
telemedicine use are now being revisited, now is the time to advocate for health
care policy changes and dedicated funding to ensure continued access to this vital
form of care for this vulnerable group of patients.
Author Contributions
Both authors contributed to conception and design; drafted the manuscript; gave final
approval; agree to be accountable for all aspects of work ensuring integrity and
accuracy.
Authors: Wendy S Looman; Megan Antolick; Rhonda G Cady; Scott A Lunos; Ann E Garwick; Stanley M Finkelstein Journal: J Pediatr Health Care Date: 2015-03-05 Impact factor: 1.812
Authors: Jay G Berry; Matt Hall; John Neff; Denise Goodman; Eyal Cohen; Rishi Agrawal; Dennis Kuo; Chris Feudtner Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 6.301