Literature DB >> 35941388

A Systematic Literature Review of the Clinical Presentation, Management, and Outcome of Gestational Gigantomastia in the 21st Century.

Nawaf Alhindi1, Hatan Mortada2,3, Wasan Alzaid4, Abdullah A Al Qurashi5,6, Basim Awan7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gestational gigantomastia (GG) is an uncommon pregnancy condition, and the underlying cause of GG has yet to be determined. Medical management and surgery are two treatment options for GG, and breast reduction or mastectomy with delayed reconstruction is the only available surgical option. We have conducted this systematic review to summarize and critically analyze all the GG data in the literature.
METHODS: The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were adhered to in reporting this article. A systematic search was conducted in February 2022 for published case reports and case series on GG using the PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane databases. The following keywords were used: macromastia, gestational gigantomastia, and gestational.
RESULTS: A total of 639 articles were searched, and only 66 case reports published between 1962 and 2022 were included. The mean patient's age at presentation was 28.79 years old. The majority of the patients were in their first trimester (n = 23, 47%). The main complaint was rapid bilateral breast enlargement (n = 54, 80.59%). Bromocriptine was the most common medical management used (n = 19/35, 54.28%). Bilateral breast reduction was the most common surgery (n = 24/48, 50%). Most patients had uneventful recovery (n = 40/54, 74.07%).
CONCLUSION: Gigantomastia is a difficult condition, in terms of its management. We have found that surgery is the gold-standard among all the cases reported; while Bromocriptine was the most commonly administered medical therapy. This systematic review provides a guideline for plastic surgeons to better facilitate their care of these patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
© 2022. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast diseases; Breast reduction; Gestational; Gigantomastia; Macromastia; Pregnancy

Year:  2022        PMID: 35941388     DOI: 10.1007/s00266-022-03003-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg        ISSN: 0364-216X            Impact factor:   2.708


  49 in total

1.  Gigantomastia complicating pregnancy.

Authors:  E F LEWISON; G S JONES; F H TRIMBLE; L C da LIMA
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1960-02

2.  Gigantomastia:report of a case.

Authors:  J J NOLAN
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1962-04       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  The level of evidence pyramid: indicating levels of evidence in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery articles.

Authors:  Daniel Sullivan; Kevin C Chung; F Felmont Eaves; Rod J Rohrich
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Gigantomastia in pregnancy.

Authors:  S Stavrides; A Hacking; A Tiltman; D M Dent
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Gigantomastia during pregnancy: effect of a dopamine agonist.

Authors:  K Hedberg; K Karlsson; G Lindstedt
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1979-04-15       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Gestational macromastia.

Authors:  R Lafreniere; W Temple; A Ketcham
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 7.  Management of gestational gigantomastia.

Authors:  Matthew R Swelstad; Brad B Swelstad; Venkat K Rao; Karol A Gutowski
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Breast reconstruction after mastectomy for gestational gigantomastia.

Authors:  Oren Lapid
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 2.326

Review 9.  Gigantomastia--a classification and review of the literature.

Authors:  Anne Dancey; M Khan; J Dawson; F Peart
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 2.740

10.  Methodological quality and synthesis of case series and case reports.

Authors:  Mohammad Hassan Murad; Shahnaz Sultan; Samir Haffar; Fateh Bazerbachi
Journal:  BMJ Evid Based Med       Date:  2018-02-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.