New onset of acute uveitis following COVID-19 vaccination.

PURPOSE: This study reported 11 cases of new-onset acute uveitis following coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination.
METHODS: This retrospective observational case study included 11 eyes of 11 patients with acute uveitis after the COVID-19 vaccination. We only included patients with new-onset uveitis. The medical records of the patients from January 2021 to January 2022 were reviewed.
RESULTS: The mean age of the participants was 51.81 years, and all patients demonstrated anterior chamber reaction with keratic precipitates in the affected eye. The mean duration between vaccination and uveitis was 8.27 days. Seven patients developed uveitis after receiving the second dose of vaccination, and four developed uveitis after receiving the third dose of vaccination. Five patients showed posterior synechiae, and three patients showed hypopyon. After treatment with topical 1% prednisolone acetate eye drops and systemic prednisolone, inflammation was adequately controlled and quickly resolved.
CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 vaccination with messenger RNA and viral vector vaccines may cause acute anterior uveitis. Although initially severe, uveitis responded well to steroid therapy with no visual impairment.

Introduction

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused serious social and economic losses globally [1]. COVID-19 vaccines were rapidly developed based on previous vaccines for diseases such as the Middle East respiratory syndrome and severe acute respiratory syndrome [2]. Several vaccines were introduced during the pandemic, including messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines such as mRNA-1273 (Moderna, Inc., Cambridge, MA) and BNT162b1 (Pfizer Inc., New York, BioNTech, Inc., Mainz, Germany) [3], as well as viral vector vaccines such as ChAdOX1 (Oxford-AstraZeneca), Ad26.COV2.S (Johnson and Johnson, New Brunswick, NJ), and BBIBP-CorV (Sinopharm, Beijing, China) [4-6]. These vaccines prevented asymptomatic and symptomatic infections, decreased disease severity, and reduced morbidity as well as mortality rates [7-9].

Nevertheless, systemic side effects, such as headache, fatigue, injection-site pain, and thrombosis, have been reported [10, 11]. Regarding COVID-19 vaccine-induced ocular complications, few studies on graft rejection after endothelial corneal transplant [12, 13] and uveitis [14, 15] have been reported to date. These studies reported a possible causal relationship between the vaccination and the occurrence of uveitis; however, there has been no strong evidence to prove it. Moreover, the number of reported cases is insufficient to be statistically significant, necessitating the requirement of more detailed reports.

In this retrospective case series, we report the clinical manifestations, treatment, and prognosis of 11 eyes of 11 patients with acute-onset uveitis after COVID-19 vaccination with no previous history of uveitis or any autoimmune diseases that can cause uveitis.

Methods

Study population

This case-series study was conducted at the Sanggye Paik Hospital of Inje University of Korea, Seoul, Korea. The study protocol was approved by the Inje University Institutional Review Board (IRB no. SGP-202202010). This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) patients who received any of the currently introduced COVID-19 vaccines (ChAdOX1, mRNA-1273, and Ad26.COV2.S); (2) patients who developed any signs of active anterior uveitis (keratic precipitates, anterior chamber cells, vitreous cells, and hypopyon) within a month of receiving the vaccination. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) any past history of uveitis; (2) any ocular surgery within 90 days before the diagnosis of uveitis; (3) any abnormal laboratory findings suggestive of uveitis-related systemic disease, except for the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) level; (4) involvement of the posterior segment on fundus photographs, such as Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada syndrome (VKH), white dot syndrome, and retinal vasculitis (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1

Clinical presentation of acute uveitis at the initial visit: slit-lamp photography of patients 1–5, 7–9, and 11. All patients showing anterior chamber cells

Diagnosis of uveitis

The patients were diagnosed with uveitis based on an ocular examination, including slit-lamp examination, fundus examination, non-contact tonometry, optical coherence tomography, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and systemic laboratory examination. Laboratory tests for complete blood cell count, electrolytes, urinary analysis, routine blood examination, ESR, CRP level, serology, rheumatoid factor, CMV immunoglobulin IgG and IgM, human leukocyte antigen-B27 (HLA-B27), antistreptolysin O (ASO), antinuclear antibody (ANA), angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA), toxoplasmosis IgG and IgM, and toxocariasis IgG. Chest radiography was also performed.

Treatment

All patients were administered 1% prednisolone acetate every 2 h and topical 1% atropine sulfate (Isopto® atropine, Alcon) twice a day. Oral prednisolone was administered in patients with 4 + anterior chamber inflammation, hypopyon, and/or 2 + vitritis. The initial dose of systemic prednisolone was 1 mg/kg/day and was tapered thereafter based on the inflammation. Response to therapy was defined as a decrease in anterior chamber inflammation and vitritis.

Results

Patient demographics

The baseline clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of the study participants are shown in Table 1. All 11 participants had unilateral manifestations. The mean age was 51.81 ± 14.9 years, ranging from 21 to 72 years. The mean logMAR BCVA was 0.78 ± 0.42, and the mean intraocular pressure (IOP) was 14.81 ± 2.99 mmHg by non-contact tonometry. Fundus examination of one patient (patient 10) showed an epiretinal membrane. Five patients had vitritis, and hypopyon was observed in three patients. Five patients had posterior synechiae at the initial visit.

Table 1

Baseline characteristics, clinical manifestations, and treatment outcomes of the patients

Patient no	Sex	Age	Eye	Vac.1	Vac.2	Vac.3	Onset (day)	Treatment periods	HLA-B27	Initial visit							Final visit
										BCVA (LogMAR)	IOP (mmHg)	Vitreous cells	AC cells	Hypopyon	KPs	PS	BCVA (LogMAR)	IOP (mmHg)
1	F	51	OD	B	B	-	3	4 weeks	Negative	0.2	16	None	1 +	None	Present	Not present	0	13
2	F	21	OS	B	B	-	2	8 weeks	Negative	1.1	16	2 +	4 +	Present	Present	Not present	0	19
3	M	50	OS	B	B	-	12	4 weeks	Negative	0.5	9	None	4 +	None	Present	Not present	0	9
4	F	52	OD	B	B	B	8	4 weeks	Negative	1	13	None	1 +	None	Present	Present	0.1	16
5	M	32	OD	J	J	-	12	4 weeks	Negative	0.7	13	1 +	4 +	None	Present	Present	0.2	17
6	M	72	OD	C	C	-	14	3 weeks	Negative	0.3	12	None	2 +	None	Present	Not present	0.1	14
7	F	67	OD	C	C	B	8	4 weeks	Negative	0.4	15	2 +	2 +	Present	Present	Not present	0	16
8	M	54	OS	B	B	-	10	6 weeks	Negative	1.3	20	1 +	4 +	None	Present	Present	0.1	21
9	F	61	OS	B	B	B	4	4 weeks	Negative	0.5	18	None	2 +	None	Present	Not present	0.1	16
10	F	63	OD	B	B	-	14	4 weeks	Negative	1.3	15	None	2 +	None	Present	Present	1	18
11	F	47	OS	B	B	B	4	6 weeks	Negative	1.3	16	1 +	4 +	Present	Present	Present	0	16

AC, anterior chamber; B, BNT162b2; BCVA, best-corrected visual acuity; C, ChAdOX1; HLA-B27, human leukocyte antigen B-27; IOP, intra ocular pressure; J, JNJ-78436735; KPs, keratic precipitates; No, number; OD, oculus dexter; OS, oculus sinister; PS, posterior synechiae; Vac, vaccination

COVID-19 vaccines

All patients received at least a second dose of the COVID-19 vaccination, and four patients received a third dose. The mean period between vaccination and the onset of uveitis was 8.27 ± 4.47 days, ranging from 2 to 14 days. Five patients developed uveitis after receiving the second dose of BNT162b1, one patient developed uveitis after receiving the second dose of ChAdOX1, and uveitis occurred in one patient after receiving the second dose of Ad26.COV2.S. Three patients had onset of uveitis following the administration of the third dose of BNT162b1, and uveitis occurred in one patient after the administration of the second dose of ChAdOX1 and the third dose of BNT162b1 (Table 1).

Patient treatment outcomes

All participants received 1% prednisolone acetate every 2 h and 1% atropine sulfate twice daily. Six patients received systemic prednisolone. The mean final logMAR BCVA was 0.14 ± 0.29, and the mean IOP was 15.90 ± 3.17 mmHg by non-contact tonometry. Anterior chamber inflammation and vitritis resolved in all patients. The mean treatment period was 4.63 ± 1.43 weeks (Table 1).

Discussion

In this single-center case series, we analyzed 11 eyes of 11 patients with acute-onset uveitis following COVID-19 vaccination. We included patients who experienced the first episode of uveitis but had no abnormal findings on laboratory tests. Uveitis in patients with a previous history of uveitis or abnormalities on laboratory examinations for uveitis is less likely to be caused by vaccination. Therefore, to analyze the effect of vaccination on uveitis, it is necessary to reduce the selection bias and minimize the effects of other variables.

The association between vaccinations and various types of ocular inflammation has been reported. Various vaccines are associated with anterior and intermediate uveitis, Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease, and multiple evanescent white dot syndrome [16-20]. Currently, four different COVID-19 vaccines have been developed. In this study, two types of COVID-19 vaccines were analyzed: mRNA vaccine and virus vector vaccines ChAdOX1 and Ad26.COV2.S. The inactivated COVID-19 vaccine BBIBP-CorV (Sinopharm, Beijing, China) and protein subunit vaccine NVXCoV2373 (Novavax) were excluded from this study as they were not introduced in South Korea during the study period. In this study, eight patients developed uveitis after receiving the BNT162b2 mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, and one patient each developed uveitis after receiving the ChAdOX1 and Ad26.COV2.S virus vector vaccines. Uveitis occurred in one patient after receiving the second dose of ChAdOX1 and the third dose of BNT162b1. There was no difference in anterior chamber reaction, hypopyon, and vitritis between the mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine and virus vector vaccine groups. Few studies on uveitis following the administration of BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination have been reported [15, 21, 22]. Recently, Rabinovitch et al. reported cases of uveitis after BNT162b2 mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccination [15]. The exact pathogenesis of uveitis following vaccination remains unclear. Cunningham proposed a mechanism based on the molecular similarities between uveal self-peptides and vaccine peptides, delayed-type hypersensitivity, and immune responses against vaccine adjuvants [23]. Steinemann et al. suggested that increased vascular permeability after vaccination affected the immunologic capability of the cornea. Immune complex deposition in the uvea and iris initiates a local inflammatory response [24]. Innate immunity is stimulated by adjuvants in mRNA vaccines through endosolic or cytoplasmic nucleic acid receptors [25]. Nucleic acid metabolism and processing may be altered in various autoimmune diseases. In return, immunization may induce an immune response [26, 27]. Such a mechanism may be considered one reason for COVID-19 vaccines triggering uveitis. In our study, all participants showed a favorable response to prednisolone, indicating an association between uveitis and vaccine-induced immune response.

In this study, all patients developed uveitis after receiving at least a second dose of the COVID-19 vaccine, 63.63% developed uveitis after receiving the second dose of vaccination, and 36.36% developed uveitis after receiving the third dose of vaccination. None of the participants developed acute uveitis after the first dose. These results are slightly different than those from the previous study by Rabinovitch et al., which reported that 32 and 68% of patients developed uveitis after receiving the first and second doses of BNT162b2 [15]. This difference may be due to the presence of some participants with a history of uveitis or uveitis-related systemic disease. Among the eight patients with uveitis following the administration of the first dose of the vaccine in Rabinovitch’s report, four patients had a previous history of uveitis, and one patient had a disease associated with uveitis. Such patients are possibly more susceptible to developing uveitis after the vaccination. Moreover, patients with a past history of uveitis are more likely to recognize uveitis-related symptoms and seek treatment. It should also be highlighted that the higher degree of reactogenicity related to the second or the third dose may explain the lower rate of occurrence of uveitis after the first dose. Polack et al. reported that systemic side effects occurred more frequently after the second dose of vaccination than after the first dose of vaccination because of the higher degree of reactogenicity connected with the second dose [27]. The development of acute uveitis after the second vaccination dose may be due to the same reason. In our study, all uveitis cases occurred shortly (range, 2–14 days) after vaccination. Vaccination may have contributed to the occurrence of uveitis based on the temporal association between vaccination and uveitis onset.

Polack et al. demonstrated that systemic side effects were more frequent in younger (< 55 years) participants [27]. In our study, the mean age was 51.81 ± 14.9 years (range, 21–72 years). Patient 2, a 21-year-old female patient, showed the shortest duration for the development of uveitis and the most severe anterior chamber inflammation with hypopyon and vitritis. The second youngest patient (patient 5, 32-year-old) also showed four signs of positive anterior chamber inflammation and vitritis. Younger patients tended to have more severe anterior chamber inflammation and vitritis. Although initially severe, all patients responded well to topical and systemic steroid therapy without vision-threatening complications. In patient 10, the final logMAR BCVA was 1.0 because of a preexisting epiretinal membrane.

The limitations of this study are as follows: the small sample size makes statistical analysis difficult, and the absence of a control group. Moreover, the causal relationship between the vaccination and the occurrence of uveitis is very difficult to prove at this moment, although it is very likely. The WHO described the causality assessment of suspected drug adverse as certain, probable, and possible [28]. Clinical response to the withdrawal of the medicine must be demonstrated for the adverse drug reaction to be classified as certain. However, vaccination has a long-lasting effect on the immune system, and the effect cannot be withdrawn. Therefore, defining the relationship between the vaccination and the occurrence of uveitis as certain causality would be very difficult. In contrast, probable causality is defined as a clinical event occurring after a reasonable duration following drug administration that is unlikely to be due to any concurrent disease or other drugs. Following this definition, all participants in our manuscript had probable causalities as they had temporal relationships between the events and were proven to have no previous history of uveitis or uveitis-related systemic disease.

In conclusion, mRNA and virus vector COVID-19 vaccines may provoke acute uveitis. In patients complaining of congestion or impaired vision after vaccination, the anterior chamber should be evaluated for inflammation to check for uveitis, particularly after the administration of the second vaccination dose.