| Literature DB >> 35938059 |
Seyedmahmood Razavizadeh1, Gitana Alencikiene1, Lina Vaiciulyte-Funk1, Per Ertbjerg2, Alvija Salaseviciene1.
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to improve the properties of soy press cake to be utilized as an ingredient of meat analogues. Soy press cakes were fermented with lactobacillus strains, and separately hydrolyzed by cellulase/xylanase mixture and α-amylase. Meat analogues were produced with 10% fermented or hydrolyzed soy press cakes. The effect of applied processes on protein oxidation, physical and functional properties of soy press cakes were analyzed, as well as sensory and textural properties of meat analogues. The results indicated that soy press cake was a suitable source of fibre and energy with low content of saturated fatty acids, and provided plant-based proteins and essential amino acids. The study demonstrated the potential of lactic acid fermentation, and enzymatic hydrolysis to improve water- and oil-holding capacity and reduce protein oxidation in soy press cakes. L. acidophilus 336 and cellulase/xylanase mixture were recommended for fermentation and hydrolysis of soy press cakes, respectively, regarding reduction of protein oxidation. Fermentation of soy press cakes with L. plantarum P1 improved the texture of meat analogues. Press cakes fermentation reduced bitterness, increased juiciness, and balanced the taste of meat analogues. Fermented soy press cake was recommended for the production of meat analogues.Entities:
Keywords: Enzymatic hydrolysis; Fermentation; Meat analogue; Soy press cake
Year: 2022 PMID: 35938059 PMCID: PMC9340857 DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2022.113736
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lebensm Wiss Technol ISSN: 0023-6438 Impact factor: 6.056
Characteristics of used enzymes.
| Enzyme | Activity, U/g | Organism of Origin | Optimal Temperature, ◦C |
|---|---|---|---|
| α-Amylase | >1400 | 70–85 | |
| Cellulase/Xylanase mixture | >45,000 cellulase >34,000 xylanase | 40–60 |
Fig. 1Scheme of experimental design.
Nutritional composition of raw soy press cakes (g/100g).
| Parameter | Composition of soy press cake, (%) |
|---|---|
| Moisture | 77.79 ± 0.15 |
| Fat | 2.8 ± 0.01 |
| Saturated fatty acid | 0.88 ± 0.03 |
| Carbohydrates | 10.87 ± 0.01 |
| Total fibre | 7.35 ± 0.05 |
| Proteins | 7.6 ± 0.1 |
Amino acid composition of soy press cakes.
| Amino acid | Amount (%) |
|---|---|
| Essential amino acidsrowhead | |
| Histidine | 0.16 |
| Threonine | 0.33 |
| | 0.32 |
| | 0.17 |
| Lysine | 0.22 |
| | 0.53 |
| | 0.26 |
| | 0.39 |
| | 0.41 |
| Conditional amino acidsrowhead | |
| Aspartic acid | 0.84 |
| Glutamic acid | 1.30 |
| Serine | 0.43 |
| | 0.29 |
| | 0.32 |
| Arginine | 0.42 |
| | 0.00 |
| Cysteine | 0.17 |
| Tyrosine | 0.25 |
Hydrophobic amino acids.
Effect of fermentation or enzymatic hydrolysis on bulk density, Water Holding Capacity (WHC), Oil Holding Capacity (OHC), and protein oxidation level of soy press cakes.
| Treatment conditions | Treatment duration (h) | Bulk density (g/ml) | WHC (g/g) | OHC (g/g) | Carbonyl content (nmol/mg of protein) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.10 ± 0.01a | 0.90 ± 0.22c | 1.86 ± 0.01c | 17.93 ± 1.37a | ||
| | 24.0 | 1.03 ± 0.00b | 1.96 ± 0.11a | 2.12 ± 0.05b | 7.42 ± 0.09b |
| | 24.0 | 1.01 ± 0.00c | 1.26 ± 0.04b | 2.26 ± 0.05a | 7.46 ± 0.25b |
| | 24.0 | 1.02 ± 0.01bc | 1.40 ± 0.02b | 2.32 ± 0.08a | 3.68 ± 0.70c |
| | 24.0 | 1.00 ± 0.01c | 1.86 ± 0.05a | 2.35 ± 0.02a | 3.15 ± 0.14c |
| Cellulase/Xylanase | 0.5 | 1.03 ± 0.00bc | 1.50 ± 0.04a | 1.95 ± 0.07bc | 4.50 ± 0.26d |
| 1 | 1.04 ± 0.00b | 1.39 ± 0.07ab | 1.91 ± 0.02bc | 4.50 ± 0.01d | |
| α-Amylase | 0.5 | 1.02 ± 0.00c | 1.23 ± 0.04b | 1.97 ± 0.04b | 9.21 ± 0.48c |
| 1.0 | 1.03 ± 0.00bc | 1.54 ± 0.01a | 2.11 ± 0.02a | 10.18 ± 1.25b | |
a,b, c Different letters in the same column for each treatment indicate significant statistical differences, (P ≤ 0.05, LSD test).
Effect of fermentation or enzymatic hydrolysis on pH, spreadability, and shear-thinning factor n values of soy press cakes.
| Treatment conditions | Treatment duration, h | Spreadability | Shear-thinning factor n | pH |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.21 ± 0.06a | 0.194 ± 0.01b | 7.02 ± 0.04a | ||
| | 24 | 0.87 ± 0.08b | 0.347 ± 0.02d | 4.93 ± 0.03b |
| | 24 | 0.93 ± 0.03b | 0.233 ± 0.02c | 5.17 ± 0.06b |
| | 24 | 1.01 ± 0.05b | 0.190 ± 0.03b | 4.82 ± 0.03b |
| | 24 | 0.61 ± 0.06c | 0.173 ± 0.04a | 5.05 ± 0.06b |
| Cellulase/Xylanase | 0.5 | 1.01 ± 0.04b | 0.400 ± 0.05e | 7.35 ± 0.05a |
| 1 | 0.98 ± 0.07b | 0.298 ± 0.02c | 7.00 ± 0.02a | |
| α-Amylase | 0.5 | 1.03 ± 0.05b | 0.412 ± 0.03e | 7.20 ± 0.00a |
| 1 | 0.85 ± 0.08b | 0.322 ± 0.00d | 7.20 ± 0.01a | |
a,b, c, d, e Different letters in the same column for each treatment indicate significant statistical differences, (P ≤ 0.05, LSD test).
Effect of fermentation or enzymatic hydrolysis of soy press cakes on texture parameters of the cooked meat analogues.
| Treatment conditions | Treatment duration,h | Meat analogue properties | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hardness, N | Chewiness | ||
| 17.21 ± 0.05a | 7.45 ± 0.02a | ||
| | 24 | 14.2 ± 0.04b | 6.67 ± 0.03b |
| | 24 | 15.22 ± 0.05a | 7.31 ± 0.01a |
| | 24 | 16.61 ± 0.08a | 8.11 ± 0.05a |
| | 24 | 16.51 ± 0.02a | 8.12 ± 0.06a |
| Cellulase/Xylanase | 0.5 | 18.1 ± 0.04a | 9.22 ± 0.07a |
| 1 | 18.25 ± 0.01a | 9.45 ± 0.01a | |
| α-Amylase | 0.5 | 19.66 ± 0.00a | 8.35 ± 0.02a |
| 1 | 19.32 ± 0.06a | 8.23 ± 0.03a | |
a,b, c Different letters in the same column for each treatment indicate significant statistical differences, (P ≤ 0.05, LSD test).
Fig. 2Spider plots of sensory evaluation of meat analogues produced with fermented soy press cakes, representing their acceptability scores (A) and intensity scores (B).
Effect of fermentation or enzymatic hydrolysis of soy press cakes on sensory attributes of the cooked meat analogues.
| Control | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cellulase/Xylanase | α-Amylase | ||||||||
| – | |||||||||
| Sweet odor | 6a | 6a | 7a | 8a | 8a | 7a | 7a | 8a | 8a |
| Oily odor | 10a | 9a | 9a | 10a | 9a | 11a | 9a | 10a | 9a |
| Acidic odor | 4a | 7b | 7b | 7b | 7b | 4a | 4a | 5a | 4a |
| Juiciness | 4a | 7b | 8b | 8b | 7b | 5a | 4a | 6a | 5a |
| Sweetness | 4a | 7b | 8b | 9b | 8b | 5a | 5b | 6a | 6a |
| Sourness | 4a | 7b | 7b | 7b | 7b | 6a | 6a | 6a | 5a |
| Acidity | 4a | 8b | 7b | 8b | 7b | 4a | 6a | 6a | 5a |
| Bitterness | 9b | 5a | 6a | 6a | 5a | 8b | 9b | 10b | 8b |
| Appearance | 4a | 5a | 5a | 4a | 5a | 5a | 4a | 4a | 4a |
| Odor | 6a | 9b | 9b | 9b | 9b | 7a | 7a | 8a | 7a |
| Taste | 5a | 9b | 8b | 8b | 8b | 7a | 6a | 6a | 6a |
| Texture | 6a | 12c | 9b | 9b | 9b | 6a | 7a | 7a | 6a |
| Overall | 6a | 10b | 9b | 10b | 10b | 7a | 8a | 7a | 7a |
a, b, c Different letters in the same row indicate significant statistical differences, (P ≤ 0.05, LSD test).
Fig. 3Spider plots of sensory evaluation of meat analogues produced with hydrolyzed soy press cakes, representing their acceptability scores (A) and intensity scores (B).