P Korantzopoulos1, A Bechlioulis2, E Florou1, S Plakoutsi1, S Sideris3. 1. First Department of Cardiology, University of Ioannina Medical School, Ioannina, Greece. 2. Second Department of Cardiology, University of Ioannina Medical School, Ioannina, Greece. 3. State Department of Cardiology, Hippokration General Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Leadless pacing (LP) is a novel permanent pacing modality without transvenous leads that is increasingly applied in certain circumstances. We aimed to report our preliminary experience in LP implementation. CASE SERIES: This observational study represents a simple registry of LP systems implanted in our tertiary center from April 2018 until November 2019 in the setting of the Greek financial crisis. Consecutive patients from the isolated area of Northwestern Greece referred to our center for LP were included. Patients' clinical and procedural data, as well as follow-up events, were carefully recorded. Nine patients (mean age: 75 years; six men) were included and were followed for a median period of 20 months. The commonest indication for LP implantation was increased patient infection risk (n: seven), while in the remaining patients (n: two), the indication was problematic vein access along with concomitant comorbidities that increase infection risk. Most of the patients (6/9) were in sinus rhythm, while the rest had slow atrial fibrillation. During the follow-up period, two patients with end-stage renal disease suffered sudden cardiac death, two patients died due to pneumonia, and one patient died due to metastatic cancer. However, no device-related death occurred during the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that LP's long-term cost-effectiveness is limited in patients with several comorbidities due to increased mortality. Indeed, considering its increased financial cost, well-defined patients' selection criteria should be developed and applied, especially in medium/low-income countries. HIPPOKRATIA 2021, 25 (2):75-78. Copyright 2021, Hippokratio General Hospital of Thessaloniki.
BACKGROUND: Leadless pacing (LP) is a novel permanent pacing modality without transvenous leads that is increasingly applied in certain circumstances. We aimed to report our preliminary experience in LP implementation. CASE SERIES: This observational study represents a simple registry of LP systems implanted in our tertiary center from April 2018 until November 2019 in the setting of the Greek financial crisis. Consecutive patients from the isolated area of Northwestern Greece referred to our center for LP were included. Patients' clinical and procedural data, as well as follow-up events, were carefully recorded. Nine patients (mean age: 75 years; six men) were included and were followed for a median period of 20 months. The commonest indication for LP implantation was increased patient infection risk (n: seven), while in the remaining patients (n: two), the indication was problematic vein access along with concomitant comorbidities that increase infection risk. Most of the patients (6/9) were in sinus rhythm, while the rest had slow atrial fibrillation. During the follow-up period, two patients with end-stage renal disease suffered sudden cardiac death, two patients died due to pneumonia, and one patient died due to metastatic cancer. However, no device-related death occurred during the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that LP's long-term cost-effectiveness is limited in patients with several comorbidities due to increased mortality. Indeed, considering its increased financial cost, well-defined patients' selection criteria should be developed and applied, especially in medium/low-income countries. HIPPOKRATIA 2021, 25 (2):75-78. Copyright 2021, Hippokratio General Hospital of Thessaloniki.
Authors: Mikhael F El-Chami; Kyoko Soejima; Jonathan P Piccini; Dwight Reynolds; Philippe Ritter; Toshimasa Okabe; Paul A Friedman; Yong-Mei Cha; Kurt Stromberg; Reece Holbrook; Dedra H Fagan; Paul R Roberts Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2019-07-02 Impact factor: 1.976
Authors: Mikhael El-Chami; Robert C Kowal; Kyoko Soejima; Philippe Ritter; Gabor Z Duray; Petr Neuzil; Lluis Mont; Alexander Kypta; Venkata Sagi; John Harrison Hudnall; Kurt Stromberg; Dwight Reynolds Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2017-06-16 Impact factor: 1.976
Authors: Clemens Steinwender; Surinder Kaur Khelae; Christophe Garweg; Joseph Yat Sun Chan; Philippe Ritter; Jens Brock Johansen; Venkata Sagi; Laurence M Epstein; Jonathan P Piccini; Mario Pascual; Lluis Mont; Todd Sheldon; Vincent Splett; Kurt Stromberg; Nicole Wood; Larry Chinitz Journal: JACC Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2019-11-11
Authors: Andreas Haeberlin; Nikola Kozhuharov; Sven Knecht; Hildegard Tanner; Beat Schaer; Fabian Noti; Stefan Osswald; Helge Servatius; Samuel Baldinger; Jens Seiler; Anna Lam; Luke Mosher; Christian Sticherling; Laurent Roten; Michael Kühne; Tobias Reichlin Journal: Europace Date: 2020-06-01 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Mikhael F El-Chami; Nicolas Clementy; Christophe Garweg; Razali Omar; Gabor Z Duray; Charles C Gornick; Francisco Leyva; Venkata Sagi; Jonathan P Piccini; Kyoko Soejima; Kurt Stromberg; Paul R Roberts Journal: JACC Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2019-01-30
Authors: Mikhael F El-Chami; Faisal Al-Samadi; Nicolas Clementy; Christophe Garweg; Jose Luis Martinez-Sande; Jonathan P Piccini; Saverio Iacopino; Michael Lloyd; Xavier Viñolas Prat; Michael Dilou Jacobsen; Philippe Ritter; Jens Brock Johansen; Claudio Tondo; Fang Liu; Dedra H Fagan; Alyssa K Eakley; Paul R Roberts Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2018-08-10 Impact factor: 6.343