Literature DB >> 35937518

Leadless pacing: First experience and outcomes in an isolated area in the setting of the Greek financial crisis.

P Korantzopoulos1, A Bechlioulis2, E Florou1, S Plakoutsi1, S Sideris3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Leadless pacing (LP) is a novel permanent pacing modality without transvenous leads that is increasingly applied in certain circumstances. We aimed to report our preliminary experience in LP implementation. CASE SERIES: This observational study represents a simple registry of LP systems implanted in our tertiary center from April 2018 until November 2019 in the setting of the Greek financial crisis. Consecutive patients from the isolated area of Northwestern Greece referred to our center for LP were included. Patients' clinical and procedural data, as well as follow-up events, were carefully recorded. Nine patients (mean age: 75 years; six men) were included and were followed for a median period of 20 months. The commonest indication for LP implantation was increased patient infection risk (n: seven), while in the remaining patients (n: two), the indication was problematic vein access along with concomitant comorbidities that increase infection risk. Most of the patients (6/9) were in sinus rhythm, while the rest had slow atrial fibrillation. During the follow-up period, two patients with end-stage renal disease suffered sudden cardiac death, two patients died due to pneumonia, and one patient died due to metastatic cancer. However, no device-related death occurred during the follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that LP's long-term cost-effectiveness is limited in patients with several comorbidities due to increased mortality. Indeed, considering its increased financial cost, well-defined patients' selection criteria should be developed and applied, especially in medium/low-income countries. HIPPOKRATIA 2021, 25 (2):75-78. Copyright 2021, Hippokratio General Hospital of Thessaloniki.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac pacing; bradycardia; cardiac implantable electronic devices; leadless pacemaker

Year:  2021        PMID: 35937518      PMCID: PMC9347340     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hippokratia        ISSN: 1108-4189            Impact factor:   0.522


  15 in total

1.  Incidence and outcomes of systemic infections in patients with leadless pacemakers: Data from the Micra IDE study.

Authors:  Mikhael F El-Chami; Kyoko Soejima; Jonathan P Piccini; Dwight Reynolds; Philippe Ritter; Toshimasa Okabe; Paul A Friedman; Yong-Mei Cha; Kurt Stromberg; Reece Holbrook; Dedra H Fagan; Paul R Roberts
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 1.976

2.  Impact of operator experience and training strategy on procedural outcomes with leadless pacing: Insights from the Micra Transcatheter Pacing Study.

Authors:  Mikhael El-Chami; Robert C Kowal; Kyoko Soejima; Philippe Ritter; Gabor Z Duray; Petr Neuzil; Lluis Mont; Alexander Kypta; Venkata Sagi; John Harrison Hudnall; Kurt Stromberg; Dwight Reynolds
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 1.976

Review 3.  Leadless Cardiac Pacemakers: Current status of a modern approach in pacing.

Authors:  Skevos Sideris; Stefanos Archontakis; Polychronis Dilaveris; Konstantinos A Gatzoulis; Konstantinos Trachanas; Ilias Sotiropoulos; Petros Arsenos; Dimitrios Tousoulis; Ioannis Kallikazaros
Journal:  Hellenic J Cardiol       Date:  2017-05-18

4.  Atrioventricular Synchronous Pacing Using a Leadless Ventricular Pacemaker: Results From the MARVEL 2 Study.

Authors:  Clemens Steinwender; Surinder Kaur Khelae; Christophe Garweg; Joseph Yat Sun Chan; Philippe Ritter; Jens Brock Johansen; Venkata Sagi; Laurence M Epstein; Jonathan P Piccini; Mario Pascual; Lluis Mont; Todd Sheldon; Vincent Splett; Kurt Stromberg; Nicole Wood; Larry Chinitz
Journal:  JACC Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2019-11-11

Review 5.  Infection control in implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices: current evidence, controversial points, and unresolved issues.

Authors:  Panagiotis Korantzopoulos; Skevos Sideris; Polychronis Dilaveris; Konstantinos Gatzoulis; John A Goudevenos
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 5.214

Review 6.  Leadless Pacemakers: State of the Art and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Domenico G Della Rocca; Carola Gianni; Luigi Di Biase; Andrea Natale; Amin Al-Ahmad
Journal:  Card Electrophysiol Clin       Date:  2018-03

7.  Leadless pacemaker implantation quality: importance of the operator's experience.

Authors:  Andreas Haeberlin; Nikola Kozhuharov; Sven Knecht; Hildegard Tanner; Beat Schaer; Fabian Noti; Stefan Osswald; Helge Servatius; Samuel Baldinger; Jens Seiler; Anna Lam; Luke Mosher; Christian Sticherling; Laurent Roten; Michael Kühne; Tobias Reichlin
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 5.214

8.  Leadless Pacemaker Implantation in Hemodialysis Patients: Experience With the Micra Transcatheter Pacemaker.

Authors:  Mikhael F El-Chami; Nicolas Clementy; Christophe Garweg; Razali Omar; Gabor Z Duray; Charles C Gornick; Francisco Leyva; Venkata Sagi; Jonathan P Piccini; Kyoko Soejima; Kurt Stromberg; Paul R Roberts
Journal:  JACC Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2019-01-30

9.  Updated performance of the Micra transcatheter pacemaker in the real-world setting: A comparison to the investigational study and a transvenous historical control.

Authors:  Mikhael F El-Chami; Faisal Al-Samadi; Nicolas Clementy; Christophe Garweg; Jose Luis Martinez-Sande; Jonathan P Piccini; Saverio Iacopino; Michael Lloyd; Xavier Viñolas Prat; Michael Dilou Jacobsen; Philippe Ritter; Jens Brock Johansen; Claudio Tondo; Fang Liu; Dedra H Fagan; Alyssa K Eakley; Paul R Roberts
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 6.343

Review 10.  Leadless Pacing: Current State and Future Direction.

Authors:  Matthias Merkel; Philipp Grotherr; Andrea Radzewitz; Claus Schmitt
Journal:  Cardiol Ther       Date:  2017-07-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.