Literature DB >> 35937463

Early Detection of Pancreatic Cancers Using Liquid Biopsies and Hierarchical Decision Structure.

Deepesh Agarwal1, Obdulia Covarrubias-Zambrano2, Stefan H Bossmann2, Balasubramaniam Natarajan1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Pancreatic cancer (PC) is a silent killer, because its detection is difficult and to date no effective treatment has been developed. In the US, the current 5-year survival rate of 11%. Therefore, PC has to be detected as early as possible. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: In this work, we have combined the use of ultrasensitive nanobiosensors for protease/arginase detection with information fusion based hierarchical decision structure to detect PC at the localized stage by means of a simple Liquid Biopsy. The problem of early-stage detection of pancreatic cancer is modelled as a multi-class classification problem. We propose a Hard Hierarchical Decision Structure (HDS) along with appropriate feature engineering steps to improve the performance of conventional multi-class classification approaches. Further, a Soft Hierarchical Decision Structure (SDS) is developed to additionally provide confidences of predicted labels in the form of class probability values. These frameworks overcome the limitations of existing research studies that employ simple biostatistical tools and do not effectively exploit the information provided by ultrasensitive protease/arginase analyses.
RESULTS: The experimental results demonstrate that an overall mean classification accuracy of around 92% is obtained using the proposed approach, as opposed to 75% with conventional multi-class classification approaches. This illustrates that the proposed HDS framework outperforms traditional classification techniques for early-stage PC detection.
CONCLUSION: Although this study is only based on 31 pancreatic cancer patients and a healthy control group of 48 human subjects, it has enabled combining Liquid Biopsies and Machine Learning methodologies to reach the goal of earliest PC detection. The provision of both decision labels (via HDS) as well as class probabilities (via SDS) helps clinicians identify instances where statistical model-based predictions lack confidence. This further aids in determining if more tests are required for better diagnosis. Such a strategy makes the output of our decision model more interpretable and can assist with the diagnostic procedure. CLINICAL IMPACT: With further validation, the proposed framework can be employed as a decision support tool for the clinicians to help in detection of pancreatic cancer at early stages.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pancreatic cancer (PC); early cancer detection; hierarchical decision structure; information fusion; liquid biopsy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35937463      PMCID: PMC9342860          DOI: 10.1109/JTEHM.2022.3186836

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med        ISSN: 2168-2372


  30 in total

1.  An Interpretable Deep Hierarchical Semantic Convolutional Neural Network for Lung Nodule Malignancy Classification.

Authors:  Shiwen Shen; Simon X Han; Denise R Aberle; Alex A Bui; William Hsu
Journal:  Expert Syst Appl       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 6.954

Review 2.  Road to early detection of pancreatic cancer: Attempts to utilize epigenetic biomarkers.

Authors:  Shinichi Fukushige; Akira Horii
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 8.679

3.  A nanobiosensor for the detection of arginase activity.

Authors:  Aruni P Malalasekera; Hongwang Wang; Thilani N Samarakoon; Dinusha N Udukala; Asanka S Yapa; Raquel Ortega; Tej B Shrestha; Hamad Alshetaiwi; Emily J McLaurin; Deryl L Troyer; Stefan H Bossmann
Journal:  Nanomedicine       Date:  2016-08-21       Impact factor: 5.307

4.  P-Value Precision and Reproducibility.

Authors:  Dennis D Boos; Leonard A Stefanski
Journal:  Am Stat       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 8.710

5.  Optical biosensing of markers of mucosal inflammation.

Authors:  Obdulia Covarrubias-Zambrano; Massoud Motamedi; Bill T Ameredes; Bing Tian; William J Calhoun; Yingxin Zhao; Allan R Brasier; Madumali Kalubowilage; Aruni P Malalasekera; Asanka S Yapa; Hongwang Wang; Christopher T Culbertson; Deryl L Troyer; Stefan H Bossmann
Journal:  Nanomedicine       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 6.096

Review 6.  Immunotherapy for pancreatic cancer: A 2020 update.

Authors:  Dimitrios Schizas; Nikolaos Charalampakis; Christo Kole; Panagiota Economopoulou; Evangelos Koustas; Efthymios Gkotsis; Dimitrios Ziogas; Amanda Psyrri; Michalis V Karamouzis
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 12.111

7.  Identification of hub genes with diagnostic values in pancreatic cancer by bioinformatics analyses and supervised learning methods.

Authors:  Chunyang Li; Xiaoxi Zeng; Haopeng Yu; Yonghong Gu; Wei Zhang
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 2.754

8.  Estimation of a significance threshold for genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Avjinder S Kaler; Larry C Purcell
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 9.  Liquid Biopsy in Pancreatic Cancer: Are We Ready to Apply It in the Clinical Practice?

Authors:  Victoria Heredia-Soto; Nuria Rodríguez-Salas; Jaime Feliu
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 6.639

10.  Classification of premalignant pancreatic cancer mass-spectrometry data using decision tree ensembles.

Authors:  Guangtao Ge; G William Wong
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.