| Literature DB >> 35937328 |
Zhenyun Han1, Fei Li1, Weihua Qiao1,2, Baoxuan Nong3, Yunlian Cheng1, Lifang Zhang1, Jingfen Huang1, Yanyan Wang1, Danjing Lou1, Jinyue Ge1, Meng Xing1, Weiya Fan1, Yamin Nie1, Wenlong Guo1, Shizhuang Wang1, Ziran Liu1, Danting Li3, Xiaoming Zheng1,2,4, Qingwen Yang1,2.
Abstract
The weedy rice (Oryza sativa f. spontanea) pericarp has diverse colors (e.g., purple, red, light-red, and white). However, research on pericarp colors has focused on red and purple, but not green. Unlike many other common weedy rice resources, LM8 has a green pericarp at maturity. In this study, the coloration of the LM8 pericarp was evaluated at the cellular and genetic levels. First, an examination of their ultrastructure indicated that LM8 chloroplasts were normal regarding plastid development and they contained many plastoglobules from the early immature stage to maturity. Analyses of transcriptome profiles and differentially expressed genes revealed that most chlorophyll (Chl) degradation-related genes in LM8 were expressed at lower levels than Chl a/b cycle-related genes in mature pericarps, suggesting that the green LM8 pericarp was associated with inhibited Chl degradation in intact chloroplasts. Second, the F2 generation derived from a cross between LM8 (green pericarp) and SLG (white pericarp) had a pericarp color segregation ratio of 9:3:4 (green:brown:white). The bulked segregant analysis of the F2 populations resulted in the identification of 12 known genes in the chromosome 3 and 4 hotspot regions as candidate genes related to Chl metabolism in the rice pericarp. The RNA-seq and sqRT-PCR assays indicated that the expression of the Chl a/b cycle-related structural gene DVR (encoding divinyl reductase) was sharply up-regulated. Moreover, genes encoding magnesium-chelatase subunit D and the light-harvesting Chl a/b-binding protein were transcriptionally active in the fully ripened dry pericarp. Regarding the ethylene signal transduction pathway, the CTR (encoding an ethylene-responsive protein kinase) and ERF (encoding an ethylene-responsive factor) genes expression profiles were determined. The findings of this study highlight the regulatory roles of Chl biosynthesis- and degradation-related genes influencing Chl accumulation during the maturation of the LM8 pericarp.Entities:
Keywords: BSA-seq; candidate genes identification; chlorophyll; green pericarp; weedy rice
Year: 2022 PMID: 35937328 PMCID: PMC9354532 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.930062
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 6.627
FIGURE 1Phenotypic analysis of LM8. (A) Whole plant phenotype. (B) Panicle morphology and caryopsis color at the fully ripe stage.
FIGURE 2Transmission electron microscopy images and a heat map of chlorophyll a/b degradation-related gene expression during the maturation of the LM8 pericarp. (A) Transmission electron microscopy image of an LM8 fresh pericarp. (a1) Developmental changes in the pericarp appearance. Numbers represent the days after flowering. (a2–a8) Chloroplast ultrastructure in different caryopsis pericarp developmental periods; g, grana; s, starch. (B) Comparison of the chloroplast ultrastructure and chlorophyll content between the LM8 and SLG dry pericarps at the fully ripe stage. (b1) Morphological differences associated with pericarp colors. (b2) Chloroplast ultrastructure. (b3) Comparison of chlorophyll contents. (C) Proposed model for the chlorophyll cycle and chlorophyll degradation. (D) Chlorophyll a/b degradation-related gene expression heat map analysis. MCS: ORUFILM04g000534, ORUFILM09g001743; PAO: ORUFILM03g002761, ORUFILM03g002762, ORUFILM03g001968, ORUFILM02g001781, ORUFILM03g002759; CAO: ORUFILM10g000111, ORUFILM10g000109; NYC: ORUFILM02g003284, ORUFILM01g000930, ORUFILM03g003804; PPD: ORUFILM11g002295, ORUFILM12g001272, ORUFILM08g000120, ORUFILM07g002209, ORUFILM11g002296, ORUFILM12g001271; RCCR: ORUFILM10g001226; CS: ORUFILM02g000235, ORUFILM10g001051; CHL: ORUFILM05g001632; HCAR: ORUFILM04g002996.
FIGURE 3Segregation analyses of pericarp colors and chlorophyll contents of green pericarps in the F2 population. (A) LM8 (green pericarp) was crossed with SLG (white pericarp). The F1 grains produced green and brown pericarps. Additionally, F2 grains with green, brown, and white pericarps were detected. (B) Chlorophyll contents. (C) Normal distribution curve analysis.
Chi-square (χ2) analysis of the segregation of pericarp colors in the F2 generation derived from a cross between LM8 and SLG.
| Times | Number | Colored | χ2 | ||||
| Green | Brown | White | Total | χ2(9:3:4) | χ2(0.05,2) | ||
| 2021.11 | Observed | 100 | 35 | 44 | 179 | 0.153 | 5.991 |
| Expected | 101 | 33 | 45 | 179 | |||
| 2022.5 | Observed | 542 | 267 | 299 | 1108 | 29.014 | 5.991 |
| Expected | 623 | 208 | 277 | 1108 | |||
| 2022.11 | Observed | 486 | 177 | 257 | 920 | 5.098 | 5.991 |
| Expected | 517 | 173 | 230 | 920 | |||
FIGURE 4LM8 pericarp colors and chlorophyll contents in response to light and temperature stress. (A,B) Pericarp colors after a treatment with 24-h light and 25/40°C temperature stress. (C) Chlorophyll contents under stress conditions. (D) Dot plot analysis of enriched GO terms in the cellular component category following an RNA-seq analysis of samples that underwent the 24-h light and 40°C treatment.
FIGURE 5Bulked segregant analysis (BSA)-seq analysis for mapping genomic regions controlling green pericarps. (A) Comparison of the pericarp colors in four bulks. (B) Δ(SNP-index) plots between C1 and C2, (C) C1 and C3, (D) C1 and W, (E) C2 and C3, (F) C2 and W, and (G) C3 and W. The Y-axis presents the chromosomes, colored dots represent the calculated SNP-indices, and the black line is the fitted SNP-index. The green, blue, and red lines represent the 90, 95, and 99% threshold confidence intervals, respectively.
Information regarding the genomic hotspot region detected using the SNP-index algorithm.
| Chromosome | Genomic candidate regions | Size (Mb) | Known genes | Candidate genes in LM8 |
| Chr4 | 20820000–20870000 | 0.05 | ||
| Chr4 | 20920000–22650000 | 1.73 | ||
| Chr4 | 22670000–22680000 | 0.01 | ||
| Chr4 | 22860000–23950000 | 1.09 | ||
| Chr4 | 24110000–26090000 | 1.98 | LOC_Os04g42030 | |
| Chr4 | 26270000–26290000 | 0.02 | ||
| Chr4 | 31600000–32800000 | 1.20 | ||
| Chr4 | 24180000–27310000 | 3.13 |
| |
| Chr4 | 30960000–32240000 | 1.28 | ||
| Chr3 | 15120000–23460000 | 8.34 |
FIGURE 6Expression levels of 12 differentially expressed genes in the LM8 pericarp during three developmental stages (P1, P2, and P3). Gene expression levels were analyzed on the basis of RNA-seq FPKM values and sqRT-PCR data. Actin was used as the control.