Introduction: Percutaneous thermal ablation of inconspicuous lesions can be challenging. Fusion ultrasound (FUS) allows the use of previously performed diagnostic imaging like computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET-CT) to localise hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) for treatment. This paper illustrates FUS case studies of pre-, intra- and post-ablation imaging of inconspicuous HCC, supplemented by use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). Method: Four prospective cases during September 2014 to October 2018, with HCC amenable to ablation, which were poorly identified on ultrasound, underwent FUS. FUS pre-screening was scheduled within three months of the previous CT or MRI, and between one to four weeks prior to the scheduled ablation date. Post-ablation imaging with FUS was performed between four to six weeks to coincide with their routine follow-up CT or MRI. Findings: There were potential benefits observed in the cases with combined techniques of FUS and CEUS for limiting circumstances such as heat sink effect, multiple lesions targeting, inconspicuous lesion detection and pre-ablation technical feasibility assessment. Discussion: The combined use of FUS and CEUS improves tumour visibility, increases operator imaging confidence and reduces heat sink effect during percutaneous thermal ablation. Conclusion: FUS imaging is helpful in targeting poor conspicuity lesions that cannot be detected on grey-scale ultrasound. It facilitates in ensuring optimal treatment of hepatic lesions for improvement of patient prognosis and follow-up imaging.
Introduction: Percutaneous thermal ablation of inconspicuous lesions can be challenging. Fusion ultrasound (FUS) allows the use of previously performed diagnostic imaging like computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET-CT) to localise hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) for treatment. This paper illustrates FUS case studies of pre-, intra- and post-ablation imaging of inconspicuous HCC, supplemented by use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). Method: Four prospective cases during September 2014 to October 2018, with HCC amenable to ablation, which were poorly identified on ultrasound, underwent FUS. FUS pre-screening was scheduled within three months of the previous CT or MRI, and between one to four weeks prior to the scheduled ablation date. Post-ablation imaging with FUS was performed between four to six weeks to coincide with their routine follow-up CT or MRI. Findings: There were potential benefits observed in the cases with combined techniques of FUS and CEUS for limiting circumstances such as heat sink effect, multiple lesions targeting, inconspicuous lesion detection and pre-ablation technical feasibility assessment. Discussion: The combined use of FUS and CEUS improves tumour visibility, increases operator imaging confidence and reduces heat sink effect during percutaneous thermal ablation. Conclusion: FUS imaging is helpful in targeting poor conspicuity lesions that cannot be detected on grey-scale ultrasound. It facilitates in ensuring optimal treatment of hepatic lesions for improvement of patient prognosis and follow-up imaging.
Authors: Young-Sun Kim; Won Jae Lee; Hyunchul Rhim; Hyo K Lim; Dongil Choi; Ji Young Lee Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Andy K W Chan; Chris Hegarty; Darren Klass; Eric Yoshida; Stephen Chung; David M Liu; Stephen G F Ho; Alison C Harris Journal: Can Assoc Radiol J Date: 2015-01-27 Impact factor: 2.248
Authors: David S K Lu; Steven S Raman; Piyaporn Limanond; Donya Aziz; James Economou; Ronald Busuttil; James Sayre Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 3.464