Jayesh Sheth1, Ira Mohapatra1, Gangotri Patra1, Riddhi Bhavsar1, Chandni Patel1, Siddharth Shah2, Aadhira Nair1. 1. Department of Biochemical and Molecular Genetics, FRIGE's Institute of Human Genetics, FRIGE House, Jodhpur Gam Road, Satellite, Ahmedabad, India. 2. Consultant Pediatric Neurologist, Royal Institute of Child Neurosciences, Vastrapur, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Sir,Tay–Sachs disease (TSD) is one of the common glycolipid storage disorders with an incidence of 1 in 100,000 live births.[1] TSD (OMIM # 272800) is a result of biallelic pathogenic variants in the HEXA gene that causes deficiency of β-hexosaminidase A (HexA) enzyme (EC 3.2.1.52). This is further categorized into a classic infantile form, sub-acute juvenile form, and late-onset form, depending on the age of onset of symptoms. Notably, India has a TSD case mostly with the infantile phenotype[2] whereas juvenile or late-onset forms have been rarely reported.Here we describe the second case of juvenile TSD from India along with a review of previously reported juvenile TSD cases having confirmed genetic study.The proband is the first child born to a non-consanguineous couple and was referred to us at 12 years of age. He had a normal development till the age of 5 years and progressive deterioration of the learned skill with bilateral tremors thereafter. On presentation at our centre, he had gait ataxia, difficulty in climbing stairs, slurred speech, difficulty in getting up and down. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans of the brain showed mild cortical atrophic changes [Figure 1]. On eye examination, cherry red spot was absent. An IQ assessment study showed IQ level to be 33.3. The clinical presentation suggested a neurodegenerative disorder with a strong suspicion of TSD. Our differentials included Sandhoff disease, neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis, Friedreich ataxia and late-onset spinal muscular atrophy.
Figure 1
T2 weighted MRI images of the brain showing cortical atrophy
T2 weighted MRI images of the brain showing cortical atrophyTo confirm the clinical diagnosis, a lysosomal enzyme β-hexosaminidase A study was carried out from the leucocytes. The test showed β-hexosaminidase A activity to be 3.1 nmol/hr/mg protein, which was less than 10% of the normal range (62.7–659.4 nmol/hr/mg protein). Further, genomic DNA extracted from blood sample was used to carry out neurology gene panel study. This identified a compound heterozygous variant c.1496G>A (chr15-72637817) (p.Arg499His) in exon 13 and c.902T>G (chr15-72641504) (p.Met301Arg) in exon 8 of the HEXA gene. As per ACMG guidelines, these variants were classified as pathogenic and likely pathogenic, respectively. The results were validated in the proband and both parents by bidirectional sequencing of the coding region of the HEXA gene (ENST00000268097). This study confirmed the presence of both variants in compound heterozygous state in the proband and heterozygous state in both parents.The juvenile form of TSD is a rare and progressive neurodegenerative disorder with a heterogeneous clinical course.[3] To date, 155 cases of juvenile TSD have been reported in the literature including a single case from India.[4] The mean age of onset was 5.24 ± 3.9 years. We found that dysarthria and gait ataxia are the most common clinical signs, seen in 96.5% and 93.1% of the cases, respectively.[356789] In the present case also, there was a similar observation with an additional sign of bilateral tremors in hand at 5 years of age which has been seen in only 26.72% of the previously reported cases.[3] The MRI findings showing cortical atrophy in our case are consistent with those observed in other juvenile TSD cases.Sandhoff et al.[10] have suggested an inverse correlation between the heterogeneity of onset and the residual activity of the β-hexosaminidase enzyme.[10] Patients with the juvenile forms of TSD may have 5-10% of wild-type enzyme activity that lies in the range of 2 to 9 nmol/hr/mg protein.[356789] Though, previous large study of infantile cases and present case of juvenile TSD could not find a correlation between enzyme activity and the onset of disease.[2] In the present case, this could be due to presence of one heterozygous variant (c.902T>G) which is commonly associated with infantile TSD.On literature review, we found, forty-one variants in HEXA to be observed with juvenile TSD [Table 1, Figure 2]. The two most common variants found in juvenile TSD are c.1496G>A (p.Arg499His) and c.533G>A (p.Arg178His) found in exon 13 and 5, respectively, in 25.4% of the 67 patients including the present case.[356789]
Table 1
Review of molecularly proven cases of juvenile TSD
Exon/Intron
Variant
Type of variant
Ethnicity
Percentage of juvenile TSD patients with the variant
Exon 1
c.1A>T (p.M1L)
Start loss
Multiple Ethnic Groups
1.5%
Exon 1
c.1A>G (p. M1V)
Start loss
African-American
1.5%
Exon 1
c.10T>C (p.S4P)
Missense
Multiple Ethnic Groups
1.5%
Exon 1
c.32T>C (p.L11P)
Missense
Japanese
1.5%
Exon 1
c.155C>A (p.S22X)
Nonsense
Spanish/Portuguese
1.5%
Exon 1
c.77G>A (p.W26X)
Nonsense
Multiple Ethnic Groups
3%
Exon 1
c.78G>A (p.W26X)
Nonsense
Cyprus
1.5%
Exon 1
c.109T>A (p.Y37N)
Missense
Multiple Ethnic Groups
3%
Exon 1
c.173G>A (p.C58Y)
Missense
NA
1.5%
Exon 3
c.409C>T (p.R137X)
Nonsense
Multiple Ethnic Groups
4.5%
Intron 4
c.459+5G>A
Non-Coding
Spanish
3%
Exon 5
c.509G>A (p.R170Q)
Missense
NA
1.5%
Exon 5
c.533G>A (p.R178H)
Missense
Multiple Ethnic Groups
25.4%
Exon 5
c.536A>G (p.H179R)
Missense
Spanish
1.5%
Exon 5
c.566G>A (p.R189H)
Missense
NA
3%
Intron 5
c.571_1G>T
Splicing
Japanese
1.5%
Intron 6
c.672+1G>A
Splicing
Multiple Ethnic Groups
3%
Exon 7
c.681C>A (p.Y227X)
Nonsense
NA
1.5%
Exon 7
c.736_737delG (p.A246R)
Missense
Spanish
1.5%
Exon 7
c.736G>A (p.A246T)
Missense
Korean
1.5%
Exon 7
c.749G>A (p.G250D)
Missense
Lebanese Maronite
1.5%
Exon 7
c.772G>C (p.D258H)
Missense
NA
1.5%
Exon 7
c.805G>A (p.G269S)
Missense
Multiple Ethnic Groups
9%
Exon 8
c.814G>A (p.G272R)
Missense
West Indian Origin
1.5%
Exon 8
c.902T>G (p.M301R)
Missense
Multiple Ethnic Groups
1.5% (*Present case)
Exon 8
c.972T>A (p.V324V)
Synonymous
Multiple Ethnic Groups
1.5%
Exon 9
c.1003A>T (p.I335F)
Missense
Spanish/Portuguese
1.5%
Intron 9
c.1073+1G>A
Splicing
Spanish
6%
Intron 10
c.1146+1G>A
Splicing
Spanish
1.5%
Exon 11
c.1195A>G (p.N399D)
Missense
West Indian Origin
1.5%
Exon 11
c.1274_1277dupTATC (p.Y427X)
Nonsense
Multiple Ethnic Groups
17.9%
Exon 11
c.1281T>A (p.Y427X)
Nonsense
India
1.5%
Exon 11
c.1305C>T (p.Y435Y)
Synonymous
Multiple Ethnic Groups
6%
Exon 12
c.1382G>T (p.G461V)
Missense
Multiple Ethnic Groups
3%
Intron 12
c.1421+5G>C
Non coding
Spanish
1.5%
Exon 13
c.1422G>C (p.W474C)
Missense
German-Dutch
3%
Exon 13
c.1496G>A (p.R499H)
Missense
Multiple Ethnic Groups
25.4% (*Present case)
Exon 13
c.1495C>T (p.R499C)
Missense
NA
3%
Exon 13
c.1511G>A (p.R504H)
Missense
Multiple Ethnic Groups
4.5%
Exon 13
c.1511G>T (p.R504L)
Missense
Argentina
1.5%
Exon 14
c.1529_1530del (p.R510H)
Missense
India
1.5%
Figure 2
Schematic diagram of HEXA gene structure with functional domains showing the 41 reported variants in juvenile TSD
Schematic diagram of HEXA gene structure with functional domains showing the 41 reported variants in juvenile TSDReview of molecularly proven cases of juvenile TSDBoth variants in the present case: c.1496G>A (p.Arg499His) and c.902T>G (p.Met301Arg) have been previously reported in the literature in multiple ethnicity. Interestingly, c.1496G>A has been observed in affected TSD patients from various ethnic backgrounds like Caucasian, Argentinean, Portuguese and Italian populations.[79] This variant is located outside the catalytic domain, and hence causes minor structural changes, which explains the late-onset clinical phenotype. While the other variant, c.902T>G (p.Met301Arg), has been reported only twice in the literature for infantile TSD. In one case, it was in homozygous state, whereas in another case, it was present in combination with another pathogenic HEXA variant p.Arg504His. This variant is located in the catalytic domain of the α- subunit of β-hexosaminidase A. Although the effect of this variant on the enzyme is unclear, it has been hypothesized that the association process of the two subunits (α and β) of the enzyme might be affected.[11]Thus, based on the reported cases in the literature and present case, it is likely possible to predict the onset of symptoms and the disease severity depending on the mutation in HEXA gene and its subsequent effect on the residual β-hexosaminidase A activity. Hence, establishing genotype-phenotype correlation is critical to understand the patient prognosis and plan effective management of the condition.Present case highlights the rarity of juvenile TSD in India and shows bilateral tremors as an early sign in this condition. The variant c.902T>G in the HEXA has been reported in infantile forms of TSD. Nonetheless, due to presence of c.1496G>A, a common variant in juvenile TSD, the index case has shown a milder phenotype with juvenile onset.
Financial support and sponsorship
This work was partly supported by Gujarat State Biotechnology Mission (GSBTM) (grant no: GSBTM/JDR &D/608/2020/459-461).
Authors: Gustavo H B Maegawa; Tracy Stockley; Michael Tropak; Brenda Banwell; Susan Blaser; Fernando Kok; Roberto Giugliani; Don Mahuran; Joe T R Clarke Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2006-10-02 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Nicholas J Smith; Anne Marie Winstone; Lesley Stellitano; Timothy M Cox; Christopher M Verity Journal: Dev Med Child Neurol Date: 2011-11-24 Impact factor: 5.449