| Literature DB >> 35936395 |
Guoqiang Qin1,2, Shilun Jiang1,2, Haotian Zhang1,2, Shengjian Qin1,2, Hongya Wu1,2, Feipeng Zhang3, Guanglei Zhang1,2.
Abstract
The effect of the curing temperature (T c) on the properties of PBO aerogel was investigated in this paper. The compressive strength of PBO aerogel prepared was much higher than that of PBO aerogel of the same density in other kinds of literature. With the robust F-type polybenzoxazine (PBO) aerogels with ultra-high Young's modulus (733.7 MPa at 0.48 g/cm3 and 1070 MPa at 0.57 g/cm3), excellent properties were obtained through a facile and scalable room-temperature HCl-catalyzed sol-gel method, followed by the ambient pressure drying technique. It is found that T c plays a vital role in the polymerization process and the evolution of the microstructure of the 3D porous PBO network, where the necks between the nanoparticles become thick and strong when T c is up to 150 °C, resulting in a pearl necklace-to-worm transformation in the micro-structure and significant growth in mechanical properties, but if T c is higher than 180 °C, the pore volume and specific surface area will decrease sharply. Moreover, all synthetic PBO aerogels here possessed inherent flame retardancy and a high residual char rate in the volume density (0.32-0.57 g/cm3). These properties make the F-type PBO aerogels a candidate material in aerospace applications or other fields.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35936395 PMCID: PMC9352322 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.2c01300
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Omega ISSN: 2470-1343
Figure 1(a) General mode of polymerization of the BO monomer. (b) PBO before (left) and after (right) heat treatment.
Figure 2(a) Infrared spectra of benzoxazine aerogel at the different curing temperatures. (b) XRD spectrum.
Figure 3(a) Stress–strain curves of PBO aerogels at different curing temperatures. (b) Comparison of Young’s modulus with that of aerogels in other literature.
Figure 4(a) DTG and (b) TG curves of the as-prepared PBO aerogels at different treatment temperatures.
Mechanical Property Parameters of PBO Aerogels Obtained at Different Curing Temperatures and Aerogels in Other Literatures
| name | ultimate strain (%) | ultimate stress (MPa) | Young’s modulus (MPa) | compressive stress (MPa) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PBO-RT | 13.21 | 10.01 | 193.32 ± 4.61 | 5.94 ± 0.21 |
| PBO-120 | 21.03 | 11.24 | 275.81 ± 5.14 | 5.76 ± 0.38 |
| PBO-150 | 60.73 | 12.50 | 733.76 ± 8.65 | 22.78 ± 4.38 |
| PBO-180 | 98.84 | 31.34 | 832.32 ± 9.34 | 23.85 ± 2.47 |
| PBO-200 | 98.61 | 27.51 | 1070.11 ± 11.21 | 24.62 ± 1.80 |
| PBO aerogel[ | 150.12 | |||
| PBO aerogel[ | 222.3 | |||
| aramid aerogel[ | 50.24 | |||
| polyurea aerogel[ | 490.45 | |||
| lignin/graphene oxide aerogel[ | 2.188 ± 0.21 | |||
| polyurethane aerogels[ | 1.2 | 0.04 |
Pore Structure of PBO Aerogel Obtained at Different Curing Temperatures
| average
pore diameter (nm) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| name | BET surface area, σ (m2 g–1) | 4 V/σ | BJH method | |
| PBO-RT | 77.12 | 0.38 | 10.41 | 20.82 |
| PBO-120 °C | 50.19 | 0.15 | 7.26 | 13.41 |
| PBO-150 °C | 37.73 | 0.10 | 6.37 | 12.31 |
| PBO-180 °C | 67.02 | 0.34 | 11.04 | 22.64 |
| PBO-200 °C | 56.21 | 0.13 | 6.50 | 12.01 |
Figure 5(a) N2 sorption measurements of the PBO aerogels: isotherm and (b) BJH plots.
Figure 6SEM image of PBO aerogel at different treatment temperatures.
Bulk Density, Thermal Resistance, and Thermal Conductivity of PBO Aerogels
| name | bulk density, ρb (g/cm3) | thermal resistance, | thermal conductivity, λ (W/m·k) |
|---|---|---|---|
| PBO-RT | 0.465 | 0.0246 | 0.122 |
| PBO-120 °C | 0.476 | 0.0624 | 0.099 |
| PBO-150 °C | 0.483 | 0.0782 | 0.091 |
| PBO-180 °C | 0.531 | 0.0831 | 0.086 |
| PBO-200 °C | 0.572 | 0.0326 | 0.138 |
| PBO aerogel[ | 0.38 | 0.069 | |
| PBO aerogels[ | 0.913 | 0.037 | |
| polybenzoxazine aerogels[ | 0.262 | 0.097 | |
| porous aramids aerogels[ | 0.913 | 0.913 | |
| SiO2 aerogel[ | 0.126 | 0.031 | |
| SiO2 aerogel[ | 0.217 | 0.027 | |
| polyurethane aerogels[ | 0.18 | 0.017 | |
| silica-polyurethane aerogel[ | 0.58 | 0.066 |
Figure 7Thermal conductivity of PBO and porous aramid aerogels at different densities.