| Literature DB >> 35936363 |
Peiting Lu1, Cuiyun Wu2.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the effect of continuous psychological nursing based on the grey clustering algorithm on erectile function, bad psychological emotion, and complications in patients after transurethral resection of prostate (TURP).Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35936363 PMCID: PMC9352487 DOI: 10.1155/2022/5400479
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Math Methods Med ISSN: 1748-670X Impact factor: 2.809
Comparison of clinical data between the two groups.
| Clinical features | Observation group ( | Control group ( |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age(year) | 72.15 ± 7.23 | 73.81 ± 4.59 | 0.817 | 0.416 |
| Education | 0.042 | 0.838 | ||
| Bachelor's degree or above | 29 | 28 | ||
| Junior college or below | 20 | 21 | ||
| Family economic income | 0.041 | 0.839 | ||
| <8 (10000/year) | 27 | 28 | ||
| ≥8 (10000/year) | 22 | 21 | ||
| Prostate volume (ml) | 65.25 ± 3.62 | 63.79 ± 1.23 | 2.008 | 0.056 |
| IPSS (score) | 21.35 ± 2.95 | 22.42 ± 3.16 | 3.254 | 0.956 |
| PVR (ml) | 63.85 ± 35.29 | 61.96 ± 40.47 | 2.102 | 0.785 |
| Qmax (ml/min) | 6.75 ± 1.35 | 7.25 ± 2.56 | 3.251 | 1.024 |
| IIEF-5 | 14.95 ± 3.21 | 15.08 ± 2.56 | 0.058 | 0.943 |
Figure 1Psychological evaluation process in patients with TURP.
Figure 2Different indicators of patients' psychology in patients with TURP.
Figure 3Calculation of weight index.
Figure 4Distribution of psychological evaluation scores.
Figure 5Calculation results of quadratic comprehensive clustering coefficient (all P < 0.001).
Comparison of IIEF-5 between the two groups.
| Group | Before nursing | After nursing |
|---|---|---|
| Observation group | 20.75 ± 2.65 | 24.87 ± 1.85 |
| Control group | 20.23 ± 3.85 | 22.24 ± 1.47 |
|
| 0.314 | 19.063 |
|
| 0.577 | 0.000 |
Comparison of psychological status between the two groups.
| Group | HAMA | HAMD |
|---|---|---|
| Observation group | ||
| Before nursing | 14.38 ± 1.19 | 17.15 ± 2.04 |
| After nursing | 6.11 ± 2.57 | 6.97 ± 2.85 |
| | 5.451 | 3.652 |
| | 0.006 | 0.027 |
| Control group | ||
| Before nursing | 14.85 ± 1.58 | 16.97 ± 1.46 |
| After nursing | 10.98 ± 2.29 | 11.35 ± 2.19 |
| | 4.652 | 2.852 |
| | 0.014 | 0.046 |
Comparison of nursing job satisfaction between the two groups.
| Group |
| High | Normal | Dissatisfied | Satisfaction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observation group | 49 | 29 | 20 | 0 | 100% |
| Control group | 49 | 25 | 17 | 7 | 85.71% |
|
| 5.538 | ||||
|
| 0.019 | ||||