| Literature DB >> 35936296 |
Cheng Wang1, Wenjing Cui2,3, Yating Zhang4, Huawen Shen4.
Abstract
Social media had made significant effect on the tourism and hospitality industry. Among diverse types of social media platforms, short video apps (SVA) represented by TikTok or Douyin had brought great changes to the tourism industry. As new mobile technology platform, short video apps had changed the way for user to obtain travel information, make traveling plans and share the travel experience. Considering the new technology of SVA and the influence in tourism, this research aims to explore the SVA users' behavior intentions and the adopting of SVA for making travel decision. Therefore, the new SVA-TAM model is proposed based on the technology acceptance model (TAM), including two new variables: electronic word of mouth (eWOM) and electronic trust (eTrust). An online survey was conducted to short video apps users. PLS-SEM was implemented for data and structural equations analysis of the final obtained 302 samples. In terms of the relationship between variables, this study found that user perceptions of SVA on usefulness and ease of use are powerful predictors of attitudes toward using SVA for travel planning, which maintains consistency with the outcome of previous TAM studies. Additionally, eWOM and eTrust positively influence user attitudes toward using SVA for travel planning even for destination decisions. Therefore, the short video apps should be taken into consideration for tourism marketing and destination branding owes to the effect on the potential users' behavior intentions.Entities:
Keywords: TAM; eTrust; eWOM; short video apps; travel intention
Year: 2022 PMID: 35936296 PMCID: PMC9355327 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.912177
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
FIGURE 1The original technology acceptance model (TAM).
FIGURE 2The research model.
Demographic profiles of respondents.
| Characteristics | Frequency | Proportion |
|
| ||
| Male | 116 | 38.41% |
| Female | 186 | 61.59% |
|
| ||
| 18–23 | 172 | 56.95% |
| 24–29 | 42 | 13.91% |
| 30–35 | 57 | 18.87% |
| 36–41 | 21 | 6.95% |
| 42–47 | 8 | 2.65% |
| 48–53 | 0 | 0.00% |
| More than 54 | 2 | 0.66% |
|
| ||
| Less than secondary/high school | 5 | 1.66% |
| Completed college degree | 46 | 15.23% |
| Bachelor’s degree | 209 | 69.21% |
| Master’s degree | 32 | 10.60% |
| Doctorate degree | 10 | 3.31% |
|
| ||
| North China: Beijing, Tianjin, Hebei, Shanxi, Inner Mongolia | 17 | 5.17% |
| Northeast: Heilongjiang Province, Jilin Province, Liaoning Province | 10 | 3.04% |
| East China: Shanghai, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Anhui, Jiangxi, Shandong, Fujian, and Taiwan | 47 | 14.29% |
| Central China: Henan Province, Hubei Province, Hunan Province | 22 | 6.69% |
| South China: Guangdong Province, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Hainan Province, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and Macao Special Administrative Region | 205 | 62.31% |
| Southwest: Chongqing, Sichuan, Guizhou, Yunnan and Tibet | 13 | 3.95% |
| Northwest: Shaanxi Province, Gansu Province, Qinghai Province, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region | 15 | 4.56% |
Composite reliability of the major constructs.
| Cronbach’s alpha | Rho_A | Composite reliability | Average variance extracted (AVE) | |
| ATU | 0.935 | 0.935 | 0.953 | 0.836 |
| BI | 0.914 | 0.915 | 0.939 | 0.795 |
| ETC | 0.919 | 0.919 | 0.943 | 0.805 |
| ETP | 0.856 | 0.861 | 0.902 | 0.698 |
| EWOM | 0.914 | 0.916 | 0.939 | 0.795 |
| eTrust | 0.884 | 0.885 | 0.945 | 0.896 |
| PEOU | 0.853 | 0.864 | 0.910 | 0.772 |
| PU | 0.930 | 0.930 | 0.955 | 0.877 |
Discriminant validity test by Fornell and Larcker criterion.
| ATU | BI | EWOM | eTrust | PEOU | PU | |
| ATU | 0.9143 | |||||
| BI | 0.8472 | 0.8918 | ||||
| EWOM | 0.8022 | 0.7845 | 0.8916 | |||
| eTrust | 0.7993 | 0.7862 | 0.735 | 0.9463 | ||
| PEOU | 0.7466 | 0.7427 | 0.7534 | 0.6719 | 0.8785 | |
| PU | 0.8204 | 0.7705 | 0.826 | 0.7454 | 0.7443 | 0.9362 |
The heterotrait–monotrait ratio of correlations criterion.
| ATU | BI | EWOM | eTrust | PEOU | PU | |
| ATU | ||||||
| BI | 0.849 | |||||
| EWOM | 0.838 | 0.839 | ||||
| eTrust | 0.837 | 0.834 | 0.816 | |||
| PEOU | 0.799 | 0.783 | 0.829 | 0.770 | ||
| PU | 0.840 | 0.837 | 0.846 | 0.821 | 0.824 |
Path coefficients and test results.
| Hypotheses | Paths | Path coefficients | Remarks | ||
| H1 | Perceived usefulness → attitude | 0.294 | 2.863 | 0.004 | Supported |
| H2 | Perceived ease of use → attitude | 0.155 | 3.028 | 0.002 | Supported |
| H3 | eWOM → attitude | 0.2 | 2.42 | 0.016 | Supported |
| H4 | eTrust → attitude | 0.329 | 6.331 | 0.000 | Supported |
| H5 | Perceived ease of use → perceived usefulness | 0.744 | 20.309 | 0.000 | Supported |
| H6 | eWOM → eTrust | 0.736 | 22.716 | 0.000 | Supported |
| H7 | eWOM → behavior intention | 0.159 | 2.699 | 0.007 | Supported |
| H8 | eTrust → behavior intention | 0.172 | 3.622 | 0.000 | Supported |
| H9 | Attitude → behavior intention | 0.623 | 10.704 | 0.000 | Supported |
Predictive relevance and effect size.
| Endogenous variables |
| Exogenous variables |
|
| eTrust | 0.542 | eWOM | 1.185 |
| PU | 0.554 | PEOU | 1.242 |
| ATU | 0.781 | EWOM | 0.047 |
| eTrust | 0.191 | ||
| PEOU | 0.041 | ||
| PU | 0.102 | ||
| BI | 0.812 | ATU | 0.536 |
| EWOM | 0.044 | ||
| eTrust | 0.052 |
Multiple mediation analysis.
| Hypotheses and path | Specific indirect effects | Direct effect | Total effect | Types of mediation | Remarks |
| eWOM to BI via eTrust | 0.126 | 0.159 | 0.56 | Complementary partial mediation | Partially supported |
| eWOM to BI via attitude | 0.124 | 0.159 | 0.56 | Complementary partial mediation | Partially supported |
| eWOM to BI via eTrust and attitude | 0.151 | 0.159 | 0.56 | Complementary partial mediation | Partially supported |
| eWOM to attitude via eTrust | 0.242 | 0.200 | 0.442 | Complementary partial mediation | Partially supported |
***P < 0.001, **P < 0.01, *P < 0.10, NS, insignificant. 1WJX.com
FIGURE 3Analysis of formative electronic trust (eTrust) variable.