| Literature DB >> 35936080 |
Abstract
The continuing rapid expansion of 99mTc diagnostic agents always calls for scaling up 99mTc production to cover increasing clinical demand. Nevertheless, 99mTc availability depends mainly on the fission-produced 99Mo supply. This supply is seriously influenced during renewed emergency periods, such as the past 99Mo production crisis or the current COVID-19 pandemic. Consequently, these interruptions have promoted the need for 99mTc production through alternative strategies capable of providing clinical-grade 99mTc with high purity. In the light of this context, this review illustrates diverse production routes that either have commercially been used or new strategies that offer potential solutions to promote a rapid production growth of 99mTc. These techniques have been selected, highlighted, and evaluated to imply their impact on developing 99mTc production. Furthermore, their advantages and limitations, current situation, and long-term perspective were also discussed. It appears that, on the one hand, careful attention needs to be devoted to enhancing the 99Mo economy. It can be achieved by utilizing 98Mo neutron activation in commercial nuclear power reactors and using accelerator-based 99Mo production, especially the photonuclear transmutation strategy. On the other hand, more research efforts should be devoted to widening the utility of 99Mo/99mTc generators, which incorporate nanomaterial-based sorbents and promote their development, validation, and full automization in the near future. These strategies are expected to play a vital role in providing sufficient clinical-grade 99mTc, resulting in a reasonable cost per patient dose.Entities:
Keywords: 99Mo supply chain; 99Mo/99mTc generators; 99mTc radiopharmaceuticals; column chromatography; electrochemical separation; nano-materials; photonuclear reaction; solvent extraction
Year: 2022 PMID: 35936080 PMCID: PMC9355089 DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2022.926258
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Chem ISSN: 2296-2646 Impact factor: 5.545
The predominantly used radionuclides in SPECT processes and their nuclear characteristics.
| Radionuclide | Half-life | Mode of decay | Main photon energy, keV | Branching ratio (intensity), % | Availability | Remark |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 99mTc | 6.01 h | IT (99.996%) | 140.51 | 89 | 99Mo → 99mTc (99Mo/99mTc generator) | |
| 100Mo(p,2n)99mTc | ||||||
| 100Mo(d,3n)99mTc | ||||||
| 123I | 13.27 h | EC, β+ (100%) | 158.97 | 83 | 122Te(d,n)123I | • High cost |
| 123Te(p,n)123I | • Low availability | |||||
| 111In | 2.80 d | EC (100%) | 171.28 | 90 | 112Cd(p,2n)111In | • Relatively long half-life |
| 245.39 | 94 | 111Cd(p,n)111In | ||||
| 201Tl | 3.04 d | EC (100%) | 167.43 | 10 | 203Tl(p,3n)201Pb → 201Tl | • Relatively long half-life |
| 67Ga | 3.26 d | EC (100%) | 93.31 | 39.2 | 68Zn(p,2n)67Ga | • Relatively long half-life |
| 184.57 | 21.2 | 67Zn(p,n)67Ga | ||||
| 300.21 | 16.8 |
The data were deduced from:
https://www-nds.iaea.org/relnsd/vcharthtml/VChartHTML.html
http://nucleardata.nuclear.lu.se/toi/
https://www-nds.iaea.org/radionuclides/gamma_emitters.html
https://www-nds.iaea.org/relnsd/vcharthtml/MEDVChart.html
The most commonly used 99mTc-based radiopharmaceuticals with their recommended injection activity and the estimated exposure dose.
| Organ | 99mTc radiopharmaceuticals | Recommended adult injected activity, MBq | Radiation dose estimation | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNMMI | ENAM | Injected activity, MBq | Effective dose, mSv | ||
| Brain | 99mTc-ECD | 555–1110 | 555–725 | 700 | 5.4 |
| 99mTc-HMPAO | 555–1110 | 555–725 | 700 | 6.5 | |
| 99mTc-MAA | 40.7–151.7 | 60–78 | 78 | 0.9 | |
| Bone and bone marrow | 99mTc-MDP | 740–1110 | 375–490 | 740 | 4.2 |
| 99mTc-HMPAO (WBC) | 185–370 | 375–490 | 370 | 4.1 | |
| Heart | 99mTc-Pyrophosphate | 370–555 | N.A | 370 | 2.1 |
| 99mTc-Tetrofosmin/sestaMIBI (exercise) | 740–1480 | 900–1176 (One-day protocol) | 740 | 5.2 | |
| 450–588 (2-day protocol min) | |||||
| 675–882 (2-day protocol max) | |||||
| 99mTc-Tetrofosmin / sestaMIBI (resting) | 740–1480 | 300–392 (One-day protocol) | 740 | 5.6 | |
| 450–588 (2-day protocol min) | |||||
| 675–882 (2-day protocol max) | |||||
| 99mTc-RBC | 555–1110 | 600–784 (Blood pool) | 555 | 3.9 | |
| 99mTc-DMSA | 74–222 | 73–95 | 90 | 0.8 | |
| 99mTc-DTPA (IV) | 37–1110 | 166–196 (normal renal function) | 190 | 0.9 | |
| 150–196 (abnormal renal function) | |||||
| 99mTc-MAG3 | 37–370 | 58–69 | 58 | 0.4 | |
| Liver | 99mTc-Sulfur/albumin colloid (IV) | 148–222 | N.A | 185 | 2.6 |
| 99mTc-Sulfur/albumin colloid (oral) | 18–74 | N.A | 46 | 1.0 | |
| 99mTc-IDA | N.A | 112–147 | N.A | N.A | |
| Lung | 99mTc-DTPA (Inhalation) | 19.98–40.70 | N.A | 30 | 0.2 |
| 99mTc-Technegas | 18.5–37 | 525–686 | 37 | 0.6 | |
| Spleen | 99mTc-RBCs | 555–1110 | 30–39 (Denatured RBC) | 555 | 3.9 |
| Stomach | 99mTc-Pertechnetate | N.A | 112–147 | 112 | 1.5 |
| Thyroid | 99mTc-Pertechnetate | 74–370 | 60–78 | 78 | 1.0 |
| Parathyroid | 99mTc-MIBI | 740–1480 | N.A | N.A | N.A |
| Cancer cells identification | 99mTc-SestaMIBI | N.A | 675–882 | N.A | N.A |
(ENAM), European Association of Nuclear Medicine; (SNMMI), the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
The activity doses were calculated for body weights from 50 to 68 Kg.
The exposure doses are based on (ICRP, 2015).
The activity doses were taken from https://www.eanm.org/publications/dosage-calculator/ and http://www.snmmi.org/ClinicalPractice/doseTool.aspx (accessed 8.6.2022).
FIGURE 1The decay scheme of 99Mo and 99mTc (Hidalgo et al., 1967).
FIGURE 2The potential production routes of 99Mo and 99mTc. Abbreviations: HEU: Highly Enriched Uranium; LEU: Low Enriched Uranium.
The evaluation of reactor-based 99Mo production technologies.
| Criteria | Uranium fission | Neutron activation | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Target | Material | LEU | U-Al alloy | Natural 98Mo | MoO3 | |
| U-metallic foil | Mo metal | |||||
| HEU | U-Al alloy | Enriched 98Mo | MoO3 | |||
| Mo metal | ||||||
| Availability | Restricted to few producers | Broadly available | ||||
| Production process | Nuclear reaction | 235U (n,f)99Mo | 98Mo (n,γ)99Mo | |||
| Cross-section, barn | 586 (× 6% fission yield) | Thermal flux | 0.13 | |||
| Epithermal flux | 6.7±0.3 | |||||
| Yield | >10,000 Ci 99Mo/g Mo | Natural 98Mo target | ∼0.2–1 Ci 99Mo/g Mo | Influenced by the neutron flux capacity | ||
| Enriched 98Mo target | ≥4 Ci 99Mo/g Mo | |||||
| Specific activity | High specific activity product | Low specific activity product | ||||
| Production facility | Limited to a small number of irradiation sites | More than 50 reactors with high neutron flux (>1014 n/cm2s) are geographically well-distributed | ||||
| Co-production isotopes | 200 different radioisotopes such as 131I and 133Xe | 99Mo solely | ||||
| Chemical Processing | Separation step | Mandatory | Can be avoided | |||
| Feasibility | Complicated and involves hazardous materials | Simple and does not include any hazardous substances | ||||
| Laboratories | Limited | Globally available | ||||
| Concerns | Proliferation risks | High | Negligible | |||
| Cost | High | Low | ||||
| Waste | 50 Ci waste per production of only 1 Ci 99Mo | Negligible | ||||
| Maturity | Status | Well-established technology | Growing technology | |||
| Capability | Covers >95% of the global demand | Used on small-scale production in some countries | ||||
| Licensing and approval | Nuclear regulatory | Approved | Approved | |||
FIGURE 3The schematic demonstration of the fission-produced 99Mo supply chain, including target irradiation, the production of 99Mo, and the 6-day Curie expression. The produced 99Mo activity from the supply chain is approximately 22% of the total irradiated activity in case of 100% recovery of 99Mo from the irradiated targets. In the same manner, if the processing efficiency is 90%, the expected remaining activity is about 17% of the total produced activity.
The producers of fission 99Mo and their global production volume.
| Irradiation facility | Country | Irradiated target | Neutron flux, n/cm2S | Year commissioned | Estimated available capacity, six-day Ci/week | Production of 99Mo, Week/year | Estimated available production capacity by 2024 | Estimated global market share, % | Expected shutdown, year | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Global producers | BR-2 | Belgium | HEU/LEU | 1.0E15 | 1961 | 6,500 | 21 | 136,500 | 17 | 2026 | |
| HFR | Netherlands | HEU/LEU | 2.7E14 | 1961 | 6,200 | 39 | 241,800 | 29 | 2026 | ||
| LVR-15 | Czech Republic | HEU/LEU | 1.5E14 | 1957 | 3,000 | 30 | 90,000 | 11 | 2028 | ||
| Maria | Poland | HEU | 3.5E14 | 1974 | 2,200 | 36 | 79,200 | 9 | 2040 | ||
| OPAL | Australia | LEU | 3.0E14 | 2006 | 2,150 | 43 | 92,450 | 11 | 2057 | ||
| +1,350 | +58,050 | 7 | |||||||||
| Safari-1 | South Africa | LEU | 2.4E14 | 1965 | 3,000 | 44 | 130,700 | 16 | 2030 | ||
| NRU | Canada | HEU | 4.0E14 | 1957 | 40% (Global market) | N.A | N.A | N.A | 2018 Retired | ||
| Osiris | France | HEU | 1.7E14 | 1966 | 8% (Global market) | N.A | N.A | N.A | 2015 Retired | ||
| Regional producers | RIAR | RBT-6 | Russia | HEU | 1.4E14 | 1975 | 540 | 50 | 27,000 | Domestic use | 2025 |
| RBT-10 | HEU | 1.5E14 | 1983 | 2025 | |||||||
| KAPROV | WWR-c | HEU | 2.5E13 | 1959 | 350 | 48 | 16,800 | Domestic use | 2025 | ||
| RA-3 |
| HEU | 4.8E13 | 1961 | 500 | 46 | 23,000 | Domestic use | 2027 | ||
The information is derived from:
The IAEA’s Research Reactor Database (RRDB): https://nucleus.iaea.org/rrdb/#/home (accessed 8.6.2022), NEA, 2019, Zhuikov, 2014, and NAP, 2018.
BR-2, Belgian Reactor 2; HFR, high flux reactor; OPAL, open pool australian light water; NRU, national research universal; SAFARI-1, South African Fundamental Atomic Research Installation 1; RIAR, the Research Institute of Atomic Reactors; and N.A, Not Available.
Available production capacity: is the upper limit of 99Mo production capability that can be achieved on a routine operating schedule.
Additional 99Mo production capability owing to the engagement of a new processing facility, namely, the ANSTO, Nuclear Medicine (ANM) project, which started in May 2019.
The main uranium fission processing facilities and their 99Mo supply capacities.
| Processing facility | Country | Target | Chemical process | Estimated available supply capacity, six-day Ci/week | Production of 99Mo, week/year | Estimated available supply capacity by 2024 | Estimated global market share, % | Expected shutdown, year | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Global producers | ANSTO | Australia | LEU | Alkaline | 2,150 | 43 | 92,450 | 13 | 2057 |
|
| +1,350
| +58,050
| 8 | ||||||
|
| Netherlands | LEU | Alkaline | 5,000 | 52 | 260,000 | 37 | N.A | |
| IRE | Belgium | HEU | Alkaline process | 3,500 | 49 | 171,500 | 24 | 2028 | |
| NTP | South Africa | LEU | Alkaline | 3,000 | 44 | 130,700 | 18 | 2030 | |
|
| Canada | HEU | Acidic | 29% (Global market) | N.A | N.A | N.A | stopped | |
| Mallinckrodt | Netherlands | HEU | Alkaline | 24% (Global market) | N.A | N.A | N.A | stopped | |
| Regional producers | RIAR | Russia | HEU | Alkaline | 540 | 50 | 27,000 | Domestic use | 2025 |
| KAPROV | HEU | Alkaline | 350 | 48 | 16,800 | Domestic use | 2025 | ||
| CNEA |
| LEU | Alkaline | 500 | 46 | 23,000 | Domestic use | 2027 | |
The information is derived from: 1 NEA, 2019, 2 NAP, 2018.
ANSTO: australian nuclear science and technology organization; ANM: ANSTO, nuclear medicine; IRE: national institute for radioelements; NTP: nuclear technology products radioisotopes; RIAR: the Research Institute of Atomic Reactors; and N.A: Not Available.
The alkaline process is fully compatible with the U-Al alloy targets and offers the advantage of 131I co-production capability.
Available supply capacity: is the upper limit of 99Mo supply capability that can be achieved on a routine operation framework.
Additional 99Mo supply capability owing to the engagement of a new processing facility, namely, ANSTO, Nuclear Medicine (ANM), which started in May 2019.
Curium was established through a merger between Mallinckrodt Nuclear Medicine and Ion Beam Applications Molecular (IBAM). http://www.mallinckrodt.com/about/news-and-media/2197068 (accessed 8.6.2022).
CNL/Nordion terminated their 99Mo processing activities at the end of 2016.
The naturally occurring molybdenum isotopes (Magill et al., 2022).
| Isotope | Abundance, % | Thermal (n,γ) cross-section, barn | Half-life | Mode of decay | Decay product | Remark |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 92Mo | 14.649 | 2E-7 | Stable | N.A | N.A | 92Mo(n,γ)93mMo |
| 0.08 | 92Mo(n,γ)93gMo | |||||
| 94Mo | 9.187 | 0.34 | Stable | N.A | N.A | |
| 95Mo | 15.873 | 13.4 | Stable | N.A | N.A | |
| 96Mo | 16.673 | 0.55 | Stable | N.A | N.A | |
| 97Mo | 9.582 | 2.2 | Stable | N.A | N.A | |
| 98Mo | 24.292 | 0.130 | Stable | N.A | N.A | |
| 100Mo | 9.744 | 0.199 | 7.01E18 years | Double β- | 100Ru (Stable) | The only unstable naturally occurring isotope of Mo |
This value is deduced from (Gedeonov and Nosov, 1989).
The main accelerator-based 99Mo and 99mTc production routes and their production capabilities per day.
| Facility | Accelerated particle | Incident particle | Target material | Nuclear reaction | Reaction parameters | Thick target yield at EOB, Ci | Available activity at calibration, Ci | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Target thickness, mm | Incident energy, MeV | Incident current | |||||||
| Electron accelerator | Electron | Photon | nat.U | 238U(γ, f)99Mo | 3.17 | 40 | 3125 | 2.30 | 1.08 |
| Electron | Photon | 100Mo | 100Mo(γ,n)99Mo | 9.96 | 40 | 3125 | 137 | 64.34 | |
| Deuteron accelerator | Deuteron | Neutron | 100Mo | 100Mo(n,2n)99Mo | N.A | N.A | N.A | N.A | N.A |
| Deuteron | Deuteron | 100Mo | 100Mo(d,p2n) 99Mo | 0.17 | 15 | 100 | 0.02 | 0.01 | |
| 0.20 | 16 | 100 | 0.03 | 0.01 | |||||
| 0.24 | 17 | 100 | 0.05 | 0.02 | |||||
| 0.28 | 18 | 100 | 0.07 | 0.034 | |||||
| Deuteron | Deuteron | 100Mo | 100Mo(d,3n)99mTc | 0.14 | 15 | 100 | 0.35 | N.A | |
| 0.18 | 16 | 100 | 0.67 | N.A | |||||
| 0.21 | 17 | 100 | 1.12 | N.A | |||||
| 0.25 | 18 | 100 | 1.73 | N.A | |||||
| Proton accelerator | Proton | Proton | 100Mo | 100Mo(p,pn)99Mo 100Mo (p,2p)99Nb →99Mo | 0.30 | 15 | 400 | 0.26 | 0.12 |
| 0.61 | 20 | 400 | 2.52 | 1.18 | |||||
| 0.99 | 25 | 400 | 7.36 | 3.46 | |||||
| 1.43 | 30 | 400 | 13.85 | 6.50 | |||||
| 1.92 | 35 | 400 | 21.44 | 10.07 | |||||
| Proton | Proton | 232Th | 232Th(p,f)99Mo | N.A | N.A | N.A | N.A | N.A | |
| Proton | Proton | 100Mo | 100Mo(p,2n)99mTc | 0.32 | 15 | 400 | 21.67 | N.A | |
| 0.63 | 20 | 400 | 48.01 | N.A | |||||
| 1.01 | 25 | 400 | 62.23 | N.A | |||||
| 1.45 | 30 | 400 | 68.18 | N.A | |||||
| 1.94 | 35 | 400 | 73.04 | N.A | |||||
| Proton | Proton | 98Mo | 98Mo(p,γ) 99mTc | 2.07 | 35 | 400 | 0.01 | N.A | |
| α-particle accelerator | α-particle | α-particle | 96Zr | 96Zr(α,n)99Mo | 0.06 | 15 | 100 | 0.03 | 0.01 |
| 0.11 | 20 | 100 | 0.04 | 0.02 | |||||
| 0.16 | 25 | 100 | 0.04 | 0.02 | |||||
| 0.22 | 30 | 100 | 0.04 | 0.02 | |||||
| 0.29 | 35 | 100 | 0.05 | 0.02 | |||||
The data were calculated using “Medical Isotope Browser” of IAEA: https://www-nds.iaea.org/relnsd/isotopia/isotopia.html (accessed on 08.06.2022) utilizing recommended cross section data from (Tarkanyi et al., 2019).
https://www.iba-radiopharmasolutions.com/cyclotrons-equipment (accessed on 08.06.2022).
Thickness of 1 radiation length (1 X0).
Yield of a cylindrical target of 1 X0 thickness and 2 cm diameter at a distance of 2 cm from a distributed Ta converter of 4.5 mm thickness. The thick target yield can be obtained by multiplication by a factor of about 4.
FIGURE 4Transient radioactive equilibrium in 99Mo/99mTc generator system. Ael: Eluted 99mTc activity. A0: 99Mo activity at calibration.
The potential production strategies of 99Mo/99mTc generators.
| Production technology | Separation technique | Advantages | Disadvantages | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Column chromatography | Based on alumina | Using (n,f)99Mo | Selective sorption of 99Mo (solid-phase extraction) | • Well-established technology | • Increases the nuclear proliferation concerns | |
| • Produces clinical-grade 99mTc in high radionuclidic, radiochemical, and chemical purities | • Produces large quantities of long-lived radioactive wastes | |||||
| • Supplies 99mTc in high RAC | ||||||
| Based on gel matrices | Using (n,γ)99Mo | • Eliminates proliferation concerns | • Supply 99mTc with very low RAC | |||
| • Retention of 99mTc on the column matrix | ||||||
| • Production of undesirable radioactive impurities | ||||||
| • A multi-step procedure leads to the loss of the 99Mo radioactivity | ||||||
| Based on nano-sorbents | Using (n,γ)99Mo | • Eliminates proliferation concerns | • Not yet demonstrated at activity scale necessary for clinical use | |||
| • The production of a 99mTc with desirable RAC | • Is not currently standard practice in 99Mo/99mTc generators | |||||
| • Improves 99Mo economy | ||||||
| • Inexpensive | ||||||
| Sublimation | Differences in the sublimation temperatures of 99Mo and 99mTc oxides | • Generates a 99mTc radionuclide of high purity | • Complex procedure | |||
| • Require high degree of safety standards | ||||||
| • Low 99mTc separation efficiency yield from 99Mo | ||||||
| Solvent extraction | Difference in the solubility of 99Mo and 99mTc in two immiscible liquid phases | • Low stability of the organic solvents | ||||
| • Low separation efficiency | ||||||
| • Requires a very high degree of radiation safety considerations | ||||||
| Electrochemical | Difference in the reduction potential of 99Mo and 99mTc | • The capacity is not limited by the amount of sorbent or extractant | • Expensive | |||
| • Generate H2 and O2, leading to explosion danger | ||||||
| Supported Liquid Membrane (SLM) | Selective extraction of the 99mTc using porous hydrophobic membrane | • Slow separation kinetics | ||||
| • Unsatisfactory 99mTc yield | ||||||
| • 99Mo breakthrough | ||||||
| • Radiation instability of the membrane and the extractant | ||||||
| • Generates significant amounts of radioactive waste | ||||||
FIGURE 5Comparison between the alumina generators based on neutron-capture-produced and fission-produced 99Mo.
The summary of 99Mo/99mTc generators developed using nanosorbents: preparation, structural characterization, loading capacity, and elution quality control data.
| Nano-sorbents | Method of preparation | Structural characteristics | Sorption capacity, (mg Mo/g) | Activity of 99Mo loaded, GBq (mCi) | Specific activity of 99Mo used, GBq/g of Mo | 99mTc Elution performance | Reference | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elution yield, (%) | Level of 99Mo impurity in 99mTc, (%) | Radio-chemical purity of 99mTcO4 -, (%) | Level of chemical impurity in 99mTc, (μg/ml) | ||||||||||
| Crystalline size, (nm) | Pore size, (nm) | Surface area, (m2.g−1) | Static | Dynamic | |||||||||
| CeO2 | Controlled hydrolysis of Ce(NO3)3.6H2O under alkaline conditions | 3.54 | 2.75 | 187 | 192 ± 10 | 84 ± 6 | 1.0 (27) | ∼5 | 76.46 ± 1.1 | <10–3 | >99 | Ce < 0.01 |
|
| TiO2 | Hydrolysis of TiCl4 in isopropyl alcohol medium | ∼40 | 0.005 | 320 | 141 ± 2 | 78 ± 2 | 0.74 (20) | ∼3 | >84 | Not detected | ≥97.3 | Ti < 0.01 |
|
| Meso- Al2O3 | Hydrolysis of Al(C3H8O)3 in presence of glucose template, followed by calcination | 2 ± 1 | 3 ± 1 | 230 ± 10 | 225 ± 20 | 168 ± 12 | 26 (700) | 18.5 | >80 | <10–3 | >99 | Al < 0.1 |
|
| γ-Al2O3 | Mechanochemical reaction of aluminium nitrate with ammonium carbonate | 5 ± 1 | 0.4 ± 0.2 | 250 ± 10 | 205 | 150 | 13.0 (350) | 11.1 | >82 | <10–3 | >99 | Al < 0.1 |
|
| t- ZrO2 | Controlled hydrolysis of ZrOCl2.8H2O under alkaline conditions | 8 ± 2 | 0.4 ± 0.1 | 340 ± 20 | 250 ± 10 | 80 | 9.25 (250) | 17.8 | >85 | <10–4 | >99 | Zr < 0.1 |
|
| Tip | Controlled hydrolysis of TiCl4 in isopropyl alcohol medium | 5 ± 1 | 0.4 ± 0.1 | 30 ± 2 | 110 | 75 | 1.1 (30) | ∼6–13 | 75–80 | <10–3 | 96.5–99.8 | Ti < 0.1 |
|
FIGURE 6The schematic illustration of the TcMM process.