| Literature DB >> 35935818 |
Jiang-Tao Ke1,2,3,4, Heng Zhang1,2,3,4, Yan-Hong Bu1,2,3,4, Pei-Rong Gan1,2,3,4, Fang-Yuan Chen1,2,3,4, Xin-Tong Dong1,2,3,4, Yan Wang1,2,3,4, Hong Wu1,2,3,4.
Abstract
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by a joint hypoxia microenvironment. Our previous untargeted metabolomics study found that sphingolipid (SPL) metabolism was abnormal in the joint synovial fluid samples from adjuvant arthritis (AA) rats. Geniposide (GE), an iridoid glycoside component of the dried fruit of Gardenia jasminoides Ellis, is commonly used for RA treatment in many Asian countries. At present, the mechanism of GE in the treatment of RA, especially in the joint hypoxia microenvironment, is not entirely clear from the perspective of SPL metabolism. The purpose of this research was to explore the potential mechanism of abnormal SPL metabolism in RA joint hypoxia microenvironment and the intervention effect of GE, through the untargeted metabolic analysis based on the ultra-performance liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UPLC-Q-TOF/MS). Arthritis index, foot swelling and histopathology were used to assess whether the AA rat model was successfully established. The SPLs extracts collected from AA rats' synovial tissue, serum and rheumatoid arthritis synovial fibroblasts (RASFs, MH7A cells, hypoxia/normoxia culture) were analyzed by metabolomics and lipdomics approach based on UPLC-Q-TOF/MS, to identify potential biomarkers associated with disorders of GE regulated RA sphingolipid metabolism. As a result, 11 sphingolipid metabolites related to RA were screened and identified. Except for galactosylceramide (d18:1/20:0), GE could recover the change levels of the above 10 sphingolipid biomarkers in varying degrees. Western blotting results showed that the changes in ceramide (Cer) level regulated by GE were related to the down-regulation of acid-sphingomyelinase (A-SMase) expression in synovial tissue of AA rats. To sum up, this research examined the mechanism of GE in the treatment of RA from the perspective of SPL metabolism and provided a new strategy for the screening of biomarkers for clinical diagnosis of RA.Entities:
Keywords: UPLC-Q-TOF/MS; geniposide; metabolomics; rheumatoid arthritis; sphingolipid
Year: 2022 PMID: 35935818 PMCID: PMC9353937 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.969408
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.988
FIGURE 1Chemical structure of geniposide.
FIGURE 2Establishment and evaluation of AA model rats and the therapeutic effect of GE. AA model rats were treated with GE for 14 days. (A) The arthritis index of rats in each group was measured, including control group, model group, GE administration group and MTX positive medicine group. (B) The degree of secondary paw swelling was measured. (C) Histopathological examination of synovial in AA rats. The data represent the means ± SD deviation of six samples in an independent experiment. ## p < 0.01, compared with control group; ** p < 0.01, compared with model group; n = 6.
FIGURE 3| PCA score plots of synovial, serum and MH7A cells extracts in ESI+ (left) and ESI− (right) modes. (A) PCA score plots of synovial sample; (B) PCA score plots of serums sample; AA = model group; C = control group; GE = Geniposide treatment group; QC = quality group; (C) PCA score plots of MH7A cells extracts sample; CY-C = normoxia group; CY-GE = normoxia GE treatment group; QY-C = hypoxia group; QY-GE = hypoxia GE treatment group.
FIGURE 4| OPLS-DA score plots and S-plots of synovial, serum and MH7A cells samples. (A) OPLS-DA model in ESI+ mode corresponding to synovial sample (AA vs. C: R2Y = 0.93, Q2 = 0.85); (B) OPLS-DA model in ESI− mode corresponding to synovial sample (AA vs. C: R2Y = 0.82, Q2 = 0.78); (C) OPLS-DA model in ESI+ mode corresponding to serum samples (AA vs. C: R2Y = 0.99, Q2 = 0.96); (D) OPLS-DA model in ESI− mode corresponding to serum samples (AA vs. C: R2Y = 0.98, Q2 = 0.94); (E) Corresponding to OPLS-DA model in ESI+ mode of MH7A sample (CY-C vs. QY-C: R2Y = 0.85, Q2 = 0.91); (F) Corresponding to OPLS-DA model in ESI− mode of MH7A sample (CY-C vs. QY-C: R2Y = 0.84, Q2 = 0.88); the variable with VIP >1.0 was highlighted with a red frame in the S-plots of each comparison.
FIGURE 5| SM (d18:1/24:1 (15Z)) primary and secondary mass spectrometry fragment attribution and cleavage pathways based on UPLC-Q-TOF/MS.
| Differential sphingolipid metabolites identified in synovial, serum and MH7A cells and GE intervention.
| Source | Metabolite | Formula | Retention time (min) | Measured m/z | VIP | Ion Form | HMDB | Trend | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M/C | GE/M | M/C | GE/M | |||||||
| Synovial | CerP (d18:1/22:0) | C40H80NO6P | 15.55 | 702.5745 | 1.12 | 2.33 | [M + H] + | HMDB0010703 | ↑ | ↓ |
| LysoSM(d18:0) | C23H51N2O5P | 16.60 | 933.7177 | 1.62 | 1.50 | [2 M + H] + | HMDB0012082 | ↑ | ↓ | |
| Serum | Araliacerebroside | C40H77NO10 | 13.78 | 732.5556 | 1.15 | 1.06 | [M + H] + | HMDB0033621 | ↑ | ↓ |
| SM(d18:1/18:0) | C41H83N2O6P | 14.30 | 731.6073 | 1.47 | 1.65 | [M + H] + | HMDB0062559 | ↑ | ↓ | |
| SM(d18:1/24:1 (15Z)) | C47H93N2O6P | 15.78 | 813.6822 | 3.74 | 2.15 | [M + H] + | HMDB0012107 | ↓ | ↑ | |
| SM(d18:1/22:0) | C45H91N2O6P | 15.87 | 787.6710 | 2.37 | 2.31 | [M + H] + | HMDB0012103 | ↓ | ↑ | |
| SM(d18:1/23:0) | C46H93N2O6P | 16.28 | 801.6855 | 1.97 | 1.85 | [M + H] + | HMDB0012105 | ↓ | ↑ | |
| LysoSM(d18:0) | C23H51N2O5P | 16.60 | 933.7177 | 1.34 | 1.62 | [2 M + H] + | HMDB0012082 | ↑ | ↓ | |
| MH7A | Cer(d18:0/14:0) | C32H65NO3 | 11.04 | 512.5046 | 1.13 | 2.39 | [M + H] + | HMDB0011759 | ↑ | ↓ |
| Cer(d18:0/16:0) | C34H69NO3 | 11.73 | 540.5362 | 1.26 | 2.67 | [M + H] + | HMDB0011760 | ↑ | ↓ | |
| Palmitoyl sphingomyelin | C39H79N2O6P | 13.58 | 703.5761 | 1.41 | 4.16 | [M + H] + | HMDB0061712 | ↑ | ↓ | |
| Araliacerebroside | C40H77NO10 | 13.78 | 732.5556 | 5.56 | 3.56 | [M + H] + | HMDB0033621 | ↑ | ↓ | |
| SM(d18:1/18:0) | C41H83N2O6P | 14.36 | 731.6075 | 1.64 | 1.64 | [M + H] + | HMDB0012089 | ↑ | ↓ | |
| Galactosylceramide (d18:1/20:0) | C44H85NO8 | 15.75 | 756.6320 | 1.37 | - | [M + H] + | HMDB0010710 | ↓ | - | |
| LysoSM(d18:0) | C23H51N2O5P | 16.67 | 933.7177 | 1.35 | 9.75 | [2 M + H] + | HMDB0012082 | ↑ | ↓ | |
FIGURE 6OPLS-DA score plots and S-plots of synovial, serum and MH7A cells samples after GE intervention. (A) OPLS-DA model in ESI+ mode corresponding to synovial sample (GE vs. AA: R2Y = 0.92, Q2 = 0.85); (B) OPLS-DA model in ESI− mode corresponding to synovial sample (GE vs. AA: R2Y = 0.84, Q2 = 0.79); (C) OPLS-DA model in ESI+ mode corresponding to serum samples (GE vs. AA: R2Y = 0.95, Q2 = 0.81); (D) OPLS-DA model in ESI− mode corresponding to serum samples (GE vs. AA: R2Y = 0.93, Q2 = 0.86); (E) and (F) Corresponding to OPLS-DA model in ESI+ mode of MH7A cells sample (CY-GE vs. CY-C: R2Y = 0.85, Q2 = 0.77; QY-GE vs. QY-C: R2Y = 0.80, Q2 = 0.82); (G) and (H) Corresponding to OPLS-DA model in ESI− mode of MH7A cells sample (CY-GE vs. CY-C: R2Y = 0.75, Q2 = 0.82; QY-GE vs. QY-C: R2Y = 0.88, Q2 = 0.91); the variable with VIP >1.0 was highlighted with a red frame in the S-plots of each comparison.
FIGURE 7Effects of GE on the standardized abundance of 14 differential metabolites in synovial tissue (A,B), serum (C ∼ H) and MH7A cells (I ∼ N). Dates are represented as mean ± SD (n = 6). (In A ∼ H, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 compared to the control group; # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01 compared to the model group; In I ∼ N, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 compared to the CY-control group; # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01 compared to the QY-control group).
FIGURE 8Metabolic networks of major sphingolipid metabolism markers associated with RA and the role of GE intervention. (Red arrows: trends in RA-induced changes in sphingolipid metabolites; Green arrows: trends in sphingolipid metabolites associated with GE treatment).
FIGURE 9Effect of GE on the expression of Acid-SMase in the synovial tissue of AA rats. The dates are represented as mean ± SD (n = 3) * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 compared to the control group; # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01# compared to the model group, GE-L = GE (30 mg/kg/day, ig), GE-M = GE (60 mg/kg/day, ig), GE-H = GE (120 mg/kg/day, ig).