| Literature DB >> 35935324 |
Zhu Zhaoyu1, Xiong Huanyu2, Zhao Yajie1, Dong Ziyu1, Liu Hui1, Shi Feng3.
Abstract
To reveal the relationship between the expression and disease progression, the expression of long noncoding RNA ATB (lncRNA ATB) and related protein kinase 9 (Nek 9) in serum of breast cancer patients by real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR (Q-PCR) is analyzed. The patients treated in our hospital from April 2021 to February 2022 are selected and grouped into several groups. Among them, 73 patients diagnosed with breast cancer and 44 patients with benign breast disease are divided into groups A and B, respectively. In addition, 50 healthy subjects are chosen for group C. The expressions of lncRNA ATB and Nek9 in serum of patients are detected by Q-PCR, and the relationship between different pathological parameters and lncRNA ATB and Nek9 in group A is analyzed. Spearman correlation coefficient is used to evaluate the correlation between lncRNA ATB and Nek9 and disease. The experimental results show that lncRNA ATB and Nek9 in 3 groups are significantly different, and group A> group B> group C (all P < 0.05). The expression of lncRNA ATB and Nek9 is closely associated with lymph node metastasis and TNM stage in breast cancer patients (P < 0.05). Besides, the Spearman correlation coefficient shows that lncRNA ATB and Nek9 are positively correlated with breast cancer incidence (P < 0.05). It is evident that lncRNA ATB and Nek9 are expressed at high levels in breast cancer patients and are positively correlated with the occurrence and development of the disease.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35935324 PMCID: PMC9314184 DOI: 10.1155/2022/2634080
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Contrast Media Mol Imaging ISSN: 1555-4309 Impact factor: 3.009
Comparison of baseline data.
| Item | Number | Age | BMI (kg/m2) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group A | 73 | 43.32 ± 6.43 | 23.32 ± 2.55 |
| Group B | 44 | 43.19 ± 6.38 | 23.28 ± 2.28 |
| Group C | 50 | 42.97 ± 6.52 | 23.41 ± 2.31 |
|
| 5.563 | 5.391 | |
|
| 0.748 | 0.693 |
Reagents and instruments.
| Reagent/instrument | Place of origin | Manufacturer |
|---|---|---|
| TRIzol | American | Invitrogen |
| Centrifuge | American | Themor |
| Chloroform | China | Chengdu Kelon Chemical Reagent Factory |
| Ethyl alcohol | China | Chengdu Kelon Chemical Reagent Factory |
| PCR amplifier | Switzerland | Roche |
| Internal primers | China | Shanghai Shenggong Bioengineering Co., Ltd. |
Comparison of lncRNA ATB and Nek9 expression levels.
| Item | Number | lncRNA ATB | Nek9 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group A | 73 | 1.85 ± 0.24 | 0.41 ± 0.08 |
| Group B | 44 | 1.17 ± 0.27 | 0.24 ± 0.05 |
| Group C | 50 | 0.83 ± 0.21 | 0.12 ± 0.04 |
|
| 0.665 | 0.139 | |
|
| 0.051 | 0.053 |
Figure 1Comparison of lncRNA ATB and Nek9 expression differences.
Relationship between pathological parameters of breast cancer and lncRNA ATB.
| Clinicopathological parameters |
| lncRNA ATB |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | −0.335 | 0.739 | ||
| <45 | 36 | 1.79 ± 0.25 | ||
| ≥45 | 37 | 1.81 ± 0.26 | ||
|
| ||||
| Tumor diameter (cm) | 0.177 | 0.860 | ||
| ≤2 | 42 | 1.82 ± 0.23 | ||
| >2 | 31 | 1.81 ± 0.25 | ||
|
| ||||
| Lymph node metastasis | 5.475 | <0.001 | ||
| Y | 41 | 1.96 ± 0.28 | ||
| N | 32 | 1.62 ± 0.24 | ||
|
| ||||
| TNM staging | −2.843 | 0.006 | ||
| I-II | 35 | 1.71 ± 0.25 | ||
| III-IV | 38 | 1.88 ± 0.26 | ||
Relationship between pathological parameters of breast cancer and Nek9.
| Clinicopathological parameters |
| Nek9 |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 0.449 | 0.655 | ||
| <45 | 36 | 0.40 ± 0.09 | ||
| ≥45 | 37 | 0.39 ± 0.10 | ||
|
| ||||
| Tumor diameter (cm) | −1.001 | 0.320 | ||
| ≤2 | 42 | 0.39 ± 0.08 | ||
| >2 | 31 | 0.41 ± 0.09 | ||
|
| ||||
| Lymph node metastasis | 5.847 | <0.001 | ||
| Y | 41 | 0.42 ± 0.08 | ||
| N | 32 | 0.32 ± 0.06 | ||
|
| ||||
| Tumor staging | −6.245 | <0.001 | ||
| I-II | 35 | 0.30 ± 0.07 | ||
| III-IV | 38 | 0.41 ± 0.08 | ||
Correlation analysis.
| Item | Breast cancer | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
| |
| lncRNA ATB | 0.782 | <0.001 |
| Nek9 | 0.766 | <0.001 |
Diagnostic performance table.
| Detection method | 95% CI | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | AUC | Cutoff value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joint detection | 0.882–0.981 | 87.70 | 82.10 | 0.931 | — |
| lncRNA ATB | 0.672–0.829 | 78.30 | 78.20 | 0.751 | |
| Nek9 | 0.512–0.684 | 61.20 | 62.20 | 0.598 |
Figure 2ROC curve evaluation of combined detection of lncRNA ATB and Nek9 for the diagnosis of breast cancer.