| Literature DB >> 35935314 |
Xiangxi Du1,2,3, Muyun Liu2,3, Yanhua Sun1.
Abstract
This exploration is to solve the efficiency and accuracy of cell recognition in biological experiments. Neural network technology is applied to the research of cell image recognition. The cell image recognition problem is solved by constructing an image recognition algorithm. First, with an in-depth understanding of computer functions, as a basic intelligent algorithm, the artificial neural network (ANN) is widely used to solve the problem of image recognition. Recently, the backpropagation neural network (BPNN) algorithm has developed into a powerful pattern recognition tool and has been widely used in image edge detection. Then, the structural model of BPNN is introduced in detail. Given the complexity of cell image recognition, an algorithm based on the ANN and BPNN is used to solve this problem. The BPNN algorithm has multiple advantages, such as simple structure, easy hardware implementation, and good learning effect. Next, an image recognition algorithm based on the BPNN is designed and the image recognition process is optimized in combination with edge computing technology to improve the efficiency of algorithm recognition. The experimental results show that compared with the traditional image pattern recognition algorithm, the recognition accuracy of the designed algorithm for cell images is higher than 93.12%, so it has more advantages for processing the cell image algorithm. The results show that the BPNN edge computing can improve the scientific accuracy of cell recognition results, suggesting that edge computing based on the BPNN has a significant practical value for the research and application of cell recognition.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35935314 PMCID: PMC9296348 DOI: 10.1155/2022/7355233
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Contrast Media Mol Imaging ISSN: 1555-4309 Impact factor: 3.009
Figure 1Neuron structure model.
Figure 2BPNN model.
Figure 3Image edge classification: (a) step edge and (b) roof edge.
BPNN parameter settings.
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Learning rate | 0.3 |
| Maximum training times | 100 |
| Accuracy required for training | 0 |
| Minimum gradient requirements | 1.12E-10 |
| Momentum factor | 0.9 |
| The activation function of the output layer | Purelin linear function |
| Number of network layers | 4 |
| Weight change increment | 1.2 |
| Reduction of weight change | 0.5 |
| Initial weight change | 0.07 |
| Loss function | Quadratic mean square function |
| Activation function | Sigmoid function |
Figure 4(a) Cell original gray image. (b) Sobel operator segmentation effect. (c) Laplacian operator segmentation effect.
Cell characteristic parameters.
| Serial number | Circumference | Area | Roundness | Equivalent diameter | Length | Width |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 39.52 | 128.00 | 1.37 | 12.17 | 12 | 13 |
| 2 | 36.32 | 109.00 | 1.39 | 11.78 | 12 | 12 |
| 3 | 40.00 | 132.00 | 1.45 | 12.99 | 13 | 13 |
| 4 | 39.80 | 123.00 | 1.48 | 12.55 | 14 | 12 |
| 5 | 43.20 | 133.00 | 1.60 | 13.05 | 13 | 13 |
| 6 | 38.32 | 118.00 | 1.46 | 12.22 | 13 | 12 |
| 7 | 36.99 | 117.00 | 1.35 | 12.22 | 12 | 12 |
| 8 | 40.38 | 124.00 | 1.55 | 12.55 | 13 | 11 |
| 9 | 36.95 | 109.00 | 1.43 | 11.77 | 13 | 10 |
| 10 | 38.92 | 124.00 | 1.37 | 12.55 | 13 | 11 |
| 11 | 38.99 | 126.00 | 1.36 | 12.65 | 14 | 12 |
| 12 | 38.97 | 125.00 | 1.39 | 12.62 | 13 | 13 |
| 13 | 38.33 | 122.00 | 1.39 | 12.51 | 13 | 11 |
| 14 | 41.81 | 130.00 | 1.55 | 12.88 | 14 | 12 |
| 15 | 40.39 | 131.00 | 1.44 | 12.93 | 13 | 13 |
| 16 | 42.63 | 148.00 | 1.42 | 13.74 | 15 | 13 |
| 17 | 42.05 | 142.00 | 1.44 | 13.46 | 13 | 13 |
| 18 | 41.81 | 138.00 | 1.44 | 13.25 | 13 | 13 |
Figure 5Cell recognition training results (S1 = 15). The horizontal line is the expected error value.
Cell recognition results.
| Actual number of cells | Cell number recognized by network | Recognition accuracy (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| White blood cells | 122 | 120 | 98.36 |
| Red blood cells | 146 | 138 | 94.52 |
| Epithelial cells | 189 | 176 | 93.12 |