| Literature DB >> 35935307 |
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of vitamin C combined with growth inhibitors on serum miR-130a, nitric oxide (NO), and hemostasis in the treatment of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) in cirrhosis. Eighty patients with cirrhosis UGIB treated in our hospital from March 2021 to March 2022 were selected and divided into two groups using the random number table method. The control group received growth inhibitor treatment, while the observation group was given vitamin C combined with growth inhibitor treatment for 3 d. The hemostatic effect, serum laboratory indexes (miR-130a, NO), liver function indexes (aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT)), adverse effects, and 24 h hemostasis rate were compared between the two groups. The hemostasis time in the observation group was shorter than that in the control group, and the blood transfusion volume was lower than that in the control group. There was no statistical difference regarding the portal blood flow, miR-130a, NO, AST, and ALT indexes between the two groups before treatment. After treatment, the portal blood flow, miR-130a, NO, AST, and ALT indexes in both groups were lower than those before treatment, and all of them were lower in the observation group than in the control group. Adverse reactions showed no significant difference between the two groups of patients with cirrhosis UGIB,, while the 24 h hemostasis rate in the observation group (97.50%) was significantly higher than that in the control group (77.50%). Vitamin C combined with growth inhibitor was effective in the treatment of cirrhotic UGIB, which could effectively shorten the hemostasis time, reduce the transfusion volume and portal blood flow, and improve miR-130a, NO, and liver function levels of patients, with higher safety, and is worthy of clinical promotion.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35935307 PMCID: PMC9314156 DOI: 10.1155/2022/5319786
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Contrast Media Mol Imaging ISSN: 1555-4309 Impact factor: 3.009
Comparison of the baseline data of the two groups (n, ± s).
| Group | Number of subjects | Male/female | Age (years) | Etiology of cirrhosis (hepatitis B/alcoholic cirrhosis/hepatitis C) | Child–Pugh classification (A/B/C) | Duration of cirrhosis (years) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observation group | 40 | 25/15 | 51.47 ± 6.82 | 14/15/11 | 10/14/16 | 4.39 ± 0.77 |
| Control group | 40 | 27/13 | 51.74 ± 6.51 | 16/15/9 | 9/13/18 | 4.57 ± 0.71 |
| Χ2/ | — | 0.220 | 0.181 | 0.333 | 0.207 | 1.087 |
|
| — | 0.639 | 0.857 | 0.846 | 0.902 | 0.280 |
Comparison of the hemostatic effect between the two groups ( ± s).
| Group | Number of subjects | Hemostasis time (hr) | Blood transfusion volume (ml) | Portal vein flow (mL/min) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Post treatment | Before treatment | ||||
| Observation group | 40 | 17.35 ± 8.74 | 1091.27 ± 24.31 | 814.32 ± 93.49 | 497.38 ± 65.23 |
| Control group | 40 | 22.69 ± 8.31 | 173.78 ± 29.85 | 816.17 ± 92.15 | 604.37 ± 69.48 |
|
| — | 2.800 | 11.913 | 0.089 | 7.100 |
|
| — | 0.006 | 0.001 | 0.929 | 0.001 |
P indicates comparison with that before treatment, P < 0.05.
Figure 1The hemostatic effect was compared between the two groups.
Comparison of serum laboratory parameters and liver function parameters between the two groups (n = 40, ± s).
| Group | miR-130a | NO ( | AST (U/L) | ALT (U/L) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before treatment | Post treatment | Before treatment | Post treatment | Before treatment | Post treatment | Before treatment | Post treatment | |
| Observation group | 8.57 ± 1.44 | 1.79 ± 0.35 | 124.37 ± 18.95 | 91.37 ± 10.29 | 89.48 ± 15.67 | 20.35 ± 6.74 | 90.27 ± 16.34 | 18.64 ± 6.51 |
| Control group | 8.51 ± 1.47 | 2.81 ± 0.37 | 125.68 ± 18.11 | 115.67 ± 10.32 | 88.39 ± 16.14 | 33.48 ± 6.95 | 90.11 ± 16.73 | 32.74 ± 6.87 |
|
| 0.184 | 12.666 | 0.316 | 10.546 | 0.307 | 8.577 | 0.043 | 9.422 |
|
| 0.854 | 0.001 | 0.753 | 0.001 | 0.760 | 0.001 | 0.966 | 0.001 |
P indicates comparison with that before treatment, P < 0.05.
Figure 2Comparison of serum laboratory parameters and liver function parameters between the two groups.
Comparison of adverse reactions and 24 h hemostasis rate between the two groups (n, (%)).
| Group | Number of subjects | Nausea and vomiting | Abdominal distention | Palpitations | Total occurrence | 24 h hemostasis rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observation group | 40 | 1 (2.50) | 1 (2.50) | 1 (2.50) | 3 (7.50) | 39 (97.50) |
| Control group | 40 | 1 (2.50) | 0 (0.00) | 1 (2.50) | 2 (5.00) | 31 (77.50) |
| Χ2 | — | — | — | — | 0.213 | 7.314 |
|
| — | — | — | — | 0.644 | 1.7 |