| Literature DB >> 35935187 |
Pingping Li1, Rui Su1, Qi Wang2, Kunyi Liu2, Hai Yang1, Wei Du1, Zhengang Li1, Song Chen1, Bin Xu3, Wen Yang1.
Abstract
Black Huangjiu (BH) is a traditional alcoholic beverage in China, which is very popular among people. The different methods (simultaneous inoculation, sequential inoculation), were applied to ferment BH in this study, which were investigated the changes in the composition of fungal communities and non-volatile flavor compounds (nVFCs) by high-throughput sequencing (HTS) and ultraperformance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometer (UPLC MS/MS). The results showed that Rhizopus and Saccharomyces were the predominant fungal genera throughout fermentation, and 471 nVFCs were detected in BH after fermentation. Compared to that observed simultaneous inoculation, Rhizopus increased at the end of sequential fermentation, and the contents of the organic acids and their derivatives increased significantly [variable importance in the projection (VIP) > 1.0, p < 0.05, fold change (FC) > 2], while that of lipids and lipid-like molecules decreased significantly (VIP > 1.0, p < 0.05, FC < 0.5). Through the correlation analysis of 32 nVFCs with significant differences (VIP > 1.0, p < 0.05, FC >32 or < 0.03) and the community, it was found that lipids and lipid-like molecules (12) and organic acids and their derivatives (10) were significantly (p < 0.05) negatively correlated with Saccharomyces, but they were significantly (p < 0.05) positively correlated with Rhizopus. Compared with simultaneous inoculation, BH fermented by sequential inoculation, the taste was stronger, sweeter, mellow, and softer. Our findings provide information on nVFC dynamics and will aid in the selection of beneficial strains to improve BH quality.Entities:
Keywords: black Huangjiu; correlation analysis; fungal communities; non-volatile components; sequential inoculation
Year: 2022 PMID: 35935187 PMCID: PMC9354453 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.955825
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 6.064
Sensory score standards of BH.
| The weight of sensory index | Grading standard | |
|---|---|---|
| Appearance | 0.1 | Hull of glossy, no obvious suspension |
| Aroma | 0.3 | Rich and fruity, no undesirable aroma |
| Taste | 0.4 | Harmonious, delicate, mellow, and full-bodied |
| Typicalness | 0.2 | Unique style of |
Bad very much: 0–19 score; Bad moderately: 20–39 score; Bad: 40–59 score; Good: 60–79 score; Good moderately: 80–89 score; Good very much: 90–100 score.
Figure 1Comparative analysis of α-diversity indexes of fungal flora in BH at different fermentation stages.
Figure 2Principal co-ordinate analysis based on weighted distance (A) and fungal communities in fermented samples at the genus level (B).
Figure 3The sensory evaluation results of BH samples in CK3 and SF3 group. *p < 0.05.
Figure 4Sunburst of the contribution of nVFCs in SF3 and CK3 in OPLS-DA. a, steroids and steroid derivatives; b, sphingolipids; c, saccharolipids; d, prenol lipids; e, glycerophospholipids; f, glycerolipids; g, fatty Acyls; H, keto acids and derivatives; i, hydroxy acids and derivatives; j, carboxylic acids and derivatives; k, carboximidic acids and derivatives; l, Organooxygen compounds; m, pyrrolidines; n, pyrroles; o, pyridines and derivatives; p, pyrans; q, pteridines and derivatives; r, oxepanes; s, naphthofurans; t, lactones; u, indoles and derivatives; v, imidazopyrimidines; w, heteroaromatic compounds; x, dihydrofurans; y, diazines; z, benzotriazoles; aa, benzopyrans; ab, benzodioxoles; ac, azolidines; ad, stilbenes; ae, phenylpropanoic acids; af, macrolides and analogs; ag, Kavalactones; ah, isoflavonoids; ai, flavonoids; aj, diarylheptanoids; ak, coumarins and derivatives; al, cinnamic acids and derivatives; am, 2-arylbenzofuran flavonoids; an, phenols; ao, phenol ethers; ap, phenanthrenes and derivatives; aq, naphthalenes; ar, benzene and substituted derivatives; as, ribonucleoside 3′-phosphates; at, pyrimidine nucleotides; au, pyrimidine nucleosides; av., pyrimidine nucleosides; aw, organonitrogen compounds; ax, non-metal oxoanionic compounds; ay, morphinans.
Figure 5Volcano plot showing the contribution of nVFCs in SF3 and CK3 in OPLS-DA. The first data in the brackets is the number of metabolites, the second data are the percentage of each metabolites in the total nVFCs in CK3 and the third data is that in SF3. 1: Prolyl-Valine; 2:LysoPE(0,0/22,0); 3:Enkephaline, (D-Ala)2-Leu; 4: Agavoside A; 5: 6-{[(16S)-5,7-dihydroxy-8,8,12,16-tetramethyl-3-[1-(2-methyl-1,3-thiazol-4-yl)prop-1-en-2-yl]-10-methylidene-9-oxo-17-oxa-4-azabicyclo[14.1.0]heptadec-4-en-11-yl]oxy}-3,4,5-trihydroxyoxane-2-carboxylic acid; 6: Gamma-Glutamylphenylalanine; 7: 6-{[(16S)-5,7-dihydroxy-8,8,10,16-tetramethyl-3-[1-(2-methyl-1,3-thiazol-4-yl)prop-1-en-2-yl]-12-methylidene-9-oxo-17-oxa-4-azabicyclo[14.1.0]heptadec-4-en-11-yl]oxy}-3,4,5-trihydroxyoxane-2-carboxylic acid; 8: Asp-Phe; 9: Physagulin D; 10: (+/−)-Hexanoylcarnitine; 11: Isoleucyl-Leucine; 12: Adenosine 3′-monophosphate; 13: PS(MonoMe(11,5)/MonoMe(11,3)); 14: Uridine diphosphate-N-acetylglucosamine; 15: Physapruin B; 16: 7a-Hydroxy-5b-cholanic acid; 17: Isoleucyl-Isoleucine; 18: Isoleucyl-Tyrosine; 19: Digalacturonate; 20: 2,10-Bisaboladiene-1,4-diol; 21: (+/−)-Octanoylcarnitine; 22: Isoleucyl-Alanine; 23: 2-(2,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-5,7-dihydroxy-6-(3-methylbut-2-en-1-yl)-3,4-dihydro-2H-1-benzopyran-4-one; 24: N-(2-Phenylethyl)-acetamide; 25: L-cis-Cyclo(aspartylphenylalanyl); 26: Leucyl-Alanine; 27: Sulfolithocholylglycine; 28: Curcumadiol; 29: Caryoptosidic acid; 30: Ascorbyl stearate; 31: Acetylcholine; 32: 1-Methylhypoxanthine.
Figure 6Correlation between fungi and nVFCs. 1 ~ 32, same as Figure 5. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.