| Literature DB >> 35933424 |
Ping Nie1, Yan Lou1, Xue Bai1, Yuexin Zhu1, Qiaoyan Guo1, Ping Luo2, Weiguang Zhang3, Bing Li4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We investigated the correlation between zinc levels and Nrf2 expression and potential effects on the clinicopathology of patients with diabetic nephropathy (DN).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35933424 PMCID: PMC9357008 DOI: 10.1038/s41387-022-00212-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutr Diabetes ISSN: 2044-4052 Impact factor: 4.725
Fig. 1Scatter diagrams showing the plasma levels of zinc, copper, and zinc/copper.
A Plasma zinc levels were significantly decreased in the DN group compared to those in the control group (*P < 0.05). B Plasma copper levels were significantly increased in the DN group compared to those in the control group (*P < 0.05). C The ratio of zinc and copper was significantly decreased in the DN group compared to that in the control group (*P < 0.05).
Fig. 2Effect of zinc on Nrf2 expression in the blood of patients with DN.
A RT-qPCR was performed to evaluate mRNA expression of Nrf2 in the blood of patients with DN and healthy people. B The mRNA expression of Nrf2 in the blood of patients with DN in the normal-zinc and low-zinc groups. Data are presented as means ± SD, *P < 0.05 versus the control group.
Fig. 3Effect of zinc on Nrf2 expression in the kidneys of patients with DN.
IHC staining of Nrf2 and semiquantitative analysis were performed to evaluate the expression of Nrf2 and HO1 in the kidneys of patients with DN. A The expression of Nrf2 in the glomeruli and tubules (IHC staining *400). B The expression of Nrf2 in the renal tissue of the low-zinc group was significantly lower than that in the renal tissue of the normal-zinc group. *P < 0.05 versus the normal-zinc group. C The expression of HO1 in the glomeruli and tubules (IHC staining *400). D The expression of HO1 in the renal tissue of the low-zinc group was significantly lower than that in the renal tissue of the normal-zinc group. *P < 0.05 versus the normal-zinc group.
Clinical data of low-zinc and normal-zinc groups.
| Normal zinc ( | Low zinc ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Male ( | 10 (71.4%) | 4 (25.0%) | 0.026* |
| Age | 48.3 ± 13.8 | 45.3 ± 11.8 | 0.530 |
| History of diabetes (years) | 7.9 ± 6.4 | 10.3 ± 7.8 | 0.384 |
| BMI | 27.0 ± 4.1 | 23.5 ± 4.1 | 0.033* |
| SBP (mmHg) | 135.0 (130.0,162.5) | 140.0 (130.5,157.5) | 0.785 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 83.1 ± 7.7 | 90.0 ± 10.2 | 0.045* |
| RBC (*109) | 4.6 ± 0.8 | 3.5 ± 0.5 | <0.001* |
| Hb (g/L) | 140.5 (116.8,153.5) | 105.0 (101.0,116.8) | 0.001* |
| Plt (*1011) | 254.5 (209.1,292.5) | 265.5 (194.1,309.2) | 0.901 |
| Alb (g/L) | 34.9 (24.5,45.9) | 27.6 (24.1,33.4) | 0.146 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 1.8 (1.4,2.6) | 1.9 (1.4,2.3) | 0.835 |
| TC (mmol/L) | 5.7 ± 1.7 | 6.6 ± 1.8 | 0.154 |
| HbA1c (mg/dl) | 7.0 (6.4,8.2) | 7.3 (5.9,8.1) | 0.917 |
| UA(μmol/L) | 385.3 ± 67.1 | 340.3 ± 81.1 | 0.113 |
| Scr (μmol/L) | 111.4 ± 43.8 | 125.3 ± 50.6 | 0.432 |
| BUN (mmol/L) | 7.1 (6.0,11.3) | 8.3 (6.7,11.2) | 0.618 |
| eGFR [mL/(min.1.73 m2)] | 70.4 ± 30.6 | 57.6 ± 30.3 | 0.259 |
| 24-h urinary protein (g) | 5.0 ± 3.9 | 6.2 ± 2.9 | 0.333 |
Sex of the two groups was compared by the chi-square test. Age, history of diabetes, BMI, DBP, RBC, TC, UA, Scr, eGFR, and 24-h urinary protein of the two groups were compared by t-test. SBP, the level of Hb, Plt, Alb, TC, HbA1c, BUN, copper, and zinc/copper of the two groups were compared by the Wilcoxon rank-sum test.
BMI body mass index, SBP systolic blood pressure, DBP diastolic blood pressure, Hb hemoglobin, Alb plasma albumin, TC total cholesterol, TG triglyceride, HbA1c glycated hemoglobin, UA uric acid, Scr serum creatinine, BUN blood urea nitrogen, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate.
*P < 0.05.
Fig. 4Scatter diagrams showing the plasma levels of zinc, copper, and zinc/copper of patients with DN.
A Plasma zinc levels were significantly lower in the low-zinc group than in the normal-zinc group (*P < 0.05). B Plasma copper levels were significantly higher in the low-zinc group than in the normal-zinc group (*P < 0.05). C The ratio of zinc and copper in the low-zinc group was significantly lower than that in the normal-zinc group (*P < 0.05).
Fig. 5Correlation between zinc levels and clinical indicators of patients with DN.
According to the Pearson correlation analysis, zinc was A positively correlated with zinc/copper (r = 0.75, P < 0.01); B negatively correlated with DBP (r = −0.409, P < 0.05); C positively correlated with Hb (r = 0.617, P < 0.01); and D positively correlated with RBC (r = 0.652, P < 0.01).
Fig. 6Pathological classifications of patients with DN.
A Typical pathological change of DN (PAS staining*400, Masson staining *400, EM*6000). B In general, the pathological classification of the low-zinc group was more serious than that of the normal-zinc group.
Relationship of zinc with pathological characteristics.
| Normal zinc ( | Low zinc ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.032* | |||
| II [ | 5 (35.7%) | 0 (0%) | |
| III [ | 7 (50.0%) | 13 (81.2%) | |
| IV [ | 2 (14.3%) | 3 (18.7%) | |
| 0.003* | |||
| Mild [ | 2 (14.3%) | 0 (0%) | |
| Moderate [ | 9 (64.3%) | 4 (25.0%) | |
| Severe [ | 3 (21.4%) | 12 (75.0%) | |
| K–W nodules [ | 9 (64.3%) | 16 (100%) | 0.014* |
| Capillary microaneurysms [ | 5 (35.7%) | 13 (81.3%) | 0.024* |
| Mesangial dissolution [ | 1 (7.1%) | 3 (18.8%) | 0.352 |
| Capsular drop, hyaline [ | 5 (35.7%) | 4 (25.0%) | 0.694 |
| Glomerulosclerosis (%) | 22.1 (9.8,33.3) | 13.1 (3.8,42.7) | 0.406 |
| Interstitial lesions | 3.3 (2.0,4.0) | 3.3 (3.0,4.0) | 0.715 |
| Vascular lesions | 3.0 (2.0,3.0) | 2.0 (2.0,3.0) | 0.586 |
| Diffuse thickening of GBM | 6 (42.9%) | 10 (62.5%) | 0.586 |
| Foot process extensive fusion | 5 (35.7%) | 5 (31.3%) | 1.000 |
K–W nodules Kimmelsteil–Wilson nodules.
*P < 0.05. By chi-square and Wilcoxon rank-sum test.