| Literature DB >> 35931948 |
Hong-Yan Shou1, Zhen-Feng Zhou2, Xin Men3, Qian Wang4, Wen-Sheng Hu5, Yun Chai5, Ting-Ting Ni6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The radial artery cannulation helps to maintain the stability of maternal hemodynamics and reduce complications, however, it is difficult for women with gestational hypertension. Ultrasound-guided median nerve block can cause arterial vasodilation, which may improve the success rate of radial artery cannulation.Entities:
Keywords: Hypertension; Nerve block; Pregnancy; Radial artery puncture
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35931948 PMCID: PMC9354365 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-022-01793-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Anesthesiol ISSN: 1471-2253 Impact factor: 2.376
Fig. 1Median nerve block and ultrasonographic measurements
Fig. 2Study flowchart Study population recruitment summary
Patient characteristics of control group and median nerve group for radial artery cannulation
| Control | Median nerve | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age(y) | 32 ± 5 | 32 ± 4 | 0.602 |
| Estimated gestational age (wk) | 37.4 ± 1.8 | 37.5 ± 1.6 | 0.618 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 27 ± 4 | 27 ± 3 | 0.933 |
| Baseline systolic pressure (mm Hg) | 137 ± 15 | 137 ± 15 | 0.955 |
| Baseline diastolic pressure (mm Hg) | 80 ± 13 | 79 ± 10 | 0.593 |
| Baseline heart rate (bpm) | 84 ± 15 | 84 ± 15 | 0.961 |
| Preeclampsia | > 0.999 | ||
| Mild | 31(67.4%) | 32(69.6%) | |
| Severe | 15(32.6%) | 14(30.4%) | |
| Antihypertension treatment | 0.770 | ||
| Labetolol | 14(30.4%) | 13(28.3%) | |
| Nicardipine | 3(6.5%) | 5(10.9%) | |
| Nifedipine | 0(0%) | 0(0%) | |
| Magnesium | 4(8.7%) | 6(13.0%) |
Values are mean ± SD or number (proportion)
Results of radial artery cannulation in control group and median nerve group
| Variables | Control | Median nerve | |
|---|---|---|---|
| First-attempt success rate ofradial artery cannulation | 36/46(78.3%) | 44/46(95.7%) | 0.027# |
| Procedure time to success within the firstattempt (s) | 172 ± 66 | 118 ± 19 | < 0.001 |
| Second-attempt success rate within 10 min(%) | 42/46(91.3%) | 44/46(95.7%) | 0.677# |
Overall number of attempts (1/2/3 attempt, n) | 36/6/4 | 44/0/2 | 0.024 |
| Overall complication at first chosen radial artery | |||
| Vasospasm | 13/46(28.3%) | 10/46(21.7%) | 0.470 |
| Hematoma | 4/46(8.7%) | 2/46(4.3%) | 0.677# |
Values are mean ± SD, or number (proportion)
Results of ultrasonographic measurements in control group and median nerve group
| Control | Median nerve | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Radial artery diameter (mm) | < 0.001 | ||
| T1 | 0.25 ± 0.04 | 0.25 ± 0.03 | |
| T2 | 0.26 ± 0.04 | 0.30 ± 0.04 | |
| T3 | 0.20 ± 0.04 | 0.25 ± 0.05 | |
| Percentage change of radial artery diameter at T2(%) | 4(0–8) | 22(14–28) | < 0.001 |
| Percentage change of radial artery diameter at T3(%) | −17[(−24)-9] | 0[(−4.9)-8.7] | < 0.001 |
| CSA (cm2) | < 0.001 | ||
| T1 | 0.052 ± 0.015 | 0.049 ± 0.014 | |
| T2 | 0.054 ± 0.015 | 0.075 ± 0.018 | |
| T3 | 0.033 ± 0.013 | 0.049 ± 0.018 | |
| Percentage change of CSA at T2(%) | 0(0–17) | 50(33–67) | < 0.001 |
| Percentage change of CSA at T3(%) | −33[(−41)-(−25)] | 0[(−3.6)-25.0] | < 0.001 |
| TAMAX (cm/sec) | 0.015 | ||
| T1 | 18 ± 9 | 16 ± 4 | |
| T2 | 23 ± 10 | 31 ± 8 | |
| T3 | 22 ± 8 | 30 ± 11 | |
| Volume of blood flow (ml/sec) | < 0.001 | ||
| T1 | 1.02 ± 0.84 | 0.79 ± 0.32 | |
| T2 | 1.28 ± 0.92 | 2.34 ± 0.92 | |
| T3 | 0.73 ± 0.57 | 1.53 ± 1.03 |
Values are mean ± SD, median (interquartile range) [range].T1 = Baseline; T2 = 10 minutes after median nerve block or local anesthesia; T3 = 30 minutes after median nerve block or local anesthesia. CSA Cross-sectional area, TAMAX Time Average Maximal Velocity
Fig. 3CSA = Cross-sectional area; TAMAX = Time Average Maximal Velocity. T1 = Baseline; T2 = 10 minutes after median nerve block or local anesthesia; T3 = 30 minutes after median nerve block or local anesthesia