Ryo Hirano1, Patrik Rogalla2, Christin Farrell3, Bernice Hoppel4, Yasuko Fujisawa5, Shigeharu Ohyu5, Chihiro Hattori5, Takuya Sakaguchi5. 1. Research and Development Center, Canon Medical Systems Corporation, Otawara, Japan. ryo1.hirano@medical.canon. 2. Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. 3. Canon Medical Systems Canada Ltd, Markham, Canada. 4. Canon Medical Systems USA, Inc, Tustin, USA. 5. Research and Development Center, Canon Medical Systems Corporation, Otawara, Japan.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Detection of early-stage liver fibrosis has direct clinical implications on patient management and treatment. The aim of this paper is to develop a non-invasive, cost-effective method for classifying liver disease between "non-fibrosis" (F0) and "fibrosis" (F1-F4), and to evaluate the classification performance quantitatively. METHODS: Image data from 75 patients who underwent a simultaneous liver biopsy and non-contrast CT examination were used for this study. Non-contrast CT image texture features such as wavelet-based features, standard deviation of variance filter, and mean CT number were calculated in volumes of interest (VOIs) positioned within the liver parenchyma. In addition, a combined feature was calculated using logistic regression with L2-norm regularization to further improve fibrosis detection. Based on the final pathology from the liver biopsy, the patients were labelled either as "non-fibrosis" or "fibrosis". Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve, area under the ROC curve (AUROC), specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy were determined for the algorithm to differentiate between "non-fibrosis" and "fibrosis". RESULTS: The combined feature showed the highest classification performance with an AUROC of 0.86, compared to the wavelet-based feature (AUROC, 0.76), the standard deviation of variance filter (AUROC, 0.65), and mean CT number (AUROC, 0.84). The combined feature's specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy were 0.66, 0.88, and 0.76, respectively, showing the most promising results. CONCLUSION: A new non-invasive and cost-effective method was developed to classify liver diseases between "non-fibrosis" (F0) and "fibrosis" (F1-F4). The proposed method makes it possible to detect liver fibrosis in asymptomatic patients using non-contrast CT images for better patient management and treatment.
PURPOSE: Detection of early-stage liver fibrosis has direct clinical implications on patient management and treatment. The aim of this paper is to develop a non-invasive, cost-effective method for classifying liver disease between "non-fibrosis" (F0) and "fibrosis" (F1-F4), and to evaluate the classification performance quantitatively. METHODS: Image data from 75 patients who underwent a simultaneous liver biopsy and non-contrast CT examination were used for this study. Non-contrast CT image texture features such as wavelet-based features, standard deviation of variance filter, and mean CT number were calculated in volumes of interest (VOIs) positioned within the liver parenchyma. In addition, a combined feature was calculated using logistic regression with L2-norm regularization to further improve fibrosis detection. Based on the final pathology from the liver biopsy, the patients were labelled either as "non-fibrosis" or "fibrosis". Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve, area under the ROC curve (AUROC), specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy were determined for the algorithm to differentiate between "non-fibrosis" and "fibrosis". RESULTS: The combined feature showed the highest classification performance with an AUROC of 0.86, compared to the wavelet-based feature (AUROC, 0.76), the standard deviation of variance filter (AUROC, 0.65), and mean CT number (AUROC, 0.84). The combined feature's specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy were 0.66, 0.88, and 0.76, respectively, showing the most promising results. CONCLUSION: A new non-invasive and cost-effective method was developed to classify liver diseases between "non-fibrosis" (F0) and "fibrosis" (F1-F4). The proposed method makes it possible to detect liver fibrosis in asymptomatic patients using non-contrast CT images for better patient management and treatment.
Authors: Naga Chalasani; Zobair Younossi; Joel E Lavine; Anna Mae Diehl; Elizabeth M Brunt; Kenneth Cusi; Michael Charlton; Arun J Sanyal Journal: Hepatology Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Naznin Daginawala; Baojun Li; Karen Buch; HeiShun Yu; Brian Tischler; Muhammad Mustafa Qureshi; Jorge A Soto; Stephan Anderson Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2015-12-17 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: Basem Hasan Elesawy; Amal Abd El Hafez; Laila Shehata Dorgham; Ahmad El-Askary Journal: Pathol Res Pract Date: 2014-07-22 Impact factor: 3.250
Authors: Perry J Pickhardt; Peter M Graffy; Adnan Said; Daniel Jones; Brandon Welsh; Ryan Zea; Meghan G Lubner Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2019-01-15 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Indra Neil Guha; Julie Parkes; Paul Roderick; Dipanker Chattopadhyay; Richard Cross; Scott Harris; Philip Kaye; Alastair D Burt; Steve D Ryder; Guruprasad P Aithal; Christopher P Day; William M Rosenberg Journal: Hepatology Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 17.425